Wheel–rail-induced derailment analysis: a comprehensive literature review of experimental and simulation-based approaches

Abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive review of the literature on the role of wheel–rail contact mechanics in train derailments. Using experimental and simulation methods, this review examines various research efforts that analyze how contact forces influence wheel climb and derailment dynamics. The related studies are summarized, and insights are provided on how they have contributed to understanding derailments and enhancing overall rolling stock safety. The review shows significant progress across different specialized areas within the broader topic of derailments. This includes advanced, state-of-the-art testing rigs, high-fidelity models that accurately replicate field conditions, materials that help prevent derailments, and wheel and rail profiles that reduce derailment risks. However, the accuracy of testing and modeling often requires more complex setups, sophisticated data analysis techniques, and greater resources. Despite these advances over the past few decades, further scientific research is necessary to understand better the root causes of events like wheel climb derailments under controlled and repeatable conditions.

Keywords

Wheel–rail interaction / Derailments / Roller rig / Safety / Railroad industry / Simulation / FEM / Analytical / Nadal’s derailment coefficient / Wheel climb / Contact forces / Wheel and rail defects

References

[1] Association of American Railroads. Freight rail history. https://www.aar.org/chronology-of-americas-freight-railroads/. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[2] Bailey J (2021) The steam age—evolution of steam engines and the 1st steam locomotive. In: Inventive geniuses who changed the world. Springer, Cham, pp 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81381-9

[3] Oldest railroads in North America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_railroads_in_No-rth_America. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[4] Eurostat. Europe freight rail network. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[5] Federal Railroad Administration. USA freight rail network. https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/freight-rail-overview. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[6] European Commission. European rail lines track length. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ttr00003/default/table?lang=en. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[7] Kehoe O (2003) Economics of truck and rail freight transportation: A look at public and external costs and the truck-rail modal split. http://kehoe.org/owen/docs/truck_vs_rail.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[8] Association of American Railroads. Railroad efficiency. https://www.aar.org/issue/freight-rail-climate-change/. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[9] Tolliver D, Lu P, Benson D (2013) Analysis of railroad energy efficiency in the United States. MPC report no. 13-250, North Dakota State University

[10] Evans AW. The economics of railway safety. Res Transp Econ. 2013, 43(1): 137-147.

[11] BNSF Railway (2023) Derailment with bridge strike and fatality. Railway derailment with bridge strike and fatality. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RIR2503.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[12] Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (2023) Trolley derailment. http://www.ntsb.gov. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[13] National Transportation Safety Board (2025) CSX transportation head-on train collision. Railroad investigation report: RIR-25-02

[14] Batarlienė N. Improving safety of transportation of dangerous goods by railway transport. Infrastructures. 2020, 5(7): 54.

[15] Zhang Z, Liu X, Holt K. Positive train control (PTC) for railway safety in the United States: policy developments and critical issues. Util Policy. 2018, 51: 33-40.

[16] Palley J (2011) Impact of the staggers rail act of 1980. https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/fra_net/1645/STAGGER_%20RAIL_ACT_OF_1980_updated_31811.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[17] Liu X, Saat MR, Barkan CPL. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2012, 22891154-163.

[18] Zhang W (2020) Experimental technologies of high-speed trains for dynamic performance. In: Dynamics of coupled systems in high-speed railways: theory and practice. Amsterdam, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813375-0.00007-8

[19] Wang W, Li GX. Development of a simulation model of a high-speed vehicle for a derailment mechanism. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2010, 224(2): 103-113.

[20] Jun X, Qingyuan Z. A study on mechanical mechanism of train derailment and preventive measures for derailment. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005, 43(2): 121-147.

[21] Blader FB (1990) A review of literature and methodologies in the study of derailment caused by excessive forces at the wheel-rail interface. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

[22] Jeong DY, Lyons ML, Orringer O et al (2009) Equations of motion for train derailment dynamics. In: ASME 2007 rail transportation division fall technical conference, September 11–12, 2007, Chicago, pp 21–27

[23] Sweet LM, Karmel A (1984) Wheelclimb derailment processes and derailment criteria. Federal Railroad Administration Report1984

[24] Liu X. Statistical causal analysis of freight-train derailments in the United States. J Transp Eng Part A Syst. 2017, 143(2. 04016007

[25] Liu X, Barkan CPL, Saat MR. Analysis of derailments by accident cause. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2011, 22611): 178-185.

[26] Liu X, Saat MR, Qin Xet al. . Analysis of U.S. freight-train derailment severity using zero-truncated negative binomial regression and quantile regression. Accid Anal Prev. 2013, 59: 87-93.

[27] Liu X, Saat MR, Barkan CPL. Freight-train derailment rates for railroad safety and risk analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2017, 98: 1-9.

[28] Barkan CPL, Dick CT, Anderson R. Railroad derailment factors affecting hazardous materials transportation risk. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2003, 1825(1): 64-74.

[29] Wilson N, Fries R, Witte Met al. . Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests: a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011, 49(7): 1113-1157.

[30] Hernandez J (2023) There are about 3 U.S. train derailments per day. They aren’t usually major disasters. https://www.npr.org/2023/03/09/1161921856/there-are-about-3-u-s-train-derailments-per-day-they-arent-usually-major-disaste. Accessed 22 Mar 2025

[31] National League of Cities (2023) Rail safety in communities across the U.S. https://www.nlc.org/resource/interactive-rail-safety-map-see-derailments-in-communities-across-the-u-s/. Accessed 22 Mar 2025

[32] Cao Y, An Y, Su Set al. . A statistical study of railway safety in China and Japan 1990–2020. Accid Anal Prev. 2022, 175. 106764

[33] Japan Transport Safety Board (2022) Summaries of major railway accident and incident reports. https://jtsb.mlit.go.jp/railrep.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2025

[34] Eurostat (2025) Railway safety statistics in the EU. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Railway_safety_statistics_in_the_EU. Accessed 22 Mar 2025

[35] Goto N (2007) Japan railway accident report—Fukuchiyama Line 2007. https://jtsb.mlit.go.jp/eng-rail_report/RA2007-3-1en.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[36] The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (2022) Derailment in Indian railways. https://cag.gov.in/webroot/uploads/download_audit_report/2022/Report-No.-22-of-2022_Railway_English_DSC-063a2dda55f3ce6.38649271.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[37] Sen PK, Bhiwapurkar M, Harsha SP (2020) Analysis of causes of rail derailment in India and corrective measures. In: Gupta VK, Varde PV, Kankar PK, Joshi N (eds) Reliability and risk assessment in engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3746-2_28

[38] Hertz H. Uber Die Beruhrung Fester Elastischer Korper Und Uber Die Harte”. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 1882, 92: 156-171.

[39] Radmehr A, Hosseinian Ahangarnejad A, Pan Y et al (2020) Wheel–rail contact patch geometry measurement and shape analysis under various loading conditions. In: 2020 joint rail conference, St. Louis, pp V001T13A005

[40] Kalker JJ. A simplified theory for non-Hertzian contact. Veh Syst Dyn. 1983, 12(1–3): 43-45.

[41] Kalker JJ. The computation of three-dimensional rolling contact with dry friction. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1979, 14(9): 1293-1307.

[42] Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. 1990, Dordrecht, Springer.

[43] Kalker JJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn. 1982, 11(1): 1-13.

[44] Vollebregt EAH (2023) User guide for CONTACT, rolling and sliding contact with friction. https://www.cmcc.nl/software/documentation/. Accessed 21 Mar 2025

[45] Meymand SZ, Keylin A, Ahmadian M. A survey of wheel–rail contact models for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016, 54(3): 386-428.

[46] Fang C, Jaafar SA, Zhou Wet al. . Wheel-rail contact and friction models: a review of recent advances. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2023, 237(10): 1245-1259.

[47] Vollebregt E. Detailed wheel/rail geometry processing with the conformal contact approach. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2021, 52(2): 135-167.

[48] Vollebregt E, Segal G. Solving conformal wheel–rail rolling contact problems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014, 52(Sup1): 455-468.

[49] Nadal MJ (1896) Theorie de la stabilite des locomotives, Part II: Mouvement de Lacet. Annales des Mines, France

[50] Santamaria J, Vadillo EG, Gomez J. Influence of creep forces on the risk of derailment of railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009, 47(6): 721-752.

[51] American Public Transportation Association (2007) Wheel load equalization of passenger railroad rolling stock. APTA PR-M-S-014-06, Rev. 1, Washington DC

[52] Zeng J, Wei L, Wu P. Safety evaluation for railway vehicles using an improved indirect measurement method of wheel–rail forces. J Mod Transp. 2016, 24(2): 114-123.

[53] Ling L, Xiao XB, Jin XS. Development of a simulation model for dynamic derailment analysis of high-speed trains. Acta Mech Sin. 2014, 30(6): 860-875.

[54] Pagaimo J, Magalhães H, Costa JNet al. . Derailment study of railway cargo vehicles using a response surface methodology. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022, 60(1): 309-334.

[55] Azizi M, Shahravi M, Ali Zakeri J. Determination of wheel loading reduction in railway track with unsupported sleepers and rail irregularities. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2021, 235(5): 631-643.

[56] Gong Y, Hu H, Xiao H. Analysis of wheel-rail force characteristics of type A metro bogie with a speed of 80 km/h. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021, 1846(1. 012042

[57] Weinstock H (1984) Wheel-climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety. In: Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting, New Orleans, 84-WA/RT-1

[58] Elkins J, Wu H. Angle of attack and distance-based criteria for flange climb derailment. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999, 33sup1): 293-305.

[59] Gilchrist AO, Brickle BV. A re-examination of the proneness to derailment of a railway wheel-set. J Mech Eng Sci. 1976, 18(3): 131-141.

[60] Sweet LM, Karmel A, Fairley SR. Derailment mechanics and safety criteria for complete rail vehicle trucks. Veh Syst Dyn. 1981, 10(2–3): 203-206.

[61] Spinola Barbosa R. A 3D contact force safety criterion for flange climb derailment of a railway wheel. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004, 42(5): 289-300.

[62] Shu X, Wilson N, Wu H et al (2005) A bi-parameter distance criterion for flange climb derailment. In: Joint Rail Conference, Pueblo, pp 9–17

[63] Zeng J, Guan QH. Study on flange climb derailment criteria of a railway wheelset. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008, 46(3): 239-251.

[64] Zeng J, Wu P. Study on the wheel/rail interaction and derailment safety. Wear. 2008, 265(9/10): 1452-1459.

[65] Durali M, Jalili MM. A new criterion for assessment of train derailment risk. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multibody Dyn. 2010, 224(1): 83-101

[66] Shabana AA. Nadal’s formula and high speed rail derailments. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2012, 7(4. 041003

[67] Guan Q, Zeng J, Jin X. An angle of attack-based derailment criterion for wheel flange climbing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2014, 2287): 719-729.

[68] Kuo CM, Lin CC. Analysis of derailment criteria. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016, 230(4): 1158-1163.

[69] Huang JY. Nadal’s limit (L/V) to wheel climb and two derailment modes. Eng Phys. 2021, 5(1. 8

[70] Zeng Y, Wilson N, Lundberg W et al (2021) Geometric criterion for flange climb derailment and IWS-based implementation. In: The IAVSD international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Saint Petersburg, pp 237–246

[71] Koo JS, Oh HS. A new derailment coefficient considering dynamic and geometrical effects of a single wheelset. J Mech Sci Technol. 2014, 289): 3483-3498.

[72] Shabana AA, Ling H (2023) Railroad wheel climb and sliding. Technical report MBS2023-5-UIC, University of Illinois Chicago

[73] Shabana AA, Ling H. Spatial dynamic formulation of the L/V ratio and mechanics of wheel climb. Nonlinear Dyn. 2023, 111(16): 14731-14750.

[74] Lewis R, Olofsson U. Wheel–rail interface handbook. 2009, Boca Raton, CRC Press.

[75] Marquis B, Greif R (2012) Application of Nadal limit for the prediction of wheel climb derailment. In: 2011 joint rail conference, Pueblo, pp 273–280

[76] Bocciolini L, Bracciali A, Benedetto DL et al (2014) Wayside measurement of lateral and vertical wheel rail forces for rolling stock homologation. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Ajaccio, Paper 171

[77] Matsumoto A, Sato Y, Ohno Het al. . Continuous observation of wheel/rail contact forces in curved track and theoretical considerations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012, 50(sup1): 349-364.

[78] Matsumoto A, Sato Y, Ohno H et al (2006) A new monitoring method of train derailment coefficient. In: IET international conference on railway condition monitoring, Birmingham, pp 136–140

[79] Matsumoto A, Sato Y, Ohno Het al. . A new measuring method of wheel–rail contact forces and related considerations. Wear. 2008, 265(9–10): 1518-1525.

[80] Cortis D, Bruner M, Malavasi G. Development of a wayside measurement system for the evaluation of wheel–rail lateral contact force. Measurement. 2020, 159. 107786

[81] Gómez E, Alonso A, Giménez JG et al (2012) Railway dynamometric wheelsets: a comparison of existing solutions and a proposal for the reduction of measurement errors. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on high-speed and intercity railways, Shenzhen and Hong Kong, pp 261–284

[82] Tanimoto M, Matsumoto K, Iwamoto A et al (2017) Remote monitoring system of derailment coefficient (L/V) for managing running safety of track and rolling stock in commercial line. In: Proceedings of the 1st international railway symposium, Aachen, pp 423–434

[83] Magel E, Tajaddini A, Trosino Met al. . Traction, forces, wheel climb and damage in high-speed railway operations. Wear. 2008, 265(9–10): 1446-1451.

[84] Wu P, Zhang F, Wang Jet al. . Review of wheel-rail forces measuring technology for railway vehicles. Adv Mech Eng. 2023, 15(3. 16878132231158991

[85] Bracciali A, Cavaliere F, Macherelli M et al (2014) Review of instrumented wheelset technology and applications. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Ajaccio, Paper 167

[86] Zhu T, Xiao S, Yang Get al. . An inverse dynamics method for railway vehicle systems. Transport. 2014, 291): 107-114.

[87] Wei L, Zeng J, Wu Pet al. . Indirect method for wheel–rail force measurement and derailment evaluation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014, 52(12): 1622-1641.

[88] Barbosa RS. Safety of a railway wheelset–derailment simulation with increasing lateral force. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009, 47(12): 1493-1510.

[89] Vollebregt EAH, Wilders P. FASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling contact algorithm. Comput Mech. 2011, 47(1): 105-116.

[90] Molatefi H, Mazraeh A. On the investigation of wheel flange climb derailment mechanism and methods to control it. J Theor Appl Mech. 2016, 54(2): 541-550.

[91] Shu X, Zeng Y, Wilson N et al (2019) Wheel/rail contact creep curve measurement and low speed wheel climb derailment investigation. In: Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Gothenburg pp 660–668

[92] Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. 2019, Boca Raton, CRC Press.

[93] Iijima H, Yoshida H, Suzuki Ket al. . A study on the prevention of wheel-climb derailment at low speed ranges. JR EAST Tech Rev. 2014, 30: 21-24

[94] Ishida H, Miyamoto T, Maebashi Eet al. . Safety assessment for flange climb derailment of trains running at low speeds on sharp curves. Q Rep RTRI. 2006, 47(2): 65-71.

[95] Nagumo Y, Tanifuji K, Imai J. Basic study of wheel flange climbing using model wheelset. Trans JSME Ser C. 2008, 74(738): 242-249.

[96] Nagase K, Wakabayashi Y, Sakahara H. A study of the phenomenon of wheel climb derailment: results of basic experiments using model bogies. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2002, 216(4): 237-247.

[97] Braghin F, Bruni S, Diana G. Experimental and numerical investigation on the derailment of a railway wheelset with solid axle. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006, 44(4): 305-325.

[98] Elkins J, Wu H (2000) New criteria for flange climb derailment. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ASME/IEEE joint railroad conference, Newark, pp 1–7

[99] Matej J. Controlled wheel flange climb derailment of the load-measuring wheel set on curved and straight track. Zesz Naukowe Inst Pojazdów. 2015, 1(101): 75-90

[100] O’Shea JJ, Shabana AA. Analytical and numerical investigation of wheel climb at large angle of attack. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016, 83(1): 555-577.

[101] O’Shea JJ, Shabana AA. Further investigation of wheel climb initiation: three-point contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multibody Dyn. 2017, 231(1): 121-132

[102] Transportation Research Board (2005) Flange climb derailment criteria and wheel/rail profile management and maintenance guidelines for transit operations. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[103] Iwnicki SD. The effect of profiles on wheel and rail damage. Int J Veh Struct Syst. 2009, 1(4): 99-104

[104] Shackleton P, Iwnicki S. Comparison of wheel–rail contact codes for railway vehicle simulation: an introduction to the Manchester Contact Benchmark and initial results. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008, 46(1–2): 129-149.

[105] Cummings S (2017) Update on AAR-2A wheel profile service tests. Transportation Technology Center. TTCI, Pueblo, Colorado

[106] Schultz J, Cummings S (2020) Analysis of AAR-2A wheel profile for locomotives. Transportation Technology Center. TTCI, Pueblo, Colorado

[107] Kumar N, Mantovani G, Radmehr A et al (2024) Estimation of wheel–rail contact patch geometry under curving conditions. In: AREMA 2024 Annual Conference & Expo, Louisville

[108] Mohammadzadeh S, Ghahremani S. Estimation of train derailment probability using rail profile alterations. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2010, 8(11): 1034-1053

[109] Mohammadzadeh S, Sangtarashha M, Molatefi H. A novel method to estimate derailment probability due to track geometric irregularities using reliability techniques and advanced simulation methods. Arch Appl Mech. 2011, 81(11): 1621-1637.

[110] Kardas-Cinal E. Spectral distribution of derailment coefficient in non-linear model of railway vehicle–track system with random track irregularities. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2013, 8(3. 031014

[111] Costa MA, Costa JN, Andrade ARet al. . Combining wavelet analysis of track irregularities and vehicle dynamics simulations to assess derailment risks. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023, 611): 150-176.

[112] Gullers P, Andersson L, Lundén R. High-frequency vertical wheel–rail contact forces—field measurements and influence of track irregularities. Wear. 2008, 265(9–10): 1472-1478.

[113] Kouroussis G, Caucheteur C, Kinet Det al. . Review of trackside monitoring solutions: from strain gages to optical fibre sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2015, 15(8): 20115-20139.

[114] Adachi M, Matsumoto A. Improvement of curving performance by expansion of gauge widening and additional measures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2012, 226(2): 203-215.

[115] Sundaram N, Sussmann T (2006) Development of gage widening projection parameter for the deployable gage restraint measurement system. U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C

[116] Shu X, Wilson N. Simulation of dynamic gauge widening and rail roll: effects on derailment and rolling contact fatigue. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008, 46(Sup1): 981-994.

[117] Radmehr A, Mirzaei SMH, Larson I et al (2025) Railroad track gage widening assessment using on-board Doppler LiDAR velocity measurements and unsupervised machine learning techniques. In: Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks III. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham

[118] Radmehr A, Ahmadian M (2023) Real-time wheel wear estimation using non-contact measurements. In: 20th international wheelset congress, Chicago

[119] Beagley TM, Pritchard C. Wheel/rail adhesion—the overriding influence of water. Wear. 1975, 35(2): 299-313.

[120] Radmehr A, Pan Y, Tajaddini A et al (2022) Wheel–rail contact force and traction analysis under wet and oil-contaminated conditions. In: Joint rail conference, Baltimore, p V001T07A002

[121] Pan Y, Radmehr A, Ahmadian M. Experimental evaluation of amount and repeated applications of top of rail friction modifiers on wear and adhesion. Int J Rail Transp. 2023, 11(6): 855-871.

[122] Kumar N, Radmehr A, Ahmadian M. Experimental evaluation of effect of leaves on railroad tracks in loss of braking. Machines. 2024, 12(5): 301.

[123] Kumar N, Radmehr A, Ahmadian M. Traction enhancement evaluation of magnetite and alumina. Int J Rail Transp. 2025.

[124] Ling L, Dhanasekar M, Thambiratnam DPet al. . Lateral impact derailment mechanisms, simulation and analysis. Int J Impact Eng. 2016, 94: 36-49.

[125] Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS. Wheel–rail wear and surface damage caused by adhesion sanding. Tribol Ser. 2003, 43: 731-741.

[126] Lan Q, Dhanasekar M, Handoko YA. Wear damage of out-of-round wheels in rail wagons under braking. Eng Fail Anal. 2019, 102: 170-186.

[127] Biazon L, Ferrer BP, Toro Aet al. . Correlations between rail grease formulation and friction, wear and RCF of a wheel/rail tribological pair. Tribol Int. 2021, 153. 106566

[128] Magel E (2011) Rolling contact fatigue: a comprehensive review. U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C

[129] Magel E, Sroba P, Sawley K et al (2004) Control of rolling contact fatigue of rails. In: Proceedings of the AREMA 2004 annual conferences, Nashville, pp 1–29

[130] Tawfik MN, Padzi MM, Abdullah Set al. . A review of the rolling contact fatigue of rail wheels under various stresses. J Fail Anal Prev. 2023, 23116-29.

Funding

Federal Railroad Administration(693JJ622C000028)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)