Predicting saturated vapor pressure of LNG from density and temperature data with a view to improving tank pressure management

Abstract

Determining the saturated vapor pressure (SVP) of LNG requires detailed thermodynamic calculations based on compositional data. Yet LNG compositions and SVPs evolve constantly for LNG stored in tanks. Moreover, the SVP of the LNG in a tank influences boil-off rates and tank pressure trends. In order to make improved tank pressure control decisions it would be beneficial for LNG tank operators to be made more constantly aware of the SVP of the LNG in a tank. Machine learning models that accurately estimate LNG SVP from density and temperature inputs offer the potential to provide such information. A dataset of five distinct, internationally traded LNG cargoes is compiled with 305 data records representing a range of temperature and density conditions. This can be used graphically to interpolate LNG SVP. However, two machine learning methods are applied to this dataset to automate the SVP predictions. A simple multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) predicts SVP of the dataset with root mean square error (RMSE) = 6.34 kPaA and R² = 0.975. The transparent open-box learning network (TOB), a regression-free optimized data matching algorithm predicts SVP of the dataset with RMSE = 0.59 kPaA and R² = 0.999. When applied to infill unknown LNG compositions the superior TOB method achieves prediction accuracy of RMSE ~3kPaA and R² = 0.996. Predicting LNG SVP to this level of accuracy is beneficial for tank-pressure management decision making.

Keywords

LNG traded Compositions / LNG SVP relationships / LNG tank pressure influences / Boil-off gas rates / Optimized data-matching prediction

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

[1] GIIGNL, The LNG industry annual report 2019. International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (GIIGNL), 2019, 56 pages, https://giignl.org/sites/default/files/PUBLIC_AREA/Publications/giignl_annual_report_2019-compressed.pdf. (Accessed 15 January 2020). Accessed.

[2] CEDIGAZ,World LNG Outlook 2019, CEDIGAZ the International Association for Natural Gas, 2019, p. 20. https://www.cedigaz.org/category/analysis/. (Accessed 15 January 2020). Accessed.

[3] M. Kulitsa, D.A. Wood, Part 1: improved monitoring onboard FSRUs is required to enhance operating performance and cut cargo loss, LNG Journal (October Issue) (2017) 22-24.

[4] M. Kulitsa, D.A. Wood, Enhanced application for FSRU recondensing equipment during periods of low or No gas send out to minimize LNG cargo losses, Petroleum 4 (4) (2018) 365-374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.01.002.

[5] MEPC,Guidelines for the Development of a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP). Resolution MEPC.282(70), Adopted by Marine Environment Protection Committee vol. 28 October (2016).

[6] DNV-GL,EU MRV, IMO DCS. https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/insights/topics/EU-MRV-and-IMO-DCS/index.html, 2019. (Accessed 15 January 2019). Accessed.

[7] ICS-Shipping,European union monitoring, reporting and verification (EU MRV) regulation. International chamber of shipping guidance. https://www. ics-shipping.org/docs/default-source/resources/ics-guidance-on-eu-mrv.pdf? sfvrsn=10, 2015. (Accessed 16 December 2019) accessed, 13.

[8] S. Mackin, R. Howells, In-depth analysis -LNG: speed, consumption and boiloff warranties. Clyde & Co insight, 7 pages, https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/in-depth-analysis-lng-speed-consumption-and-boil-off-warranties, 2020. (Accessed 15 January 2020). Accessed.

[9] M. Kulitsa, D.A. Wood, Soft metal blanket with optional anti-sloshing conceptual designs to improve pressure control for floating and land-based liquefied natural gas tanks, Advances in Geo-Energy Research 3 (4) (2019) 424-447, https://doi.org/10.26804/ager.2019.04.09.

[10] Q.-S. Chen, J. Wegrzyn, V. Prasad, Analysis of temperature and pressure changes in liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic tanks, Cryogenics 44 (2004) 701-709.

[11] K. Li, G. Wang, C. Liu,Study on calculation of liquid level and storage of tanks for LNG-fuelled vessels, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 111 (2018), 012030, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/111/1/012030, 8 pages.

[12] Y. Shao, Y. Lee, H. Kang, Dynamic optimization of boil-off gas generation for different time limits in liquid natural gas bunkering, Energies 12 (2019) 1130, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061130.

[13] NIST,Reference Fluid thermodynamic and Transport properties database (REFPROP):version 10. https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/referencefluid-thermodynamic-and-transport-properties-database-refprop, 2020. (Accessed 8 January 2020) accessed.

[14] J.M. Shah, J.J. Aarts, Effect of weathering of LNG in storage tanks, in: K.D. Timmerhaus (Ed.), Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Springer Science & Business, 1995, pp. 253-260.

[15] D.A. Wood, S. Mokhatab, Natural gas interchangeability in focus as sources of LNG widen, LNG Journal (February) (2007) 14-18.

[16] F. Yang, Measurement method of liquid level in LNG tank[J], Tianjin chemical 4 (4) (2014) 54-55, 27.

[17] D.A. Wood, M. Kulitsa, Weathering/ageing of LNG cargoes during marine Transport and processing on FSU and FSRU, J. Energy Resour. Technol. 140 (10) (2018), 102901, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039981 (11 pages).

[18] A. Benito, Accurate Determination of LNG Quality Unloaded in Receiving Terminals: an Innovative Approach, GERG Academic Network Event, Brussels, Belgium, 2009, pp. 1-23.

[19] M. Miana, R. Del Hoyo, V. Rodrigálvarez, J.R. Valdés, R. Llorens, Calculation models of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) weathering during ship transportation, Appl. Energy 87 (2010) 1687-1700.

[20] E. Adom, S.Z. Islam, X. Ji, Modelling of boil-off gas in LNG tanks: a case study, Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2 (4) (2010) 292-296.

[21] D. Dobrota, B. Lalić, I. Komar, Problem of boil -off in LNG supply chain, Trans. Marit. Sci. (2013) 91-100, 02.

[22] G.G. Dimopoulis, C.A. Frangopoulos, A dynamic model for liquefied natural gas evaporation during marine transportation, Int. J. Therm. 11 (3) (2008) 123-131.

[23] L.A. Pellegrini, S. Moioli, F. Brignoli, C. Bellini, L.N.G. Technology, The weathering in above-ground storage tanks, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (10) (2014) 3931-3937.

[24] C. Migliore, C. Tubilleja, V. Vesovic, Weathering prediction model for stored liquefied natural gas (LNG), J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26 (2015) 570-580.

[25] C.M. Capello,Modelling the Weathering Process of Stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, 2016, p. 305.

[26] A. Hubert, S. Dembele, P. Denissenko, J. Wen, Predicting liquefied natural gas (LNG) rollovers using computational Fluid dynamics, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 62 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103922.

[27] C. Migliore, A. Salehi, V. Vesovic, A non-equilibrium approach to modelling the weathering of stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Energy 124 (2017) 684-692.

[28] D.A. Wood, transparent, Open-Box learning network provides insight to complex systems and a performance benchmark for more-opaque machine learning algorithms, Advances in Geo-Energy Research 2 (2) (2018) 148-162, https://doi.org/10.26804/ager.2018.02.04(2018).

[29] F. Fausett, Fundamentals of Neural Networks: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.

[30] S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, first ed., 1994 (Saddle River, NJ, USA).

[31] K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, H. White, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Network. 2 (1989) 359-366, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080 (89) 90020-8.

[32] K. Hornik, Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks, Neural Network. 4 (1991) 251-257, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T.

[33] R. Battiti, First and second order methods for learning: between steepest descent and Newton’s method, Neural Comput. 4 (2) (1992) 141-166.

[34] D.A. Wood, Transparent open-box learning network provides auditable predictions for coal gross calorific value, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 5 (2) (2019) 395-419, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0543-9.

[35] Frontline Solvers, Standard Excel Solver -Limitations of Nonlinear Optimization, 2020 (accessed: 13 January 2020), https://www.solver.com/standardexcel-solver-limitations-nonlinear-optimization.