Model development and efficient calibration of railway transition zones using experimental data

Ricardo Vidal , Alexandre Cury , Flávio Barbosa

Railway Engineering Science ›› : 1 -20.

PDF
Railway Engineering Science ›› :1 -20. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-026-00440-9
Article
research-article
Model development and efficient calibration of railway transition zones using experimental data
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of the train–track system plays a pivotal role in defining relevant operational parameters, such as train speed, comfort, and safety. In sections where the railway subgrade is well compacted, train circulation is smoother and more stable, with lower levels of displacement during operation. However, railway transition zones between embankments and viaducts often show significant stiffness changes, which can lead to differential settlements, larger deflections, and higher maintenance needs over time. This study develops and experimentally calibrates a finite-element computational model to simulate the mechanical response of such transition zones. The model is calibrated using track deflection measurements obtained at only three instrumented locations under trains operating at multiple speeds on an active Brazilian railway. Numerical–experimental comparisons identify the governing parameters affecting track response within the transition region. In addition, a spatial stiffness-variation function is formulated and its parameters are calibrated using the same measurement set. The results allow a more accurate representation of train–track interaction and provide guidance for the design and maintenance of durable, safer railway transition zones.

Keywords

Embankment–bridge railway transition / Railway experimental tests / Finite element model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ricardo Vidal, Alexandre Cury, Flávio Barbosa. Model development and efficient calibration of railway transition zones using experimental data. Railway Engineering Science 1-20 DOI:10.1007/s40534-026-00440-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Xu L. On dynamic analysis method for large-scale train-track-substructure interaction. Railw Eng Sci, 2022, 30(2): 162-182.

[2]

Lima A, Dersch M, Lee J, et al.. Track modulus assessment of engineered interspersed concrete sleepers in ballasted track. Appl Sci, 2021, 11(1): 261.

[3]

Liu X, Xiao J, Cai D et al (2023) Recent advances in subgrade engineering for high-speed railway. Intell Transp Infrastruct 2:liad001

[4]

Ye YG, Shi DC, Poveda-Reyes S et al (2020) Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 21(10):783–798

[5]

Wang H, Chang L, Markine V. Structural health monitoring of railway transition zones using satellite radar data. Sensors, 2018, 18(2): 413.

[6]

Paixão A, Varandas JN, Fortunato E. Dynamic behavior in transition zones and long-term railway track performance. Front Built Environ, 2021, 7. ArticleID: 658909

[7]

Melo R, Finotti R, Guedes A, et al.. Out-of-roundness wheel damage identification in railway vehicles using AutoEncoder models. Appl Sci, 2025, 15(5): 2662.

[8]

Dahlberg T. Railway track stiffness variations—consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civ Eng, 2010, 8(1): 1-12

[9]

Sol-Sánchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez MC. The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: a state of the art review. Constr Build Mater, 2015, 75: 293-305.

[10]

Wang H, Markine V. Corrective countermeasure for track transition zones in railways: adjustable fastener. Eng Struct, 2018, 169: 1-14.

[11]

Safari Baghsorkhi M, Laryea S, McDowell G, et al.. An investigation of railway sleeper sections and under sleeper pads using a box test apparatus. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(7): 1722-1734.

[12]

Sañudo R, Jardí I, Martínez J-C, et al.. Monitoring track transition zones in railways. Sensors, 2022, 22(1): 76.

[13]

Jain A, Metrikine AV, Steenbergen MJMM, et al.. Railway transition zones: evaluation of existing transition structures and a newly proposed transition structure. Int J Rail Transp, 2024, 12(6): 979-999.

[14]

Niu F, Zhang S, Zeng L, et al.. Settlement trend of embankment-bridge transition section reinforced with thermosyphons in permafrost regions. Transp Geotech, 2023, 43. ArticleID: 101131

[15]

Bhardawaj S, Chandmal Sharma R, Kumar Sharma S. A survey of railway track modelling. Int J Veh Struct Syst, 2020, 11(5): 508-518

[16]

Bhattacharjee N, Choudhary K, Manna B et al (2023) An assessment of progress and challenges in modelling of railway track transition zones. In: Smart geotechnics for smart societies. CRC Press, pp 2571–2574

[17]

Sakhare A, Farooq H, Nimbalkar S, et al.. Dynamic behavior of the transition zone of an integral abutment bridge. Sustainability, 2022, 14(7): 4118.

[18]

Yan B, Dai GL, Zhang HP. Beam-track interaction of high-speed railway bridge with ballast track. J Cent South Univ, 2012, 19(5): 1447-1453.

[19]

Alves Ribeiro C, Calçada R, Delgado R. Calibration and experimental validation of a dynamic model of the train-track system at a culvert transition zone. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2018, 14(5): 604-618.

[20]

Paixão A, Fortunato E, Calçada R. Transition zones to railway bridges: Track measurements and numerical modelling. Eng Struct, 2014, 80: 435-443.

[21]

Resende L, Finotti R, Barbosa F, et al.. Damage identification using convolutional neural networks from instantaneous displacement measurements via image processing. Struct Health Monit, 2024, 23(3): 1627-1640.

[22]

Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Masters BR (2009) Digital image processing, third edition. J Biomed Opt 14(2):029901

[23]

VFCO—Ferrovias Centro-Oeste (2025) Locomotivas: Catálogo de locomotivas brasileiras. VFCO, Brasil. http://vfco.brazilia.jor.br/. Accessed 18 Mar 2026

[24]

Chu KH, Dhar CL, Garg VK. Railway-bridge impact: simplified train and bridge model. J Struct Div, 1979, 105(9): 1823-1844.

[25]

Olsson M. Finite element, modal co-ordinate analysis of structures subjected to moving loads. J Sound Vib, 1985, 99(1): 1-12.

[26]

Zhai W, Sun X. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track. Veh Syst Dyn, 1994, 23(sup1): 603-615.

[27]

Canlı D, Şenyurt S. Bezier curves and surfaces with the generalized $\alpha $-Bernstein operator. Symmetry, 2025, 17(2): 187.

[28]

Zhang N, Xia H, Guo WW, et al.. A vehicle-bridge linear interaction model and its validation. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2010, 10(2): 335-361.

[29]

Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures, 2006. New Jersey, Prentice Hall

[30]

Zhang X, Thompson D, Jeong H, et al.. Measurements of the high frequency dynamic stiffness of railway ballast and subgrade. J Sound Vib, 2020, 468. ArticleID: 115081

[31]

Wu Y-S, Yang Y-B, Yau J-D. Three-dimensional analysis of train-rail-bridge interaction problems. Veh Syst Dyn, 2001, 36(1): 1-35.

[32]

Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Delgado R, et al.. Finite-element model calibration of a railway vehicle based on experimental modal parameters. Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51(6): 821-856.

[33]

Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning, 2006. New York, Springer

[34]

Cloug RW, Penzien J. Dynamics of structures, 1993, 2, New York, McGraw-Hill

[35]

Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical optimization, 1999. New York, Springer.

[36]

MathWorks (2024) MATLAB Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide. Natick, MA

[37]

Nogueira FMA, Barbosa FS. Novel approach for precise identification of vibration frequencies and damping ratios from free vibration decay time histories data of nonlinear single degree of freedom models. Int J Non Linear Mech, 2024, 167. ArticleID: 104867

[38]

Kerr AD. Fundamentals of railway track engineering, 2003, 1, Omaha, Simmons-Boardman

[39]

Kouroussis G, Connolly DP, Verlinden O. Railway-induced ground vibrations—a review of vehicle effects. Int J Rail Transp, 2014, 2(2): 69-110.

[40]

CEN (2017) EN 13848-5:2017 Railway applications—track—track geometry quality—part 5: geometric quality levels. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

[41]

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) (2023) Track Safety Standards, 49 CFR Part 213, §213.63, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/part-213. Accessed 18 Aug 2025

[42]

Papagiannopoulos GA, Hatzigeorgiou GD. On the use of the half-power bandwidth method to estimate damping in building structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2011, 31(7): 1075-1079.

[43]

López-Aragón JA, Puchol V, Astiz MA. Influence of the modal damping ratio calculation method in the analysis of dynamic events obtained in structural health monitoring of bridges. J Civ Struct Health Monit, 2024, 14(5): 1191-1213.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico(407256/2022-9)

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais(APQ-00032-24)

Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes(TED UFJF-DNIT)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/