Feasibility of hydrogen fuel cell technology for railway intercity services: a case study for the Piedmont in North Carolina

Abstract

Diesel fuel combustion results in exhaust containing air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. Many railway vehicles use diesel fuel as their energy source. Exhaust emissions, as well as concerns about economical, alternative power supply, have driven efforts to move to hydrogen motive power. Hydrogen fuel cell technology applied to railways offers the opportunity to eliminate harmful exhaust emissions and the potential for a low- or zero-emission energy supply chain. Currently, only multiple-unit trains with hydrail technology operate commercially. Development of an Integrated Hybrid Train Simulator for intercity railway is presented. The proposed tool incorporates the effect of powertrain components during the wheel-to-tank process. Compared to its predecessors, the proposed reconfigurable tool provides high fidelity with medium requirements and minimum computation time. Single train simulation and the federal government’s Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET^®) model are used in combination to evaluate the feasibility of various train and powertrain configurations. The Piedmont intercity service operating in North Carolina is used as a case study. The study includes six train configurations and powertrain options as well as nine hydrogen supply options in addition to the diesel supply. The results show that a hydrail option is not only feasible, but a low- or zero-carbon hydrogen supply chain could be possible.

Keywords

Hydrail / Life cycle assessment / Criteria pollutants / Well-to-wheel / Single train simulation / Modeling

References

[1.] Davis S, Boundy RG (2020) Transportation energy data book: 38 edition (No. ORNL/TM-2019/1333). Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN

[2.] Sweeney J, Donnelly A, McElwain L, Jones M (2002) Climate change: indicators for Ireland (2000-LS-5.2.2-M1). Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford

[3.] Isaac RS (2020) Fuels and fuel technologies for powering 21st century passenger and freight rail: simulation-based case studies in a US context, Dissertation, University of California, Davis. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3wt0n8tx

[4.] Hoffrichter A Hillmansen S Roberts C. Conceptual propulsion system design for a hydrogen-powered regional train. IET Electr Syst Transp, 2016 6 2 56-66

[5.] Bocharnikov Y Tobias A Roberts C . Optimal driving strategy for traction energy saving on DC suburban railways. IET Electr Power Appl, 2007 1 675-682

[6.] Lu S Hillmansen S Ho TK Roberts C. Single-train trajectory optimization. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2013 14 743-750

[7.] Newsom G (2020) Executive Order N-79-20. Sacramento, CA, State of California. https://sd32.senate.ca.gov/sites/sd32.senate.ca.gov/files/pdf/executive_order_n-79-20_-_a_technology-neutral_approach_to_zero_emission_mobility_11_10_20.pdf . Accessed 15 Jun 2021

[8.] Berkeley Simulation Software (2021) What is RTC? http://berkeleysimulation.com/rtc.php. Accessed 14 Feb 2021

[9.] Rail Management Consultants International GmbH (2021) RailSys®—My favorite software at work. https://www.rmcon-int.de/railsys-en/. Accessed 14 Feb 2021

[10.] AREMA (2018) Manual for railway engineering: Chapter 16 Economics of railway engineering and operations. Lanham, MD

[11.] Hillmansen S Roberts C. Energy storage devices in hybrid railway vehicles: a kinematic analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2007 221 1 135-143

[12.] Walker A, McGordon A, Hannis G, Picarelli A et al (2006) A novel structure for comprehensive HEV powertrain modelling. In: 2006 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Windsor, UK, 6–8 Sept. 2006. IEEE, pp 1–5

[13.] Urgun-Demirtas M (2019) GREET model: the greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/articles/greet-greenhouse-gases-regulated-emissions-and-energy-use-transportation. Accessed 14 Feb, 2021

[14.] Hexagon (2019) Composite type 4 high-pressure tanks for CNG light-duty vehicles. Lincoln, NE. https://cdn.hexagongroup.com/uploads/2020/04/Brochure_CNG-Light-Duty-Vehicles.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb, 2021

[15.] IEA (2009) Transport, energy and CO2: moving toward sustainability. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/imports/events/14/Fulton_IEA_Day.pdf . Accessed 20 Feb, 2021

[16.] Johnson Matthey (2017) Battery systems. Davis, CA. http://www.jmbatterysystems.com/technology/our-guide-to-batteries . Accessed 16 Feb, 2021

[17.] Harris WL (2020) Trains: exploring decarbonization options. Stanford Hydrogen Focus Group Decarbonizing Heavy Duty Transport. Stanford CA

[18.] IEA (2006) Hydrogen production and storage: R&D priorities and gaps. Hydrogen Implementing Agreement. Paris, IEA. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/

[19.] Stiegel GJ Ramezan M. Hydrogen from coal gasification: an economical pathway to a sustainable energy future. Int J Coal Geol, 2006 65 3–4 173-190

[20.] IEA (2021) The future of hydrogen—analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen . Accessed 14 Feb, 2021

[21.] Meegahawatte D Hillmansen S Roberts C Falco M McGordon A Jennings P. Analysis of a fuel cell hybrid commuter railway vehicle. J Power Sources, 2010 195 23 7829-7837

[22.] Hoffrichter A, Little N, Foster S et al (2020) The Piedmont service: hydrogen fuel cell locomotive feasibility connect NCDOT business resources. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/research/Pages/ProjDetails.aspx?ProjectID=2019-43. Accessed 30 Dec 2020

[23.] Harris L (2019) Plans for hydrail implementation on NCDOT's Piedmont passenger trains. In: 2019 TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC

[24.] Lahnaoui A Wulf C Heinrichs H Dalmazzone D. Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility via compressed hydrogen trucks. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2019 44 35 19302-19312

[25.] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2021) Basic hydrogen properties chart: hydrogen tools. https://h2tools.org/tools . Accessed 14 Feb, 2021

[26.] Li Z Pan X Sun K Zhou W Gao D Liu S Ma J. Development of safety standard for mobile hydrogen refueling facilities in China. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2014 39 25 13935-13939

[27.] Kent S, Isaac R, Little N, Hoffrichter A (2019) Low- or zero-emission multiple-unit feasibility study. San Bernardino, CA, 30 Dec 2019

[28.] Hoffrichter A (2013) Hydrogen as an energy carrier for railway traction. Dissertation, University of Birmingham

[29.] Gillette JL, Kolpa RL (2008) Overview of interstate hydrogen pipeline systems (No. ANL/EVS/TM/08-2). Argonne National Lab, Argonne, IL, US

[30.] Air Products and Chemicals Inc (2013) SmartFuel hydrogen supply options. Allentown, PA

[31.] Hexagon Lincoln (2017) Hydrogen storage and transportation systems. Lincoln, NE

[32.] NC By Train (2021) NCDOT. https://www.ncbytrain.org/schedules/Pages/piedmont.aspx Accessed 14 Feb 2021

[33.] EPA (2020) North Carolina nonattainment/maintenance status for each county by year for all criteria pollutants, Green Book. https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/anayo_nc.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2021

[34.] Frey HC, Graver BM, Hu J (2016) Locomotive biofuel study—rail yard and over the road measurements using portable emissions measurement system (No. DOT/FRA/ORD-16/04). Office of Research, Development, and Technology, US Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC 20590

Funding

North Carolina Department of Transportation