A feasibility study on in-service non-destructive inspection of railway rails by an ultrasonic technique based on travelling electromagnetic acoustic transducers

Abstract

This study explores the feasibility of electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) for ultrasonic rail inspection, focusing on bulk wave generation from the rail head and on defect detection at the central part of the rail foot. As a contactless method, EMATs could overcome some known limitations of conventional ultrasonic techniques, but require further validation. Different campaigns of experimental tests were performed, evaluating, by means of a probability of detection approach, the response of the technique to several artificial semi-elliptical flaws of increasing size and by considering two sensors characterized by different working frequencies. In contact, static tests allowed to assess the basic feasibility of the inspection technique and showed a linear response to defect size, saturating when defect width exceeded the rail web thickness. Dynamic tests allowed to introduce the effects of lift-off on signal responses. During all tests, the higher-frequency sensor outperformed the lower-frequency one. Finally, full-scale bogie tests on an indoor permanent track installation, comprehensive of defective rails, confirmed the higher flaw detection rates of the higher-frequency sensor, with minimal detection failures despite occasional false alarms. EMATs showed encouraging results for in-motion rail inspection: with further technical development and optimization, this technique could enhance ultrasonic rail inspection by diagnostic trains.

Keywords

Rail / Ultrasonic testing / Electromagnetic acoustic transducer / Diagnostic train / In-service inspection

References

[1] European Committee for Standardization (2017) EN 13674. Railway applications – Track – Rail – Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above. CEN, Brussels, 2011 + A1:2017

[2] UIC (2002) Rail defects. UIC Code 712R, 4th edn. International Union of Railways, Paris

[3] European Committee for Standardization (2018) EN 16729. Railway applications – Infrastructure – Non-destructive testing on rails in track – Part 3: Requirements for identifying internal and surface rail defects. CEN, Brussels.

[4] RailCorp (2012) Rail Defects Handbook. Report TMC 226, version 1.2

[5] U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Railroad Administration (2015) Track Inspector Rail Defect Reference Manual. Revision 2

[6] Cannon DF, Edel KO, Grassie SL, et al.. Rail defects: an overview. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct, 2003, 26: 865-887

[7] Kumar S (2006) Study of Rail Breaks: Associated Risks and Maintenance Strategies. Technical Report, Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå Railway Research Center (JVCT), Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

[8] Ge H, Huat DCK, Koh CG, et al.. Guided wave-based rail flaw detection technologies: state-of-the-art review. Struct Health Monit, 2022, 21(3): 1287-1308

[9] Ph Papaelias M, Roberts C, Davis CL. A review on non-destructive evaluation of rails: State-of-the-art and future development. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2008, 222(4): 367-384

[10] Alahakoon S, Sun YQ, Spiryagin M, et al.. Rail flaw detection technologies for safer, reliable transportation: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 2018, 140(2 020801

[11] Winchester C. Detecting rail defects. Railway Wonders of the World Part, 1935, 29: 919-924

[12] Dey A, Kurz J, Tenczynski L (2016) Detection and evaluation of rail defects with non-destructive testing methods. In: Proc. 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT 2016), 13–17 June 2016, Munich, Germany

[13] Clark R. Rail flaw detection: overview and needs for future developments. NDT E Int, 2004, 37(2): 111-118

[14] Mićić M, Brajović L, Lazarević L, et al.. Inspection of RCF rail defects–review of NDT methods. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 182 109568

[15] Xiong L, Jing G, Wang J, et al.. Detection of rail defects using ndt methods. Sensors, 2023, 23: 4627

[16] Moustakidis S, Kappatos V, Karlsson P, et al.. An intelligent methodology for railways monitoring using ultrasonic guided waves. J Nondestruct Eval, 2014, 33(4): 694-710

[17] European Committee for Standardization (2016) EN 16729. Railway applications – Infrastructure – Non-destructive testing on rails in track – Part 1: Requirements for ultrasonic inspection and evaluation principles. CEN, Brussels

[18] Krautkramer J, Krautkramer H. Ultrasonic testing of materials, 19904Berlin, Springler

[19] Poudel A, Lindeman B, Wilson R. Current practices of rail inspection using ultrasonic methods: a review. Mater Eval, 2019, 77: 870-883

[20] Wang H, Li Y, Wang F, et al.. Development of an ultrasonic system for nondestructively detecting flaws in the rail foot of in-service railway. Measurement, 2025, 251 117289

[21] Hirao M, Ogi H. Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers, 20172Berlin, Springer

[22] Salzburger HJ, Schuppmann M, Wang L, et al.. In-motion ultrasonic testing of the tread of high-speed railway wheels using the inspection system AUROPA III. Insight Non Destr Test Cond Monit, 2009, 51(7370-372

[23] Kawashima K. Measurement of velocity variations along a wave path in the through-thickness direction in a plate. Ultrasonics, 2005, 43(3): 135-144

[24] Zhao X, Varma VK, Mei G, et al.. In-line nondestructive inspection of mechanical dents on pipelines with guided shear horizontal wave electromagnetic acoustic transducers. J Press Vessel Technol, 2005, 127(3): 304-309

[25] Frost HM. Electromagnetic–ultrasound transducers: principles, practice, and applications. Physical Acoustics, 1979, 14: 179-275

[26] Thompson RB. Physical principles of measurements with EMAT transducers. Phys Acoust, 1990, 19: 157-200

[27] Jian X, Dixon S, Quirk K, et al.. Electromagnetic acoustic transducers for in- and out-of plane ultrasonic wave detection. Sens Actuators A Phys, 2008, 148(1): 51-56

[28] Lee CM, Rose JL, Cho Y. A guided wave approach to defect detection under shelling in rail. NDT E Int, 2009, 42(3): 174-180

[29] Rose JL, Avioli MJ, Mudge P, et al.. Guided wave inspection potential of defects in rail. NDT E Int, 2004, 37(2): 153-161

[30] Fan Y, Dixon S, Edwards RS, et al.. Ultrasonic surface wave propagation and interaction with surface defects on rail track head. NDT E Int, 2007, 40(6): 471-477

[31] Edwards RS, Dixon S, Jian X. Characterisation of defects in the railhead using ultrasonic surface waves. NDT E Int, 2006, 39(6): 468-475

[32] Xiang L, Greenshields D, Dixon S, et al.. Phased electromagnetic acoustic transducer array for Rayleigh wave surface defect detection. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Contr, 2020, 67(7): 1403-1411

[33] Edwards RS, Dixon S, Jian X. Depth gauging of defects using low frequency wideband Rayleigh waves. Ultrasonics, 2006, 44(1): 93-98

[34] Wang SJ, Chen XY, Jiang T et al (2014) Electromagnetic ultrasonic guided waves inspection of rail base. In: 2014 IEEE Far East Forum on Nondestructive Evaluation/Testing, June 20–23, 2014, Chengdu, China. IEEE, pp 135–139

[35] Hu S, Shi W, Lu C, et al.. Rapid detection of cracks in the rail foot by ultrasonic B-scan imaging using a shear horizontal guided wave electromagnetic acoustic transducer. NDT E Int, 2021, 120 102437

[36] Petcher PA, Potter MDG, Dixon S. A new electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) design for operation on rail. NDT E Int, 2014, 65: 1-7

[37] European Commission (2016) RIFLEX (Rail inspection by Flexible Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer), Final Report Summary

[38] Entezami M, Weston P, Stewart E, et al.. Lineside and on-board monitoring techniques for infrastructure and rolling stock on high-speed lines. Int J Railw Tech, 2016, 5(4): 49-77

[39] Xue Z, Xu Y, Hu M, et al.. Systematic review: Ultrasonic technology for detecting rail defects. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 368 130409

[40] Ge H, Chua Kim Huat D, Koh CG, et al.. Guided wave–based rail flaw detection technologies: state-of-the-art review. Struct Health Monit, 2022, 21(3): 1287-1308

[41] Chabhaz A, Brassard M, Pelletier A (2000) Mobile inspection system for rail integrity assessment. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference of Non-Destructive Testing, Oct. 2000, Rome, Italy

[42] Li Y, Liu Z, Zheng Y, et al.. Transverse crack detection of rail base considering wedge-like structure and using a bulk-wave electromagnetic acoustic transducer. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2022, 716002009

[43] Han S-W, Cho S-H, Jang G-W, et al.. Non-contact inspection of rail surface and internal defects based on electromagnetic ultrasonic transducers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2016, 27(3): 427-434

[44] Yi Z, Wang K, Kang L et al (2010) Rail flaw detection system based on electromagnetic acoustic technique. In: 5th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, June 15–17, 2010, Taichung, Taiwan, China. IEEE, pp 211–215

[45] Romano S, Manenti D, Beretta S, et al.. Semi-probabilistic method for residual lifetime of aluminothermic welded rails with foot cracks. Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2016, 85: 398-411

[46] Innerspec Technology Inc (2018) Standard Sensors & Accessories for EMAT Applications. Rev. T-SA-C18

[47] Berens A P (1994) NDE Reliability Data Analysis. In: ASM Handbook Volume 17: Nondestructive Evaluation and Quality Control, 3rd Edn. ASM International, USA

[48] Georgiou GA (2006) Probability of Detection (POD) curves: derivation, applications and limitations. Research Report 454, HSE, UK

[49] Charles Annis PE (2009) MIL-HDBK-1823A, Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment, US Department of Defense Handbook, USA. https://statistical-engineering.com/mh1823/. Accessed 11 November 2024

[50] Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP. Simulation and the monte carlo method, 20173Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons

[51] Fishman G. Monte carlo: concepts algorithms and applications, 2003, New York, Springer

Funding

Fondazione Politecnico di Milano(C40/2019)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)