Integration of fatigue life assessment into structural optimization of a railway vehicle bogie frame: development and application of a new methodology

Abstract

Rolling stock manufacturers are increasingly developing innovative structural solutions aimed at enhancing the quality and reliability of railway vehicle components, thereby enhancing the existing standard platforms. Structural optimization processes represent an effective strategy to reduce manufacturing costs by promoting geometries that are simpler to design and fabricate. While structural optimization is now a well-established practice in the railway sector, the integration of fatigue considerations into this process remains limited. Although several studies in the literature attempt to address fatigue through various approaches, none have proven entirely satisfactory. This research aims to bridge this gap by introducing a novel methodology capable of automatically computing fatigue-related parameters, thereby enabling a parallel fatigue performance evaluation throughout the entire optimization process, iteration by iteration. The methodology is implemented via a dedicated software tool, which can be adapted with minimal modifications to interface with most commercial finite element platforms. The proposed approach has been applied to the structural optimization of a metro bogie frame. The methodology was then employed in multiple activities: iterative fatigue monitoring during the optimization process; extension of a previous study by incorporating fatigue behavior; reconstruction of the final post-optimization geometry based on fatigue-driven design considerations, thus ensuring manufacturability and fatigue resistance. Although not all potential uses have been fully explored, the proposed methodology has demonstrated its effectiveness as a valuable tool for integrating fatigue into structural optimization, ultimately enabling the designer to reconstruct fatigue-aware final geometries.

Keywords

Structural topological optimization / Fatigue assessment / Railway vehicle dynamics / Railway engineering / Railway vehicle design / Casting design

References

[1] Zhang LX, Meng XJ, Ding ZJet al. . Simulation-based reliability design optimization method for industrial robot structural design. Appl Sci. 2023, 13(6. 3776

[2] Albers A, Ottnad J (2009) Integrated structural and controller optimization for lightweight robot design. In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Paris, France, December 7–10, 2009

[3] Guo S, Gao J, Guo J et al (2016) Design of the structural optimization for the upper limb rehabilitation robot. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China, 7–10 August 2016. IEEE, pp 1185–1190

[4] Shanmugasundar G, Sivaramakrishnan R, Meganathan Set al. . Structural optimization of an five degrees of freedom (T-3R-T) robot manipultor using finite element analysis. Mater Today Proc. 2019, 16: 1325-1332.

[5] Pietropaoli M, Ahlfeld R, Montomoli F et al (2016) Design for additive manufacturing: internal channel optimization. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Volume 5B: Heat Transfer, Seoul, South Korea, 13–17 June 2016

[6] Kirsch KL, Thole KA. Experimental investigation of numerically optimized wavy microchannels created through additive manufacturing. J Turbomach. 2018, 1402. 021002

[7] Li Z, Zheng X. Review of design optimization methods for turbomachinery aerodynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2017, 93: 1-23.

[8] Bandini A, Cascino A, Meli Eet al. . Improving aeromechanical performance of compressor rotor blisk with topology optimization. Energies. 2024, 178. 1883

[9] Korta J, Raniolo R, Danti Met al. . Multi-objective optimization of a car body structure. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst. 2012, 53): 1143-1152.

[10] Leiva JP (2011) Structural optimization methods and techniques to design efficient car bodies. In: Proceedings of International Automotive Body Congress 2011, Troy, Michigan, USA, 9–10 November 2011. Curran Associates, Inc., NY, pp 190–213

[11] Christensen J, Bastien C. Nonlinear optimization of vehicle safety structures: Modeling of structures subjected to large deformations. 2015, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann

[12] Miao BR, Luo YX, Peng QMet al. . Multidisciplinary design optimization of lightweight carbody for fatigue assessment. Mater Des. 2020, 194. 108910

[13] Cho JG, Koo JS, Jung HS. A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. J Mech Sci Technol. 2016, 30(2): 673-681.

[14] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. Comparative analysis and dynamic size optimization of aluminum and carbon fiber thin-walled structures of a railway vehicle car body. Materials. 2025, 18(7): 1501.

[15] Koenig J (2011) Integral consideration of the lightweight design for railway vehicles. Paper presented at Young Researchers Seminar 2011, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 8–10 June, 2011

[16] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. Dynamic size optimization approach to support railway carbody lightweight design process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2023, 2377871-881.

[17] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. A strategy for lightweight designing of a railway vehicle car body including composite material and dynamic structural optimization. Railw Eng Sci. 2023, 31(4): 340-350.

[18] Srivastava PK, Shukla S. Topology optimization: weight reduction of Indian railway freight bogie side frame. Int J Mech Eng. 2021, 6: 4374-4383

[19] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. Development of a methodology for railway bolster beam design enhancement using topological optimization and manufacturing constraints. Eng. 2024, 5(3): 1485-1498.

[20] Yamamoto M. Non-parametric optimization of railway wheel web shape based on fatigue design criteria. Int J Fatigue. 2020, 134. 105463

[21] Xiu R, Spiryagin M, Wu Qet al. . Fatigue life prediction for locomotive bogie frames using virtual prototype technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2021, 235(9): 1122-1131.

[22] European Committee for Standardization (2023) Railway applications – Wheelsets and bogies – Method of specifying the structural requirements of bogie frames (EN 13749:2021+A1:2023)

[23] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. Development of a design procedure combining topological optimization and a multibody environment: application to a tram motor bogie frame. Vehicles. 2024, 6(4): 1843-1856.

[24] Mi C, Li W, Xiao Xet al. . Lifetime assessment and optimization of a welded A-type frame in a mining truck considering uncertainties of material properties and structural geometry and load. Appl Sci. 2019, 9(5. 918

[25] Zhou W, Zhang G, Wang Het al. . Experimental fatigue evaluation of bogie frames on metro trains. Machines. 2022, 1011. 1003

[26] Guo F, Wu SC, Liu JXet al. . Fatigue life assessment of bogie frames in high-speed railway vehicles considering gear meshing. Int J Fatigue. 2020, 132. 105353

[27] Jameson A (1995) Gradient based optimization methods. MAE Technical Report No.2057, Princeton University

[28] Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Direzione Generale per le Investigazioni Ferroviarie (2012) Relazione di indagine sull’incidente ferroviario del 29 giugno 2009 nella stazione di Viareggio (Investigation report on the railway accident of 29 June 2009 at Viareggio station). https://www.studio-gabrielli.it/documenti/relazione-viareggio-2009.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2025

[29] European Committee for Standardization. Railway applications – Requirements for bogies and running gears (EN 15827:2011). 2011, Brussels, CEN

[30] European Committee for Standardization. Railway applications – Welding of railway vehicles and components – Part 3: Design requirements (EN 15085–3:2023). 2023, Brussels, CEN

[31] European Committee for Standardization. Hot finished structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels – Part 1: Technical delivery conditions (EN 10210–1:2006). 2006, Brussels, CEN

[32] European Committee for Standardization. Hot rolled products of structural steels – Part 2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels (EN 10025–2:2004). 2004, Brussels, CEN

[33] European Committee for Standardization. Steels for quenching and tempering – Part 1: General technical delivery conditions (EN 10083–1:2006). 2006, Brussels, CEN

[34] European Committee for Standardization. Railway applications – Strength assessment of rail vehicle structures – Part 1: General (EN 17149–1:2024). 2024, Brussels, CEN

[35] European Rail Research Institute. Programme of tests to be carried out on wagons with steel underframe and body structure (suitable for being fitted with the automatic buffing and draw coupler) and on their cast steel frame bogies (ERRI B 12/RP 17). 1997, Utrecht, ORE

[36] European Rail Research Institute. Limit stress evaluation and fatigue assessment for bogies and vehicle bodies (ERRI B 12/RP 60). 1998, Utrecht, ORE

[37] Yüksel Ç. Microstructural analysis of EN-GJS-450-10 ductile cast iron via vibrational casting. China Foundry. 2020, 174): 272-278.

[38] Cascino A, Meli E, Rindi A. A new strategy for railway bogie frame designing combining structural–topological optimization and sensitivity analysis. Vehicles. 2024, 6(2): 651-665.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)