Review of EOR-based techniques for enhancing sweep efficiency in carbon geo-storage

Muhammad Shehryar , Arshad Raza , Guenther Glatz , Muhammad Shahzad Kamal , Mohamed Mahmoud , Ahmad Mahboob , Saad Alafnana

Petroleum ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) : 533 -544.

PDF (2022KB)
Petroleum ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) :533 -544. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2025.08.001
Review Article
research-article
Review of EOR-based techniques for enhancing sweep efficiency in carbon geo-storage
Author information +
History +
PDF (2022KB)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological reservoirs faces viscous fingering, gravity override, and poor mobility control due to its low viscosity and resulting inefficient distribution and compromised storage capacity. Therefore, an urgent need arises to thicken the CO2 and enhance its viscosity for better mobility control and uniform distribution across the reservoir. This study examines the different schemes to enhance sweep efficiency in subsurface storage. In the context of polymer-, surfactant-, and foam-based technologies, the study defines optimization for CO2 injection and retention. Sweep efficiency is critical in maximizing reservoir usage and minimizing the risk of leakage by ensuring even dispersion of CO2. Polymers could increase CO2 viscosity, thereby yielding better mobility control and wider reservoir coverage. Surfactants reduce interfacial tension, enabling CO2 to invade less permeable areas, while foams act as conformance control agents, changing the flow path of CO2 away from the high permeability and into the underused areas. The study further includes advanced materials like CO2-soluble polymers, fluorinated surfactants, and nanoparticle-stabilized foams with superior stability under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions typical of deep reservoirs. Though effective, these approaches are challenged with chemical degradation, economic feasibility and environmental consequences. The study delves into these limitations and suggests integrated approaches involving polymers, and surfactant foams for enhanced sweep efficiency. These findings are a step towards realizing surfactant efficient and sustainable carbon sequestration technologies and contribute to the efforts of the world to mitigate climate change.

Keywords

Sweep efficiency / Foam / Surfactants / Polymers / Chemical / EOR

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Muhammad Shehryar, Arshad Raza, Guenther Glatz, Muhammad Shahzad Kamal, Mohamed Mahmoud, Ahmad Mahboob, Saad Alafnana. Review of EOR-based techniques for enhancing sweep efficiency in carbon geo-storage. Petroleum, 2025, 11(5): 533-544 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2025.08.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Muhammad Shehryar: Writing-original draft. Arshad Raza: Writing-original draft, Conceptualization. Guenther Glatz: Resources, Investigation. Muhammad Shahzad Kamal: Resources, Formal analysis. Mohamed Mahmoud: Writing-review & editing, Data curation. Ahmad Mahboob: Writing-review & editing, Writing-original draft. Saad Alafnan: Writing-review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The author(s) would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Deanship of Research (DOR) at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals for funding this work through the H2 Consortium Grant No. H2FC2303.

References

[1]

C.B. Field, et al., Summary for Policymakers, Mar. 2015, pp. 1-32 [Online]. Available: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/summary-for-policymakers-2. (Accessed 19 January 2025).

[2]

C. Marchetti, On geoengineering and the CO2 problem 1 (1) (Mar. 1977) 59-68, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162777, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59-68.

[3]

Bachu: evaluation of CO2 sequestration capacity in... - google scholar.” Accessed: January. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title = Evaluation/20of/20CO2/20sequestration/20capacity/20in/20oil/20and/20gas/20reservoirs/20in/20the/20Western/20Canada/20Sedimentary/20Basin&author = S./20Bachu&publication_year = 2004&pages = 1-77.

[4]

Understanding carbon capture and storage - british geological survey.” Accessed: November. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discovering-geology/climate-change/carbon-capture-and-storage/.

[5]

J. van Straelen, F. Geuzebroek, N. Goodchild, G. Protopapas, L. Mahony, CO2 capture for refineries, a practical approach, Energy Proc. 1 (1) (Feb. 2009) 179-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2009.01.026.

[6]

S. Bachu, Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change 44 (Issue 3) (Jun. 2003) 277-289, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0762-9, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 277-289.

[7]

R.A. Chadwick, P. Zweigel, U. Gregersen, G.A. Kirby, S. Holloway, P.N. Johannessen, Geological reservoir characterization of a CO2 storage site: the Utsira Sand, Sleipner, northern North Sea, Energy 29 (9-10) (Jul. 2004) 1371-1381, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2004.03.071.

[8]

I.W. Wright, The in Salah Gas CO2 storage project, International Petroleum Technology Conference 2007, IPTC 2007 1 (2007) 658-663, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-PDB.147.IPTC11326.

[9]

T. Dance, Assessment and geological characterisation of the CO2 CRC Otway project CO2 storage demonstration site: from prefeasibility to injection, Mar. Petrol. Geol. 46 (Sep. 2013) 251-269, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPETGEO.2013.06.008.

[10]

The SLB energy glossary | energy glossary.” Accessed: November. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://glossary.slb.com/en/.

[11]

S.E. Buckley, M.C. Leverett, Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands, Transactions of the AIME 146 (1) (Dec. 1942) 107-116, https://doi.org/10.2118/942107-G.

[12]

P. Fang, et al., Chemical-assisted CO2 water-alternating-gas injection for enhanced sweep efficiency in CO2-EOR, Molecules 2024 29 (Aug. 2024) 3978, https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES29163978, vol. 29, no. 16, p. 3978.

[13]

W. Heidug, “Methods to assess geologic CO2 storage capacity: status and best practice.” [Online]. Available: www.iea.org.

[14]

Y.-Q. Zhang, et al., A technical review of CO2 flooding sweep-characteristics research advance and sweep-extend technology, Pet. Sci. (Sep. 2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PETSCI.2024.09.005.

[15]

E.A. Al-Khdheeawi, Optimizing CO2-Water injection ratio in heterogeneous reservoirs: implications for CO2 geo-storage, Energies 17 (3) (Feb. 2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030678.

[16]

A. Telmadarreie, J.J. Trivedi, CO2 foam and CO2 polymer enhanced foam for heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage, Energies 13 (21) (Nov. 2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215735.

[17]

Z. AlYousef, O. Swaie, A. Alabdulwahab, S. Kokal, The role of polymer on surfactant-foam stability during carbon dioxide mobility control process, in: Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Conference at Oman petroleum and Energy Show, OPES 2022, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2118/200125-MS.

[18]

N. Pal, X. Zhang, M. Ali, A. Mandal, H. Hoteit, Carbon Dioxide Thickening: a Review of Technological Aspects, Advances and Challenges for Oilfield Application, Elsevier Ltd, May 01, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122947.

[19]

E.X. Ricky, G.C. Mwakipunda, E.E. Nyakilla, N.A. Kasimu, C. Wang, X. Xu, A Comprehensive Review on CO2 Thickeners for CO2 Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery: Recent Advances and Future Outlook, Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Oct. 25, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.06.018.

[20]

R. Dehury and J. S. Sangwai, “Pore-Scale Heterogeneity and Salinity Impacts on CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers: a Microfluidic and Computational Investigation #”.

[21]

S. Krevor, et al., Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage-from pore scale physics to field scale implications-NC-ND license, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40 (2015) 221-237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.006.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

[22]

S. Iglauer, A. Al-Yaseri, Improving basalt wettability to de-risk CO2 geo-storage in basaltic formations, Advances in Geo-Energy Research 5 (3) (2021) 347-350, https://doi.org/10.46690/AGER.2021.03.09.

[23]

J. Iranzi, Y.C. Park, H. Son, Coupling effects of surfactant-induced interfacial tension reduction and wettability alteration in CO2 storage, Energy Fuels (Oct. 2024), https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.4C03431/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/EF4C03431_0012.JPEG.

[24]

Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, C. Vuik, H. Hajibeygi, Simulation of CO2 Storage Using a Parameterization Method for Essential Trapping Physics: FluidFlower Benchmark Study, Jan. 2023 [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08004.

[25]

R. Ramadhan, et al., Geomechanics contribution to CO2 storage containment and trapping mechanisms in tight sandstone complexes: a case study on Mae Moh Basin, Sci. Total Environ. 928 (Jun) (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172326.

[26]

J.E. Hanssen, T. Holt, L.M. Surguchev, Foam processes: an assessment of their potential in North Sea reservoirs based on a critical evaluation of Current field experience, Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery 1 (Apr. 1994) 361-376, https://doi.org/10.2118/27768-MS.

[27]

D. Al-Bayati, A. Saeedi, Q. Xie, M.B. Myers, C. White, Influence of permeability heterogeneity on miscible CO2 flooding efficiency in sandstone reservoirs: an experimental investigation, Transport Porous Media 125 (2) (Nov. 2018) 341-356, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1121-3.

[28]

Z. Wang, et al., CO2 storage in saline aquifers: a simulation on quantifying the impact of permeability heterogeneity, J. Clean. Prod. 471 (Sep) (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143415.

[29]

J.G. Richardson, H.L. Stone, A quarter century of progress in the application of reservoir engineering, J. Petrol. Technol. 25 (12) (Dec. 1973) 1371-1379, https://doi.org/10.2118/4697-PA.

[30]

T.D. Ma, G.K. Youngren, Performance of Immiscible water-alternating-gas (IWAG) Injection at Kuparuk River Unit, North Slope, Alaska, Sep. 1994, https://doi.org/10.2118/28602-MS.

[31]

N. Kothari, B. Raina, K. Chandak, V. Iyer, H. Mahajan, Application of Ferrofluid for Enhanced Surfactant Flooding in EOR, Jun. 2010, pp. 14-17, https://doi.org/10.2118/131272-MS.

[32]

A. Al-Abri, H. Sidiq, R. Amin, Mobility ratio, relative permeability and sweep efficiency of supercritical CO2 and methane injection to enhance natural gas and condensate recovery: coreflooding experimentation, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 9 (Nov. 2012) 166-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNGSE.2012.05.011.

[33]

L. Hou, et al., An evaluation method of supercritical CO2 thickening result for particle transporting, J. CO2 Util. 21 (Oct. 2017) 247-252, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOU.2017.07.023.

[34]

F. Llave, F. Chung, T. B.-S. R. Engineering, and undefined, “Use of entrainers in improving mobility control of supercritical CO2,” onepetro.org, in: F. M. Llave, F.T.H. Chung (Eds.), TE Burchfieldspe Reservoir Engineering, 1990 • onepetro.org, 1990 [Online]. Available: https://onepetro.org/RE/article/5/01/47/168223?casa_token=gUf85n-McPUAAAAA:kG5UXcswUdBNJUA5J5a9jMjUk1IDde083bUAuzj4actuMJ-kIr-DgUGUyodiFy_MMa9WOsV2NA. (Accessed 19 January 2025).

[35]

R.E. Terry, A. Zaid, C. Angelos, D.L. Whitman, Polymerization in Supercritical CO2 to Improve CO2/Oil Mobility Ratios, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, Feb. 1987, pp. 289-296, https://doi.org/10.2118/16270-MS.

[36]

D.K. Dandge, J.P. Heller, Polymers for Mobility Control in CO2 Floods, vol. 833836, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, Feb. 1987, pp. 297-305, https://doi.org/10.2118/16271-MS.

[37]

K. Trickett, et al., Rod-like micelles thicken CO2, Langmuir 26 (1) (Jan. 2010) 83-88, https://doi.org/10.1021/LA902128G.

[38]

B. Sun, et al., Molecular simulation aided design of copolymer thickeners for supercritical CO2 as non-aqueous fracturing fluid, J. CO2 Util. 28 (Dec. 2018) 107-116, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOU.2018.09.015.

[39]

K. Harrison, J. Goveas, K.P. Johnson, E.A. O'Rear, Water-in-Carbon dioxide microemulsions with a fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon hybrid surfactant, Langmuir 10 (10) (Oct. 1994) 3536-3541, https://doi.org/10.1021/LA00022A028/ASSET/LA00022A028.FP.PNG_V03.

[40]

R. Fink, D. Hancu, R. Valentine, E.J. Beckman, Toward the development of ‘CO2-philic’ hydrocarbons. 1. Use of side-chain functionalization to lower the miscibility pressure of polydimethylsiloxanes in CO2, J. Phys. Chem. B 103 (31) (Aug. 1999) 6441-6444, https://doi.org/10.1021/JP990333M/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/JP990333MF00002.JPEG.

[41]

J. Liu, B. Han, G. Li, X. Zhang, J. He, Z. Liu, Investigation of nonionic surfactant Dynol-604 based reverse microemulsions formed in supercritical carbon dioxide, Langmuir 17 (26) (Dec. 2001) 8040-8043, https://doi.org/10.1021/LA010743D/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/LA010743DF00006.JPEG.

[42]

J. Liu, B. Han, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Li, G. Yang, Solubility of Ls-36 and Ls-45 surfactants in supercritical CO2 and loading water in the CO2/water/surfactant systems, Langmuir 18 (8) (Apr. 2002) 3086-3089, https://doi.org/10.1021/LA011721U/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/LA011721UF00003.JPEG.

[43]

W. Ryoo, S.E. Webber, K.P. Johnston, Water-in-Carbon dioxide microemulsions with methylated branched hydrocarbon surfactants, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (25) (Dec. 2003) 6348-6358, https://doi.org/10.1021/IE0300427/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/IE0300427F00014.JPEG.

[44]

Y. Zhang, et al., Experiment on high pressure CO2 foam stability of nonionic surfactants, Zhongguo Shiyou Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science) 37 (4) (Aug. 2013), https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1673-5005.2013.04.019.

[45]

J. Li, B. Peng, X. Li, D. Luo, Molecular dynamics study on BS12/SDS stabilized CO2 foam: evaluation of surfactant monolayer structure and interfacial properties, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 681 (Jan. 2024) 132726, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2023.132726.

[46]

Q. Niu, et al., Role of interfacial and bulk properties of long-chain viscoelastic surfactant in stabilization mechanism of CO2 foam for CCUS, J. CO2 Util. 66 (Dec. 2022) 102297, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOU.2022.102297.

[47]

S. Alzobaidi, C. Da, V. Tran, M. Prodanović, K.P. Johnston, High temperature ultralow water content carbon dioxide-in-water foam stabilized with viscoelastic zwitterionic surfactants, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 488 (Feb. 2017) 79-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIS.2016.10.054.

[48]

C. Zhang, P. Wu, Z. Li, T. Liu, L. Zhao, D. Hu, Ethanol enhanced anionic surfactant solubility in CO2 and CO2 foam stability: MD simulation and experimental investigations, Fuel 267 (May 2020) 117162, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2020.117162.

[49]

S. Etemad, A. Telmadarreie, A. Kantzas, S. Bryant, Conformance control evaluation of the of cellulose nanocrystals based CO2 foams stabilized in synergy with surfactant, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 648 (Sep. 2022) 129274, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2022.129274.

[50]

S. Chen, et al., Experimental evaluation of combined plugging system for CO2-Improved oil recovery and storage, Energy Fuels 37 (6) (Mar. 2023) 4401-4412, https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.3C00246/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/EF3C00246_0011.JPEG.

[51]

J.L. Kendall, D.A. Canelas, J.L. Young, J.M. DeSimone, Polymerizations in supercritical carbon dioxide, Chem. Rev. 99 (2-3) (1999) 543-563, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9700336.

[52]

Y. Gu, S. Zhang, Y. She, Effects of polymers as direct CO2 thickeners on the mutual interactions between a light crude oil and CO2, J. Polym. Res. 20 (2) (Feb. 2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-0061-9.

[53]

A.S. Hanamertani, S. Ahmed, Probing the role of associative polymer on scCO2-Foam strength and rheology enhancement in bulk and porous media for improving oil displacement efficiency, Energy 228 (Aug) (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120531.

[54]

E.X. Ricky, G.C. Mwakipunda, E.E. Nyakilla, N.A. Kasimu, C. Wang, X. Xu, A Comprehensive Review on CO2 Thickeners for CO2 Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery: Recent Advances and Future Outlook, Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Oct. 25, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.06.018.

[55]

J.E. Marshall, et al., On the Solubility and Stability of Polyvinylidene Fluoride, MDPI AG, May 01, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091354.

[56]

V. Neela, N. Von Solms, Permeability, diffusivity and solubility of carbon dioxide in fluoropolymers: an experimental and modeling study, J. Polym. Res. 21 (4) (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-014-0401-z.

[57]

Y. Gu, S. Zhang, Y. She, Effects of polymers as direct CO2 thickeners on the mutual interactions between a light crude oil and CO2, J. Polym. Res. 20 (2) (Feb. 2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-0061-9.

[58]

K.M. Tadepalli, S. Chakrabarty, P. Patil, R. Kumar, Design of CO2 thickeners and role of aromatic rings in enhanced oil recovery using molecular dynamics, Langmuir 39 (3) (Jan. 2023) 989-996, https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.LANGMUIR.2C02477.

[59]

S. Kilic, R.M. Enick, E.J. Beckman, Fluoroacrylate-aromatic acrylate copolymers for viscosity enhancement of carbon dioxide, J. Supercrit. Fluids 146 (Apr. 2019) 38-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2019.01.001.

[60]

J.J. Lee, et al., The solubility of low molecular weight Poly(Dimethyl siloxane) in dense CO2 and its use as a CO2-philic segment, J. Supercrit. Fluids 119 (Jan. 2017) 17-25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.08.003.

[61]

M. Du, et al., Laboratory experiment on a toluene-polydimethyl silicone thickened supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing fluid, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 166 (Jul. 2018) 369-374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.039.

[62]

T. Kar, A. Firoozabadi, Effective viscosification of supercritical carbon dioxide by oligomers of 1-decene, iScience 25 (5) (May 2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104266.

[63]

N.M. Al Hinai, et al., Experimental evaluations of polymeric solubility and thickeners for supercritical CO2 at high temperatures for enhanced oil recovery, Energy Fuels 32 (2) (Feb. 2018) 1600-1611, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03733.

[64]

S. Afra, M. Alhosani, A. Firoozabadi, Improvement in CO2 geo-sequestration in saline aquifers by viscosification: from molecular scale to core scale, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 125 (May 2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103888.

[65]

D. Tapriyal, DESIGN OF NON-FLUOROUS CO2 SOLUBLE COMPOUNDS, 2004.

[66]

P. Xue, J. Shi, X. Cao, S. Yuan, Molecular dynamics simulation of thickening mechanism of supercritical CO2 thickener, Chem. Phys. Lett. 706 (Aug. 2018) 658-664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.07.006.

[67]

Y. Zhang, Z. Zhu, J. Tang, Research on polyether-based hydrocarbon thickener for CO2, Fluid Phase Equilib. 532 (Mar) (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112932.

[68]

R.M. Enick, SPE 154122 Mobility and Conformance Control for CO2 EOR via Thickeners, Foams, and Gels-A Literature Review of 40 Years of Research and Pilot Tests, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onepetro.org/SPEIOR/proceedings-pdf/12IOR/12IOR/SPE-154122-MS/3988580/spe-154122-ms.pdf/1.

[69]

E.X. Ricky, G.C. Mwakipunda, E.E. Nyakilla, N.A. Kasimu, C. Wang, X. Xu, A Comprehensive Review on CO2 Thickeners for CO2 Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery: Recent Advances and Future Outlook, Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Oct. 25, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.06.018.

[70]

S. Mahajan, H. Yadav, S. Rellegadla, A. Agrawal, Polymers for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fundamentals and Selection Criteria Revisited, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Nov. 01, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11618-y.

[71]

F. Zhang, et al., Laboratory experimental study on polymer flooding in high-temperature and high-salinity heavy oil reservoir, Appl. Sci. 12 (22) (Nov. 2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211872.

[72]

T. Skauge, P.A. Ormehaug, A. Alsumaiti, S. Masalmeh, A. Skauge, Polymer stability at harsh temperature and salinity conditions, in: Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Conference at Oman petroleum and Energy Show, OPES 2022, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2118/200178-MS.

[73]

S. Kim, J.C. Santamarina, Engineered CO2 injection: the use of surfactants for enhanced sweep efficiency, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 20 (2014) 324-332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.018.

[74]

A. Mahboob, A.S. Sultan, The SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://onepetro.org/SPESATS/proceedings-pdf/16SATS/All-16SATS/SPE-182839-MS/1414852/spe-182839-ms.pdf/1.

[75]

J. Eastoe, et al., Designed CO2-philes stabilize water-in-carbon dioxide microemulsions, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 45 (22) (May 2006) 3675-3677, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600397.

[76]

K. Trickett, et al., Rod-like micelles thicken CO2, Langmuir 26 (1) (Jan. 2010) 83-88, https://doi.org/10.1021/la902128g.

[77]

P. Zhang, et al., Experimental investigation of amine-surfactant CO2 foam for smart mobility control during CO2 flooding, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 184 (Jan. 2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106511.

[78]

X. Fan, et al., Oxygenated hydrocarbon ionic surfactants exhibit CO2 solubility, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (33) (Aug. 2005) 11754-11762, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja052037v.

[79]

A.S. Elhag, et al., Switchable diamine surfactants for CO2 mobility control in enhanced oil recovery and sequestration, in: Energy Procedia, Elsevier Ltd, 2014, pp. 7709-7716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.804.

[80]

C.S. Boeije, W.R. Rossen, SAG foam flooding in carbonate rocks, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171 (Dec. 2018) 843-853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.017.

[81]

M.A. Almobarky, Z. AlYousif, D. Schechter, Gas/water foams stabilized with a newly developed anionic surfactant for gas mobility control applications, Pet. Sci. 17 (4) (Aug. 2020) 1025-1036, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00437-x.

[82]

R. Tripathi, Z.P. Alcorn, A. Graue, S.D. Kulkarni, Combination of non-ionic and cationic surfactants in generating stable CO2 foam for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage, Advances in Geo-Energy Research 13 (1) (Jul. 2024) 42-55, https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.07.06.

[83]

T. Park, S. Yoon, J. Jung, T.H. Kwon, Effect of fluid-rock interactions on in situ bacterial alteration of interfacial properties and wettability of CO2-Brine-Mineral systems for geologic carbon storage, Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (23) (Dec. 2020) 15355-15365, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05772.

[84]

L.C. Burrows, et al., CO2-Soluble nonionic surfactants for enhanced CO2 storage via in situ foam generation, Energy Fuels 37 (16) (Aug. 2023) 12089-12100, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01262.

[85]

A. Goodman, L. Burrows, D. Tapriyal, F. Haeri Bob Enick, P. Shah, “Enhanced CO2 storage and injectivity,” U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Management Project Review Meeting August 15 - 19, 2022. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/file/22CM_CTS18_Goodman_2.pdf.

[86]

S. Liang, W. Luo, Z. Luo, W. Wang, X. Xue, B. Dong, Research of CO2-Soluble surfactants for enhanced oil recovery: review and outlook, Molecules 28 (24) (Dec. 2023) 8042, https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES28248042.

[87]

R. Tripathi, Z.P. Alcorn, A. Graue, S.D. Kulkarni, Combination of non-ionic and cationic surfactants in generating stable CO2 foam for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage, Advances in Geo-Energy Research 13 (1) (Jul. 2024) 42-55, https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.07.06.

[88]

A.J. Worthen, et al., Design of Nanoparticles for Generation and Stabilization of CO2-in-brine Foams with or Without Added Surfactants, Nov. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11217v2. (Accessed 20 February 2025).

[89]

A. Bhadani, K. Iwabata, K. Sakai, S. Koura, H. Sakai, M. Abe, Sustainable oleic and stearic acid based biodegradable surfactants, RSC Adv. 7 (17) (2017) 10433-10442, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27036K.

[90]

U. Kanbur, et al., Catalytic carbon-carbon bond cleavage and carbon-element bond formation give new life for polyolefins as biodegradable surfactants, Chem 7 (5) (May 2021) 1347-1362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.03.007.

[91]

C. Fu, N. Liu, Rheology and Stability of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 Foam Under Reservoir Conditions, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/.

[92]

A. Hassanzadeh, et al., Successful CO2-Foam field implementation for improving oil sweep efficiency in EVGSAU field at Permian Basin: expansion phase, in: Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), 2022, https://doi.org/10.2118/210182-MS.

[93]

F. Zhao, et al., Review of Foam with Novel CO2-Soluble Surfactants for Improved Mobility Control in Tight Oil Reservoirs, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Nov. 01, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225411.

[94]

H. Halsøy, A. Graue, Z.P. Alcorn, CO2 foam generation and strength in the presence of oil at high pressure and temperature, in: Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), 2024, https://doi.org/10.2118/220922-MS.

[95]

Z.P. Alcorn, T. Føyen, J. Gauteplass, B. Benali, A. Soyke, M. Fernø, Pore-and core-scale insights of nanoparticle-stabilized foam for CO2-enhanced oil recovery, Nanomaterials 10 (10) (Oct. 2020) 1-15, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10101917.

[96]

Y. Zhang, Q. Liu, H. Ye, L.L. Yang, D. Luo, B. Peng, Nanoparticles as Foam Stabilizer: Mechanism, Control Parameters and Application in Foam Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Elsevier B.V., Jul. 01, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108561.

[97]

M. Issakhov, M. Shakeel, P. Pourafshary, S. Aidarova, A. Sharipova, Hybrid surfactant-nanoparticles assisted CO2 foam flooding for improved foam stability: a review of principles and applications, Petroleum Research 7 (2) (Jun. 2022) 186-203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.10.004.

[98]

X. Lyu, D. Voskov, W. Rossen, Simulation of foam-assisted co2 storage in saline aquifers, in: ECMOR 2020 - 17th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202035101.

[99]

F. Guo, S. A. Aryana, Y. Wang, J. F. Mclaughlin, and K. Coddington, “Enhancement of Storage Capacity of CO2 in Megaporous Saline Aquifers Using nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 Foam.”.

[100]

Z.P. Alcorn, H. Halsøy, A. Sæle, B. Brattekås, A. Ellingsen, A. Graue, CO2 foam flow dynamics at reservoir conditions, in: Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), 2023, https://doi.org/10.2118/214973-MS.

[101]

S. Liang, W. Luo, Z. Luo, W. Wang, X. Xue, B. Dong, Research of CO2-Soluble Surfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Review and Outlook, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Dec. 01, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248042.

[102]

J.R. Lliguizaca-Davila, J.S.M. Sanz, B. Brattekås, Z.P. Alcorn, An experimental investigation of polymer enhanced CO2 foam flooding: foam stabilization and CO2 mobility control, in: Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), 2024, https://doi.org/10.2118/218260-MS.

[103]

M. Mumtaz, M. Mushtaq, E.W. Al-Shalabi, W. Alameri, G. Karanikolos, S. Iglauer, Polymer-enhanced foam formulation design for CO2-Sequestration and mobility control in carbonate reservoirs, in: ADIPEC, SPE, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.2118/222140-MS.

[104]

Z. AlYousef, O. Swaie, A. Alabdulwahab, S. Kokal, The role of polymer on surfactant-foam stability during carbon dioxide mobility control process, in: Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Conference at Oman petroleum and Energy Show, OPES 2022, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2118/200125-MS.

[105]

J. Pang, K. Mohanty, Surfactant-nanoparticle foam to increase CO2 storage in high-salinity carbonate reservoirs, Energy Fuels 38 (11) (Jun. 2024) 9967-9979, https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.4C01177/SUPPL_FILE/EF4C01177_SI_001.PDF.

[106]

Y. Chen, et al., Ethoxylated cationic surfactants for CO2 EOR in high temperature, high salinity reservoirs, Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery 2 (Apr. 2012) 1224-1238, https://doi.org/10.2118/154222-MS.

[107]

S. Alzobaidi, C. Da, V. Tran, M. Prodanović, K.P. Johnston, High temperature ultralow water content carbon dioxide-in-water foam stabilized with viscoelastic zwitterionic surfactants, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 488 (Feb. 2017) 79-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIS.2016.10.054.

[108]

L. Li, Y. Wu, S. Chong, Q. Wen, Q. Lin, S. Zhang, Influence of CO2 migration from geological storage on the chemical composition of groundwater and monitoring indicators, Environ. Earth Sci. 81 (3) (2022) 73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10194-2.

[109]

E. Kravchenko, T.L. Dela Cruz, X.W. Chen, M.H. Wong, Ecological consequences of biochar and hydrochar amendments in soil: assessing environmental impacts and influences, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 31 (30) (2024) 42614-42639, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33807-8.

[110]

A. Farhadian, M.E. Semenov, A. Mohammadi, U.Z. Mirzakimov, E.R. Son, M.A. Varfolomeev, Efficient Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Biodegradable Surfactants in Form of Clathrate Hydrate: New eco-friendly Approach, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113830.

[111]

A. Soares, B. Guieysse, B. Jefferson, E. Cartmell, J.N. Lester, Nonylphenol in the environment: a critical review on occurrence, fate, toxicity and treatment in wastewaters, Environ. Int. 34 (7) (Oct. 2008) 1033-1049, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2008.01.004.

[112]

Z. Lu, J. Gan, Isomer-specific biodegradation of nonylphenol in river sediments and structure-biodegradability relationship, Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2) (Jan. 2014) 1008-1014, https://doi.org/10.1021/ES403950Y/SUPPL_FILE/ES403950Y_SI_001.XLSX.

[113]

U. Merrettig-Bruns, E. Jelen, Anaerobic biodegradation of detergent surfactants, Materials 2009 2 (Mar. 2009) 181-206, https://doi.org/10.3390/MA2010181, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 181-206.

[114]

M.T. García, E. Campos, A. Marsal, I. Ribosa, Biodegradability and toxicity of sulphonate-based surfactants in aerobic and anaerobic aquatic environments, Water Res. 43 (2) (Feb. 2009) 295-302, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2008.10.016.

[115]

I.Y. Kim, E. Joachim, H. Choi, K. Kim, Toxicity of silica nanoparticles depends on size, dose, and cell type, Nanomedicine 11 (6) (Aug. 2015) 1407-1416, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANO.2015.03.004.

[116]

S. Murugadoss, et al., Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: an update, Arch. Toxicol. 91 (9) (2017) 2967-3010, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00204-017-1993-Y. Jun. 2017.

[117]

Q. Chen, Y. Xue, J. Sun, Kupffer cell-mediated Hepatic Injury Induced by Silica Nanoparticles in Vitro and in Vivo, vol. 8, Mar. 2013, pp. 1129-1140, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S42242, vol. 8, pp. 1129-1140.

[118]

J. Ma, et al., Effects of CO2 leakage from CCS on the physiological characteristics of C4 crops, Energy Proc. 63 (Jan. 2014) 3209-3214, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2014.11.346.

[119]

L.C. Liu, Q. Li, J.T. Zhang, D. Cao, Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO2 geological storage in China: gaps and suggestions for future regulations, Mitig. Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change 21 (2) (Feb. 2016) 191-207, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11027-014-9589-9/TABLES/5.

PDF (2022KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/