Soil legacy effects and plant–soil feedback contribution to secondary succession processes

Abstract

● The PSF of three species is positive in response to different soil origin.

● The PSF of early-species is negative in response to plant growth period.

● The PSF of mid- and late-species is negative in early- species soil over time.

● The PSF of mid- and late-species is neutral in mid- species soil over time.

● The PSF of mid- and late-species is positive in late-species soil over time.

Secondary succession is the process by which a community develops into a climax community over time. However, knowledge on the mechanisms, relating to soil legacy effects (soil chemistry and enzyme activity) and plant–soil feedback (PSF), driving community succession remains limited. In this work, we examined the PSF associated with three succession stage species through a 2-year greenhouse experiment. Setaria viridis, Stipa bungeana, and Bothriochloa ischemum were selected to represent dominant and representative early-, mid-, and late-successional stage species, respectively, of semiarid grasslands on the Loess Plateau. In response to the different soil origin, the shoot biomass of early-, mid-, and late-species were all higher when grown in their own soil than in other species’ soils, which indicated that the PSF of three species were positive. Over two growth periods, the early-species experienced a negative PSF, but the mid- and late-species experienced negative, neutral and positive PSF in the soil of early-, mid- and late-species, respectively. Our study demonstrates that soil legacy effects and PSF have a significant impact on community succession processes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Grassland / Plant growth / Plant-soil feedback / Soil microbial activity / Soil legacy effects / Secondary succession

References

[1] Alami, M.M., Xue, J., Ma, Y., Zhu, D., Abbas, A., Gong, Z., Wang, X., 2020. Structure, function, diversity, and composition of fungal communities in rhizospheric soil of Coptis chinensis Franch under a successive cropping system. Plants9, 244.

[2] Bell, T., Newman, J.A., Silverman, B.W., Turner, S.L., Lilley, A.K., 2005. The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature436, 1157–1160.

[3] Bever, J.D., 2003. Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytologist157, 465–473.

[4] Bever, J.D., Westover, K.M., Antonovics, J., 1997. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. Journal of Ecology85, 561–573.

[5] Bremner, J. M., Mulvaney, C. S., 1982. Part 2, Chemical and Microbial Properties. In Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., eds. Nitrogen-Total. Methods of Soil Analysis, Agronomy Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 595-624.

[6] Castle, S.C., Lekberg, Y., Affleck, D., Cleveland, C.C., Vries, F., 2016. Soil abiotic and biotic controls on plant performance during primary succession in a glacial landscape. Journal of Ecology104, 1555–1565.

[7] Deng, L., Liu, G.B., Shangguan, Z.P., 2014. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China’s ‘Grain-for-Green’ Program: a synthesis. Global Change Biology20, 3544–3556.

[8] Ehrenfeld, J.G., Ravit, B., Elgersma, K., 2005. Feedback in the plant–soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources30, 75–115.

[9] Elser, J.J., Fagan, W.F., Kerkhoff, A.J., Swenson, N.G., Enquist, B.J., 2010. Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytologist186, 593–608.

[10] Flory, S.L., Clay, K., 2013. Pathogen accumulation and long-term dynamics of plant invasions. Journal of Ecology101, 607–613.

[11] Grime, J.P., 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

[12] Hedin, L.O., 2004. Global organization of terrestrial plant-nutrient interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America101, 10849–10850.

[13] Helmus, M.R., Keller, W.B., Paterson, M.J., Yan, N.D., Cannon, C.H., Rusak, J.A., 2010. Communities contain closely related species during ecosystem disturbance. Ecology Letters13, 162–174.

[14] Jiang, J., Xiong, Y., Jiang, H., Ye, D., Song, Y., Li, F., 2009. Soil microbial activity during secondary vegetation succession in semiarid abandoned lands of Loess Plateau. Pedosphere19, 735–747.

[15] Jing, J., Bezemer, T.M., van der Putten, W.H., 2015. Complementarity and selection effects in early and mid-successional plant communities are differentially affected by plant-soil feedback. Journal of Ecology103, 641–647.

[16] Kardol, P., Bezemer, T.M., van der Putten, W.H., 2006. Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession. Ecology Letters9, 1080–1088.

[17] Kuťáková, E., Mészárošová, L., Baldrian, P., Münzbergová, Z., 2019. Evaluating the role of biotic and chemical components of plant-soil feedback of primary successional plants. Biology and Fertility of Soils56, 345–358.

[18] Li, Y.M., Wang, S.J., Lu, M., Zhang, Z., Chen, M.K., Li, S.H., Cao, R., 2019. Rhizosphere interactions between earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase nutrient availability and plant growth in the desertification soils. Soil & Tillage Research186, 146–151.

[19] Liu, H., Wu, Y., Xu, H., Ai, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, G., Xue, S., 2021. Mechanistic understanding of interspecific interaction between a C4 grass and a C3 legume via arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, as influenced by soil phosphorus availability using a ¹³C and ¹⁵N dual-labelled organic patch. Plant Journal108, 183–196.

[20] Lozano, Y.M., Hortal, S., Armas, C., Pugnaire, F.I., 2014. Interactions among soil, plants, and microorganisms drive secondary succession in a dry environment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry78, 298–306.

[21] Maestre, F.T., Valladares, F., Reynolds, J.F., 2005. Is the change of plant-plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments. Journal of Ecology93, 748–757.

[22] Mahaming, A.R., Mills, A.A.S., Adl, S.M., 2009. Soil community changes during secondary succession to naturalized grasslands. Applied Soil Ecology41, 137–147.

[23] Millard, P., Singh, B.K. 2010. Does grassland vegetation drive soil microbial diversity?. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems88, 147–158.

[24] Nelson, D., Sommers, L., 1982. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter, In: Page, A.L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbial Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

[25] Olsen, S., Sommers, L., 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page, A.L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbial Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

[26] Qiang, W., He, L.L., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Liu, Y., Liu, Q.H., Pang, X.Y., 2021. Aboveground vegetation and soil physicochemical properties jointly drive the shift of soil microbial community during subalpine secondary succession in southwest China. Catena202, 105251.

[27] Rasmann, S., Bauerle, T.L., Poveda, K., Vannette, R., 2011. Predicting root defence against herbivores during succession. Functional Ecology25, 368–379.

[28] Saiya-Cork, K.R., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Zak, D.R., 2002. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry34, 1309–1315.

[29] Schade, J.D., Kyle, M., Hobbie, S.E., Fagan, W.F., Elser, J.J., 2003. Stoichiometric tracking of soil nutrients by a desert insect herbivore. Ecology Letters6, 96–101.

[30] Smith, A.P., Marín-Spiotta, E., Balser, T., 2015. Successional and seasonal variations in soil and litter microbial community structure and function during tropical postagricultural forest regeneration: a multiyear study. Global Change Biology21, 3532–3547.

[31] Song, M., Yu, L., Jiang, Y., Korpelainen, H., Li, C., 2019. Increasing soil age drives shifts in plant-plant interactions from positive to negative and affects primary succession dynamics in a subalpine glacier forefield. Geoderma353, 435–448.

[32] Valliere, J.M., Escobedo, E.B., Bucciarelli, G.M., Sharifi, M.R., Rundel, P.W., 2019. Invasive annuals respond more negatively to drought than native species. New Phytologist223, 1647–1656.

[33] van de Voorde, T.F.J., van der Putten, W.H., Martijn Bezemer, T., 2011. Intra- and interspecific plant-soil interactions, soil legacies and priority effects during old-field succession. Journal of Ecology99, 945–953.

[34] Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S., 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry19, 703–707.

[35] Walker, L.R., Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Clarkson, B.D., 2010. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. Journal of Ecology98, 725–736.

[36] Xiao, L., Liu, G.B., Li, P., Li, Q., Xue, S., 2020. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation during secondary succession of natural grassland on the Loess Plateau, China. Soil & Tillage Research200, 104605.

[37] Xu, H.W., Ai, Z.M., Qu, Q., Wang, M.G., Liu, G.B., Xue, S. 2021a. Invasibility and recoverability of a plant community following invasion depend on its successional stages. Soil Ecology Letters4, 171–185.

[38] Xu, H., Qu, Q., Chen, Y.H., Liu, G.B., Xue, S., 2021b. Responses of soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon stability over time after cropland abandonment in different vegetation zones of the Loess Plateau of China. Catena196, 104812.

[39] Xue, Z.J., Zhou, Z.C., An, S.S., 2021. Changes in the soil microbial communities of different soil aggregations after vegetation restoration in a semiarid grassland, China. Soil Ecology Letters3, 6–21.

[40] Yang, M., Yuan, Y., Huang, H.C., Ye, C., Guo, C.W., Xu, Y.G., Wang, W.P., He, X.H., Liu, Y.X., Zhu, S.S., 2019. Steaming combined with biochar application eliminates negative plant-soil feedback for sanqi cultivation. Soil & Tillage Research189, 189–198.

[41] Zhang, J., Ai, Z., Xu, H., Liu, H., Wang, G., Deng, L., Liu, G., Xue, S., 2021. Plant-microbial feedback in secondary succession of semiarid grasslands. Science of the Total Environment760, 143389.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press