Resistance risk asssement and molecular basis of metconazole in Fusarium pseudograminearum

Guixiang Li , Yiwen Li , Ling Zhang , Han Jiang , Kang Yuan , Jianqiang Miao , Xili Liu

Stress Biology ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 30

PDF
Stress Biology ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 30 DOI: 10.1007/s44154-025-00221-0
Original Paper

Resistance risk asssement and molecular basis of metconazole in Fusarium pseudograminearum

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The fungicide metconazole, which acts as a sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitor (DMI), can exhibit strong inhibitory effects on Fusarium pseudograminearum. However, the resistance mechanism as well as the risk that F. pseudograminearum develops resistance to metconazole is yet to be fully assessed. In this study, metconazole displayed a mean EC50 value of 0.0559 μg/mL against 105 F. pseudograminearum isolates. Ten sensitive parental isolates were then subjected to fungicide adaptation to generate resistant mutants, with in vitro experiments subsequently highlighting the inferior fitness of the mutants. In addition, metconazole exhibited positive cross-resistance with both mefentrifluconazole and tebuconazole. Altogether, the results confirmed the low risk that F. pseudograminearum develops resistance to metconazole. Finally, a mutation genotype (M151T) was identified in FpCYP51B, with the mutants also overexpressing the FpCYP51 genes. Subsequent molecular docking and transformation-based experiments indicated that M151T substitution and overexpression in FpCYP51 genes conferred resistance to metconazole in F. pseudograminearum.

Keywords

Metconazole / Resistance mechanism / Resistance risk / Fusarium pseudograminearum / Point mutation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guixiang Li, Yiwen Li, Ling Zhang, Han Jiang, Kang Yuan, Jianqiang Miao, Xili Liu. Resistance risk asssement and molecular basis of metconazole in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Stress Biology, 2025, 5(1): 30 DOI:10.1007/s44154-025-00221-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aoki T, O'Donnell K (1999) Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium pseudograminearum sp. nov., formerly recognized as the Group 1 population of F. graminearum. Mycologia 91:597–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761245

[2]

BrandfassC, KarlovskyP. Upscaled CTAB-based DNA extraction and real-time PCR assays for Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum DNA in plant material with reduced sampling error. Int J Mol Sci, 2008, 9: 2306-2321.

[3]

Brent KJ, Hollomon DW (2007) Fungicide Resistance in Crop Pathogens: How Can it Be Managed? GIFAPBr, ussels https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/monographs/monograph-2.pdf

[4]

Burgess LW, Backhouse D, Swan LJ, Esdaile RJ (1996) Control of Fusarium crown rot of wheat by late stubble burning and rotation with sorghum. Australas Plant Pathol 25:229–33. https://doi.org/10.1071/ap96042

[5]

Deng YY, Li W, Zhang P, Sun HY, Zhang XX, Zhang AX, Chen HG (2019) Fusarium pseudograminearum as an emerging pathogen of crown rot of wheat in eastern China. Plant Pathol 69:240–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13122

[6]

DuanYB, LiMX, ZhaoHH, et al. . Molecular and biological characteristics of laboratory metconazole-resistant mutants inFusarium graminearum. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2018, 152: 55-61.

[7]

Fan XF, Yan Z, Yang MX, Waalwijk C, van der Lee T, van Diepeningen A, Brankovics B, Chen WQ, Feng J, Zhang H (2021) Contamination and translocation of deoxynivalenol and its derivatives associated with Fusarium crown rot of wheat in Northern China. Plant Dis 105:3397–406. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0612-RE

[8]

FeiYC, ChengQ, ZhangH, et al. . Maleic acid and malonic acid reduced the pathogenicity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by inhibiting mycelial growth, sclerotia formation and virulence factors. Stress Biol, 2023, 3145.

[9]

Friggeri L, Hargrove TY, Wawrzak Z, Blobaum AL, Rachakonda G, Lindsley CW, Villalta F, Nes WD, Botta M, Guengerich FP, Lepesheva GI (2018) Sterol 14α-demethylase structure-based design of VNI (( R)- N-(1-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-2-(1 H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl)-4-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzamide)) derivatives to target fungal infections: synthesis, biological evaluation, and crystallographic analysis. J Med Chem 61:5679–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00641

[10]

HawkinsNJ, FraaijeBA. Fitness penalties in the evolution of fungicide resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2018, 56: 339-360.

[11]

Hollaway GJ, Evans ML, Wallwork H, Dyson CB, McKay AC (2013) Yield loss in cereals, caused by Fusarium culmorum and F. pseudograminearum, is related to fungal DNA in soil prior to planting, rainfall, and cereal type. Plant Dis 97:977–82. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-12-0867-RE

[12]

HudsonO, WaliullahS, JiP, et al. . Molecular characterization of laboratory mutants of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum resistant to prothioconazole, a Demethylation Inhibitor (DMI) Fungicide. J Fungi, 2021, 7: 704.

[13]

KazanK, GardinerDM. Fusarium crown rot caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum in cereal crops: recent progress and future prospects. Mol Plant Pathol, 2018, 19: 1547-1562.

[14]

Kumazawa S, Ito A, Saishoji T, Chuman H (2000) Development of new fungicides, ipconazole and metconazole. J Pestic Sci 25:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.25.321

[15]

LiHL, YuanHX, FuB, et al. . First report of Fusarium pseudograminearum causing crown rot of wheat in Henan. China. Plant Dis, 2012, 96: 1065.

[16]

LiGX, LiXH, ZengY, et al. . Three point mutations in AaCYP51 combined with induced overexpression ofAaCYP51conferred low-level resistance to mefentrifluconazole inAlternaria alternata. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2023, 197: 105677.

[17]

LiGX, ZhangL, WangHK, et al. . Resistance to the DMI fungicide mefentrifluconazole in Monilinia fructicola : risk assessment and resistance basis analysis. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2023, 199: 105786.

[18]

Li YW, Tang YD, Xue ZW, Wang Y, Shi YF, Gao XH, Li X, Li GX, Li F, Lu, L (2023c) Resistance risk and resistance-related point mutation in SdhB and SdhC1 of cyclobutrifluram in Fusarium pseudograminearum. J Agric Food Chem 71:1886–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08022

[19]

Li G, Ru B, Zhang L, Li Y, Gao X, Peng Q, Miao J, Liu X (2024a) Mefentrifluconazole-resistant risk and resistance-related point mutation in FpCYP51B of Fusarium pseudograminearum. J Agric Food Chem 72:1516–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08014

[20]

LiGX, ZhangL, LiYW, et al. . Analysis of resistance risk and mechanism of the 14α-demethylation inhibitor ipconazole in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2024, 199. 105786

[21]

Lichtemberg PSF, Luo Y, Morales RG, Muehlmann-Fischer JM, Michailides TJ, May De Mio LL (2017) The point mutation G461S in the MfCYP51 gene is associated with tebuconazole resistance in Monilinia fructicola populations in Brazil. Phytopathology 107:1507–14. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-17-0050-R

[22]

Liu X, Yu FW, Schnabel G, Wu JB, Wang ZY, Ma ZH (2011) Paralogous cyp51 genes in Fusarium graminearum mediate differential sensitivity to sterol demethylation inhibitors. Fungal Genet Biol 48:113–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2010.10.004

[23]

LiuZY, JianYQ, ChenY, et al. . A phosphorylated transcription factor regulates sterol biosynthesis inFusarium graminearum. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 1228.

[24]

LiuX, WangS, FanZY, et al. . Antifungal activities of metconazole against the emerging wheat pathogenFusarium pseudograminearum. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2023, 190: 105298.

[25]

Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, Simmerling C (2015) ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3696–713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255

[26]

MiaoJQ, CaiM, DongX, et al. . Resistance assessment for oxathiapiprolin in Phytophthora capsici and the detection of a point mutation (G769W) in PcORP1 that confers resistance. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7: 615.

[27]

ObanorF, NeateS, SimpfendorferS, et al. . Fusarium graminearumandFusarium pseudograminearumcaused the 2010 head blight epidemics in Australia. Plant Pathol, 2012, 62: 79-91.

[28]

Poole GJ, Harries M, Hüberli D, Miyan S, MacLeod WJ, Lawes R, McKay A (2018) Crown rot of wheat in Australia: Fusarium pseudograminearum taxonomy, population biology and disease management. Australas Plant Path 47:285–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-018-0554-z

[29]

Qian HW, Du J, Chi MY, Sun XM, Liang WX, Huang JG, Li BD (2018) The Y137H mutation in the cytochrome P450 FgCYP51B protein confers reduced sensitivity to tebuconazole in Fusarium graminearum. Pest Manage Sci 74:1472–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4837

[30]

Schmitz HK, Medeiros CA, Craig IR, Stammler G (2013) Sensitivity of Phakopsora pachyrhizi towards quinone-outside-inhibitors and demethylation-inhibitors, and corresponding resistance mechanisms. Pest Manage Sci 70:378–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3562

[31]

Shao WY, Wang JR, Wang HY, Wen ZY, Liu C, Zhang Y, Zhao YF, Ma ZH(2022) Fusarium graminearum FgSdhC1 point mutation A78V confers resistance to the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen. Pest Manage Sci 78:1780–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6795

[32]

SmileyRW, GourlieJA, EasleySA, et al. . Crop damage estimates for crown rot of wheat and barley in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Dis, 2005, 89: 595-604.

[33]

SpoltiP, JorgeBCD, PonteEMD. Sensitivity of Fusarium graminearum causing head blight of wheat in Brazil to tebuconazole and metconazole fungicides. Trop Plant Pathol, 2012, 37: 419-423.

[34]

WangXT, LiuKH, LiY, et al. . Zinc metalloprotease FgM35, which targets the wheat zinc-binding protein TaZnBP, contributes to the virulence ofFusarium graminearum. Stress Biol, 2024, 4: 45.

[35]

WeiJQ, GuoXH, JiangJ, et al. . Resistance risk assessment of Fusarium pseudograminearum from wheat to prothioconazole. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2023, 191. 105346

[36]

YouBJ, LeeMH, ChungKR. Gene-specific disruption in the filamentous fungus Cercospora nicotianae using a split-marker approach. Arch Microbiol, 2009, 191: 615-622.

[37]

Zhang Y, Mao CX, Zhai XY, Jamieson PA, Zhang CQ (2020b) Mutation in cyp51b and overexpression of cyp51a and cyp51b confer multiple resistant to DMIs fungicide prochloraz in Fusarium fujikuroi. Pest Manage Sci 77:824–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6085

[38]

ZhangYS, WangLM, LiangS, et al. . FpDep1, a component of Rpd3L histone deacetylase complex, is important for vegetative development, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis inFusarium pseudograminearum. Fungal Genet Biol, 2020, 135: 103299.

[39]

Zhao YX, Chi MY, Sun HL, Qian HW, Yang J, Huang JG (2021) The FgCYP51B Y123H mutation confers reduced sensitivity to prochloraz and is important for conidiation and ascospore development in Fusarium graminearum. Phytopathology 111:1420–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-09-20-0431-r

[40]

ZhaoLM, LvGQ, HeY, et al. . Occurrence status and integrated control measures of wheat crown rot in Henan Province. China Plant Prot, 2022, 42: 49-51

[41]

Zhou HF, He X, Wang S, Ma QZ, Sun BJ, Ding SL, Chen LL, Zhang M, Li HL (2019) Diversity of the Fusarium pathogens associated with crown rot in the Huanghuai wheat-growing region of China. Environ Microbiol 21:2740–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14602

[42]

Zhou F, Jiao Y, Han AH, Zhou XL, Kong JM, Hu HY, Liu RQ, Li CW (2024) Survey of prothioconazole sensitivity in Fusarium pseudograminearum isolates from Henan Province, China, and characterization of resistant laboratory mutants. BMC Plant Biol 24:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04714-w

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China(National Key Research)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

226

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/