On the evaluation of steam assisted gravity drainage in naturally fractured oil reservoirs

Abstract

Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) as a successful enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process has been applied to extract heavy and extra heavy oils. Huge amount of global heavy oil resources exists in carbonate reservoirs which are mostly naturally fractured reservoirs. Unlike clastic reservoirs, few studies were carried out to determine the performance of SAGD in carbonate reservoirs. Even though SAGD is a highly promising technique, several uncertainties and unanswered questions still exist and they should be clarified for expansion of SAGD methods to world wide applications especially in naturally fractured reservoirs. In this communication, the effects of some operational and reservoir parameters on SAGD processes were investigated in a naturally fractured reservoir with oil wet rock using CMG-STARS thermal simulator. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of fracture properties including fracture orientation, fracture spacing and fracture permeability on the SAGD performance in naturally fractured reservoirs. Moreover, one operational parameter was also studied; one new well configuration, staggered well pair was evaluated. Results indicated that fracture orientation influences steam expansion and oil production from the horizontal well pairs. It was also found that horizontal fractures have unfavorable effects on oil production, while vertical fractures increase the production rate for the horizontal well. Moreover, an increase in fracture spacing results in more oil production, because in higher fracture spacing model, steam will have more time to diffuse into matrices and heat up the entire reservoir. Furthermore, an increase in fracture permeability results in process enhancement and ultimate recovery improvement. Besides, diagonal change in the location of injection wells (staggered model) increases the recovery efficiency in long-term production plan.

Keywords

SAGD / EOR / Naturally fractured reservoir / Operational parameters

References

[1] X. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Gu, Four important onset pressures for mutual interactions between each of three crude oils and CO2, J. Chem. Eng. Data 55 (2010) 4390-4398.

[2] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, S. Ayatollahi, M.-H. Ghazanfari, M. Masihi, Experimental determination of interfacial tension and miscibility of the CO2-crude oil system: temperature, pressure, and composition effects, J. Chem. Eng. Data 59 (2014) 61-69.

[3] D. Yang, Y. Gu, Interfacial interactions between crude oil and CO₂ under reservoir conditions, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 23 (2005) 1099-1112.

[4] J. Taber, F. Martin, R. Seright, EOR screening criteria revisited e part 1: introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects, SPE Reserv. Eng. 12 (1997) 189-198.

[5] A. Al-Adasani, B. Bai, Recent developments and updated screening criteria of enhanced oil recovery techniques, in: International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.

[6] M.W. Britton, W.L. Martin, R.J. Leibrecht, R.A. Harmon, The street Ranch pilot test of fracture-assisted steamflood technology, J. Petrol. Technol. 35 (1983) 511-522.

[7] M. Pooladi-Darvish, S. Ali, Steam heating of fractured formations containing heavy oil: basic premises and a single-block analytical model,in:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1994.

[8] J. Batycky, R. Leaute, B. Dawe,A mechanistic model of cyclic steam stimulation, in:1997 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, 1997, pp. 323-336.

[9] R. González, C. Brunings, L. Toussaint, ESP's in cyclic steam injection wells, in: Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1997.

[10] F. Tabasinejad, R. Kharrat, S. Vossoughi, Feasibility study of in-situ combustion in naturally fractured heavy oil reservoirs, in: International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006.

[11] B.S. Sola, F. Rashidi, Application of the SAGD to an Iranian carbonate heavy oil reservoir, in: SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific Section/GSA Cordilleran Section Joint Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006.

[12] H.H. Kiasari, M.M. Kiasari, B.S. Sola, Investigation on effects of rock-fluid properties on the SAGD production profile in naturally fractured reservoir (NFR), Petrol. Coal 52 (2010) 243-248.

[13] R.M. Butler, Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen, 1991.

[14] R. Butler, SAGD comes of age!, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 37 (1998).

[15] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, H.H. Kiasari, N. Alizadeh, S. Mighani, A. Kamari, Application of fast-SAGD in naturally fractured heavy oil reservoirs: a case study,in:18th Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference (MEOS), Society of Petroleum Engineers, Bahrain International Exhibition Centre, Manama, Bahrain, 2013.

[16] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Shokrollahi, A. Tatar, F. Gharagheizi, A.H. Mohammadi, A. Naseri, Reservoir oil viscosity determination using a rigorous approach, Fuel 116 (2014) 39-48.

[17] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, M. Khishvand, A. Naseri, A.H. Mohammadi, Toward reservoir oil viscosity correlation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 90 (2013) 53-68.

[18] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, B. Aminshahidy, A. Pajouhandeh, S.H. Yousefi, S.A. Hosseini-Kaldozakh, A soft computing approach for the determination of crude oil viscosity: light and intermediate crude oil systems, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 59 (2016) 1-10.

[19] A. Al-Bahlani, T. Babadagli, SAGD laboratory experimental and numerical simulation studies: a review of current status and future issues, J. Pet. Sci Eng. 68 (2009) 135-150.

[20] A. Kamari, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A.H. Mohammadi, H. Hashemi-Kiasari, E. Mohagheghian, On the evaluation of fast-SAGD process in naturally fractured heavy oil reservoir, Fuel 143 (2015) 155-164.

[21] A.S. Bagci, Experimental and simulation studies of SAGD process in fractured reservoirs, in: SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006.

[22] T. Nasr, D. Law, H. Golbeck, G. Korpany, Counter-current aspect of the SAGD process, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 39 (2000) 41-47.

[23] Q. Chen, M.G. Gerritsen, A.R. Kovscek, Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on the steam-assisted gravity-drainage process, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 11 (2008) 921-932.

[24] P. Llaguno, F. Moreno, R. Garcia, Z. Mendez, E. Escobar, A reservoir screening methodology for SAGD applications, in: Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Petroleum Society of Canada, 2002.

[25] H. Shin, M. Polikar, Review of reservoir parameters to optimize SAGD and fast-SAGD operating conditions, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 46 (2007) 35-41.

[26] N. Edmunds, H. Chhina, Economic optimum operating pressure for SAGD projects in Alberta, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 40 (2001) 13-17.

[27] A.K. Singhal, Y. Ito, M. Kasraie, Screening and design criteria for steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) projects,in:SPE International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998.

[28] L. Shanqiang, A. Baker, Optimizing horizontal-well steam-simulation strategy for heavy-oil development, in: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Canton, Ohio, USA, 2006.

[29] H. Hashemi-Kiasari, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, S. Mighani, A.H. Mohammadi, B. Sedaee-Sola, Effect of operational parameters on SAGD performance in a dip heterogeneous fractured reservoir, Fuel 122 (2014) 82-93.

[30] I. Gates, N. Chakrabarty, Optimization of steam assisted gravity drainage in McMurray reservoir, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 45 (2006) 54-62.

[31] T.S. Ong, R. Butler, Wellbore flow resistance in steam-assisted gravity drainage, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 29 (1990).