On fuzzy modelling of dynamic track behaviour

Katja Stampka , Vincent Radmann , Jannik Theyssen , Ennes Sarradj

Railway Engineering Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 474 -495.

PDF
Railway Engineering Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 474 -495. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-024-00370-4
Article
research-article

On fuzzy modelling of dynamic track behaviour

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Rolling noise is an important source of railway noise and depends also on the dynamic behaviour of a railway track. This is characterized by the point or transfer mobility and the track decay rate, which depend on a number of track parameters. One possible reason for deviations between simulated and measured results for the dynamic track behaviour is the uncertainty of the value of some track parameters used as input for the simulation. This in turn results in an uncertainty in the simulation results. In this contribution, it is proposed to use the general transformation method to assess a uncertainty band for the results. Most relevant input parameters for determining the point input mobility and the track decay rate for a ballasted track are analysed with regard to the uncertainties and for the value of each an interval is determined. Then, the general transformation method is applied to four different simulation methods, working both in the frequency and time domains. For one example track, the resulting uncertainty bands are compared to one dataset with measurements for the point mobility and the track decay rate. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the parameters that significantly influence the overall result. While all four simulation methods produce broad uncertainty bands for the results, none did match the measured results for the point mobility and the track decay rate over the entire frequency range considered. Besides the large influence of the uncertain pad stiffness, it turned out that the rail wear is also a significant source of uncertainty of the results. Overall, it is demonstrated that the proposed approach allows assessing the influence of uncertain input parameters in detail.

Keywords

Dynamic track behaviour / Uncertainty / General transformation method / Track decay rate / Rolling noise

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Katja Stampka, Vincent Radmann, Jannik Theyssen, Ennes Sarradj. On fuzzy modelling of dynamic track behaviour. Railway Engineering Science, 2025, 33(3): 474-495 DOI:10.1007/s40534-024-00370-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ThompsonDJRailway noise and vibration: mechanisms, modelling and means of control, 2009, Amsterdam. Elsevier.

[2]

European Committee for Standardization (2008) Railway applications-Noise emission- Characterisation of the dynamic properties of track sections for pass by noise measurements. EN 15461:2008+A1:2010

[3]

Lamprea-PinedaA, ConnollyD, HusseinM. Beams on elastic foundations-a review of railway applications and solutions. Transp Geotech, 2021, 33. 100696

[4]

SquicciariniG, ThompsonDJ, TowardMGR, et al.. The effect of temperature on railway rolling noise. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(8): 1777-1789.

[5]

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) (2015) Track inspector rail defect reference manual. Technical report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC

[6]

KnotheK, GrassieSL. Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Veh Syst Dyn, 1993, 22(3–4): 209-262.

[7]

LiQ, ThompsonDJ, TowardMGR. Estimation of track parameters and wheel-rail combined roughness from rail vibration. Rail Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(4): 1149-1167.

[8]

GryL. Dynamic modelling of railway track based on wave propagation. J Sound Vib, 1996, 195(3): 477-505.

[9]

NordborgA. Vertical rail vibrations: pointforce excitation. Acta Acust Acust, 1998, 84(2): 280-288

[10]

HanssM. The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst, 2002, 130(3): 277-289.

[11]

HanssMApplied fuzzy arithmetic: an introduction with engineering applications, 2005, Berlin. Springer.

[12]

HaagT, HerrmannJ, HanssM. Identification procedure for epistemic uncertainties using inverse fuzzy arithmetic. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2010, 24(7): 2021-2034.

[13]

WalzNP, HanssM. Fuzzy arithmetical analysis of multibody systems with uncertainties. Arch Mech Eng, 2013, 60(1): 109-125.

[14]

SeidelJ, LippertS, EstorffO. Vibro-acoustical sensitivities of stiffened aircraft structures due to attached mass-spring-dampers with uncertain parameters. Aerospace, 2021, 87174.

[15]

StampkaK, SarradjE. A time-domain finite-difference method for bending waves on infinite beams on an elastic foundation. Acoustics, 2022, 4(4): 867-884.

[16]

HecklMA. Railway noise can random sleeper spacings help?. Acta Acust Acust, 1995, 81(6): 559-564

[17]

HecklMA. Coupled waves on a periodically supported Timoshenko beam. J Sound Vib, 2002, 252(5): 849-882.

[18]

NilssonCM, JonesCJC, ThompsonDJ, et al.. A waveguide finite element and boundary element approach to calculating the sound radiated by railway and tram rails. J Sound Vib, 2009, 321(3–5): 813-836.

[19]

ZhangX, ThompsonDJ, LiQ, et al.. A model of a discretely supported railway track based on a 2.5D finite element approach. J Sound Vib, 2019, 438: 153-174.

[20]

TheyssenJS, AggestamE, ZhuS, et al.. Calibration and validation of the dynamic response of two slab track models using data from a full-scale test rig. Eng Struct, 2021, 234. 111980

[21]

NordborgA. Wheel/rail noise generation due to nonlinear effects and parametric excitation. J Acoust Soc Am, 2002, 111(4): 1772-1781.

[22]

ZhangX, ThompsonDJ, JeongH. Measurements of the high frequency dynamic stiffness of railway ballast and subgrade. J Sound Vib, 2020, 468. 115081

[23]

Hanss M (2000) A nearly strict fuzzy arithmetic for solving problems with uncertainties. In: 19th international conference of the North American fuzzy information processing society Atlanta, pp 439-443

[24]

ZadehLA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.

[25]

MantelM, StampkaK, SarradjE. Acoustic optimisation of the rail track by targeted variation of continuous superstructure parameters along the track. Acta Acustica, 2024, 8(61): 1-13

[26]

Wittel H, Muhs D, Jannasch D et al (2015) Roloff/Matek Maschinenelemente: Normung, Berechnung, Gestaltung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

[27]

CzichosH, SkrotzkiB, SimonFGDas Ingenieurwissen: Werkstoffe, 2014, Berlin Heidelberg. Springer. .

[28]

Deutschen Institut für Normung e. V. (2017) Railway applications-Track-Rail-Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above. German version EN 13674-1:2011+A1:2017

[29]

Deutsche Bahn AG (2011) Richtlinie 821-Oberbau inspizieren

[30]

CremerL, HecklM, PeterssonBATStructure-borne sound, 2005, Heidelberg. Springer, Berlin. .

[31]

WuTX, ThompsonDJ. A double Timoshenko beam model for vertical vibration analysis of railway track at high frequencies. J Sound Vib, 1999, 224(2): 329-348.

[32]

RyueJ, ThompsonD, WhiteP, et al.. Decay rates of propagating waves in railway tracks at high frequencies. J Sound Vib, 2009, 320: 955-976.

[33]

ThompsonDJ, JonesCJC, WuTX, et al.. The influence of the non-linear stiffness behaviour of rail pads on the track component of rolling noise. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 1999, 213(4): 233-241.

[34]

WuTX, ThompsonDJ. The effects of local preload on the foundation stiffness and vertical vibration of railway track. J Sound Vib, 1999, 219(5): 881-904.

[35]

ThompsonDJ, VerheijJW. The dynamic behaviour of rail fasteners at high frequencies. Appl Acoust, 1997, 52(1): 1-17.

[36]

VincentN, BouvetP, ThompsonDJ, et al.. Theoretical optimization of track components to reduce rolling noise. J Sound Vib, 1996, 193(1): 161-171.

[37]

Sainz-AjaJ, CarrascalI, FerreñoD, et al.. Influence of the operational conditions on static and dynamic stiffness of rail pads. Mech Mater, 2020, 148. 103505

[38]

ThompsonDJ, van VlietWJ, VerheijJW. Developments of the indirect 32 method for measuring the high frequency dynamic stiffness of resilient elements. J Sound Vib, 1998, 213(1): 169-188.

[39]

Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A (2009) State dependent properties of rail pads. Technical report, University of Wollongong Research Online

[40]

Huber P, Schneider P (2021) Forschungsprojekt Schienenbefestigung Phase “I”. Schlussbericht version 1.2, KPZ Fahrbahn

[41]

HasapA, NoraphaiphipaksaN, KanchanomaiC. Influence of malposition on the performance of elastic rail clip: Toe load, stress, and friction. Structures, 2020, 28: 2661-2670.

[42]

OreguiM, NúñezA, DollevoetR, et al.. Sensitivity analysis of railpad parameters on vertical railway track dynamics. J Eng Mech, 2017, 143504017011

[43]

FenanderÅ. Frequency dependent stiffness and damping of railpads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 1997, 211(1): 51-62.

[44]

ThompsonDJ, JonesC. The effects of rail support stiffness on railway rolling noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 1999, 105: 947-947.

[45]

OscarssonJ. Simulation of train-track interaction with stochastic track properties. Veh Syst Dyn, 2002, 37(6): 449-469.

[46]

FerraraR, LeonardiG, JourdanF. A contact-area model for rail-pads connections in 2-D simulations: sensitivity analysis of train-induced vibrations. Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51(9): 1342-1362.

[47]

Heinrich Krug GmbH & Co. KG (2016) Zwischenlagen (pads) https://www.heinrich-krug.de/oberbau/zwischenlagen/. Accessed 5 May 2024

[48]

KostovasilisD, ThompsonDJ, HusseinMFM. A semi-analytical beam model for the vibration of railway tracks. J Sound Vib, 2017, 393: 321-337.

[49]

ZhaiW, WangK, LinJ. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib, 2004, 270(4): 673-683.

[50]

SadriM, SteenbergenM. Effects of railway track design on the expected degradation: parametric study on energy dissipation. J Sound Vib, 2018, 419: 281-301.

[51]

Walton-Macaulay C, Bryson LS, Guenther KJ (2014) Experimental study on the stiffness degradation of railroad ballast subjected to clay fouling. In: 2014 Joint Rail Conference, Colorado Springs, pp V001T01A004

[52]

KaewunruenS, NgamkhanongC, NgJ. Influence of time-dependent material degradation on life cycle serviceability of interspersed railway tracks due to moving train loads. Eng Struct, 2019, 199. 109625

[53]

Deutschen Institut für Normung e. V. (2016) Railway applications-Concrete sleepers and bearers-Part 1: general requirements. German version EN 13230-1:2016

[54]

Shenton MJ (1978) Deformation of railway ballast under repeated loading conditions. In: Railroad Track Mechanics and Technology, Proceedings of a Symposium Held at Princeton University, Princeton, pp 405–425

[55]

Gourley T (1996) Concrete railway sleeper durability. In: Eleventh International Rail Track Conference. Adelaide, pp 143–150

[56]

Li Q, Thompson DJ, Toward M (2017) Dataset for paper: estimation of track parameters and wheel-rail combined roughness from rail vibration. University of Southampton. https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0068

[57]

Dlubal Software GmbH. Querschnittswerte UIC (abgenutzt) Standardquerschnitte der Deutschen Bahn, abgenutzt. https://www.dlubal.com/de/ querschnittswerte/series-uic-abgenutzt-din-en-13674-1. Accessed May 5 2023

[58]

MaziluT, LeuM. Impact of the rail-pad multi-discrete model upon the prediction of the rail response. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 2017, 227. 012079

[59]

BlancoB, AlonsoA, KariL. Distributed support modelling for vertical track dynamic analysis. Veh Syst Dyn, 2018, 56(4): 529-552.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

120

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/