A fungal effector hijacks a plastid protein to dampen plant immunity; PR1 is here for rescue
Muhammad Saad Shoaib Khan , Faisal Islam , Huan Chen , Jian Chen
Stress Biology ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 23
A fungal effector hijacks a plastid protein to dampen plant immunity; PR1 is here for rescue
Plants are engaged in a constant battle for survival against pathogens, which triggers a multifaceted immune response characterized by pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) to prevent infection. These two immune responses operate synergistically to enhance plant immunity. PTI is considered the first line of defense involving the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by specific receptors in host cells known as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which initiate defense signaling. However, many pathogens often overcome the first line of defense (PTI) and successfully deploy effector proteins to promote virulence and subvert plant immunity, leading to host susceptibility. In the counter-defense, the ETI defense mechanism is activated by triggering resistance (R) genes in plants that usually encode nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich-containing (NLR) proteins. During plant-pathogen interactions, transcriptional reprogramming of defense-related genes such as pathogenesis-related proteins and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are essential for facilitating programmed cell death at the infected location to inhibit pathogen proliferation. While ROS and PR protein are critical in plant-pathogen interaction, they are not universally required or effective against all pathogens. Hence, plants’ multilayer immune layer is encrypted with the compensatory activation of ETI defense response towards the failure of one component of the defense system to maintain robust immunity.
Medical and Health Sciences / Immunology / Biological Sciences / Plant Biology
| [1] |
Balk J, Pilon M (2011) Ancient and essential: the assembly of iron-sulfur clusters in plants. Trends Plant Sci 6:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.006 |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Chen Y-L, Lee C-Y, Cheng K-T, Chang W-H, Huang R-N, Nam HG, Chen Y-R (2014) Quantitative Peptidomics Study Reveals That a Wound-Induced Peptide from PR-1 Regulates Immune Signaling in Tomato. Plant Cell. 26:4135–4148. https://https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.131185. |
| [4] |
Chen Y-L, Lin F-W, Cheng K-T, Chang C-H, Huang S-C, Efferth T, Chen YR (2023) XCP1 cleaves Pathogenesis-related protein 1 into CAPE9 for systemic immunity in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 14:4697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40406-7 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Gamir J, Darwiche R, van't Hof P, Choudhary V, Stumpe M, Schneiter R, Mauch F (2017) The sterol-binding activity of Pathogenesis-related protein 1 reveals the mode of action of an antimicrobial protein. Plant J 89:502–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13398 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Li J, Yang L, Ding S, Gao M, Yan Y, Yu G, Zheng Y, Liang W (2024) Plant PR1 rescues condensation of the plastid iron-sulfur protein by a fungal effector. Nat Plants 10(11):1775–1789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01811-y |
| [9] |
Li J, Wang C, Yang L, Qiu F, Li Y, Zheng Y, Liu S, Song L, Liang W (2023) Enhancing tomato resistance by exploring early defense events against Fusarium wilt disease. Phyto Res 5:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-023-00176-y |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Yamada K, Saijo Y, Nakagami H, Takano Y (2016) Regulation of sugar transporter activity for antibacterial defense in Arabidopsis. Science 354:1427–1430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5692 |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |