No tillage outperforms conventional tillage under arid conditions and following fertilization
Stavros D. Veresoglou, Junjiang Chen, Xuheng Du, Qi Fu, QingLiu Geng, Chenyan Huang, Xilin Huang, Nan Hu, Yiming Hun, Guolin C. Li, Zhiman Lin, Zhiyu Ma, Yuyi Ou, Shuo Qi, Haitian Qin, Yingbo Qiu, Xibin Sun, Ye Tao, YiLing Tian, Jie Wang, Lingxiao Wu, Ziwei Wu, Siqi Xie, Ao Yang, Dan Yang, Chen Zeng, Ying Zeng, RuJie Zhang
No tillage outperforms conventional tillage under arid conditions and following fertilization
● On average conventional tillage outperformed no tillage.
● Across fertilized trials, however, no tillage performed best.
● Aridity increases yield benefits of no tillage over conventional tillage.
● Fertile settings favor conventional tillage over no tillage.
Reduced tillage practices present a tool that could sustainably intensify agriculture. The existing literature, however, lacks a consensus on how and when reduced tillage practices should get implemented. We reanalyzed here an extensive dataset comparing how regular tillage practices (i.e., conventional tillage) impacted yield of eight crops compared to stopping tillage altogether (i.e., no-tillage practice). We observed that aridity and fertilization favored no tillage over conventional tillage whereas conventional tillage performed better under high fertility settings. We further show that the responses are consistent across the crops. Our reanalysis complements the original and fills a gap in the literature questioning the conditions under which reducing tillage presents a viable alternative to common tillage practices.
Aridity / Crop production / Soil erosion / Sustainable agriculture / Tillage practices
[1] |
Adekalu, K.O., Oknade, D.A., 2006. Effect of irrigation amount and tillage system on yield and water use efficiency of cowpea. Communications is Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37, 225– 237.
|
[2] |
Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5– 32.
|
[3] |
Dang, Y.P., Balzer, A., Crawford, M., Rincon-Florez, V., Liu, H., Melland, A.R., Antille, D., Kodur, S., Bell, M.J., Whish, J.P.M., Lai, Y., Seymour, N., Carvalhas, L.C., Schenk, P., 2018. Strategic tillage in conservation agricultural systems of north-eastern Australia: why, where, when and how? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 , 1000- 1215
|
[4] |
Derpsch, R., Franzluebbers, A.J., Duiker, S.W., Reicosky, D.C., Koeller, K., Friedrich, T., Sturny, W.G., Sá, J.C.M., Weiss, K., 2014. Why do we need to standardize no-tillage research? Soil and Tillage Research 137, 16- 22
|
[5] |
Koenger, R., 2021. quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 5: 85. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg
|
[6] |
Lamour, A., Lotz, L.A.P., 2007. The importance of tillage depth in relation to seedling emergence in stale seedbeds. Ecological Modelling 201, 536– 546.
|
[7] |
Mathew, R.P., Feng, Y., Githinji, L., Ankumah, R., Balkcom, K.S., 2012. Impact of no-tillage and conventional tillage systems on soil microbial communities Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2012 , 548620
|
[8] |
Montgomery, D.R., 2007. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 13268– 13272.
|
[9] |
Nakagawa, S., Schielzeth, H., 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, 133– 142.
|
[10] |
Peixoto, S.D., da Silva, L.C.M., de Melo, L.B.B., Azevedo, R.P., Araújo, B.C.L., de Carvalho, T.S., Moreira, S.G., Curi, N., Silva, B.M., 2020. Occasional tillage in no-tillage systems: A global meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment 745, 140887.
|
[11] |
Pinheiro, J.C., Bates, D.M., 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Technometrics 43, 111– 114.
|
[12] |
Powlson, D.S., Stirling, C.M., Jat, M.L., Gerard, B.G., Palm, C.A., Sanchez, P.A., Cassman, K.G., 2014. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change 4, 678– 683.
|
[13] |
Schmidt, R., Mitchell, J., Scow, K., 2019. Cover cropping and no-till increase diversity and symbiotroph:saprotroph ratios of soil fungal communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 129, 99– 109.
|
[14] |
Scopei, E., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Da Silva, F.A.M, Corbeels, M., Xaview, J.H.V., Lahmar, R., Recous, S., Bernoux, M., Blanchart, E., Mendes, C., de Trourdonnet, S., 2013. Conservation agriculture cropping systems in temperate and tropical conditions, performances and impacts. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33, 113– 130.
|
[15] |
Shakoor, A., Shajbaz, M., Farooq, T.H., Sahar, N.E., Shahzad, S.M., Altaf, M.M., Ashraf, M., 2021. A global meta-analysis of greenhouse gases emission and crop yield under no-tillage as compared to conventional tillage. Science of the Total Environment 750, 142299.
|
[16] |
Su, Y., Gabrielle, B., Makowski, D., 2021a. A global dataset for crop production under conventional tillage and no tillage systems. Scientific Data 8, 33.
|
[17] |
Su, Y., Gabrielle, B., Beillouin, D., Makowskii, D., 2021b. High probability of yield gain through conservation agriculture in dry regions for major staple crops. Scientific Reports 11, 3344.
|
[18] |
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., Befort, B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 20260– 20264.
|
[19] |
Triplett Jr, G.B., Dick, W.A., 2008 No‐tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agronomy Journal 100, S153- S165.
|
[20] |
Zhou, J.L., Gandomi, A.H., Chen, F., Holzinger, A., 2021. Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: A survey on methods and metrics. Electronics 10, 593.
|
[21] |
Zuber, S.M., Villamil, M.B., 2016. Meta-analysis approach to assess effect of tillage on microbial biomass and enzyme activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 97, 176– 187.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |