Coupler force reduction method for multiple-unit trains using a new hierarchical control system

Abstract

During traction and braking of multiple-unit trains, substantial longitudinal dynamic forces might occur in couplers due to the non-optimal distribution of traction and braking forces generated by self-propelled carriages. These dynamic forces might create shocks affecting the reduction of endurance of the weakest train structural components primarily. Thus, the overall operational safety of the train is also lowered. The purpose of the paper is to develop a new control system to supervise the activities related to the longitudinal dynamics of each train carriage in a multiple-unit train to reduce the longitudinal coupler forces acting during train traction and braking. The hierarchical structure of the control system consists of two levels. The first master level of control works like standard cruise control. However, the reduction of longitudinal coupler forces is achieved by applying a second level of slave control systems with a control configuration of feedback compensation.

Keywords

Longitudinal train dynamics / Control system / Multiple-unit train / Railway coupler

References

[1.] Allenbach JM Chapas P Comte M Kaller R. Electric traction, 2008 Lausanne EPFL Press

[2.] Wu Q Spiryagin M Cole C. Longitudinal train dynamics: an overview. Veh Syst Dyn, 2016 54 12 1688-1714

[3.] Liu P Zhai W Wang K. Establishment and verification of three-dimensional dynamic model for heavy-haul train–track coupled system. Veh Syst Dyn, 2016 54 11 1511-1537

[4.] Oprea RA. A discontinuous model simulation for train start-up dynamics. Aust J Mech Eng, 2018 16 139-146

[5.] Ansari M Esmailzadeh E Younesian D. Longitudinal dynamics of freight trains. Int J Heavy Veh Syst, 2009 16 1 102-131

[6.] Sharma SK Sharma RC Kumar A Palli S. Challenges in rail vehicle-track modeling and simulation. Int J Veh Struct Syst, 2015 7 1 1-9

[7.] Sharma SK Kumar A. Ride performance of a high speed rail vehicle using controlled semi active suspension system. Smart Mater Struct, 2017 26 5 055026

[8.] Sharma SK Kumar A. Ride comfort of a higher speed rail vehicle using a magnetorheological suspension system. P I Mech Eng K-J Mul, 2018 232 1 32-48

[9.] Sharma SK. Multibody analysis of longitudinal train dynamics on the passenger ride performance due to brake application. P I Mech Eng K-J Mul, 2019 233 2 266-279

[10.] Shan W Wei L Chen K. Longitudinal train dynamics of electric multiple units under rescue. J Mod Transp, 2017 25 8 250-260

[11.] Śmietana K (April 4, 2019) A growing problem with cracks on Dart EMUs sheathings. PKP Intercity suspends the sale of tickets. https://forsal.pl/artykuly/1406692,pekniecia-w-pociagach-dart-pkp-intercity-wstrzymuje-sprzedaz-biletow-na-niektore-polaczenia.html (in Polish)

[12.] Newell P (2021) Couplers. https://www.coalstonewcastle.com.au/physics/couplers/

[13.] Ling L Xiao X Xiong J Zhou L Wen Z Jin X. A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys Eng), 2014 15 2 964-983

[14.] Jin X, Zhang D, He Y, Liu K, Zeng Y, Yan G (2018) Structural health monitoring of train coupling system. In: 9th European workshop on structural health monitoring (EWSHM 2018), July 10–13, 2018 in Manchester, UK. https://www.ndt.net/article/ewshm2018/papers/0131-Zhang.pdf

[15.] Brenna M Foiadelli F Zaninelli D. Electrical railway transportation systems, 2018 Hoboken Wiley

[16.] Du H Hu X Ma C. Dominant pole placement with modified PID controllers. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2019 17 2833-2838

[17.] Shaban EM Sayed H Abdelhamid A. A novel discrete PID+ controller applied to higher order/time delayed. Int J Dyn Control, 2019 7 2 888-900

[18.] Fišer J Zítek P. PID controller tuning via dominant pole placement in comparison with Ziegler–Nichols tuning. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019 52 18 43-48

[19.] Sangtungtong W, Dadthuyawat W (2013) The two parallel PID controllers with their output-weighting adaptation. In: IEEE (ed) 2013 10th International conference on electrical engineering/electronics, computer, telecommunications and information technology (ECTI-CON 2013), May 15–17, 2013 in Krabi, THAILAND, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2013.6559488

[20.] Thomas HM (2015) Control systems analysis and design. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform

[21.] Zaccarian L Teel AR. A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs. Automatica, 2002 38 10 1735-1744

[22.] Lurie BJ Enright PJ. Classical feedback control with nonlinear multi-loop systems with MATLAB and Simulink, 2020 London CRC Press

[23.] Zhai W. Vehicle–track coupled dynamics: theory and applications, 2020 Berlin Springer

[24.] Sone S. Comparison of the technologies of the Japanese Shinkansen and Chinese High-speed Railways. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys Eng), 2015 16 10 769-780

[25.] Wu Q Spiryagin M Wolfs P Cole C. Traction modelling in train dynamics. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai, 2019 233 4 382-395

[26.] Song Q Song Y Cai W. Adaptive backstepping control of train systems with traction/braking dynamics and uncertain resistive forces. Veh Syst Dyn, 2011 49 9 1441-1454

[27.] Jackiewicz J. Awrejcewicz J. Optimal control of automotive multivariable dynamical systems. Dynamical systems theory and applications, 2017 Cham Springer 151-168

Funding

Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy(BS)