An investigation into intermittent electrification strategies and an analysis of resulting CO₂ emissions using a high-fidelity train model

Abstract

A near-term strategy to reduce emissions from rail vehicles, as a path to full electrification for maximal decarbonisation, is to partially electrify a route, with the remainder of the route requiring an additional self-powered traction option. These rail vehicles are usually powered by a diesel engine when not operating on electrified track and are referred to as bi-mode vehicles. This paper analyses the benefits of discontinuous electrification compared to continuous electrification using the CO₂ estimates from a validated high-fidelity bi-mode (diesel-electric) rail vehicle model. This analysis shows that 50% discontinuous electrification provides a maximum of 54% reduction in operational CO₂ emissions when compared to the same length of continuously electrified track. The highest emissions savings occurred when leaving train stations where vehicles must accelerate quickly to line speed. These results were used to develop a linear regression model for fast estimation of CO₂ emissions from diesel running and electrification benefits. This model was able to estimate the CO₂ emissions from a route to within 10% of that given by the high-fidelity model. Finally, additional considerations such as cost and the embodied CO₂ in electrification infrastructure were analysed to provide a comparison between continuous and discontinuous electrification. Discontinuous electrification can cost up to 56% less per reduction in lifetime emissions than continuous electrification and can save up to 2.3 times more lifetime CO₂ per distance electrified.

Keywords

Railway electrification / CO₂ reduction / Discontinuous electrification / Bi-mode rail vehicle

References

[1.] UK Department for Transport (2017) Air quality plan for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in UK.

[2.] Johnson J (2018) Let’s raise our ambitions for a cleaner, greener railway, Hansard, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lets-raise-our-ambitions-for-a-cleaner-greener-railway. Accessed 05-Dec-2018

[3.] Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce (2019) Final report to the minister for rail, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.rssb.co.uk/Library/improving-industry-performance/Rail-Industry-Decarbonisation-Task-Force-Initial-Report-to-the-Rail-Minister-January2019.pdf. Accessed 04-Jun-2020

[4.] Office of Rail and Road (2020) Rail infrastructure, assets and environmental 2018–19 Annual Statistical Release, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/infrastructure-and-emissions/rail-infrastructure-and-assets/. Accessed 04-Jun-2020

[5.] Hoffrichter A Miller AR Hillmansen S Roberts C. Well-to-wheel analysis for electric, diesel and hydrogen traction for railways. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2012 17 1 28-34

[6.] Network Rail (2020) Traction decarbonisation network strategy, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Traction-Decarbonisation-Network-Strategy-Executive-Summary.pdf. Accessed 09-Nov-2020

[7.] Logan KG Nelson JD McLellan BC Hastings A. Electric and hydrogen rail: potential contribution to net zero in the UK. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2020 87 102523

[8.] Esters T Marinov M. An analysis of the methods used to calculate the emissions of rolling stock in the UK. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2014 33 1-16

[9.] Tian Z Zhao N Hillmansen S Roberts C Dowens T Kerr C. SmartDrive: traction energy optimization and applications in rail systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2019 20 7 2764-2773

[10.] Scheepmaker GM Pudney PJ Albrecht AR Goverde RMP Howlett PG. Optimal running time supplement distribution in train schedules for energy-efficient train control. J Rail Transp Plan Manag, 2020 14

[11.] Din T Hillmansen S. Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions analysis for a concept design of a hydrogen hybrid railway vehicle. IET Electr Syst Transp, 2017 8 2 112-121

[12.] Scheepmaker GM Goverde RMP Kroon LG. Review of energy-efficient train control and timetabling. Eur J Op Res, 2017 257 2 355-376

[13.] Wang L (2014) Energy efficiency for diesel passenger trains, University of Birmingham

[14.] Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (2020) Annual Return 2020 – Data Tables, [Online]. Available: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Network-Rail-Infrastructure-Limited-Annual-Return-2020-data-tables-1.xlsx. Accessed 07-Oct-2020

[15.] Hoffrichter A Silmon J Schmid F Hillmansen S Roberts C. Feasibility of discontinuous electrification on the Great Western Main Line determined by train simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2013 227 3 296-306

[16.] Silmon J Hillmansen S. Investigating discontinuous electrification and energy storage on the Northern Trans-Pennine route. IET Conf Railw Tract Syst, 2010

[17.] Harrison TJ Midgley WJB Goodall RM Ward CP. Development and control of a rail vehicle model to optimise energy consumption and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2021

[18.] Golightly D Gamble C Palacin R Pierce K. Multi-modelling for decarbonisation in urban rail systems. Urban Rail Transit, 2019 5 4 254-266

[19.] Rogers A Robinson C Agatsuma K Iwasaki M Inarida S Yamamoto T Konishi K Mochida T. Development of class 800 / 801 high-speed rolling stock for UK intercity express programme. Hitachi Rev, 2014 63 10 646-654

[20.] Open Train Times Ltd. (202) OpenTrainTimes,” [Online]. Available: https://www.opentraintimes.com/. Accessed 04-Jun-2020

[21.] Network Rail (2020) National Electronic Sectional Appendix - Network Rail,” [Online]. Available: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-and-commercial/information-for-operators/national-electronic-sectional-appendix/. Accessed: 04-Jun-2020

[22.] Kemp R (2007) Traction Energy Metrics - T618, Rail Safety and Standards Board

[23.] Green-Hughes E Nicholls M. Speed - Britain’s Fastest Trains, 2019 Stamford Key Publishing Ltd

[24.] Schmid F (2020) The energy cost of comfort, Professional Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineers, p. 52

[25.] Stettler MEJ Midgley WJB Swanson JJ Cebon D Boies AM. Greenhouse gas and noxious emissions from dual fuel diesel and natural gas heavy goods vehicles. Environ Sci Technol, 2016 50 4 2018-2026

[26.] MTU Ltd (2016) PowerPacks® with 12V 1600 For Railcar Applications,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://mtu-online-shop.com/print/3234421_MTU_Rail_spec_PowerPack_12V1600.pdf. Accessed: 04-Jun-2020

[27.] Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy (2019) Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2019,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2019. Accessed 04-Jun-2020

[28.] Milford RL Allwood JM. Assessing the CO₂ impact of current and future rail track in the UK. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2010 15 2 61-72

[29.] “Case study: Electrification Embodied Carbon Savings.” [Online]. Available: https://www.rssb.co.uk/sustainability/Electrification-Embodied-Carbon-Savings. Accessed 15-Feb-2021

[30.] Chang B Kendall A. Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2011 16 6 429-434

Funding

RSSB(COF-IPS-02); Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council(DTE-Network-Plus-1)