HIL testing of wheel slide protection systems: criteria for continuous updating and validation

Abstract

Assessment of railway wheel slide protection (WSP) systems involves the execution of complex experimental activities that are quite expensive and time-consuming, since they involve the physical reproduction of degraded adhesion conditions on a real railway line. WSP is devoted to regulating applied braking forces to avoid excessive wheel sliding in case of degraded adhesion conditions between wheel and rail. WSP must be also compliant to safety specifications related to assured braking performances and consumed air. Hardware in the loop (HIL) testing offers an affordable and sustainable way to accelerate these activities optimizing cost, duration and safety of experimental activities performed online. HIL test rigs are subjected to continuous updates, customization and natural ageing of their components. This work investigates the criteria that can be adopted to assure a continuous monitoring and validation of a real WSP test rig, the Italian test rig of Firenze Osmannoro.

Keywords

Hardware in the loop (HIL) / Wheel slide protection (WSP) / Degraded adhesion conditions / Train brake

References

[1.] UIC 541-05 Brakes—specifications for the construction of various brake parts—wheel slide protection device (WSP)

[2.] EN 15595:2021 Railway applications—braking—wheel slide protection

[3.] UIC 540 (E) Brakes—air brakes for freight trains and passenger trains

[4.] Nicks S (1998) Condition monitoring of the track/train interface. In: IEE seminar condition monitoring for rail transport systems, London

[5.] Pugi L Malvezzi M Tarasconi A Palazzolo A Cocci G Violani M. HIL simulation of WSP systems on MI-6 test rig. Veh Syst Dyn, 2006 44 sup1 843-852

[6.] Kim HY Lee NJ Lee DC . Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for a wheel slide protection system of a railway train. IFAC Proc Vol, 2014 47 3 12134-12139

[7.] Lee NJ, Kang CG (2015) A control algorithm for WSP valves in a pneumatic brake system of a railway vehicle. In: 15th International conference on control, automation and systems (ICCAS). IEEE, Busan, pp 119–122

[8.] Lee DC Kang CG. A mechanical brake hardware-in-the-loop simulation of a railway vehicle that accounts for hysteresis and pneumatic cylinder dynamics. Adv Mech Eng, 2015 7 11 1-11

[9.] Nakazawa S Hijikata D. Wheel slide protection system by the use of the tangential force in the macro slip area. Quart Rep RTRI, 2017 58 3 196-203

[10.] Allotta B Pugi L Malvezzi M Bartolini F Cangioli F. A scaled roller test rig for high-speed vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn, 2010 48 sup1 3-18

[11.] Bruni S, Liu B, Sabbioni E et al (2017) Development of a MB model for designing a control strategy of a full scale roller rig. In: The dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. CRC Press, Rockhampton, pp 885–891

[12.] Bosso N Gugliotta A Zampieri N. Strategies to simulate wheel–rail adhesion in degraded conditions using a roller-rig. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015 53 5 619-634

[13.] Toni P Malvezzi M Pugi L Rinchi M Presciani P. Development and validation of odometric algorithms for railway control and monitoring systems. Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 2003 58 5 433-457+473

[14.] Iwnicki S Spiryagin M Cole C McSweeney T. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 2019 CRC Press

[15.] Panagin R (1997) La dinamica del veicolo ferroviario. Levrotto e Bella

[16.] Pugi L (2019) Meccatronica. Elementi di Trazione Elettrica. Società Editrice Esculapio

[17.] IRS 60650 (2021) Railway application—rolling stock—standard designation of axle arrangement on locomotives and multiple-unit sets. International Union of Railways

[18.] Meli E Pugi L Ridolfi A. An innovative degraded adhesion model for multibody applications in the railway field. Multibody Sys Dyn, 2014 32 2 133-157

[19.] Malvezzi M Presciani P Allotta B Toni P. Probabilistic analysis of braking performance in railways. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2003 217 3 149-166

[20.] Malvezzi M Pugi L Papini S Rindi A Toni P. Identification of a wheel-rail adhesion coefficient from experimental data during braking tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2013 227 2 128-139

[21.] Addeo F Allotta B Malvezzi M Pugi L Tarasconi A Violani M. ATP/ATC subsystem testing and validation using a HIL test rig. WIT Trans Built Environ, 2004 74 411-420

[22.] Voltr P Lata M. Transient wheel–rail adhesion characteristics under the cleaning effect of sliding. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015 53 5 605-618

[23.] Bosso N Gugliotta A Magelli M . Study of wheel–rail adhesion during braking maneuvers. Proc Struct Integr, 2019 24 680-691

[24.] Ali HI Samsul N Bashi SM . A review of pneumatic actuators (modeling and control). Aust J Basic Appl Sci, 2009 3 2 440-454

[25.] Pugi L Palazzolo A Fioravanti D. Simulation of railway brake plants: an application to SAADKMS freight wagons. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2008 222 4 321-329

[26.] Pugi L Alfatti F Berzi L . Fast modelling and identification of hydraulic brake plants for automotive applications. Int J Fluid Power, 2020 21 2 169-210

[27.] Wu Q, Cole C, Spiryagin M et al (2023) Freight train air brake models. Int J Rail Transport 11(1):1–49