Impact of methane adsorption on tight rock permeability measurements using pulse-decay

Mohamed Mahmoud , Mohammed Eliebid , Hasan Y. Al-Yousef , Muhammad Shahzad Kamal , Karem Al-Garadi , Salaheldin Elkatatny

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 382 -387.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :382 -387. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2019.01.002
research-article
Impact of methane adsorption on tight rock permeability measurements using pulse-decay
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The permeability of the rock is usually measured by the injection of gas using Darcy's flow model (pulse-decay). For oil formations, helium and nitrogen are the most common gases used to measure the permeability of the rock. However, recent approaches are based on the use of methane as it minimizes the properties difference between the testing fluid and reservoir fluid. This work focused on the latter approach to compute the correction of gas adsorption. The most widely used model is Cui et al. model that is based on Langmuir adsorption isotherm. In this work, we introduced a modified model that is based on Freundlich isotherm. This model also includes the correction for gas adsorption such as Freundlich isotherms proved to be more appropriate for the adsorption on intact reservoir rock. The model is based on gas and rock properties and reduced pressure and temperature were used to accommodate the gas compressibility. The modified model can also capture effective porosity of adsorption (ϕa) that can correct the pulse-decay storage capacity parameters a and b. The permeability estimation of ultra-tight samples using the modified approach is enhanced owing to the correction in the storage volume and rock porosity. Including the proper adsorption isotherm enhanced the porosity estimation because Langmuir isotherm yielded 11% porosity and Freundlich isotherm yielded 12% porosity. Similar results were obtained in the permeability estimation, Langmuir isotherm resulted in a 1.5% error compared to zero error in the Freundlich isotherm estimation.

Keywords

Methane adsorption / Pulsed decay / Tight rocks / Permeability measurements

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mohamed Mahmoud, Mohammed Eliebid, Hasan Y. Al-Yousef, Muhammad Shahzad Kamal, Karem Al-Garadi, Salaheldin Elkatatny. Impact of methane adsorption on tight rock permeability measurements using pulse-decay. Petroleum, 2019, 5(4): 382-387 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2019.01.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences for providing the financial and research support for this work.

References

[1]

S.P. Ojha, S. Misra, A. Tinni, C. Sondergeld, C. Rai, Relative permeability estimates for Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford shale samples from oil, gas and condensate windows using adsorption-desorption measurements, Fuel 208 (2017) 52-64.

[2]

J. Sun, X. Dong, J. Wang, D.R. Schmitt, C. Xu, T. Mohammed, D. Chen, Measurement of total porosity for gas shales by gas injection porosimetry (GIP) method, Fuel 186 (2016) 694-707.

[3]

X. Chen, G. Yao, An improved model for permeability estimation in low permeable porous media based on fractal geometry and modified Hagen-Poiseuille flow, Fuel 210 (2017) 748-757.

[4]

A. Ghanizadeh, S. Bhowmik, O. Haeri-Ardakani, H. Sanei, C.R. Clarkson, A comparison of shale permeability coefficients derived using multiple non-steady-state measurement techniques: examples from the Duvernay Formation, Alberta (Canada), Fuel 140 (2015) 371-387.

[5]

G.H. Bruce, D.W. Peaceman, H.H. Rachford Jr. J. D. Rice, Calculations of unsteadystate gas flow through porous media, J. Petrol. Technol. 5 (1953).

[6]

G. Wallick, J. Aronofsky, Effect of gas slip on unsteady flow of gas through porous media-experimental verification, J. Petrol. Technol. 6 (1954) 27-29.

[7]

J. Aronofsky, Effect of gas slip on unsteady flow of gas through porous media, J. Appl. Phys. 25 (1954) 48-53.

[8]

S. Jones, A technique for faster pulse-decay permeability measurements in tight rocks, SPE Form. Eval. 12 (1997) 19-26.

[9]

J. Walder, A. Nur, Permeability measurement by the pulse-decay method: effects of poroelastic phenomena and non-linear pore pressure diffusion, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. (1986) 225-232 Geomechanics Abstracts, Pergamon.

[10]

H. Wang, D. Hart, Experimental error for permeability and specific storage from pulse decay measurements, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. (1993) 1173-1176 Geomechanics Abstracts, Elsevier.

[11]

R. Feng, S. Harpalani, J. Liu,Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 2-Experimental study, Fuel 191 (2017) 565-573.

[12]

R. Feng, J. Liu, S. Harpalani,Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 1-Background and numerical analysis, Fuel 191 (2017) 555-564.

[13]

X. Cui, A. Bustin, R.M. Bustin, Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications, Geofluids 9 (2009) 208-223.

[14]

M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, I. Hussein, S. Elkatatny, R. Shawabkeh, A. Sultan, M.J. Al- Marri, Impact of surfactant on the retention of CO2 and methane in carbonate reservoirs, Energy Fuel. 32 (2018) 5355-5363.

[15]

A. Dicker, R. Smits, A practical approach for determining permeability from laboratory pressure-pulse decay measurements, International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1988.

[16]

J.D. Walls, A.M. Nur, T. Bourbie, Effects of pressure and partial water saturation on gas permeability in tight sands: experimental results, J. Petrol. Technol. 34 (1982) 930-936.

[17]

P. Hsieh, J. Tracy, C. Neuzil, J. Bredehoeft, S. Silliman, A transient laboratory method for determining the hydraulic properties of ‘tight’rocks—I. Theory, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. (1981) 245-252 Geomechanics Abstracts, Elsevier.

[18]

W. Lin, Compressible Fluid Flow through Rocks of Variable Permeability, California Univ., 1977.

[19]

W.F. Brace, J. Walsh, W. Frangos, Permeability of granite under high pressure, J. Geophys. Res. 73 (1968) 2225-2236.

[20]

L. Klinkenberg, The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, Drilling and Production Practice, American Petroleum Institute, 1941.

[21]

M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, R. Shawabkeh, S. Elkatatny, I.A. Hussein, Effect of CO2 adsorption on enhanced natural gas recovery and sequestration in carbonate reservoirs, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 55 (2017) 575-584.

[22]

W. Guo, Z. Hu, X. Zhang, R. Yu, L. Wang, Shale gas adsorption and desorption characteristics and its effects on shale permeability, Energy Explor. Exploit. 35 (2017) 463-481.

[23]

M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, S. Elkatatny, M. Abouelresh, R. Shawabkeh, Adsorption role in shale gas recovery and the feasibility of CO2 in shale enhanced gas recovery: a study on shale gas from Saudi Arabia, SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017.

[24]

R.C. McCarty,Thermophysical properties of helium-4 from 2 to 1500 K with pressures to 1000 atmospheres, US. Nat. Bureau Stand. Inst. Basic Stand, 1972.

[25]

V. Romanov, Y. Soong, Helium-volume dynamics of Upper Freeport coal powder and lumps, Int. J. Coal Geol. 77 (2009) 10-15.

[26]

J. Rouquerol, F. Rouquerol, P. Llewellyn, G. Maurin, K.S. Sing, Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications, Academic press, 2013.

[27]

K.S. Sing, Adsorption methods for the characterization of porous materials, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 76 (1998) 3-11.

[28]

M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, R. Shawabkeh, S. Elkatatny, Surfactants impact on CO2 sequestration for enhanced gas recovery and in depleted carbonate reservoirs, SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017.

[29]

P. Ning, F. Li, H. Yi, X. Tang, J. Peng, Y. Li, D. He, H. Deng, Adsorption equilibrium of methane and carbon dioxide on microwave-activated carbon, Separ. Purif. Technol. 98 (2012) 321-326.

[30]

M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, R. Shawabkeh, S. Elkatatny, I. Hussein, Effect of CO2 content on the natural gas production from tight gas sandstone reservoirs, SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017.

[31]

Z. Zeng, R.B. Grigg, B. Bai, Experimental development of adsorption and desorption kinetics of a CO2-foaming surfactant onto berea sandstone, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006.

[32]

T.F. Rexer, M.J. Benham, A.C. Aplin, K.M. Thomas, Methane adsorption on shale under simulated geological temperature and pressure conditions, Energy Fuel. 27 (2013) 3099-3109.

[33]

Y.-q. Zhu, H. Su, Y. Jing, J. Guo, J. Tang, Methane adsorption on the surface of a model of shale: a density functional theory study, Appl. Surf. Sci. 387 (2016) 379-384.

[34]

R. Heller, J. Vermylen, M. Zoback, Experimental investigation of matrix permeability of gas shales, AAPG Bull. 98 (2014) 975-995.

[35]

E.C. Rebecca,S.S. Ikiensikimama, Coefficient of Isothermal Gas Compressibility for Reservoir Fluid in Niger Delta Region.

[36]

M. Al-Harahsheh, R. Shawabkeh, M. Batiha, A. Al-Harahsheh, K. Al-Zboon, Sulfur dioxide removal using natural zeolitic tuff, Fuel Process. Technol. 126 (2014) 249-258.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/