Simulating the effects of structural discontinuities on the long-term behavior of the ballasted railway track

Abstract

Structural discontinuities in railway tracks have proven challenging from a maintenance perspective. These discontinuities can lead to uneven settlements, reducing serviceability of the railway network and increasing the track’s dynamic loading. To optimize the long-term performance of railway structures, it is essential to evaluate different design solutions under varying loading conditions to identify potential risk factors early. Consequently, this study proposes a novel computational model for simulating the dynamic long-term behavior of ballasted railway tracks. The proposed model enables computationally efficient simulation and provides an innovative mathematical framework for analyzing the mechanical behavior of structural discontinuities, allowing detailed consideration of substructure and subsoil properties, including their variations along the longitudinal direction of the track. Simulations were conducted to investigate the effects of bridge transition zones and rail defects on the short- and long-term behavior of the track for two vehicle types. In addition, extensive field measurement data were utilized for model verification. Based on simulations, the axle load appears to be the primary factor influencing the long-term performance of railway transition zones. However, for more localized defect types, the significance of driving speed and the unsprung mass of rolling stock becomes more pronounced. Overall, the findings highlight the nonlinear relationship between vehicle loading and structural deterioration, emphasizing its strong dependence on track properties.

Keywords

Railway / Transition zone / Rail defects / Dynamic loading / Differential settlement

References

[1] Fortunato E, Paixão A, Calçada R. Railway track transition zones: design, construction, monitoring and numerical modelling. Int J Railw Technol, 2013, 2(4): 33-58

[2] Indraratna B, Sajjad MB, Ngo Tet al.. Improved performance of ballasted tracks at transition zones: a review of experimental and modelling approaches. Transp Geotech, 2019, 21 100260

[3] Lackenby J, Indraratna B, McDowell Get al.. Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading. Geotech, 2007, 57(6): 527-536

[4] Kolos A, Konon A, Chistyakov P. Change of ballast strength properties during particles abrasive wear. Procedia Eng, 2017, 189: 908-915

[5] Nurmikolu A (2005) Degradation and frost susceptibility of crushed rock aggregates used in structural layers of railway track. Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology

[6] Nålsund R. Effect of grading on degradation of crushed-rock railway ballast and on permanent axial deformation. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 2010, 2154(1): 149-155

[7] Selig ET, Waters JM. Track geotechnology and substructure management, 1994, London, Thomas Telford Publications

[8] Brecciaroli F, Kolisoja P (2006). Deformation behavior of railway embankment materials under repeat loading. Ratahallintokeskus, Helsinki

[9] Latvala J, Kolisoja P, Luomala H. The cyclic loading resistance of old railway track sub-ballast materials at different water contents. Transp Geotech, 2022, 35 100772

[10] Latvala J (2024) The effect of drainage on the functionality of railway track sub-ballast. Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology

[11] Indraratna B, Salim W, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Advanced rail geotechnology—ballasted track, 2011, Boca Raton, CRC Press

[12] Van Dyk BJ, Edwards JR, Dersch MSet al.. Evaluation of dynamic and impact wheel load factors and their application in design processes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(1): 33-43

[13] Li D, Hyslip J, Sussmann Tet al.. Railway geotechnics, 2019, Boca Raton, CRC Press

[14] Sañudo R, Dell’Olio L, Casado JAet al.. Track transitions in railways: a review. Constr Build Mater, 2016, 112: 140-157

[15] Esveld C (2001) Modern railway track. 2nd edn. MRT-Productions, Zaltbommel

[16] Johansson A, Nielsen JO. Out-of-round railway wheels—wheel–rail contact forces and track response derived from field tests and numerical simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2003, 217(2): 135-146

[17] Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S, Christie Det al.. Field assessment of the performance of a ballasted rail track with and without geosynthetics. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2010, 136(7): 907-917

[18] Peltomäki M (2021) Radan alusrakenteen ja pohjamaan kuormituskestävyysmitoituksen kehittäminen. Väyläviraston julkaisuja 59/2021. Väylävirasto Helsinki

[19] Ishida M, Moto T, Kono Aet al.. Influence of loose sleeper on track dynamics and bending fatigue of rail welds. Q Rep RTRI, 1999, 40(2): 80-85

[20] Varandas JN, Hölscher P, Silva MAG. Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transitions zones. Comput Struct, 2011, 89(13–14): 1468-1479

[21] Zhu JY, Thompson DJ, Jones CJC. On the effect of unsupported sleepers on the dynamic behaviour of a railway track. Veh Syst Dyn, 2011, 49(9): 1389-1408

[22] Grossoni I, Iwnicki S, Bezin Yet al.. Dynamics of a vehicle–track coupling system at a rail joint. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2015, 229(4): 364-374

[23] Nielsen JCO, Li X. Railway track geometry degradation due to differential settlement of ballast/subgrade—numerical prediction by an iterative procedure. J Sound Vib, 2018, 412: 441-456

[24] Lei X, Mao L. Dynamic response analyses of vehicle and track coupled system on track transition of conventional high speed railway. J Sound Vib, 2004, 271(3–5): 1133-1146

[25] Nasrollahi K, Nielsen JCO, Aggestam Eet al.. Prediction of long-term differential track settlement in a transition zone using an iterative approach. Eng Struct, 2023, 283 115830

[26] Varandas JN, Hölscher P, Silva MA. Settlement of ballasted track under traffic loading: application to transition zones. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2014, 228(3): 242-259

[27] Gallego I, Muñoz J, Rivas Aet al.. Vertical track stiffness as a new parameter involved in designing high-speed railway infrastructure. J Transp Eng, 2011, 137(12): 971-979

[28] Kalliainen A, Kolisoja P, Nurmikolu A. 3D finite element model as a tool for analyzing the structural behavior of a railway track. Procedia Eng, 2016, 143: 820-827

[29] Peltomäki M, Kolisoja P, Luomala H (2022) Modeling the loading behavior of railway structure under static load using a verified 3D finite element model. In: Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields. Trondheim, pp 517–526

[30] Sakhare A, Punetha P, Meena NKet al.. Dynamic behaviour of integral abutment bridge transition under moving train loads. Transp Geotech, 2023, 40 100989

[31] Varandas JN, Paixão A, Fortunato Eet al.. A numerical study on the stress changes in the ballast due to train passages. Procedia Eng, 2016, 143: 1169-1176

[32] Punetha P, Nimbalkar S. Numerical investigation on dynamic behaviour of critical zones in railway tracks under moving train loads. Transp Geotech, 2023, 41 101009

[33] Wang H, Silvast M, Markine Vet al.. Analysis of the dynamic wheel loads in railway transition zones considering the moisture condition of the ballast and subballast. Appl Sci, 2017, 7(12): 1208

[34] Zhang Q, Dong J, Leng Wet al.. Dynamic stress response in a novel prestressed subgrade under heavy-haul train loading: a numerical analysis. Constr Build Mater, 2024, 412 134749

[35] Nasrollahi K, Ramos A, Nielsen JCOet al.. Benchmark of calibrated 2D and 3D track models for simulation of differential settlement in a transition zone using field measurement data. Eng Struct, 2024, 316 118555

[36] Paixão A, Varandas JN, Fortunato E. Dynamic behavior in transition zones and long-term railway track performance. Front Built Environ, 2021, 7 658909

[37] Shan Y, Zhou S, Wang Bet al.. Differential settlement prediction of ballasted tracks in bridge–embankment transition zones. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2020, 146904020075

[38] Peltomäki M, Kolisoja P, Luomala H. Simplified approach to estimating the loading response of traffic infrastructures. Transp Eng, 2024, 17 100268

[39] Harr ME, Lovell CW. Vertical stresses under certain axisymmetrical loadings. Highway Res Record, 1963, 39: 68-77

[40] Lei X, Noda NA. Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile. J Sound Vib, 2002, 258(1): 147-165

[41] Peltomäki M, Kolisoja P, Luomala H. Novel permanent deformation model for granular materials. Transp Geotech, 2025, 51 101494

[42] Jaky J. Földművek csúszólapjai. A Magyar Mérnök- és Építész-Egylet Közlönyének, 1944, 78(17): 269-276

[43] Chan FWK (1990) Permanent deformation resistance of granular layers in pavements. Dissertation, University of Nottigham

[44] Kolisoja P (1997). Resilient deformation characteristics of granular materials. Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology

[45] Kuula P, Luomala H, Pulkkinen E et al (2017) Tukikerroksen toiminnan kehittäminen. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä, Helsinki (in Finnish)

[46] Ionescu D (2004). Evaluation of the engineering behaviour of railway ballast. Dissertation, University of Wollongong

[47] Pelho A, Luomala H, Oksanen B et al (2023). Komposiitti-ja pohjainratapölkkyjen vaikutus liikennetärinään Pori–Mäntyluoto-rataosalla: Vuosien 2020 ja 2021 tärinä-ja ratarakenteen mittaukset. Väyläviraston julkaisuja, Helsinki

[48] Kolisoja P, Järvenpää I, Mäkelä E (2000) Instrumentation and modelling of track structure, 250 kN and 300 kN axle loads. Ratahallintokeskus, Helsinki

[49] Profillidis VA (2000) Railway engineering. 2ed. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham

[50] Väylävirasto (2024). Ratatekniset ohjeet (RATO) 11—Radan päällysrakenne. Väyläviraston ohjeita 15/2024

[51] Hettler A. Bleibende Setzungen des Schotteroberbaus. Eisenbahn-technische Rundschau (ETR), 1984, 33(11): 847-853

[52] Yang F, Wei Z, Sun Xet al.. Wheel–rail rolling contact behavior induced by both rail surface irregularity and sleeper hanging defects on a high-speed railway line. Eng Fail Anal, 2021, 128 105604

[53] Iverson KE (1962) A programming language. In: Proceedings of the May 1–3, 1962, Spring Joint Computer Conference. San Francisco, pp 345351

Funding

Väylävirasto

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)