The rudist buildup depositional model, reservoir architecture and development strategy of the cretaceous Sarvak formation of Southwest Iran

Yang Du , Jin-liang Zhang , Shu-fen Zheng , Jun Xin , Jie Chen , Yi-Zhen Li

Petroleum ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 16 -26.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) :16 -26. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2015.04.001
Original article
research-article
The rudist buildup depositional model, reservoir architecture and development strategy of the cretaceous Sarvak formation of Southwest Iran
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper studies the lithofacies, sedimentary facies, depositional models and reservoir architecture of the rudist-bearing Sar-3 zone of Cretaceous Sarvak in the Southwest of Iran by utilizing coring, thin section, XRD data of five coring wells and 3D seismic data. Research results include the following: According to lithofacies features and their association, the rudist-mound and tidal flat are the main microfacies in the Sar-3 depositional time. By investigating the regional tectonic setting and seismic interpretation, a depositional model was built for the Sar-3 zone, which highlights four key points: 1) The distribution of the rudist-buildup is controlled by the paleo-high. 2) The build-up outside of the wide colonize stage but reached the wave-base level in a short time by regression and formation uplift, and was destroyed by the high energy current, then forming the moundy allochthonous deposition after being dispersed and redeposited. 3) The tidal flat develops widely in the upper Sar-3, and the deposition thickness depends on the paleo-structure. The tidal channel develops in the valley and fringe of the Paleo-structure. 4) The exposure within the leaching effect by the meteoric water of the top of Sar-3 is the main controlling factor of the reservoir vertical architecture. The Sar-3 zone featured as the dualistic architecture consists of two regions: the lower is the rudist reef limestone reservoir and the upper is the tidal condense limestone interlayer. The thickness of each is controlled by the paleo-structure. The Paleo-high zone is the preferential development zone. Based on reservoir characteristics of the different zones, a targeted development strategy has been proposed. Keeping the trajectory in the middle of the oil-layer in the paleo-high, and in the paleo-low, make the trajectory crossing the oil-zone and then keep it in the lower.

Keywords

Iran / Southwest Iran / Sarvak / Lithology facies / Depositional model / Reservoir architecture / Development strategy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yang Du, Jin-liang Zhang, Shu-fen Zheng, Jun Xin, Jie Chen, Yi-Zhen Li. The rudist buildup depositional model, reservoir architecture and development strategy of the cretaceous Sarvak formation of Southwest Iran. Petroleum, 2015, 1(1): 16-26 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2015.04.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This paper is sponsored by the “The optimization deployment and enhance the oil recovery of the Carbonate reservoir in the MiddleEast oilfields” of China National Oil Company(11.2011E-2501.X.01), and the Authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to Xu Zhongjun and Huang Hexiong from the Oil Reservoir Department of PetroChina International (Iran) for assistance and guidance in preparing this paper. Special thanks are also given to N. Abdi, B. Henderi and A. Derisi from the Oil Reservoir Department of PetroChina International (Iran) for their recommendations and references used in this paper.

This research was carried out as part of the South Azadegan Development Program which was prepared by colleagues from the Department of Near Eastern Studies, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development. The Authors are extremely grateful to all of them.

References

[1]

M. Al-Dabbas, J. Al-Jassim, S. Jumaily, Depositional environments and porosity distribution in regressive Limestone reservoirs of the mishrif formation, southern Iraq, Arab. Geosci. 3 (2010) 67-78.

[2]

A.S. Alsharhan, A.E.M. Nairn, A review of the cretaceous formations in the arabian Peninsula and the gulf: Part II. mid-cretaceous (Wasia group) stratigraphy and paleogeography, Petrol. Geol. 1988 (11) (1988) 89-112.

[3]

A.S. Alsharhan, A.E.M. Nairn, Carbonate platform models of arabian cretaceous reservoir, AAPG Memo. 56 (1993) 148-184.

[4]

A.S. Alsharhan, A.E.M. Nairn, Sedimentary Basins and Petroleum Geology of the Middle East[M], Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp. 816e843.

[5]

A.A.M. Aqrawi, G.A. Thehni, G.H. Sherwani, et al., Mid-cretaceous rudistbearing carbonates of the mishrif formation; an important reservoir sequence in the mesopotamian Basin, Iraq, Petrol. Geol. 21 (1998) 57-82.

[6]

B. Beiranvand, A. Ahmadi, M. Sharafodin, Mapping and classifying flow units in the upper part of the mid-cretaceous sarvak formation (Western dezful embayment, SW Iran) based on a determination of the reservoir types, Petrol. Geol. 30 (2007) 357-373.

[7]

Gabriele Carannante, Roberto Graziano, Gerardo Pappone, et al., Depositional system and response to sea level oscillations of the senonian rudistbearing carbonate shelves. Examples from Central mediterranean areas, Facies 40 (1999) 1-24.

[8]

Dejun Xu, Zhang Wencai, Xiujuan Du, et al., Reservoir characteristics and development suggestion of chalky limestone in the zagros Basin, Iran, Petroleum Geology Exp. 32 (1) (2010) 15-18.

[9]

R.J. Dunham, Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture, in: W.E. Ham (Ed.), Classification of Carbonate Rocks[M]. AAPG 1, 1962, pp. 108e121.

[10]

Ali Ghabeishavi, Hossein Vaziri-Moghaddam, Azizolah Taheri, et al., Microfacies and depositional environment of the cenomanian of the Bangestan anticline, SW Iran, Jouranl Asian Earth Sci. 37 (2010) 275-285.

[11]

Guangming Yu, Lan bolong, Chengshan Wang, et al., The environment and characters of late cretaceous rudists organic reef in Gangba Tibet, J. Mineralogy Petrology 3 (1982) 39-43.

[12]

E. Hajikazemi, I.S. Al-Aasm, M. Coniglio, Subaerial exposure and meteoric diagenesis of the CenomanianeTuronian upper sarvak formation, southwestern Iran, Geo Soc. Lond Spec. Pub 330 (2010) 253-272.

[13]

E. Hajikazemi, I.S. Al-Aasm, M. Coniglio, Chemostratigraphy of CenomanianeTuronian carbonates of the sarvak formation, southern Iran, Petrol. Geol. 35 (2012) 187-206.

[14]

W.W. Hay, Evolving ideas about the cretaceous climate and ocean circulation, Cretac. Res. 29 (2008) 725-753.

[15]

E. Heydari, Tectonic versus eustatic control on super sequences of the zagros mountains of Iran, Tectonophysics 451 (2008) 56-70.

[16]

Hui Liu, Guo Rui, Junchang Dong, et al., Productivity evaluation and influential factor analysis for sarvak reservoir in south azadegan oil field, Iran, Petroleum Explor. Dev. 40 (5) (2013) 585-590.

[17]

Jianhua Zhong, Zhifeng Wen, Yong Li, et al., Organic reefs study: concept, classification, characteristics, history and development, Geol. Rev. 51 (3) (2005) 288-299.

[18]

Jiasong Fan, E essential elements formation of giant-scaled carbonate rock Fields in middle east, Mar. Orig. Pet. Geol. 8 (1-2) (2003) 61-67.

[19]

Hamzeh Mehrabi, Hossain Rahimpour-Bonab, Paleoclimate and tectonic controls on the depositional and digenetic history of the cenomanian-early turonian carbonate reservoirs, dezful embayment, SW Iran, Facies 60 (2014) 147-167.

[20]

H. Rahimpour-Bonab, H. Mehrabi, A.H. Enayati-Bidgoli, et al., Coupled imprints of tropical climate and recurring emersions on reservoir evolution of a mid-cretaceous carbonate ramp, zagros Basin, SW Iran, Cretac. Res. 37 (2012) 15-34.

[21]

H. Rahimpour-Bonab, H. Mehrabi, A. Navidtalab, Flow unit distribution and reservoir modeling in cretaceous carbonates of the sarvak formation, abteymouroilfield, dezful embayment, SW Iran, Petrol. Geol. 35 (3) (2012) 213-236.

[22]

F.N. Sadooni, The nature and origin of upper cretaceous Basin margin rudist buildups of the mesopotamian Basin, southern Iraq, with consideration of possible hydrocarbon stratigraphic entrapment, Cretac. Res. 26 (2005) 213-224.

[23]

Sijing Huang, Hairuo Qing, Zuowei Hu, et al., Geochemistry in different shell layers of rudist bivalve from late cretaceous in the south of Tibet and preservation for the information of SeaWater, Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 24 (1) (2006) 67-72.

[24]

G.D. Stanley Jr., The evolution of modern corals and their early history, Earth-Science Rev. 60 (2003) 195-225.

[25]

M.E. Tuker, V.P. Wright, Carbonate Sedimentology, Blackwell Sci. Pub, Oxford, 1990, pp. 426e482.

[26]

P.E. Videtich, R.K. Mclimans, H.K.S. Waston, et al. Depositional, diagenetic, thermal and maturation histories of cretaceous mishrif formation, fateh field Dubai, AAPG Bull. 72 (1988) 1143-1159.

[27]

Xiaole Jia, Dengfa He, Xiaoguang Tong, Formation and distribution of giant oil and gas fields in zagros foreland Basin, China Pet. Explor. 18 (5) (2013) 8-21.

[28]

A.S. Alsharhan, Facies variations, diagenesis and exploration potential of the cretaceous rudist-bearing carbonates of the arabian gulf, AAPG Bull. 79 (1995) 531-550.

[29]

Yang Du, Yingjie Yi, Jun Xin, et al., Genesis of large-amplitude tilting oilwater contact in Sarvak Formation in South Azadegan Oilfield, Iran, Petrol. Geol. Exp. 37 (2) (2015) 187-193.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/