Dynamical counterfactual inference under time-series model for water flooding oilfield

Guoquan Wen , Chao Min , Qingxia Zhang , Guoyong Liao

Petroleum ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 113 -124.

PDF (13835KB)
Petroleum ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) :113 -124. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2024.11.001
Full Length Article
research-article
Dynamical counterfactual inference under time-series model for water flooding oilfield
Author information +
History +
PDF (13835KB)

Abstract

The performances of numerical simulation and machine learning in production forecasting are severely dependent on precise geological modeling and high-quality history matching. To address these challenges, causal inference is an effective methodology since it can provide a causality for formalizing causality in history, not statistical dependence. In this paper, to dynamically predict oil production from causality existed in water flooding oilfield, a dynamical counterfactual inference framework is built to predict oil production. The proposed framework can forecast the oil production under non-observation of engineering factors, i.e., counterfactual, and provide the causal effect of engineering factors impacting on oil production. Meanwhile, combining with the practice exploitation in engineering factor impacting on production, a counterfactual experiment is designed to execute counterfactual prediction. Compared with general machine learning and statistical models, our results not only show better performance in oil production flooding but also guide the specific optimization in improving production, which holds more practical application significance.

Keywords

Water flooding oilfield / Single oil well / Counterfactual inference / Time-series

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guoquan Wen, Chao Min, Qingxia Zhang, Guoyong Liao. Dynamical counterfactual inference under time-series model for water flooding oilfield. Petroleum, 2025, 11(1): 113-124 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2024.11.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Guoquan Wen: Writing-original draft, Software, Methodology, Conceptualization. Chao Min: Writing-review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. Qingxia Zhang: Writing-review & editing. Guoyong Liao: Writing-review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Y. Yao, D. Sun, J.H. Xu, et al., Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery methods for mature continental heavy oilfields in China based on geology, technology and sustainability criteria, Energy (2023) 127962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127962.

[2]

X. Zhou, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, et al., Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery potential using gas/water flooding in a tight oil reservoir, Fuel 272 (2020) 117706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117706Getrightsandcontent.

[3]

X. Zheng, S.H.I. Junfeng, C.A.O. Gang, et al., Progress and prospects of oil and gas production engineering technology in China, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 49 (3) (2022) 644-659, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60054-5.

[4]

Y. Li, Q. Zhao, Z. Xue, Management mode and application of geoscience-engineering integration, Engineering 18 (2022) 12-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.04.019.

[5]

L.I. Yang, Y. Yong, Exploration and practice of green low-cost development in old oilfields, Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency 26 (2) (2019) 1-6, https://doi.org/10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.02.001 (in Chinese).

[6]

H. Yang, J. Kim, J. Choe, Field development optimization in mature oil reservoirs using a hybrid algorithm, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 156 (2017) 41-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.05.009.

[7]

G. Chen, K. Zhang, L. Zhang, et al., Global and local surrogate-model-assisted differential evolution for water flooding production optimization, SPE J. 25 (1) (2020) 105-118, https://doi.org/10.2118/199357-PA.

[8]

J.I.A. Deli, L.I.U. He, J. Zhang, et al., Data-driven optimization for fine water injection in a mature oilfield, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 47 (3) (2020) 674-682, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60084-2.

[9]

F. Hourfar, H.J. Bidgoly, B. Moshiri, et al., A reinforcement learning approach for water flooding optimization in petroleum reservoirs, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 77 (2019) 98-116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.09.019.

[10]

M.G. Alfarizi, M. Stanko, T. Bikmukhametov, Well control optimization in water flooding using genetic algorithm coupled with Artificial Neural Networks, Upstream Oil and Gas Technology 9 (2022) 100071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100071.

[11]

W. Li, L. Wang, Z. Dong, et al., Reservoir production prediction with optimized artificial neural network and time series approaches, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 215 (2022) 110586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110586.

[12]

R. Zhang, J.I.A. Hu, Production performance forecasting method based on multivariate time series and vector autoregressive machine learning model for water flooding reservoirs, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 48 (1) (2021) 201-211, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60016-2.

[13]

Z. Zhong, A.Y. Sun, Y. Wang, et al., Predicting field production rates for water flooding using a machine learning-based proxy model, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 194 (2020) 107574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107574.

[14]

Y. Li, M. Onur, INSIM-BHP: a physics-based data-driven reservoir model for history matching and forecasting with bottomhole pressure and production rate data under water flooding, J. Comput. Phys. 473 (2023) 111714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111714.

[15]

R. Masoomi, F. Torabi, A new computational approach to predict hot-water flooding (HWF) performance in unconsolidated heavy oil reservoirs, Fuel 312 (2022) 122861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122861.

[16]

H. Sun, A. Chawathe, H. Hoteit, et al., Understanding shale gas flow behavior using numerical simulation, SPE J. 20 (1) (2015) 142-154, https://doi.org/10.2118/167753-PA.

[17]

D.Y. Ding, N. Farah, B. Bourbiaux, et al., Numerical simulation of low permeability unconventional gas reservoirs[C]// SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/167711-MS, 2014.

[18]

J. Pearl, Causal inference in statistics: an overview, Statist. Surv. (2009), https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS057.

[19]

V. Chernozhukov, I. Fernández-Val, B. Melly, Inference on counterfactual distributions, Econometrica 81 (6) (2013) 2205-2268, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10582.

[20]

O. Gomez, S. Holter, J. Yuan, et al., Vice: visual counterfactual explanations for machine learning models[C], in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2020, pp. 531-535, https://doi.org/10.1145/3377325.3377536.

[21]

M. Du, N. Liu, X. Hu, Techniques for interpretable machine learning, Commun. ACM 63 (1) (2019) 68-77, https://doi.org/10.1145/3359786.

[22]

C. Min, G. Wen, L. Gou, et al., Interpretability and causal discovery of the machine learning models to predict the production of CBM wells after hydraulic fracturing, Energy 285 (2023) 129211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129211.

[23]

B. Han, G. Cui, Y. Wang, et al., Effect of fracture network on water injection huff-puff for volume stimulation horizontal wells in tight oil reservoir: field test and numerical simulation study, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 207 (2021) 109106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109106.

[24]

J.J. Sheng, K. Chen, Evaluation of the EOR potential of gas and water injection in shale oil reservoirs, Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources 5 (2014) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2013.12.001.

[25]

zeng W. Xiang, D. Hailong G. Tao, Method of moderate water injection and its application in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs of Yanchang oilfield, NW China, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 45 (6) (2018) 1094-1102, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30112-5.

[26]

R. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Tang, et al., A simulator for production prediction of multistage fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir considering complex fracture geometry, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 67 (2019) 14-29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.011.

[27]

K. Zhang, Y. Zuo, H. Zhao, et al., Fourier neural operator for solving subsurface oil/water two-phase flow partial differential equation, SPE J. 27 (3) (2022) 1815-1830, https://doi.org/10.2118/209223-PA.

[28]

L. Guoxin, L. Zhengdong, D. Weihong, et al., Progress, challenges and prospects of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC, China Petroleum Exploration 27 ( 1) (2022) 1, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2022.01.001 (in Chinese).

[29]

A. Sircar, K. Yadav, K. Rayavarapu, et al., Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry, Petroleum Research 6 (4) (2021) 379-391, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.009.

[30]

H.H. Alkinani, A.T. Al-Hameedi, S. Dunn-Norman, et al., Applications of artificial neural networks in the petroleum industry: a review[C], in: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2118/195072-MS.OnePetro.

[31]

S. Li, K. Xu, G. Xue, et al., Prediction of coal spontaneous combustion temperature based on improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm and support vector regression, Fuel 324 (2022) 124670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124670.

[32]

W. Niu, Y. Sun, X. Yang, et al., Toward production forecasting for shale gas wells using transfer learning, Energy Fuels 37 (7) (2023) 5130-5142, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00234.

[33]

I. Aizenberg, L. Sheremetov, L. Villa-Vargas, et al., Multilayer neural network with multi-valued neurons in time series forecasting of oil production, Neurocomputing 175 (2016) 980-989, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.092.

[34]

S. Wang, C. Qin, Q. Feng, et al., A framework for predicting the production performance of unconventional resources using deep learning, Appl. Energy 295 (2021) 117016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117016.

[35]

W. Liu, W.D. Liu, J. Gu, Forecasting oil production using ensemble empirical model decomposition based Long Short-Term Memory neural network, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 189 (2020) 107013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107013.

[36]

X. Song, Y. Liu, L. Xue, et al., Time-series well performance prediction based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network model, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 186 (2020) 106682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106682.

[37]

J.F. Torres, D. Hadjout, A. Sebaa, et al., Deep learning for time series forecasting: a survey, Big Data 9 (1) (2021) 3-21, https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2020.0159.

[38]

D. Fan, H. Sun, J. Yao, et al., Well production forecasting based on ARIMA-LSTM model considering manual operators, Energy 220 (2021) 119708, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119708.

[39]

S. Gupta, F. Fuehrer, B.C. Jeyachandra, Production forecasting in unconventional resources using data mining and time series analysis[C], in: SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, SPE, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/171588-MS.D011S004R008.

[40]

H. Tian, M. Wang, S. Liu, et al., Influence of pore water on the gas storage of organic-rich shale, Energy Fuels 34 (5) (2020) 5293-5306, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03415.

[41]

C. Pozrikidis, D.K. Gartling, Fluid dynamics: theory, computation, and numerical simulation, Appl. Mech. Rev. 55 (3) (2002), https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1470683.B55-B55.

[42]

J. Pearl, Causal Inference in Statistics: an Overview, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS057.

[43]

K. Mohaddes, M.H. Pesaran, Country-specific oil supply shocks and the global economy: a counterfactual analysis, Energy Econ. 59 (2016) 382-399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.08.007.

[44]

J.J. Andersen, M.L. Ross, The big oil change: a closer look at the Haber-Menaldo analysis, Comp. Polit. Stud. 47 (7) (2014) 993-1021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488557.

[45]

S. Haber, V. Menaldo, Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105 (1) (2011) 1-26, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000584.

[46]

Y. Ning, H. Kazemi, P. Tahmasebi, A comparative machine learning study for time series oil production forecasting: ARIMA, LSTM, and Prophet, Comput. Geosci. 164 (2022) 105126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105126.

[47]

J. Abrevaya, Y.C. Hsu, R.P. Lieli, Estimating conditional average treatment effects, J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 33 (4) (2015) 485-505, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2014.975555.

PDF (13835KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/