Train–track coupled dynamics analysis: system spatial variation on geometry, physics and mechanics

Lei Xu, Wanming Zhai

Railway Engineering Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1) : 36-53.

Railway Engineering Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1) : 36-53. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-020-00203-0
Article

Train–track coupled dynamics analysis: system spatial variation on geometry, physics and mechanics

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify the influence of system spatial variability on train–track interaction from perspectives of stochastic analysis and statistics. Considering the spatial randomness of system properties in geometry, physics and mechanics, the primary work is therefore simulating the uncertainties realistically, representatively and efficiently. With regard to the track irregularity simulation, a model is newly developed to obtain random sample sets of track irregularities by transforming its power spectral density function into the equivalent track quality index for representation based on the discrete Parseval theorem, where the correlation between various types of track irregularities is accounted for. To statistically clarify the uncertainty of track properties in physics and mechanics in space, a model combining discrete element method and finite element method is developed to obtain the spatially varied track parametric characteristics, e.g. track stiffness and density, through which the highly expensive experiments in situ can be avoided. Finally a train–track stochastic analysis model is formulated by integrating the system uncertainties into the dynamics model. Numerical examples have validated the accuracy and efficiency of this model and illustrated the effects of system spatial variability on train–track vibrations comprehensively.

Keywords

Railway engineering / Stochastic dynamic analysis / Train–track interaction / Vehicle–track coupled dynamics / Track irregularities / Longitudinal inhomogeneity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lei Xu, Wanming Zhai. Train–track coupled dynamics analysis: system spatial variation on geometry, physics and mechanics. Railway Engineering Science, 2020, 28(1): 36‒53 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-020-00203-0

References

[1.]
Garg VK Dukkipati RV. Dynamics of railway vehicle systems, 1984 Ontario Academic Press
[2.]
EN14363:2005 (2005) Railway applications-testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles-testing of running behavior and stationary tests. CEN, Brussels, Beligium
[3.]
Xu L Zhai W Gao J. A probabilistic model for track random irregularities in vehicle/track coupled dynamics. Appl Math Model, 2017 51 145-158
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Perrin G Soize C Duhamel D Fünfschilling C. Track irregularities stochastic modelling. Probab Eng Mech, 2013 34 123-130
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Náprstek J Frýba L. Stochastic modelling of track and its substructure. Veh Sys Dy, 1995 24 sup 1 297-310
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Fröhling RD Scheffel H Ebersöhn W. The vertical dynamic response of a rail vehicle caused by track stiffness variations along the track. Veh Syst Dyn, 1996 25 Suppl 175-187
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Oscarsson J Nielsen JCO. Dynamic train/track interaction with state-dependent track properties, technical report F215, 1999 Göteborg, Sweden Department of Solid Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology
[8.]
Oscarsson J. Dynamic train–track-ballast interaction with unevenly distributed track properties. Veh Syst Dyn, 2002 37 1 385-396
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Nielsen JCO Oscarsson J. Simulation of dynamic train–track interaction with state-dependent track properties. J Sound Vib, 2004 275 3–5 515-532
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Andersen L Øren S Nielsen RK. Vibrations of a track caused by variation of the foundation stiffness. Probab Eng Mech, 2003 18 171-184
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Wu TX Thompson DJ. Influence of random sleeper spacing and ballast stiffness on the vibration behaviour of railway track. Acta Acust United Acust, 2000 86 2 313-321
[12.]
Dahlberg T. Railway track stiffness variations: consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civil Eng, 2010 8 1 1-12
[13.]
Sañudo R dell’Olio L Casado JA Carrascal IA Diego S. Track transitions in railways: a review. Constr Build Mater, 2016 112 140-157
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Nielsen JCO Abrahamsson TJS. Coupling of physical and modal components for analysis of moving non-linear dynamic systems on general beam structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 1992 33 9 1843-1859
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Yang YB Chang CH Yau JD. An element for analysing vehicle-bridge systems considering vehicle’s pitching effect. Int J Numer Method Eng, 1999 46 1031-1047
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Zhai W Han Z Chen Z Ling L Zhu S. train–track-bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019 57 7 984-1027
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Chen XM Deng X Xu L. A three-dimensional dynamic model for railway vehicle-track interactions. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn, 2018 13 071006
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Zhai W. Vehicle-track coupled dynamics theory and applications, 2020 Singapore Springer
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Zhai W Wang K Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle-track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2009 47 11 1349-1376
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Arvidsson T Andersson A Karoumi R. Train running safety on non-ballasted bridges. Int J Rail Transp, 2019 7 1 1-22
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Zhao X Li Z. The solution of frictional wheel–rail rolling contact with a 3D transient finite element model: Validation and error analysis. Wear, 2011 271 444-452
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Vermeulen PJ Johnson KL. Contact of non-spherical bodies transmitting tangential forces. J Appl Mech, 1964 31 338-340
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Sladkowski A Sitarz M. Analysis of wheel–rail interaction using FE Software. Wear, 2005 258 1217-1223
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Xu L Zhai W. A three-dimensional dynamic model for train–track interactions. Appl Math Model, 2019 76 443-465
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Xu L Yu ZW Shi C. A matrix coupled model for vehicle-slab track-subgrade interactions at 3-D space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2020 128 105894
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
Kalker JJ. Survey of wheel–rail rolling contact theory. Veh Syst Dyn, 1979 5 317-358
CrossRef Google scholar
[27.]
Vermeulen PJ Johnson KL. Contact of nonspherical elastic bodies transmitting tangential forces. J Appl Mech, 1964 86 338-340
CrossRef Google scholar
[28.]
Wen DZ Zhuo RH Ding DJ Zheng H Cheng J Li ZH. Generation of correlated pseudorandom variables in Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Phys Sin, 2012 61 22 220204(in Chinese)
[29.]
Golub GH Van Loan CF. Matrix computations, 1996 3 Baltimore Johns Hopkins
[30.]
Press W Flannery B Teukolsky S . Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 1992 2 New York Cambridge University Press
[31.]
Cundall PA Strack ODL. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique, 1979 29 1 47-65
CrossRef Google scholar
[32.]
Hunt GA (2000) EUROBALT optimises ballasted track, Railway Gazette International: 813–816
[33.]
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2004) Particle flow code in 2 dimensions, version 3.1, user’s mannual
[34.]
Zhang X Zhao C Zhai W. Dynamic behavior analysis of high-speed railway ballast under moving vehicle loads using discrete element method. Int J Geomech, 2016 17 7 04016157
CrossRef Google scholar
[35.]
Oscarsson J Dahlberg T. Dynamic train track ballast interaction computer models and full scale experiments. Veh Syst Dyn, 1998 29 73-84
CrossRef Google scholar
[36.]
Oscarsson J. Dynamic train–track interaction: variability attributable to scatter in the track properties. Veh Syst Dyn, 2002 37 1 59-79
CrossRef Google scholar
[37.]
Ma C. Research on evaluation index optimization method of high-speed railway ballasted bed. Railw Stand Des, 2016 60 5 20-24
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN)(11790283); National Natural Science Foundation of China(51735012)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/