A general and robust 3D finite element dynamics framework for railway vehicle–bridge interaction with nonlinear wheel–rail contact modeling

Abstract

A key challenge in 3D finite element models of coupled railway vehicle–bridge dynamics is the rigorous definition of kinematic constraints and the development of an efficient, robust solution. This paper presents a novel approach that can be implemented in general finite element software using constraint equations tailored to wheel–rail contact behavior, essential for analyzing lateral vehicle–bridge interactions. The method employs absolute coordinates to describe the motion of nodes defining the track position and orientation for each wheelset, without assuming infinitesimal displacements or rotations. This general formulation enables realistic simulations of extreme scenarios involving large lateral movements caused by strong winds or earthquakes. The proposed wheel–rail contact model is first validated against published results, and a 3D numerical example demonstrates the method’s performance and capabilities.

Keywords

Railway vehicle–bridge interaction / Wheel–rail contact / Finite element method / Kinematic constraints / Multibody dynamics / Nonlinear dynamics

References

[1] Zhai W, Han Z, Chen Z, et al.Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 57(7): 984-1027.

[2] Montenegro PA, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, et al.Assessment of train running safety on bridges: a literature review. Eng Struct, 2021, 241(3112425

[3] Frýba LDynamics of railway bridges, 19962PragueThomas Telford

[4] Yang YB, Yau JD, Wu YSVehicle-bridge interaction dynamics: with applications to high-speed railways2004SingaporeWorld Scientific

[5] Tanabe M, Wakui H, Matsumoto N, et al.Computational model of a shinkansen train running on the railway structure and the industrial applications. J Mater Process Technol2003, 140(1–3): 705-710.

[6] Xia H, Zhang N, De Roeck G. Dynamic analysis of high speed railway bridge under articulated trains. Comput Struct, 2003, 81(26–27): 2467-2478.

[7] Xu YL, Zhang N, Xia H. Vibration of coupled train and cable-stayed bridge systems in cross winds. Eng Struct, 2004, 26(10): 1389-1406.

[8] Shabana AA, Zaazaa KE, Sugiyama HRailroad vehicle dynamics. A computational approach, 2008, Boca Raton: CRC Press

[9] Nguyen DV, Kim KD, Warnitchai P. Simulation procedure for vehicle-substructure dynamic interactions and wheel movements using linearized wheel-rail interfaces. Finite Elem Anal Des2009, 45(5): 341-356.

[10] Antolín P, Goicolea JM, Oliva J, Astiz MA. Nonlinear train-bridge lateral interaction using a simplified wheel-rail contact method within a finite element framework. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn, 2012, 7(4041014

[11] Antolín P, Zhang N, Goicolea JM, et al.Consideration of nonlinear wheel–rail contact forces for dynamic vehicle–bridge interaction in high-speed railways. J Sound Vib, 2013, 335): 1231-1251.

[12] Zhai W, Xia H, Cai C, et al.High-speed train-track-bridge dynamic interactions—part I: theoretical model and numerical simulation. Int J Rail Transp, 2013, 1(1–2): 3-24.

[13] Qiao H, Xia H, Du X. Dynamic analysis of an integrated train-bridge-foundation-soil system by the substructure method. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2018, 18(5): 1850069.

[14] Xiao X, Ren WX. A versatile 3D vehicle-track-bridge element for dynamic analysis of the railway bridges under moving train loads. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2019, 194):1950050.

[15] Liu Y, Gu Q. A modified numerical substructure method for dynamic analysis of vehicle-track-bridge systems. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2020, 20(12):2050134.

[16] Montenegro PA, Ribeiro D, Ortega M, et al.Impact of the train-track-bridge system characteristics in the runnability of high-speed trains against crosswinds—part I: running safety. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2022, 224104974

[17] Pan J, Gu Q, Guo W, Liu H. Efficient modeling and safety analysis of train-track-bridge systems using a unified double-coordinate model. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2024, 26: 2541008.

[18] Zhang N, Xia H, Guo WW. Vehicle-bridge interaction analysis under high-speed trains. J Sound Vib, 2008, 309(3–5):407-425.

[19] Majka M, Hartnett M. Effects of speed, load and damping on the dynamic response of railway bridges and vehicles. Comput Struct, 2008, 86(6): 556-572.

[20] Kwark JW, Choi ES, Kim YJ, et al.Dynamic behavior of two-span continuous concrete bridges under moving high-speed train. Comput Struct, 2004, 82(4–5): 463-474.

[21] Song MK, Noh HC, Choi CK. A new three-dimensional finite element analysis model of high-speed train-bridge interactions. Eng Struct, 2003, 25(13): 1611-1626.

[22] Oliva J, Goicolea JM, Antolín P, Astiz MA. Relevance of a complete road surface description in vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics. Eng Struct, 2013, 56: 466-476.

[23] Kwasniewski L, Li H, Wekezer J, Malachowski J. Finite element analysis of vehicle–bridge interaction. Finite Elem Anal Des, 2006, 42(11): 950-959.

[24] Henchi K, Fafard M, Talbot M, Dhatt G. An efficient algorithm for dynamic analysis of bridges under moving vehicles using a coupled modal and physical components approach. J Sound Vib, 1998, 212(4): 663-683.

[25] Neves S, Montenegro P, Azevedo A, Calçada R. A direct method for analyzing the nonlinear vehicle-structure interaction. Eng Struct, 2014, 69: 83-89.

[26] Zhang N, Xia H, Guo WW, De Roeck G. A vehicle bridge linear interaction model and its validation. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2010, 10(2): 335-361.

[27] Olmos JM, Astiz MA. Analysis of the lateral dynamic response of high pier viaducts under high-speed train travel. Eng Struct, 2013, 56: 1384-1401.

[28] Montenegro P, Neves S, Calçada R, et al.Wheel-rail contact formulation for analyzing the lateral train-structure dynamic interaction. Comput Struct, 2015, 152: 200-214.

[29] Dimitrakopoulos EG, Zeng Q. A three-dimensional dynamic analysis scheme for the interaction between trains and curved railway bridges. Comput Struct, 2015, 149: 43-60.

[30] Montenegro PA, Calçada R. Wheel–rail contact model for railway vehicle–structure interaction applications: development and validation. Railw Eng Sci, 2023, 31(3): 181-206.

[31] Chen G, Zhai W. A new wheel/rail spatially dynamic coupling model and its verification. Veh Syst Dyn, 2004, 41(4): 301-322.

[32] Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Silva M. A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2007, 45(2): 165-189.

[33] Wu Y, Yang Y, Yau J. Three-dimensional analysis of train-rail-bridge interaction problems. Veh Syst Dyn, 2001, 36: 1-35.

[34] Yau JD, Yang YB. Vibration reduction for cable-stayed bridges traveled by high-speed trains. Finite Elem Anal Des, 2004, 40(3): 341-359.

[35] Yang F, Fonder GA. An iterative solution method for dynamic response of bridge-vehicle system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 1996, 25(2): 195-215.

[36] Shabana AA, Sany JR. A survey of rail vehicle track simulations and flexible multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn, 2001, 26(2): 179-210.

[37] Romero I. The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods. Comput Mech, 2004, 34(2): 121-133.

[38] Crisfield MA, Jelenić G. Objectivity of strain measures in geometrically exact 3D beam theory and its finite element implementation. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1998, 455(1983): 1125-1147.

[39] Claus H, Schiehlen W. Modeling and simulation of railway bogie structural vibrations. Veh Syst Dyn, 1997, 29(1): 538-552.

[40] Spurrier RA. Comment on singularity-free extraction of a quaternion from direction cosine matrix. J Spacecr Rockets, 1978, 15(4): 255.

[41] Dassault Systems (2023) Abaqus 2023, Abaqus unified FEA software

[42] Hertz H. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper und über die Härte. Jorunal für reine und agewandte Mathematik, 1882, 92: 157-171

[43] Pascal JP, Sauvage G. New method for reducing the multicontact wheel/rail problem to one equivalent contact patch. Veh Syst Dyn, 1992, 20(sup1): 475-489.

[44] Piotrowski J, Chollet H. Wheel-rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact. Veh Syst Dyn, 2005, 43(6–7): 455-483.

[45] Johnson KLContact mechanics, 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[46] Ayasse JB, Chollet H, Pascal JP (1987) Modelisation simplifiee d’un bogie avec frottement sec Tech. rep. INRETS

[47] Kik W, Piotrowski J (1996) A fast approximate method to calculate normal load at contact between wheel and rail creep forces during rolling In: Proceedings of the second mini conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems Budapest

[48] Linder C (1997) Verschleiss von Eisenbahnradern mit Unrundheiten Dissertation ETH

[49] Kalker JJ (1996) Book of Tables for the Hertzian Creep-Force Law In: 2nd mini conference on contact mechanics and wear of wheel/rail systems Budapest, pp 11–20

[50] Vollebregt EAH (2012) User guide for CONTACT. Vollebregt & Kalker’s rolling and sliding contact model. Technical report, VORtech BV, Delft, Holanda

[51] Kalker JJ. The principle of virtual work and its dual for contact problems. Ing Arch1986, 56(6): 453-467.

[52] Kalker JJ. Numerical calculation of the elastic field in a half-space. Commun Appl Numer Methods, 1986, 2: 401-410.

[53] Kalker JJThree-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact (solid mechanics and its applications), 1990, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[54] Shackleton P, Iwnicki SD (2006) Wheel–rail contact benchmark. Technical report. The Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester

[55] Shackleton P, Iwnicki SD. Comparison of wheel–rail contact codes for railway vehicle simulation: an introduction to the Manchester Contact Benchmark and initial results. Veh Syst Dyn2008, 46(1–2): 129-149.

[56] European Committee for Standarization (2008) Railway applications—aerodynamics—part 6: requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment. EN14067-6, Brussels

[57] Simiu E, Scanlan RHWind effects on structures, 19963New YorkWiley

[58] European Railway Agency (2008) Technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘rolling stock’ sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system

[59] International Union of Railways (2007) Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour—safety—track fatigue—running behaviour. UIC Leaflet 518

[60] Simó JC, Vu-Quoc L. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions—a geometrically exact approach. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1988, 66(2): 125-161.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung(214987)

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme(101121765)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)