Comparative evaluation of concrete sand-control fences used for railway protection in strong wind areas

Abstract

Concrete-plate fences have been widely adopted for windblown sand control and mitigation along railways. However, the inclination angles of inserting the concrete plate with respect to the vertical direction, i.e., straight or obliquely inserted concrete plates (SIP or OIP), significantly influence the efficiency of sand-control. This study performs a comparative evaluation of the SIP and OIP sand-control fences using wind tunnel testing and field monitoring data collected from the Lanzhou–Wulumuqi High-Speed Railway Project. The results show that the fence’s ability to reduce the wind speed and the sand-retaining efficiency gradually weakens with the increasing wind speed. Compared with the SIP fence, the OIP fence has a better wind speed reduction capability, stronger ability to capture fine particles below the top of the fence; it is more efficient for sand-retaining and induces stronger eddy intensity. Generally, the wind tunnel test and field monitoring results are consistent, whereas wind tunnel tests incline to overestimate wind speed reduction and sand-control efficiency. The study also finds that the aeolian sand accumulated around the fence can weaken the protection efficiency, and hence cleaning the aeolian sand accumulated around the fence should be done periodically to ensure the designed functions.

Keywords

Concrete-plate fences / Plate-inserting methods / Sand-control performance evaluation / Wind-sand flow / Wind tunnel test / Field monitoring

References

[1.] Dong Z Chen G He X . Controlling blown sand along the highway crossing the Taklimakan Desert. J Arid Environ, 2004 57 3 329-344

[2.] Han Z Wang T Dong Z . Chemical stabilization of mobile dune fields along a highway in the Taklimakan Desert of China. J Arid Environ, 2007 68 260-270

[3.] Zhang K-C Qu J-J Liao K-T . Damage by windblown sand and its control along Qinghai–Tibet Railway in China. Aeol Res, 2010 1 143-146

[4.] Xie S Qu J Lai Y . Formation mechanism and suitable controlling pattern of sand hazards at Honglianghe River section of Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Nat Hazards, 2015 76 2 855-871

[5.] Zhang C-L Zou X-Y Pan X-H . Near-surface airflow field and aerodynamic characteristics of the railway-protection system in the Shapotou region and their significance. J Arid Environ, 2007 71 2 169-187

[6.] Wang T Qu J Ling Y . Wind tunnel test on the effect of metal net fences on sand flux in a Gobi Desert, China. J Arid Land, 2017 9 6 888-899

[7.] Shi L Wang D Li K. Windblown sand characteristics and hazard control measures for the Lanzhou–Wulumuqi high-speed railway. Nat Hazards, 2020 104 353-374

[8.] Cornelis WM Gabriels D. Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. J Arid Environ, 2005 61 2 315-332

[9.] Li B Sherman DJ. Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences: a review. Aeol Res, 2015 17 34-38

[10.] Raine JK Stevenson DC. Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1977 2 159-180

[11.] Perera MDAES. Shelter behind two-dimensional solid and porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1981 8 1–2 93-104

[12.] Lee SJ Park KC Park CW. Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements. Atmos Environ, 2002 36 9 1453-1463

[13.] Dong Z Qian G Luo W . Threshold velocity for wind erosion: the effects of porous fences. Environ Geol, 2006 51 3 471-475

[14.] Dong Z Mu Q Luo W . An analysis of drag force and moment for upright porous wind fences. J Geophys Res, 2008 113 D4 1-8

[15.] Caborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and Microclimate. Bulletin-Forestry Commission (RU)

[16.] Alhajraf S. Computational fluid dynamic modeling of drifting particles at porous fences. Environ Model Softw, 2004 19 163-170

[17.] Jacobs AFG Wartena L. Flow and turbulence around thin fences in perpendicular and oblique flow direction. Neth J Agric Sci, 1987 35 7-20

[18.] Wilson JD. Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence I: measurements. J Appl Meteorol, 2004 43 1149-1167

[19.] Peña A Bechmann A Conti D . The fence experiment-full-scale lidar-based shelter observations. Wind Energy Sci, 2016 1 2 101-114

[20.] McClure S Kim JJ Lee SJ . Shelter effects of porous multi-scale fractal fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2017 163 6-14

[21.] Wang T Qu J Ling Y . Shelter effect efficacy of sand fences: a comparison of systems in a wind tunnel. Aeol Res, 2018 30 32-40

[22.] Keylock CJ Nishimura K Nemoto M . The flow structure in the wake of a fractal fence and the absence of an “inertial regime”. Environ Fluid Mech, 2012 12 3 227-250

[23.] Telenta M Duhovnik J Kosel F . Numerical and experimental study of the flow through a geometrically accurate porous wind barrier model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2014 124 99-108

[24.] Lima IA Araújo AD Parteli EJR . Optimal array of sand fences. Sci Rep, 2017 7 45148 1-8

[25.] Bruno L Fransos D Giudice A. Solid barriers for windblown sand mitigation: aerodynamic behavior and conceptual design guidelines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2018 173 32-40

[26.] Dong Z Luo W Qian G . A wind tunnel simulation of the mean velocity fields behind upright porous fences. Agric For Meteorol, 2007 146 1–2 82-93

[27.] Zhang N Kang J-H Lee S-J. Wind tunnel observation on the effect of a porous wind fence on the shelter of saltating sand particles. Geomorphology, 2010 120 24-232

[28.] Cheng J-J Xue C-C. The sand-damage-prevention engineering system for the railway in the desert region of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2014 125 30-37

[29.] Zhang S Ding G-D Yu M-H . Effect of straw checkerboards on wind proofing, sand fixation, and ecological restoration in shifting sandy land. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018 15 10 2184

[30.] Bruno L Horvata M Raffaele L. Windblown sand along with railway infrastructures: a review of challenges and mitigation measures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2018 177 340-365

[31.] Hong S-W Lee I-B Seo I-H. Modeling and predicting wind velocity patterns for windbreak fence design. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2015 142 53-64

[32.] Wu X Zou X Zhang C . The effect of wind barriers on airflow in a wind tunnel. J Arid Environ, 2013 97 73-83

[33.] White BR. Laboratory simulation of aeolian sand transport and physical modeling of flow around dunes. Ann Arid Zone, 1996 35 3 187-213

[34.] Cheng JJ Jiang FQ Xue CX . Characteristics of the disastrous wind-sand environment along railways in the Gobi area of Xinjiang, China. Atmos Environ, 2015 102 344-354

[35.] Lee SJ Kim HB. Laboratory measurements of velocity and turbulence field behind porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1999 80 311-326

[36.] Ma R Wang J Qu J . Effectiveness of shelterbelt with a non-uniform density distribution. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2010 98 767-771

[37.] Dong Z Wang H Liu X . The blown sand flux over a sandy surface: a wind-tunnel investigation on the fetch effect. Geomorphology, 2004 57 117-127

[38.] Cheng J-J Lei J-Q Li S-Y . Disturbance of the inclined inserting-type sand fence to wind–sand flow fields and its sand control characteristics. Aeol Res, 2016 21 139-151

Funding

Science and Technology Development Plan of China Railway Group Limited (CREC)(2015-kj035-g004-03)