Quantifying the influence of sleeper spacing on lateral resistance using a novel experimental method

Abstract

Lateral resistance, principally dictated by the interaction between sleepers (ties) and ballast, is a fundamental property of ballasted railway track which is critical to overall track stability and safety. This study investigates the influence of sleeper spacing on lateral resistance to support overall track system design and track safety management. A novel multi-sleeper push test (MSPT) methodology, utilising both a kinematic restraint to better replicate track conditions and a state-of-the-art digital image correlation (DIC) system to measure surface ballast movement, has been used to evaluate the lateral resistance behaviour of two different sleeper types (concrete and steel) under seven different sleeper spacing conditions (550–850 mm). This is the first direct comparison of modern concrete and steel sleeper variants under these conditions. It is found that both sleeper types exhibit similar lateral resistance behaviour at small displacements (less than 3 mm) but, regardless of the spacing used, steel sleepers have significantly greater lateral resistance beyond this point. Although it depends on the assessment method used, concrete sleepers demonstrated an optimum spacing of approximately 675 mm, whilst steel sleepers showed highest resistance at approximately 706 mm. However, concrete sleepers showed less sensitivity to changes in spacing compared to steel sleepers, which retained high resistance over a narrower range of spacings. These findings contribute to track safety management by improving buckling mitigation strategies and component selection, whilst unlocking the ability to assess system-level impacts to aid the pursuit of more sustainable railway infrastructure design.

Keywords

Sleeper / Ballast / Lateral resistance / Multi-sleeper push test / Railway track

References

[1] Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway dynamics. 20061Boca Raton, CRC Press.

[2] Zhao J, Chan AC, Burrow MN. Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information. J Oper Res Soc. 2007, 58(8): 1047-1055.

[3] Liu J, Du S, Liu Get al. . Influence of unsupported sleepers on the dynamic stability of ballasted bed based on wheelset impact tests. Railw Eng Sci. 2023, 31(1): 52-60.

[4] Kish A, Samavedam G (1991) Dynamic buckling of continuous welded rail track: theory, tests, and safety concepts. In: Conference on lateral track stability. St Louis, No. 1289, Transportation Research Record.

[5] Ellis I (2001) Track terminology (British Railway Track). Permanent Way Institution, Ingatestone

[6] Sañudo R, Miranda M, Alonso Bet al. . Sleepers spacing analysis in railway track infrastructure. Infrastructures. 2022, 7(6. 83

[7] Koyama E, Ito K, Hayano ket al. . A new approach for evaluating lateral resistance of railway ballast associated with extended sleeper spacing. Soils Found. 2021, 616): 1565-1580.

[8] Sutar A, Tande S. Effect of H-beam and double channel sleeper spacing and positioning on steel girder railway bridge using FEM. Innov Infrastruct Sol. 2024, 9(12): 479.

[9] Sañudo Ortega R, Pombo Jet al. . The importance of sleepers spacing in railways. Constr Build Mater. 2021, 300. 124326

[10] Bogacz R, Czyczuła W, Konowrocki R. Influence of sleepers shape and configuration on track-train dynamics. Shock Vib. 2014, 2014393867

[11] Grassie SL. Rail corrugation: characteristics, causes, and treatments. Proceed Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2009, 2236581-596.

[12] Schmid F. Best practice in wheel–rail interface management for mixed traffic railways. 20101Birmingham, University of Birmingham Press

[13] Hasan N. Railroad tie spacing related to wheel-load distribution and ballast pressure. Pract Period Struct Des Constr. 2015, 20(4. 04014047

[14] Wu T, Thompson DJ. The influence of random sleeper spacing and ballast stiffness on the vibration behaviour of railwaytrack. Acta Acust United Acust. 2000, 862): 313-321

[15] Network Rail (2021) Design and construction of track, NR/L2/TRK/2102. London

[16] Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français. SNCF 0221: Règles de conception de la voie ferrée. Paris

[17] Deutsche Bahn (2021) Ril 800.0110: Planung von Oberbauarten. Berlin

[18] Zhao W, Xiao H, Li X. Mechanical behavior analysis of enhanced railway sleepers for small radius curves. Comput Part Mech. 2025, 12(5): 2745-2758.

[19] Sañudo R, Cerrada M, Alonso Bet al. . Analysis of the influence of support positions in transition zones. A numerical analysis. Constr Build Mater. 2017, 145: 207-217.

[20] Słodczyk I, Whittle J, Fletcher Det al. . Improved lateral resistance test: investigating the effect of a partial uplift restraint during a single sleeper push test. Transp Res Rec. 2025, 2679(4): 554-569.

[21] Whittle JW, Danks S, Słodczyk Iet al. . Using digital image correlation (DIC) to measure railway ballast movement in full-scale laboratory testing of sleeper lateral resistance. Proceed Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2024, 238(8): 1037-1041.

[22] Chi Y, Xiao H, Wang Yet al. . Experimental study and numerical simulation of the impact of under-sleeper pads on the dynamic and static mechanical behavior of heavy-haul railway ballast track. Railw Eng Sci. 2024, 32(3): 384-400.

[23] Whittle JW, Słodczyk IA, Danks Set al. . Investigating the effect of railway track ballast and bed conditions on the lateral resistance of timber, concrete, steel, and composite sleepers using a novel test methodology. Eng Struct. 2025, 340. 120769

[24] Koike Y, Nakamura T, Hayano Ket al. . Numerical method for evaluating the lateral resistance of sleepers in ballasted tracks. Soils Found. 2014, 54(3): 502-514.

[25] British Standards Institution (2000) Steel sleepers, BS 500:2000. London

[26] British Steel Limited (2016) Steel sleepers—installation guide. Scunthorpe

[27] Sussmann T, Kish A, Trosino M. Influence of track maintenance on lateral resistance of concrete-Tie track. Transp Res Rec. 2003, 1825(1): 56-63.

[28] Bian X, Cai W, Luo Zet al. . Image-aided analysis of ballast particle movement along a high-speed railway. Engineering. 2023, 27: 161-177.

[29] Wang L, Meguid M, Mitri HS. Impact of ballast fouling on the mechanical properties of railway ballast: insights from discrete element analysis. Processes. 2021, 9(8. 1331

[30] Ngamkhanong C, Kaewunruen S, Baniotopoulos C. Influences of ballast degradation on railway track buckling[J. Eng Fail Anal. 2021, 122. 105252

[31] Chi Y, Xiao H, Zhang Zet al. . Influence of wind-blown sand content on the mechanical quality state of ballast bed in sandy railways. Railw Eng Sci. 2024, 324): 533-550.

[32] Xu C, Ito K, Hayano Ket al. . Combined effect of supported and unsupported sleepers on lateral ballast resistance in ballasted railway track. Transp Geotech. 2023, 38. 100913

[33] Le Pen LM, Powrie W. Contribution of base, crib, and shoulder ballast to the lateral sliding resistance of railway track: a geotechnical perspective. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011, 225(2): 113-128.

[34] De Iorio A, Grasso M, Penta Fet al. . On the ballast–sleeper interaction in the longitudinal and lateral directions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018, 232(2): 620-631.

[35] International Union of Railways (2019) Lateral track resistance (LTR). Paris

[36] De Iorio A, Grasso M, Penta Fet al. . Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 1. Planning and experimental setup. Frattura Integrità Strutt. 2014, 8(30): 478-485.

[37] Pucillo GP (2020) Thermal buckling in CWR tracks: critical aspects of experimental techniques for lateral track resistance evaluation. In: 2020 Joint Rail Conference. St. Louis, pp V001T08A009

[38] Pucillo GP, Penta F, Catena Met al. . On the lateral stability of the sleeper-ballast system. Procedia Struct Integr. 2018, 12: 553-560.

[39] Reiner IA (1977) Lateral resistance of railroad track. FRA/ORD-77/41, United States Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.

[40] Van’t Zand J, Moraal J (1997) Ballast resistance under three dimensional loading. Dissertation, Delft University

[41] McHenry M, LoPresti J (2016) Field evaluation of sleeper and fastener designs for freight operations. In: the 11th World Congress on Railway Research (WCRR2016), Milan, 29 May–2 June, 2016

[42] US Federal Railroad Administration (2008) Evaluation of tie plate cracking on composite ties. RR08–21, Pueblo

[43] Network Rail (2021) Track ballast and stoneblower aggregate. NR/L2/TRK/8100, London

[44] British Steel Limited (2023) Development of a new lateral resistance test rig. 2023-I005, Scunthorpe

[45] Whittle JW, Slodczyk I (2024) Lateral resistance testing and finding applications. In: British Steel Annual Technical Forum, Scunthorpe, 14 May 2024

[46] Aela P, Jitsangiam P, Li Xet al. . Influence of ballast bulk density and loading conditions on lateral resistance of concrete sleeper components. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2023, 237(10): 1284-1293.

[47] Jing G, Fu H, Aela P. Lateral displacement of different types of steel sleepers on ballasted track. Constr Build Mater. 2018, 186: 1268-1275.

[48] Network Rail (2023) Inspection & maintenance of permanent way: track geometry—inspections and minimum actions, NR/L2/TRK/001/mod11. London

[49] Montalban L, Zamorano C, Morales Set al. . Study of the influence of sleepers’ material on track dynamics through numerical simulations. J Vibroeng. 2015, 17(7): 3832-3843

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council(EP/S022635/1)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)