Affect and satisfaction time dependency: An experience sampling study

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the time dependency between affect and satisfaction on a momentary level. Ninety-eight students participated in the study, using the experience sampling method. Affect and satisfaction scales were administered five times a day for 7 days via handheld devices, sampling the whole awake period with ratings approximately 3–4 h apart. The aim of this study was to examine the cross-correlation between affect and satisfaction at the intra-individual level and to test their temporal consistency via lagged cross-correlations. On average, satisfaction was robustly associated with positive affect (PA; mean correlation 0.50) and negative affect (NA; mean correlation −0.38). The correlation of satisfaction with affect factors showed a consistent temporal dependency. Lag (i.e., the shift of one time series with respect to another) significantly affected the magnitude of the correlation coefficients of satisfaction with PA and NA (explaining almost half of the correlation variance). A significant affect–satisfaction cross-correlation can be found when no lag is present. The introduction of a lag reduces the affect–satisfaction cross-correlation to virtually zero. Research suggests that affect and satisfaction overlap at the momentary level, and the results of this study imply that they are also time-dependent. These findings corroborate the idea that momentary satisfaction judgments are partially based on available emotional information, both in terms of intensity and temporal consistency.

Key words： cross-correlation; momentary affect; satisfaction; time-dependency

References

1 Andrews, F. M., & Robinson, J. P. (1991). Measures of subjective well-being. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 61–114). Academic Press.

2 Arthaud-day, M. L., Rode, J. C., Mooney, C. H., & Near, J. P. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445–476.

3 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

4 Barrett, L. F., & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 175–185.

5 Bonito, J. A., Ruppel, E. K., & Keyton, J. (2012). Reliability estimates for multilevel designs in group research. Small Group Research, 43(4), 443–467.

6 Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.

7 Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.

8 Diener, E., Fujita, F., Tay, L., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). Purpose, mood, and pleasure in predicting satisfaction judgments. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 333–341.

9 Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology, 58(2), 87–104.

10 Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). Russell Sage Foundation.

11 Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.

12 Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

13 Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment – monitoring behavior in daily life settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 206–213.

14 Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967–984.

15 Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 577–606.

16 Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.

17 Hudson, N. W., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2017). Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 45–54.

18 Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology, 16(4), 327–342.

19 Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., Blackie, L. E. R., & Weiss, B. (2021). Examining within-person relationships between state assessments of affect and eudaimonic well-being using multi-level structural equation modeling. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(5), 691–700.

20 Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2017a). Examining the effect of affect on life satisfaction judgments: A within-person perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 68(April), 32–37.

21 Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2017b). Examining the within-person effect of affect on daily satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 71(September), 27–32.

22 Jovanovic, V. (2011). Personality and subjective well-being: One neglected model of personality and two forgotten aspects of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 631–635.

23 Kardum, I. (1998). Affect intensity and frequency: Their relation to mean level and variability of positive and negative affect and Eysencks personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 33–47.

24 Kashdan, T. B., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Whether, when, and how is spirituality related to well-being? Moving beyond single occasion questionnaires to understanding daily process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1523–1535.

25 Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 66–75.

26 Larsen, R. J. (1987). The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1195–1204.

27 Larsen, R. J. (2009). The contribution of positive and negative affect to emotional well-being. Psychological Topics, 18, 247–266.

28 Larsen, R. J., Augustine, A. A., & Prizmic, Z. (2009). A process approach to emotion and personality: Using time as a facet of data. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1407–1426.

29 Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., Barrett, L. F., Liquist, K. A., & Wagner, T. D. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(3), 121–143.

30 Lucas, R. E., Donnellan, B. M., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four National Panel Studies. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 323–331.

31 Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1091–1098.

32 Lucas, R. E., Freedman, V. A., & Cornman, J. C. (2018). The short-term stability of life satisfaction judgments. Emotion, 18(7), 1024–1031.

33 Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., Eid, M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 431–441.

34 Luhmann, M., Krasko, J., & Terwiel, S. (2021). Subjective well-being as a dynamic construct. In The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 1231–1249). Elsevier.

35 Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(1), 2–9.

36 Mitsutake, G., Otsuka, K., Cornélissen, G., Herold, M., Günther, R., Dawes, C., Burch, J. B., Watson, D., & Halberg, F. (2001). Circadian and infradian rhythms in mood. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 55, 94–100.

37 Nezlek, J. B. (2005). Distinguishing affective and non-affective reactions to daily events. Journal of Personality, 73, 1539–1568.

38 Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Diary methods for social and personality psychology. In J. B. Nezlek (Ed.), The SAGE library of methods in social and personality psychology. Sage Publications.

39 Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.

40 Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.

41 Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 340–354.

42 Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66(1), 3–8.

43 Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2019). Analyzing dynamic data: A tutorial. Personality and Individual Differences, 136(1), 38–51.

44 Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 198–215.

45 Ross, M., Eyman, A., & Kischuck, N. (1986). Determinants of subjective well- being. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (pp. 79–93). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

46 Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177–198.

47 Sailer, U., Rosenberg, P., Nima, A., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Archer, T., & Garcia, D. (2014). A happier and less sinister past, a more hedonistic and less fatalistic present and a more structured future: Time perspective and well-being. PeerJ, 2, e303.

48 Schimmack, U. (2002). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. Ohn & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). Oxford University Press.

49 Schimmack, U., & Anusic, I. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781.

50 Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–384.

51 Schimmack, U., Krause, P., Wagner, G. G., & Schupp, J. (2009). Stability and change of well being: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 19–31.

52 Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.

53 Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 582–593.

54 Schwarz, N. (2010). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglansky, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–307). Sage Publications.

55 Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of Weil-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523.

56 Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). Russell Sage Foundation.

57 Shrout, P., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). Guilford Press.

58 Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 22–42.

59 Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E. (2007). Real-time data collection for pain: Appraisal and current status. Pain Medicine, 8(suppl 3), S85–S93.

60 Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3), 236–243.

61 Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2003). Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24(2), 182–199.

62 Suh, E. M., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1091–1102.

63 Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1031–1039.

64 Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford University Press.

65 Tončić, M., & Anić, P. (2020). Effects of momentary affect on satisfaction judgments. Journal of Individual Differences, 41(2), 61–67.

66 Tončić, M., Brdar, I., & Anić, P. (2010). Ličnost i zadovoljstvo životom: Kakva je uloga pozitivnih i negativnih emocija? Personality and life satisfaction: What's the role of positive and negative emotions? In I. Sorić, V. Ćubela Adorić, L. Gregov, & Z. Penezić (Eds.), 17. Dani psihologije.

67 Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

68 Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Suzuki, N. (2003). Relating momentary affect to the five factor model of personality: A Japanese case. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(2), 80–93.

69 Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 178–197.