An experimental study on the viscosity of SPAM solutions with a new correlation predicting the apparent viscosity of sulfonated polyacrylamides

Abstract

Being one of the most commonly performed EOR methods, polymer injection is used to increase the mobility ratio and decrease water relative permeability to allow the injected fluid to sweep more oil towards the production well. Before the polymer solution is injected into the reservoir through the injection wells, the process of polymer injection must be simulated using commercial numerical reservoir simulators. In order to be able to simulate the process, the viscosity behavior of the solution must be known. Therefore, a model is required to estimate the viscosity of the injected fluids versus shear rate and polymer concentration. In this study, a new mathematical function based on the power-law fluid equation is presented, which can be applied to predict the viscosity of SPAM solutions. The two required parameters of the power-law equation are obtained by fitting a power-law function to the viscosity-shear rate data. Samples in different polymer concentrations (using two SPAM polymers with different molecular weights) were prepared and their viscosity was measured against different shear rates. The results were fitted to the power-law equation and their corresponding power-law parameters were recorded. A mathematical function was introduced and tested for each parameter. The new functions combined with the power-law equation were used to estimate the viscosity of different polymer solutions with different SPAM concentrations. The results showed that the model is capable of estimating the viscosity with acceptable precision. Furthermore, it is applicable in various temperatures and water salinities.

Keywords

Enhanced Oil Recovery / EOR / SPAM / Polymer solution / Apparent viscosity

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

[1] J. Parshall, Mature Fields hold big expansion opportunity, J. Petrol. Technol. 64 (10) (2012) 52-58.

[2] A.M. Firozjaii, H.R. Saghafi, Review on Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Polymer Flooding: Fundamentals, Experimental and Numerical Simulation, Petroleum (2019).

[3] F.F. Craig, The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding, Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, 1993.

[4] R.B. Needham, P.H. Doe, Polymer flooding review, J. Petrol. Technol. 39 (12) (1987) 1503-1507.

[5] A. Bengar, et al., Optimized polymer flooding projects via combination of experimental design and reservoir simulation, Petroleum 3 (4) (2017) 461-469.

[6] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, et al., Toward reservoir oil viscosity correlation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 90 (2013) 53-68.

[7] A. Mai, A. Kantzas, Heavy oil waterflooding: effects of flow rate and oil viscosity, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 48 (2009) 42-51, 03.

[8] B. Zhao, K.K. Mohanty, Effect of wettability on immiscible viscous fingering in porous media, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 174 (2019) 738-746.

[9] H. Luo, et al., Scaling up the interplay of fingering and channeling for unstable water/polymer floods in viscous-oil reservoirs, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 165 (2018) 332-346.

[10] A. Benham, R. Olson, A model study of viscous fingering, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 3 (1963) 138-144, 02.

[11] A.M. Radovanovic, A.P. Pires, A.M. Peres, Semi-analytical transient pressure solution for power-law polymer injection in a vertical well, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 173 (2019) 569-578.

[12] L. Weidong, et al., Experimental study on the mechanism of enhancing oil recovery by polymeresurfactant binary flooding, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 44 (4) (2017) 636-643.

[13] Y.-Y. Wang, et al., Hydrophobically modified associating polyacrylamide solutions: relaxation processes and dilational properties at the oil water interface, Macromolecules 37 (8) (2004) 2930-2937.

[14] J. Bock, D. Schulz, C. McCormick, Water-Soluble Polymers: Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Wiley, New York, 1986.

[15] J. Hou, et al., The role of viscoelasticity of alkali/surfactant/polymer solutions in enhanced oil recovery, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 47 (3-4) (2005) 219-235.

[16] C. Preux, I. Malinouskaya, Reservoir simulation model calibration methodology with polymer flooding based on laboratory experiments, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 181 (2019).

[17] D.T. Gentekos, L.N. Dupuis, B.P. Fors, Beyond dispersity: deterministic control of polymer molecular weight distribution, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (6) (2016) 1848-1851.

[18] S. Banerjee, et al., Mechanism of polymer adsorption on shale surfaces: effect of polymer type and presence of monovalent and divalent salts, Petroleum 3 (3) (2017) 384-390.

[19] V. Torrealba, H. Hoteit, Improved polymer flooding injectivity and displacement by considering compositionally-tuned slugs, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 178 (2019) 14-26.

[20] Y. Lee, et al., Oil recovery by low-salinity polymer flooding in carbonate oil reservoirs, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 181 (2019), 106211.

[21] C. Noik, A. Audibert, P. Delaplace, Injectivity of sulfonated polymers under North Sea field conditions, in: SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1994.

[22] L. Nurmi, et al., Sulfonated polyacrylamides-evaluation of long term Stability by accelerated aging at elevated temperature,in:SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018.

[23] M. Han, et al., Laboratory investigation of the injectivity of sulfonated polyacrylamide solutions into carbonate reservoir rocks,in:SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012.

[24] M. Rashidi, Physico-chemistry Characterization of Sulfonated Polyacrylamide Polymers for Use in Polymer Flooding, 2010.

[25] S. Baeurle, E. Nogovitsin, Challenging scaling laws of flexible polyelectrolyte solutions with effective renormalization concepts, Polymer 48 (16) (2007) 4883-4899.

[26] N. Lai, et al., The study on permeability reduction performance of a hyperbranched polymer in high permeability porous medium, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 112 (2013) 198-205.

[27] A. Samanta, et al., Effects of alkali, salts, and surfactant on rheological behavior of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide solutions, J. Chem. Eng. Data 55 (10) (2010) 4315-4322.

[28] A.D. Koohi, et al., Swelling and gelation time behavior of sulfonated polyacrylamide/chromium triacetate hydrogels, J. Macromol. Sci., Part B 50 (10) (2011) 1905-1920.

[29] M.B. Salehi, et al., Rheological and transport properties of sulfonated polyacrylamide hydrogels for water shutoff in porous media, Polym. Adv. Technol. 25 (4) (2014) 396-405.

[30] K. Sigale, A. Omari, Aspects of crosslinking sulfonated polyacrylamides from rheological studies on their gels, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 64 (6) (1997) 1067-1072.

[31] M. Rashidi, A.M. Blokhus, A. Skauge, Viscosity and retention of sulfonated polyacrylamide polymers at high temperature, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119 (6) (2011) 3623-3629.

[32] I.I. Mukhamatdinov, et al., A new approach for measuring rheology of polymer solutions in reservoir conditions, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 181 (2019).