Assessing freight train derailment risk: comparison of European rules integrated with digital twins for running safety indexes

N. Bosso , L. Cantone , M. Magelli , R. Trinchero , N. Zampieri

Railway Engineering Science ›› : 1 -13.

PDF
Railway Engineering Science ›› :1 -13. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-026-00446-3
Article
research-article
Assessing freight train derailment risk: comparison of European rules integrated with digital twins for running safety indexes
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper compares the assessment of freight train running safety according to two European rules, namely the UIC IRS 40421 and the EN 14363, under emergency braking operations. The paper relies on a combination of longitudinal train dynamics (LTD) simulations for the evaluation of the in-train forces and multibody (MB) simulations for the calculation of the running safety indexes derived from the wheel-rail contact forces. The results confirm that the IRS 40421 is more conservative when assessing the safety of families of freight trains with a statistical perspective. Nonetheless, in individual operating scenarios, the IRS 40421 can predict safe conditions when MB simulations calculate running safety indexes above the limits prescribed by the EN 14363. To improve the running safety assessment from the outputs of LTD simulations, the paper suggests the introduction of kernel regressions, acting as digital twins of MB simulations, for the prediction of the running safety indexes. Digital twins improve the consistency with the classification of derailment conditions based on the outputs of the MB simulations. The findings highlight the complementary value of the two rules and the potential of digital twins to support the reliable assessment of freight train running safety.

Keywords

Railways / Running safety / Derailment / Longitudinal train dynamics / Multibody dynamics / Machine learning / Digital twins

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
N. Bosso, L. Cantone, M. Magelli, R. Trinchero, N. Zampieri. Assessing freight train derailment risk: comparison of European rules integrated with digital twins for running safety indexes. Railway Engineering Science 1-13 DOI:10.1007/s40534-026-00446-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wilson N, Wu H, Klopp A, et al., et al.Iwnicki S, Spiryagin M, Cole C, et al., et al.. Railway vehicle derailment and prevention. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 20192Boca Raton, CRC Press

[2]

Evans AW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: 1980–2009. Accid Anal Prev, 2011, 43(1): 391-401

[3]

Evans AW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: an update to 2019. Accid Anal Prev, 2021, 158 ArticleID: 106182

[4]

Liu X, Saat MR, Barkan CPL. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 2012, 2289(1): 154-163

[5]

Liu X. Statistical causal analysis of freight-train derailments in the United States. J Transp Eng A Syst, 2017, 143(2 ArticleID: 04016007

[6]

Ebrahimi H, Sattari F, Lefsrud L, et al.. Analysis of train derailments and collisions to identify leading causes of loss incidents in rail transport of dangerous goods in Canada. J Loss Prev Process Ind, 2021, 72 ArticleID: 104517

[7]

Cole C, et al.Iwnicki S, Spiryagin M, Cole C, et al.. Longitudinal train dynamics and vehicle stability in train operations. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 20192nd EditionBoca Raton, CRC Press

[8]

Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C. Longitudinal train dynamics: an overview. Veh Syst Dyn, 2016, 54(12): 1688-1714

[9]

Wu Q, Cole C, Spiryagin M, et al.. Freight train air brake models. Int J Rail Transp, 2023, 11(1): 1-49

[10]

Cole C, McClanachan M, Spiryagin M, et al.. Wagon instability in long trains. Veh Syst Dyn, 2012, 50(sup1): 303-317

[11]

European Committee for Standardization (2016) Railway applications: testing and simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles—running behaviour and stationary tests. EN 14363:2016

[12]

Schmid R, Micić Batka V, Pospischil F. Prud’homme criterion: a review of its application in railway vehicle approval. Int J Rail Transp, 2026, 14(1): 1-16

[13]

International Union of Railways (2021) Rules for the consist and braking of international freight trains. IRS 40421/E/2:2021

[14]

International Union of Railways. Wagons: running safety. UIC, 2012, 530–2: 2008

[15]

Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2024) Railway applications: testing and simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles — running safety under longitudinal compressive force. EN 15839:2024

[16]

Krishna VV, Berg M, Stichel S. Tolerable longitudinal forces for freight trains in tight S-curves using three-dimensional multi-body simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2020, 234(5): 454-467

[17]

Krishna VV, Jobstfinke D, Melzi S, et al.. An integrated numerical framework to investigate the running safety of overlong freight trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2021, 235(1): 47-60

[18]

Cantone L. TrainDy: the new Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer software for freight train interoperability. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2011, 225(1): 57-70

[19]

Cole C, Spiryagin M, Wu Q, et al.. Modelling, simulation and applications of longitudinal train dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2017, 55(10): 1498-1571

[20]

Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Cole C. International benchmarking of longitudinal train dynamics simulators: benchmarking questions. Veh Syst Dyn, 2017, 55(4): 450-463

[21]

Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C, et al.. International benchmarking of longitudinal train dynamics simulators: results. Veh Syst Dyn, 2018, 56(3): 343-365

[22]

Bosso N, Magelli M, Zampieri N. Long train dynamic simulation by means of a new in-house code. WIT Trans Built Environ, 2020, 199: 249-259

[23]

Magelli M, Zampieri N. A novel approach for longitudinal train dynamics simulations with multibody codes. Veh Syst Dyn, 2025, 63(5): 978-996

[24]

Magelli M, Corrêa PHA, dos Santos AA. Assessing the effect of modelling approaches for longitudinal train dynamics simulations with a multibody code. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-body Dyn, 2025, 239(4): 326-338

[25]

Pshinko OM, Ursulyak LV, Zhelieznov KI, et al.. To the problem of train running safety. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2020, 985(1 ArticleID: 012014

[26]

Di Gialleonardo E, Cazzulani G, Melzi S, et al.. The effect of train composition on the running safety of low-flatcar wagons in braking and curving manoeuvres. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(6): 666-677

[27]

Bosso N, Magelli M, Trinchero R, et al.. Application of machine learning techniques to build digital twins for long train dynamics simulations. Veh Syst Dyn, 2024, 62(1): 21-40

[28]

Bosso N, Cantone L, Gugliotta A, et al (2024) Introduction of digital twins in the longitudinal train dynamics simulation of freight train air brake operations. Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks III. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp 297–306

[29]

Bosso N, Magelli M, Zampieri N. Dynamical effects of the increase of the axle load on European freight railway vehicles. Appl Sci, 2023, 13(3): 1318

[30]

Cantone L. Simulation of freight trains with up to three traction units in radio communication. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2022, 1214(1 ArticleID: 012039

[31]

RFI Disposizione di esercizio N° 27:2007. Allegato 1: Standard di qualità geometrica del binario con velocità fino a 300 km/h

[32]

Kalker JJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn, 1982, 11(1): 1-13

[33]

International Union of Railways (1993) Benchmark problem results and assessment. Bogies with steered or steering wheelsets. Technical Report B 176/3

[34]

Suykens JAK, Van Gestel T, De Brabanter J, et al.. Least squares support vector machines, 2002, Singapore, World Scientific

[35]

Trinchero R, Larbi M, Torun HM, et al.. Machine learning and uncertainty quantification for surrogate models of integrated devices with a large number of parameters. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 4056-4066

[36]

Ghojogh B, Crowley M (2019) The theory behind overfitting, cross validation, regularization, bagging, and boosting: tutorial. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.12787

[37]

Soleimani N, Trinchero R, Canavero FG. Bridging the gap between artificial neural networks and kernel regressions for vector-valued problems in microwave applications. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2023, 71(6): 2319-2332

[38]

De Brabanter K, Karsmakers P, Ojeda F, et al.. LS-SVMlab toolbox user’s guide version 1.8, 2011, Belgium, ESAT-SISTA, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

[39]

European Committee for Standardization (2013) On the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing regulation (EC) No 352/2009. EU 402/2013

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca(FISA-2023-00314)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/