Integrated Mineral Analysis of sandstone and dolomite formations using different chelating agents during matrix acidizing

Mian Umer Shafiq , Hisham Khaled Ben Mahmud , Mohsen Ghasemi

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 67 -76.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :67 -76. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.07.002
research-article
Integrated Mineral Analysis of sandstone and dolomite formations using different chelating agents during matrix acidizing
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Mineral analysis plays a major role in the successful matrix acidizing as it shows the change in physiochemical changes in the formation due to the reaction with fluids injected. Mineralogy of the reservoir can be altered by injecting mineral acids during matrix acidizing. But various complications are connected during the application of these acids such as environmental hazards, corrosion of pipes and tubings, precipitation of fluosilicates and fast spending of acid. To mitigate these problems, chelating agents have been applied as an alternative by different researchers. In this study, three different chelating agents EDTA, GLDA and HEDTA were applied to stimulate sandstone and dolomite samples. The pH value of these chelates ranges from 1.7 to 3 and is measured before and after core flooding to observe physiochemical changes. Core flooding experiments under 180 °F temperature were performed at a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min on core samples having dimensions (3 inch × 1.5 inch). Porosity, permeability, Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), and TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analysis (TIMA) were employed to measure changes in formation properties such as morphology, topology and mineralogy. The reacted sample of acids was analyzed for sodium, potassium, calcium, aluminium, magnesium, and iron using the ICP technique to find the capability of these chelates to remove positive ions. HEDTA found to be effective in chelating iron, calcium and magnesium and it also removed some amount of aluminium ions from the sandstone samples. Permeability and porosity analysis concluded that HEDTA is more efficient in creating new big pore spaces. TIMA analysis confirms that HEDTA is effective in dissolving quartz and other positive ions while dissolved a large amount of calcium and sodium from the sandstone as compared to other chelates. TIMA analysis also concluded that HEDTA is effective in increasing porosity of sandstone formation while GLDA is effective in dolomites.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mian Umer Shafiq, Hisham Khaled Ben Mahmud, Mohsen Ghasemi. Integrated Mineral Analysis of sandstone and dolomite formations using different chelating agents during matrix acidizing. Petroleum, 2019, 5(1): 67-76 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.07.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

First of all, thanks to JDLC Centre, Curtin Australia for their support in utilizing TIMA machine. The TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analysis (TIMA) instrument was Funded by a grant from the Australian Research Council (LE140100180) and is operated by the John de Laeter Centre at Curtin University with the support of the Geological Survey of Western Australia, University of Western Australia and Murdoch University.

Thanks to Sven and TSW Analytical Pty Ltd as an analyst and analytical service provider for ICP analysis.

References

[1]

EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040, 2014.

[2]

Q. Ji, L. Zhou, H.A. Nasr-El-Din, Acidizing Sandstone Reservoirs Using Fines Control Acid, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014.

[3]

B.G. Al-Harbi, M.H. Al-Khaldi, K.A. AlDossary, Interactions of Organic-hf Systems with Aluminosilicates: Lab Testing and Field Recommendations, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011.

[4]

Halliburton, Carbonate Matrix Acidizing Treatment, Halliburton, 2000a.

[5]

Halliburton, Effective Sandstone Acidizing, Halliburton, 2000b.

[6]

M.J. Economides, K.G. Nolte, Reservoir Stimulation. Ebglewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001.

[7]

J.L. Gidley, Acidizing Sandstone Formations: a Detailed Examination of Recent Experience, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1985.

[8]

A.D. Hill, K. Sepehrnoori, P.Y. Wu, Design of the HCl Preflush in Sandstone Acidizing, 2015.

[9]

R.L. Thomas, H.A. Nasr-El-Din, S. Mehta, V. Hilab, J.D. Lynn, The Impact of HCl to HF Ratio on Hydrated Silica Formation during the Acidizing of a High Temperature Sandstone Gas Reservoir in Saudi Arabia, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2002.

[10]

M.U. Shafiq, H.B. Mahmud, Sandstone matrix acidizing knowledge and future development, J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 7 (2017) 1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0314-6.

[11]

Mian Umer Shafiq, H.K.B.M,An Effective Acid Combination for Enhanced Properties and Corrosion Control of Acidizing Sandstone Formation, 2016. CUTSE 2015, I. C. S. M. S. a. Engineering. Miri, Sarawak, IOP Publishing. 121.

[12]

Mian Umer Shafiq, H.K.B.M, Mohamed Ali Hamid,Comparison of Buffer Effect of Different Acids during Sandstone Acidizing, 2015. CUTSE 2014. I. C. S. M. S. a. Engineering, IOP Publishing. 78.

[13]

C. Xiong, Application and Study of Acid Techniques Using Novel Selective Emulsified Acid System. CPS, SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE, China, Beijing, 2010.

[14]

F. Yang, H.A. Nasr-El-Din, B.M. Al-Harbi, Acidizing Sandstone Reservoirs Using HF and Formic Acids, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012.

[15]

M.A. Mahmoud, H.A. Nasr-El-Din, C. De Wolf, A. Alex, Sandstone Acidizing Using a New Class of Chelating Agents, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011.

[16]

W. Frenier, M. Brady, S. Al-Harthy, R. Arangath, K.S. Chan, N. Flamant, M. Samuel, Hot Oil and Gas Wells Can Be Stimulated without Acids, 2004.

[17]

S.A. Ali, E. Ermel, J. Clarke, M.J. Fuller, Z. Xiao, B. Malone, Stimulation of Hightemperature Sandstone Formations from West Africa with Chelating Agentbased Fluids, 2008.

[18]

M. Mahmoud, New formulation for sandstone acidizing that eliminates sand production problems in oil and gas sandstone reservoirs, J. Energy Resour. Technol. 139 (4) (2017), https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036521.

[19]

A.E. Martell, R.M. Smith, R.J. Motekaitis, NIST Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal Complexes Databases, Texas A&M University, 2004.

[20]

W.W. Frenier, Novel Scale Removers Are Developed for Dissolving Alkaline Earth Deposits, 2001, https://doi.org/10.2118/65027-MS.

[21]

D. Kolodynska, J. Jachula, Z. Hubicki, MGDA as a new biodegradable complexing agent for sorption of heavy metal ions on anion exchanger, in: International Symposium on Physico -Chemical Methods of the Mixture Separation -Ars Sepatoria. Kudowa, Zdroj, 2009.

[22]

P.J. Schuler, K.S. Wang, K.L. Dunn, et al., Effects of scale dissolvers on barium sulfate deposits: a macroscopic and microscopic study, in: CORROSSION, 2002. Denver, Colorado.

[23]

H.O. McLeod Jr., L. B. Ledlow, M.V. Till, The Planning, Execution, and Evaluation of Acid Treatments in Sandstone Formations, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1983.

[24]

I. Ward, K. Merigot, B.I.A. McInnes,Application of quantitative mineralogical analysis in archaeological micromorphology: a case study from barrow is., Western Australia, J. Archaeol. Meth. Theor (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-017-9330-6.

[25]

D. Pirrie, A.R. Butcher, M.R. Power, P. Gottlie, G.L. Miller, Rapid quantitative mineral and phase analysis using automated scanning electron microscopy (QemSCAN); potential applications in forensic geosciences, in: K. Pye, D. croft (Forensic Geoscience,Eds.), vol. 232, Geological Society, London, 2004, pp. 123-136. Special Publications.

[26]

D. Haberlah, M.A.J. Williams, G. Halverson, G.H. McTainsh, S.M. Hill, T. Hrstka, P. Jaime, A.R. Butcher, P. Glasby, Loess and floods: high-resolution multi-proxy data of Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) slackwater deposition in the Flinders Ranges, semi-arid South Australia, Quat. Sci. Rev. 29 (19-20) (2010) 2673-2693.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/