Performance-based comprehensive functional damage probability assessment framework for high-speed railway bridge under earthquake

Abstract

Current seismic damage assessments for high-speed railway (HSR) bridges primarily focus on the overall structural safety, lacking evaluations from multiple performance perspectives, which affects the post-earthquake traffic decision-making for the bridges. This study proposes a performance-based comprehensive functional damage probability assessment framework for high-speed railway simply supported bridges (HSRSSBs) under earthquakes. The framework categorizes the functions of HSR bridges into three levels: post-earthquake traffic function (PTF), structural bearing function (SBF), and collapse resistance function (CRF), corresponding to the operational, structural safety, and structural integrity requirements of HSRSSB, respectively. By analyzing the damage states of key bridge components during earthquakes, the functional damage probability assessment indicators and classification thresholds are established according to various performance requirements. Damage probability calculations are conducted using the probability density evolution method and vulnerability method. Finally, based on the relationship between damage probabilities at different functional levels, a comprehensive damage probability assessment framework considering the three-level performance requirements of HSRSSBs is developed, and the influence of varying pier heights on the functional damage probability relationship is examined. The results indicate that current HSRSSB designs meet all performance requirements under frequent earthquakes. Under design-level earthquake conditions, the SBF remains in a slight damage state, while the PTF exhibits varying degrees of damage, which worsens as pier height increases. The pier structure satisfies seismic demands even under rare earthquake conditions.

Keywords

Earthquake / High-speed railway bridge / Damage probability / Functional damage / Performance-based

References

[1] ZhouT, JiangL, XiangP, et al.. Effects of near-fault pulse-type ground motions on high-speed railway simply supported bridge and pulse parameter analysis. B Earthq Eng, 2022, 20(11): 6167-6192

[2] ZhouW, HouY, JiangL, et al.. Study on practical calculation method of post-earthquake traffic capacity of high-speed railway bridge. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2024, 187: 108983

[3] HuZ, WeiB, JiangL, et al.. Track structural damage index for high-speed railway girder bridges considering residual deformations due to earthquake. B Earthq Eng, 2022, 20(12): 6587-6609

[4] WenT, JiangL, JiangL, et al.. Optimal intensity measure selection in incremental dynamic analysis: methodology improvements and application to a high-speed railway bridge. B Earthq Eng, 2024, 22(4): 2059-2083

[5] WeiB, YangT, JiangL, et al.. Effects of uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track–bridge system of high-speed railway. B Earthq Eng, 2018, 16(9): 3739-3769

[6] WenTX, JiangLZ, JiangLQ, et al.. Interlayer area damage modeling and damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridge and track system. Eng Struct, 2022, 272: 114989

[7] CuiS, GuoC, SuJ, et al.. Seismic fragility and risk assessment of high-speed railway continuous-girder bridge under track constraint effect. B Earthq Eng, 2019, 17(3): 1639-1665

[8] ZhouT, PengY, LiJ. Structural reliability analysis using probability density evolution method and adaptive surrogate model. J Vib Eng, 2022, 33(05): 1035-1043 (in Chinese)

[9] MatsuzakiH. Time-dependent seismic reliability of isolated bridges considering ageing deterioration of lead rubber bearings. Struct Infrastruct E, 2022, 18(10–11): 1526-1541

[10] StefanidouSP, ParaskevopoulosEA. Seismic fragility analysis of railway reinforced concrete bridges considering real-time vehicle–bridge interaction with the aid of co-simulation techniques. Earthq Eng Struct D, 2022, 51(9): 2137-2161

[11] GuoW, WangY, GeC, et al.. Seismic failure features of multi-span simply supported girder bridges of high-speed railway under near-fault earthquake. J Vib Shock, 2020, 39(17): 210-218 (in Chinese)

[12] JiangL, ZhouW, WeiB, et al.. Research progress of train-track-bridge system safety of high-speed railway under earthquake action. Chin Civil Eng J, 2020, 53(09): 1-13 (in Chinese)

[13] HuJ, WenW, ZhaiC, et al.. Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2024, 241: 109641

[14] YuJ, JiangL, ZhouW, et al.. Component damage and failure sequence of track-bridge system for high-speed railway under seismic action. J Earthq Eng, 2023, 27(3): 656-678

[15] WangZ, JiaL, MaX, et al.. Accessibility-oriented performance evaluation of high-speed railways using a three-layer network model. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2022, 222: 108411

[16] WeiB, LiCB, WangP, et al.. The seismically induced failure sequence of multiple components of high-speed railway bridges under different earthquake intensities. J Vibroeng, 2020, 22(7): 1629-1647

[17] LiuX, JiangL, XiangP, et al.. Safety and comfort assessment of a train passing over an earthquake-damaged bridge based on a probability model. Struct Infrastruct E, 2023, 19(4): 525-536

[18] MackieK, StojadinovićB. Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states. Earthq Eng Struct D, 2007, 36(13): 1953-1971

[19] SheikhMN, LégeronF. Performance based seismic assessment of bridges designed according to Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Can J Civil Eng, 2014, 41(9): 777-787

[20] Ministry of Railways of the People’s Republic of China (MR-PRC) Code for seismic design of railway engineering GB50111–2006, 2009 Beijing China Planning Press (in Chinese)

[21] WeiB, XiaoB, HuZ, et al.. Damage control analysis of components in high-speed railway bridge–track system based on combined seismic isolation design under earthquake. Structures, 2023, 54: 515-526

[22] ZhuZ, DavidsonMT, HarikIE, et al.. Train-induced vibration characteristics of an integrated high-speed railway station. J Perform Constr Fac, 2017, 31(4): 04017010

[23] TangY, ZhuZ, BaZ, et al.. Running safety assessment of trains considering post-earthquake damage state of bridge–track system. Eng Struct, 2023, 287: 116187

[24] ZhouG, ZhuZ, HuangY, et al.. Post-earthquake damage probability assessment of high-speed railway simply supported bridge based on traffic capacity. Eng Struct, 2024, 318: 118741

[25] ChenY, JiangL, LaiZ, et al.. A novel evaluation of train running safety on the HSR bridges under earthquakes based on the observed track deformation rate. Eng Struct, 2023, 275: 115260

[26] ZhuZ, ZhouG, ZhengW, et al.. Running safety assessment method of trains under seismic conditions based on the derailment risk domain. Railw Eng Sci, 2024, 32(4): 499-517

[27] National Railway Administration of China Code for design of high speed railway TB 10621–2014, 2014 Beijing China Railway Press (in Chinese)

[28] Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China Double spherical seismic isolation bearing for bridge JT/T 927–2014, 2014 Beijing China Communications Press (in Chinese)

[29] WeiB, WangW, WangP, et al.. Seismic responses of a high–speed railway (HSR) bridge and track simulation under longitudinal earthquakes. J Earthq Eng, 2020, 26(9): 4449-4470

[30] CornellCA, JalayerF, Hamburger RonaldO, et al.. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng, 2002, 128(4): 526-533

[31] BiK, RenW, ChengP, et al.. Domino-type progressive collapse analysis of a multi-span simply-supported bridge: a case study. Eng Struct, 2015, 90: 172-182

[32] HAZUS99 (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology: User’s manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC

[33] ZhouC, WangJ. Seismic vulnerability analysis of railway bridges under Wenchuan earthquake. J Beijing Jiaotong Univ, 2020, 38: 101-106 (in Chinese)

[34] ZhuZ, GongW, WangL, et al.. Efficient assessment of 3D train–track–bridge interaction combining multi-time-step method and moving track technique. Eng Struct, 2019, 183: 290-302

[35] ChenG, ZhaiW. A new wheel/rail spatially dynamic coupling model and its verification. Vehicle Syst Dyn, 2004, 41(4): 301-322

[36] LiuH, YuZ, GuoW, et al.. A novel method to search for the wheel–rail contact point. Int J Struct Stab Dy, 2019, 19(11): 1950142

[37] ShenZY, HendrickJK, ElkinsJA. A comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis. Veh Syst Dyn, 1983, 12(1–3): 79-83

[38] Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2020) Specifications for seismic design of highway bridges. JTG/T 2231–01–2020. China Communications Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

[39] ConteJ, PengB. Fully nonstationary analytical earthquake ground-motion model. J Eng Mech, 1997, 123(1): 15-24

[40] OuJ, NiuD, DuX. The design is based on the model of random ground motion and its parameters. Earthq Eng Eng Dyn, 1991, 11: 45-54 (in Chinese)

[41] JinZ, LiuW, PeiS. Probabilistic evaluation of railway vehicle’s safety on bridges under random earthquake and track irregularity excitations. Eng Struct, 2022, 266: 114527

[42] ZhouG, ZhuZ, TangY, et al.. Seismic scenario reproduction and damage mechanism analysis of Liuhuanggou Bridge under near-fault earthquake. B Earthq Eng, 2023, 21(13): 6091-6120

[43] ChenZ, ZhaiW, TianG. Study on the safe value of multi-pier settlement for simply supported girder bridges in high-speed railways. Struct Infrastruct E, 2018, 14(3): 400-410

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(5247084033)

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China(2022JJ30745)

Frontier cross research project of Central South University(2023QYJC006)

Science, Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway group limited(2021-Special-04-2)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)