On the scale-up criteria for bubble columns

Abstract

It is generally admitted that experimental data obtained in “laboratory-scale” bubble columns are representative of “industrial-scale” reactors if the well-known three “Wilkinson et al. scale-up criteria” are satisfied: (a) the diameter of the bubble column is larger than 0.15 m, (b) the sparger openings are larger than 1-2 mm and (c) the aspect ratio is larger than 5. The aim of this communication is to contribute to the existing discussion. To this end, this communication collects relevant experimental investigation and include new experimental data: in particular, we have experimentally studied the combined effect of the aspect ratio (within the range of 1-15) and the sparger design (considering both “coarse” and “fine” spargers) on the gas holdup in a large-diameter and large-scale gas-liquid bubble column. The bubble column has been operated both in the batch mode and in the counter-current mode. Filtered air has been used as the gaseous phase in all the experiments, while the liquid phase has included deionized water and different aqueous solutions of organic (i.e., ethanol) and inorganic (i.e., sodium chloride, NaCl) active agents. It is found that the “Wilkinson et al. scale-up criteria” are valid for the air-water case in the batch mode for “very-coarse” spargers. Conversely, they are no more valid when considering different liquid velocity, and/or aqueous solutions of active agents, and other sparger openings.

Keywords

Bubble column / Scale-up / Gas sparger / Gas holdup / Liquid phase properties

References

[1] S.K. Majumder, Hydrodynamics and Transport Processes of Inverse Bubbly Flow, Elsevier Inc., 2016.

[2] A. Shaikh, M. Al-Dahhan, Scale-up of bubble column reactors: a review of current state-of-the-art, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 8091-8108.

[3] R. Rzehak, Modeling of mass-transfer in bubbly flows encompassing different mechanisms, Chem. Eng. Sci. 151 (2016) 139-143.

[4] P.M.Wilkinson, A.P. Spek, L.L. van Dierendonck, Design parameters estimation for scale-up of high-pressure bubble columns, AIChE J. 38 (1992) 544-554.

[5] S. Sasaki, K. Hayashi, A. Tomiyama, Effects of liquid height on gas holdup in airewater bubble column, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 72 (2016) 67-74.

[6] S. Sasaki, K. Uchida, K. Hayashi, A. Tomiyama, Effects of column diameter and liquid height on gas holdup in air-water bubble columns, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 82 (2017) 359-366.

[7] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, Comprehensive experimental investigation of countercurrent bubble column hydrodynamics: holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and local flow properties, Chem. Eng. Sci. 146 (2016) 259-290.

[8] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, G. De Guido, L.A. Pellegrini, The dual effect of viscosity on bubble column hydrodynamics, Chem. Eng. Sci. 158 (2017) 509-538.

[9] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, Influence of internals on counter-current bubble column hydrodynamics: holdup, flow regime transition and local flow properties, Chem. Eng. Sci. 145 (2016) 162-180.

[10] J. Kitscha, G. Kocamustafaogullari, Breakup criteria for fluid particles, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 15 (1989) 573-588.

[11] C.S. Brooks, S.S. Paranjape, B. Ozar, T. Hibiki, M. Ishii, Two-group drift-flux model for closure of the modified two-fluid model, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 37 (2012) 196-208.

[12] M.E. Shawkat, C.Y. Ching, Liquid turbulence kinetic energy budget of Co-Current bubbly flow in a large diameter vertical pipe, J. Fluid Eng. 133 (2011), 091303-091303.

[13] Y.T. Shah, B.G. Kelkar, S.P. Godbole, W.D. Deckwer, Design parameters estimations for bubble column reactors, AIChE J. 28 (1982) 353-379.

[14] G. Besagni, G.R. Guédon, F. Inzoli, Annular gap bubble column: experimental investigation and computational fluid dynamics modeling, J. Fluid Eng. 138 (2016) 011302.

[15] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, The effect of liquid phase properties on bubble column fluid dynamics: gas holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and shapes, interfacial areas and foaming phenomena, Chem. Eng. Sci. 170 (2016) 270-296.

[16] K. Akita, F. Yoshida, Gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Effects of liquid properties, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 12 (1973) 76-80.

[17] J. Voigt, K. Schügerl, Absorption of oxygen in countercurrent multistage bubble columnsdI Aqueous solutions with low viscosity, Chem. Eng. Sci. 34 (1979) 1221-1229.

[18] P. Rollbusch, M. Becker, M. Ludwig, A. Bieberle, M. Grünewald, U. Hampel, R. Franke, Experimental investigation of the influence of column scale, gas density and liquid properties on gas holdup in bubble columns, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 75 (2015) 88-106.

[19] A. Sangnimnuan, G.N. Prasad, J.B. Agnew, Gas hold-up and backmixing in a bubble-column reactor under coal-hydroliquefaction conditions, Chem. Eng. Commun. 25 (1984) 193-212.

[20] T.J.W. de Bruijn, J.D. Chase, W.H. Dawson, Gas holdup in a two-phase vertical tubular reactor at high pressure, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 66 (1988) 330-333.

[21] R. Lau, W. Peng, L.G. Velazquez-Vargas, G.Q. Yang, L.S. Fan, Gas-liquid mass transfer in high-pressure bubble columns, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004) 1302-1311.

[22] G.Q. Yang, L.S. Fan, Axial liquid mixing in high-pressure bubble columns, AIChE J. 49 (2003) 1995-2008.

[23] A.T. Shawaqfeh, Gas holdup and liquid axial dispersion under slug flow conditions in gaseliquid bubble column, Chem. Eng. Process: Process Intensification 42 (2003) 767-775.

[24] J.H. Hills, The operation of a bubble column at high throughputs: I. Gas holdup measurements, Chem. Eng. J. 12 (1976) 89-99.

[25] M.S. Baawain, M.G. El-Din, D.W. Smith, Artificial neural networks modeling of ozone bubble columns: mass transfer coefficient, gas hold-up, and bubble size, Ozone Sci. Eng. 29 (2007) 343-352.

[26] A.K. Biń, B. Duczmal, P. Machniewski, Hydrodynamics and ozone mass transfer in a tall bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 6233-6240.

[27] H. Jin, S. Yang, G. He, M. Wang, R.A. Williams, The effect of gas-liquid countercurrent operation on gas hold-up in bubble columns using electrical resistance tomography, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 85 (2010) 1278-1283.

[28] T. Otake, S. Tone, K. Shinohara, Gas holdup in the bubble column with cocurrent and countercurrent gas-liquid flow, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. (1981) 338-340.

[29] G. Besagni, G. Guédon, F. Inzoli, Experimental investigation of counter current air-water flow in a large diameter vertical pipe with inners, J. Phys. Conf. 547 (2014) 012024.

[30] I. Reilly, D. Scott, T. Debruijn, D. MacIntyre, The role of gas phase momentum in determining gas holdup and hydrodynamic flow regimes in bubble column operations, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 72 (1994) 3-12.

[31] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, The effect of electrolyte concentration on counter-current gas-liquid bubble column fluid dynamics: gas holdup, flow regime transition and bubble size distributions, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 118 (2017) 170-193.

[32] G. Besagni, A.D. Pasquali, L. Gallazzini, E. Gottardi, L.P.M. Colombo, F. Inzoli, The effect of aspect ratio in counter-current gas-liquid bubble columns: experimental results and gas holdup correlations, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 94 (2017) 53-78.

[33] S. Sharaf, M. Zednikova, M.C. Ruzicka, B.J. Azzopardi, Global and local hydrodynamics of bubble columns e effect of gas distributor, Chem. Eng. J. 288 (2016) 489-504.

[34] M.C. Ruzicka, J. Zahradnı ́ k, J. Drahoś, N.H. Thomas, Homogeneouseheterogeneous regime transition in bubble columns, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 4609-4626.

[35] D. Lucas, E. Krepper, H.M. Prasser, A. Manera, Investigations on the stability of the flow characteristics in a bubble column, Chem. Eng. Technol. 29 (2006) 1066-1072.

[36] D. Lucas, H.M. Prasser, A. Manera, Influence of the lift force on the stability of a bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) 3609-3619.

[37] R.F. Mudde, W.K. Harteveld, H.E.A. van den Akker, Uniform flow in bubble columns, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (2009) 148-158.

[38] J. Zahradnı ́ k, M. Fialová, V. Linek, The effect of surface-active additives on bubble coalescence in aqueous media, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 (1999) 4757-4766.

[39] B. Giorgio, I. Fabio, Influence of electrolyte concentration on holdup, flow regime transition and local flow properties in a large scale bubble column, J. Phys. Conf. 655 (2015) 012039.

[40] G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, G. De Guido, L.A. Pellegrini, Experimental investigation on the influence of ethanol on bubble column hydrodynamics, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 112 (2016) 1-15.

[41] Y.T. Shah, S. Joseph, D.N. Smith, J.A. Ruether, On the behavior of the gas phase in a bubble column with ethanol-water mixtures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 24 (1985) 1140-1148.