On use of the hierarchical function to achieve efficient and accurate dynamic analysis of vehicle-slab track coupled systems

Abstract

To improve the accuracy and efficiency of the vehicle-track dynamic interaction under the framework of traditional finite element method, the hierarchical function has been introduced into the track structure modeling and coupled by multi-scale coupling method in substructural interaction and wheel–rail contacts with high modeling versatility. The reliability of the proposed method is validated by comparing to the results obtained by the FEM model from aspects of the dynamic response in the time- and frequency-domain and the characteristic frequencies of structural vibration. In addition, the efficiency and accuracy of hierarchical function in vehicle–track dynamics simulation are also proved. In the numerical examples, the errors of FEM-based and hierarchical function-based track structure models are analyzed from the perspective of characteristic frequency; the computational efficiency and accuracy of different hierarchical function-based coupled dynamics models of vehicle-track are compared; finally, the shear effect of rails and track slabs on the dynamic response of the system is analyzed. Numerical analysis indicated that, in comparison with other high-order function, the calculation efficiency can be increased by 56%. Furthermore, the shear effect predominantly influences vertical dynamic response, but has little effect on displacement and lateral dynamic response.

Keywords

Vehicle–track interaction / Hierarchical function / Energy variation method / Shear effect

References

[1] Zhai W, Sun X. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track. Veh Syst Dyn, 1994, 23(sup1): 603-615

[2] Zhai W. Development of vehicle-track coupled dynamics theory and engineering practice. Chine Sci Bull, 2022, 67(32): 3793-3807

[3] Li M, Ma M, Liu W, et al.. Influence of static preload on vibration reduction effect of floating slab tracks. J Vib Contr, 2018, 25(6): 1148-1163

[4] Yan B, Pan L, Xu L, et al.. Dynamic performance analysis of floating slab track system considering flexible wheelset. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 393 132074

[5] Jiang P, Ling L, Ding X, et al.. Resonance of railway vehicles induced by floating-slab tracks: mechanism and countermeasures. Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 60(12): 4098-4117

[6] Ling L, Jiang P, Wang K, et al.. Dynamic interaction between rail vehicles and vibration-attenuating slab tracks. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 258 119545

[7] Zhai W, Wang K, Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2009, 47(11): 1349-1376

[8] Yan Z, Markine V, Gu A, et al.. Optimization of the dynamic properties of the ladder track system to control rail vibration using the multipoint approximation method. J Vib Contr, 2014, 20(13): 1967-1984

[9] Zhai W. Vehicle–Track coupled dynamics: theory and applications, 2020, Singapore, Springer Singapore

[10] Li Z, Xu L, Liu P, et al.. Numerical modelling and analysis for nonlinear stiffness of subgrade soil subject to 3-D vehicle-track interaction. Transp Geotech, 2023, 42 101095

[11] Paixão A, Fortunato E, Calçada R. The effect of differential settlements on the dynamic response of the train–track system: a numerical study. Eng Struct, 2015, 88: 216-224

[12] Varandas JN, Paixão A, Fortunato E, et al.. Long-term deformation of railway tracks considering train-track interaction and non-linear resilient behaviour of aggregates–a 3D FEM implementation. Comput Geotech, 2020, 126 103712

[13] Xu L, Wu L, Li Z, et al.. Further research of multi‑scale assemble and matrix reassemble method for efficient analysis of railway track–substructure system subjected to a moving train. Railway Eng Sci, 2025, 33 102984

[14] Li Q, Xu Y, Wu D. Concrete bridge-borne low-frequency noise simulation based on train–track–bridge dynamic interaction. J Sound Vib, 2012, 331(10): 2457-2470

[15] Paixão A, Varandas JN, Fortunato E, et al.. Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges. Eng Struct, 2018, 164: 169-182

[16] Babuska I, Szabo BA, Katz IN. Thep-version of the finite element method. SIAM J Numer Anal, 1981, 18(3): 515-545

[17] Solin P, Segeth K, Dolezel I. High-order finite element methods, 2003, Washington DC, CRC Press

[18] Zienkiewicz OC, Irons BM, Scott FC et al (1970) Three-dimensional stress analysis. In: Proc. IUTAM Symp. Liege, pp 413–431

[19] Zienkiewicz OC, Gago SR De JP, Kelly DW, (1983) The hierarchical concept in finite element analysis. Comput Struct 16(1–4):53–65

[20] Zhu D (1986) Development of hierarchal finite element methods at BIAA. In: Computational Mechanics ’86. Toyoko, pp 159–164

[21] Bardell NS. The application of symbolic computing to the hierarchical finite element method. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 1989, 28(5): 1181-1204

[22] West LJ, Bardell NS, Dunsdon JM, et al.. Some limitations associated with the use of K-orthogonal polynomials in hierarchical versions of the finite element method. Vibrations, 1997, 1: 217-231

[23] Bardell NS. The free vibration of skew plates using the hierarchical finite element method. Comput Struct, 1992, 45(5–6): 841-874

[24] Bardell NS. Free vibration analysis of a flat plate using the hierarchical finite element method. J Sound Vib, 1991, 151(2): 263-289

[25] Han W, Petyt M, Hsiao KM. An investigation into geometrically nonlinear analysis of rectangular laminated plates using the hierarchical finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des, 1994, 18(1–3): 273-288

[26] Han W, Petyt M. Linear vibration analysis of laminated rectangular plates using the hierarchical finite element method—I Free vibration analysis. Comput Struct, 1996, 61(4): 705-712

[27] Houmat A. An alternative hierarchical finite element formulation applied to plate vibrations. J Sound Vib, 1997, 206(2): 201-215

[28] Beslin O, Nicolas J. A hierarchical functions set for predicting very high order plate bending modes with any boundary conditions. J Sound Vib, 1997, 202(5): 633-655

[29] Houmat A. In-plane vibration of plates with curvilinear plan-forms by a trigonometrically enriched curved triangular p-element. Thin Walled Struct, 2008, 46(2): 103-111

[30] Chu D. Hierarchical finite element method, 1993, Beijing (in Chinese), National Defense Industry Press

[31] Pan L, Xu L, Yan B. APPL MATH MODEL, 2025

[32] Xu Lei (2025) Matrix formulation of the wheel-rail contact element in train-track dynamic analysis. Appl Math Model 140:115874

[33] Stupazzini M, Paolucci R (2010) Ground motion induced by train passage in urban area. In: ISMA2010 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, pp 3547–3558

[34] Luo J, Zhu S, Zhai W. An advanced train-slab track spatially coupled dynamics model: Theoretical methodologies and numerical applications. J Sound Vib, 2021, 501 116059

[35] Xu L. Train-track-substructure dynamic interaction: theoretical model and numerical algorithm, 2021, Beijing (in Chinese), China Railway Publishing House

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.