Aerodynamic performance of combined bogie fairings in an 8-car high-speed train

Abstract

Aerodynamic drag accounts for 75%–80% of the total running resistance of high-speed trains operating above 300 km/h, and the bogie region significantly contributes to this drag due to its complex separated flow structures. This study investigates the aerodynamic performance and drag-reduction mechanism of combined bogie fairings applied to a full-scale eight-car high-speed train at 400 km/h using three-dimensional steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations with the k–ω SST turbulence model. Eleven configurations were analyzed, including a baseline model, three single-fairing configurations (side, front, and rear), and seven combined configurations incorporating two to four fairing components, all including the side fairing. Among the single-fairing cases, the side fairing achieved the largest total drag reduction of 7.62% by suppressing flow entrainment into the bogie cavity due to the lateral shielding, while the front fairing yielded a 5.66% reduction mainly through the skin-friction drag reduction. In contrast, the rear fairing increased drag owing to the blockage-induced pressure increase inside the bogie cavity. The optimal combined configuration of Side + Front + Bottom reduced total aerodynamic drag by 18.05% relative to the baseline. This improvement was primarily attributed to a 33.12% decrease in the pressure drag achieved through coordinated control of lateral entrainment, frontal deflection, and upwash suppression into the bogie cavity. Furthermore, adding the rear fairing to the optimal combination showed negligible change in total drag under the forward-running condition, suggesting its potential applicability as a geometrically symmetric configuration for bidirectional operation. The results demonstrate a context-dependent mechanism shift of the front fairing from the skin-friction drag reduction in isolation to the pressure-drag reduction in combination, producing a super-additive interaction. This underscores the importance of integrated bogie flow management for the aerodynamic optimization of high-speed trains.

Keywords

High-speed train / Bogie fairing / Aerodynamic drag reduction / Flow control / Computational fluid dynamics

References

[1] Rochard BP, Schmid F. A review of methods to measure and calculate train resistances. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2000, 214(4): 185-199

[2] Schetz JA. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2001, 33: 371-414

[3] Raghunathan RS, Kim H-D, Setoguchi T. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2002, 38(6–7): 469-514

[4] Kwon H, Oh H (2013) Decomposition and reduction of aerodynamic drag of high-speed train. In: 10th World Congress on Railway Research. Sydney, 25th-28th Nov

[5] Wang J, Minelli G, Dong T, et al.. The effect of bogie fairings on the slipstream and wake flow of a high-speed train. An IDDES study. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2019, 191: 183-202

[6] Weidner D, Stoll D, Kuthada T, et al.. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains with respect to ground simulation. Fluids (Basel), 2022, 7(7 228

[7] Zhang J, Adamu A, Gidado F, et al.. Flow control for aerodynamic drag reduction of a high-speed train with diversion slots on bogie regions. Phys Fluids, 2023, 35(11 115111

[8] Adamu A, Zhang J, Tajudeen H, et al.. Aerodynamic drag reduction of a high-speed train with cavities on bogie regions. Phys Fluids, 2025, 37(6 065143

[9] Jiang C, Long JL, Li YS, et al.. Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic drag reduction based on bottom deflectors and streamlined bogies of a high-speed train. J Cent South Univ, 2024, 31(9): 3312-3328

[10] Gao G, Xiang N, Ding Y, et al.. A smooth-guiding method for aerodynamic drag reduction on key regions of a high-speed train. Mech Based Des Struct Mach, 2026, 54: 2537310

[11] Moon JS, Kim SW, Kwon HB. A study on the aerodynamic drag reduction of high-speed train using bogie side fairing. J Comput Fluids Eng, 2014, 19(1): 41-46

[12] Xie Z, Zeng W, Zhou Y, et al.. Aerodynamic drag reduction of high-speed trains via integrated bogie fairing designs. Railw Eng Sci, 2026

[13] Wang T, Yang L, Wang Y, et al.. Research on aerodynamic drag reduction for 400 km/h high-speed trains. Adv Wind Eng, 2025, 2(2 100056

[14] Kim B, Kim N, Lee K et al (2026) Experimental and numerical analysis of aerodynamic drag reduction of high-speed train: impact of nose, bogie-fairing and roof-apparatus variations. Railw Eng Sci

[15] Niu J, Wang Y, Liu F, et al.. Numerical study on comparison of detailed flow field and aerodynamic performance of bogies of stationary train and moving train. Veh Syst Dyn, 2021, 59(12): 1844-1866

[16] Xia C, Tian H, Li X, et al.. Numerical investigation of vortex shedding and flow structures in the bogie cavity of a high-speed train. Comput Fluids, 2017, 148: 128-142

[17] Jin Y, Chen X. Research on aerodynamic characteristics of high-velocity train bogies. J Eng Appl Sci, 2024, 71(1): 206

[18] Kwon H. Characteristics of the air flow underneath high-speed trains running on the ballast track. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2023, 232 105283

[19] Anderson JD. Fundamentals of aerodynamics, 2011, 5th edn, New York McGraw-Hill

[20] Kim B, Ahn J, Kwon H. A study on a partially-open bogie fairing to improve anti-snow performance of a high-speed train. J Mech Sci Technol, 2023, 37(4): 1859-1869

[21] Kim N, Kim B, Gill J, et al.. Study on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains running at over 370 km/h using computational fluid dynamics. J Korean Soc Railw, 2023, 26(12): 856-865 in Korean

[22] Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605

[23] Huo Y, Minelli G, Krajnović S. Assessment of steady RANS and hybrid RANS-LES (IDDES) for prediction of high-speed train aerodynamic drag. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2023, 239105991

[24] Yang X, Guo D, Li T, Yang G. Comparison of steady RANS and hybrid RANS-LES methods for high-speed train aerodynamics. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2020, 200104141

[25] European Committee for Standardization (2013) Railway applications—Gauges. EN 15273, Brussels

[26] Korea Railroad Research Institute (2015) Korean Railway Standards for Rolling Stock. KRRI, Uiwang (in Korean)

[27] Standards Australia (2015) Rolling stock outlines. AS 7507, Sydney

[28] Spalart PR, Rumsey CL. Effective inflow conditions for turbulence models in aerodynamic calculations. AIAA J, 2007, 45(10): 2544-2553

[29] Munoz-Paniagua J, García J, Lehugeur B. Evaluation of RANS, SAS and IDDES models for the simulation of the flow around a high-speed train subjected to crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2017, 171: 50-66

[30] Zhang J, Li JJ, Tian HQ, et al.. Impact of ground and wheel boundary conditions on numerical simulation of the high-speed train aerodynamic performance. J Fluids Struct, 2016, 61: 249-261

[31] American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2009) Standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer. ASME V&V 20-2009, New York

[32] Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, et al.. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng, 2008, 130(7 078001

[33] Baker C. The flow around high speed trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2010, 98(6/7): 277-298

[34] Kwon H. A study on the resistance force and the aerodynamic drag of Korean high-speed trains. Veh Syst Dyn, 2018, 56(8): 1250-1268

[35] Muld TW, Efraimsson G, Henningson DS. Flow structures around a high-speed train extracted using proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition. Comput Fluids, 2012, 57: 87-97

[36] Dai Z, Li T, Zhang W, et al.. Investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains with shields beneath bogies. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2024, 246 105666

[37] Yu M, Liu J, Dai Z. Aerodynamic drag components of high-speed trains at 400 km/h and implication for running resistance. Railw Eng Sci, 2021, 29(3): 345-358

Funding

Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement(RS-2022-00143396)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.