Development of a modelling framework for running safety analysis of a heavy-haul freight vehicle crossing a bridge under different loading conditions

Abstract

Evaluation of train running safety for freight and heavy-haul railway vehicles is a poorly addressed topic in the literature, despite their distinct dynamic behaviour and track conditions compared with passenger and high-speed railways. For this purpose, a framework for the development of a three-dimensional numerical analysis of train running safety crossing a bridge using a vehicle–structure interaction methodology is presented. Numerical models of the railway bridge were developed and calibrated, and multibody models of the heavy-haul vehicles were created and optimised based on modal data. Structure and vehicle dynamic responses were obtained using the dynamic interaction models that consider nonlinear wheel–rail contact models. Assessment of structural and train running safety was performed for multiple train speeds for both loaded and unloaded vehicles using different degrees of rail geometric irregularities based on the Federal Railroad Administration’s power spectral density functions. The case study is a 550-metre-long railway bridge composed of 22 simply supported steel-concrete composite spans, crossed by heavy-haul vehicles of the gondola-type wagon with 375 kN axle loads. The safety of the bridge was assessed in terms of structural responses according to European codes, while the running safety of the vehicle was evaluated through indirect running safety indices as well as direct derailment coefficients based on vertical and lateral wheel–rail contact forces and more advanced criteria. It was found that in regular operational conditions, all indices are well below recommended limit values for loaded vehicles, whereas the unloaded vehicles presented a more unstable dynamic behaviour.

Keywords

Train running safety / Vehicle–structure interaction / Railway bridges / Heavy-haul vehicle

References

[1] Cantero D, Arvidsson T, OBrien E, et al. . Train-track-bridge modelling and review of parameters. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2016, 12(9): 1051-1064

[2] Zhai W, Han Z, Chen Z, et al. . Train-track-bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 57(7): 984-1027

[3] Li Y, Xiang H, Wang Z, et al. . A comprehensive review on coupling vibrations of train—bridge systems under external excitations. Railw Eng Sci, 2022, 30(3): 383-401

[4] Jin X. Research progress of high-speed wheel-rail relationship. Lubricants, 2022, 10(10): 248

[5] Montenegro P, Calçada R. Wheel–rail contact model for railway vehicle-structure interaction applications: development and validation. Railw Eng Sci, 2023, 31(3): 181-206

[6] Yang Y, Yau J. Resonance of high-speed trains moving over a series of simple or continuous beams with non-ballasted tracks. Eng Struct, 2017, 143: 295-305

[7] Ribeiro D, Costa B, Cruz L, et al. . Simulation of the dynamic behavior of a centenary metallic bridge under metro traffic actions based on advanced interaction models. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2021, 21(04): 2150057

[8] Arvidsson T, Andersson A, Karoumi R. Train running safety on non-ballasted bridges. Int J Rail Transp, 2019, 7(1): 1-22

[9] Ma L, Zhang W, Cai SC, et al. . The dynamic amplification factors for continuous beam bridges along high-speed railways. Adv Struct Eng, 2021, 24(11): 2542-2554

[10] Stoura CD, Dimitrakopoulos EG. Additional damping effect on bridges because of vehicle-bridge interaction. J Sound Vib, 2020, 476 115294

[11] Wang L, Zhang X, Liu H, et al. . Global reliability analysis of running safety of a train traversing a bridge under crosswinds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2022, 224 104979

[12] Montenegro P, Carvalho H, Ortega M, et al. . Impact of the train-track-bridge system characteristics in the runnability of high-speed trains against crosswinds - part i: Running safety. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2022, 224 104974

[13] Gong W, Zhu Z, Liu Y, et al. . Running safety assessment of a train traversing a three-tower cable-stayed bridge under spatially varying ground motion. Railw Eng Sci, 2020, 28: 184-198

[14] Zhao H, Gao L, Wei B, et al. . Seismic safety assessment with non-gaussian random processes for train-bridge coupled systems. Earthq Eng Eng Vib, 2024, 23(1): 241-260

[15] Giannakos K. Comparison of magnitude of actions on track in high-speed and heavy-haul railroads: Influence of resilient fastenings. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 2012, 2289(1): 70-77

[16] Esveld C. Modern railway track, 20012Albuquerque, MRT Productions

[17] Li D, Hyslip J, Sussmann T, et al. . Railway geotechnics, 20151London, CRC Press

[18] Selig ET, Waters JM. Track geotechnology and substructure management, 1994, Leeds, Emerald Publishing Limited

[19] El-Sibaie M (1863) Zhang YJ (2004) Objective track quality indices. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1:81–87

[20] Zhao J, Chan AHC, Stirling AB, et al. . Optimizing policies of railway ballast tamping and renewal. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 2006, 1943(1): 50-56

[21] International Union of Railways (2005) Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour: safety, track fatigue and ride quality. Leaflet 518 (English version), Paris

[22] International Union of Railways (2008) Best practice guide for optimum track geometry durability. Paris

[23] Andrade AR, Teixeira PF. A bayesian model to assess rail track geometry degradation through its life-cycle. Res Transp Econ, 2012, 36(1): 1-8

[24] International Union of Railways (2009) Classification of lines for the purpose of track maintenance. Leaflet 714 (4th ed.), Paris

[25] Ticona Melo LR, Bittencourt TN, Ribeiro D, et al. . Dynamic response of a railway bridge to heavy axle-load trains considering vehicle-bridge interaction. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2018, 18(01): 1850010

[26] Xiao Y, Luo X, Liu J, et al. . Dynamic response of railway bridges under heavy-haul freight trains. Adv Civ Eng, 2020, 2020: 7486904

[27] Neves S, Montenegro P, Azevedo A, et al. . A direct method for analyzing the nonlinear vehicle-structure interaction. Eng Struct, 2014, 69: 83-89

[28] Montenegro P, Neves S, Calçada R, et al. . Wheel-rail contact formulation for analyzing the lateral train-structure dynamic interaction. Comput Struct, 2015, 152: 200-214

[29] Hertz H. Ueber die berührung fester elastischer körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1882, 92: 156-171

[30] Kalker J. The computation of three-dimensional rolling contact with dry friction. Numerical Meth Engineering, 1979, 14(9): 1293-1307

[31] Kalker JJ. Book of Tables for the Herzian Creep-force Law, 1996, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics , Delft University of Technology

[32] Montenegro P, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, et al. . Assessment of train running safety on bridges: A literature review. Eng Struct, 2021, 241 112425

[33] Nadal J (1908) Locomotives a Vapeur. Éditions Le Vieil Armand, Strasbourg

[34] Prud’homme A. La résistance de la voie aux efforts transversaux éxercés par le material roulant. Rev Gen Chem Fer (Revue Generale des Chemins de Fer), 1967, 86(1): 1-23

[35] The European Committee for Standardization (2022) Railway applications. aerodynamics requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment EN 14067-6:2018+a1:2022. Brussels

[36] The European Committee for Standardization (2016) Railway applications — testing and simulation for the acceptance of running of railway vehicles – running behaviour and stationary tests EN 14363:2016. Brussels

[37] The Association of American Railroads (2023) Manual of standards and recommended practices: Section c, part ii - design, fabrication, and construction of freight cars. Washington, DC

[38] Ishida H, Matsuo M. Safety criteria for evaluation of railway vehicle derailment. QR RTRI, 1999, 40(1): 18-25

[39] Ishida H, Matsuo M, Fujioka T. Safety assessment method of railway vehicle under oscillatory wheel load fluctuation. J Environ Eng, 2007, 2(2): 407-418

[40] Montenegro PA (2015) A methodology for the assessment of the train running safety on bridges. Dissertation, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto

[41] The European Committee for Standardization (2005) Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design EN 1990

[42] The Commission of the European Communities (2002) Commission decision of 30 may 2002 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the infrastructure subsystem of the trans-european high-speed rail system referred to in article 6(1) of council directive 96/48/EC. Official Journal of the European Union

[43] Zhai W, Wang K, Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2009, 47(11): 1349-1376

[44] Hu B, Schiehlen W. On the simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Probab Eng Mech, 1997, 12(2): 105-113

[45] Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Cole C, et al. . Design and simulation of heavy haul locomotives and trains, 2016CRC Press

[46] Lima E, Baruffaldi L, Manetti J, et al. . Effect of truck shear pads on the dynamic behaviour of heavy haul railway cars. Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 60(4): 1188-1208

[47] dos Santos GM, Lopes LS, Kina EJ, et al. . The influence of wheel profile on the safety index. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2010, 224(5): 429-434

[48] Bragança C, Neto J, Pinto N, et al. . Calibration and validation of a freight wagon dynamic model in operating conditions based on limited experimental data. Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 60(9): 3024-3050

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo(2021/12367-2 and 2024/06964-6)

Institute of Research and Development in Structures and Construction(UIDB/04708/2020 and Programmatic Funding - UIDP/04708/2020)

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia(2022.00628.CEECIND)

Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking(No. 101121765)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)