Nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam flooding for enhanced heavy oil recovery: A micro-optical analysis

Arifur Rahman , Ezeddin Shirif , Farshid Torabi

Petroleum ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 696 -704.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) :696 -704. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2024.06.002
Full Length Article
research-article
Nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam flooding for enhanced heavy oil recovery: A micro-optical analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Surfactant flooding is a well-known chemical approach for enhancing oil recovery. Surfactant flooding has the disadvantage that it cannot withstand the harsh reservoir conditions. Improvements in oil recovery and release are made possible by the use of nanoparticles and surfactants and CO2 co-injection because they generate stable foam, reduce the interfacial tension (IFT) between water and oil, cause emulsions to spontaneously form, change the wettability of porous media, and change the characteristics of flow. In the current work, the simultaneous injection of SiO2, Al2O3 nanoparticles, anionic surfactant SDS, and CO2 in various scenarios were evaluated to determine the microscopic and macroscopic efficacy of heavy oil recovery. IFT (interfacial tension) was reduced by 44% when the nanoparticles and SDS (2000 ppm) were added, compared to a reduction of roughly 57% with SDS only. SDS-stabilized CO2 foam flooding, however, is unstable due to the adsorption of SDS in the rock surfaces as well as in heavy oil. To assess foam's potential to shift CO2 from the high permeability zone (the thief zone) into the low permeability zone, directly visualizing micromodel flooding was successfully executed (upswept oil-rich zone). Based on typical reservoir permeability fluctuations, the permeability contrast (defined as the ratio of high permeability to low permeability) for the micromodel flooding was selected. However, the results of the experiment demonstrated that by utilizing SDS and nanoparticles, minimal IFT was reached. The addition of nanoparticles to surfactant solutions, however, greatly boosted oil recovery, according to the findings of flooding studies. The ultimate oil recovery was generally improved more by the anionic surfactant (SDS) solution including nanoparticles than by the anionic surfactant (SDS) alone.

Keywords

Micromodel / CO2 foam / Surfactant / Nanoparticles / Interfacial tension / Heavy oil

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Arifur Rahman, Ezeddin Shirif, Farshid Torabi. Nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam flooding for enhanced heavy oil recovery: A micro-optical analysis. Petroleum, 2024, 10(4): 696-704 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2024.06.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding

The Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC), MITACS, and graduate studies at the University of Regina all provided funding for this study.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., E.S., and F.T.; methodology, A. R.; validation, A.R., E.S. and F.T.; formal analysis, A.R.; investigation, A.R.; resources, A.R., E.S. and F.T..; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.; writing—review and editing, A.R. and F.T.; supervision, E.S., and F.T.; project administration, E.S. and F.T.; funding acquisition, E.S. and F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors have approved the manuscript's publication, and it was submitted without any conflicts of interest. I would want to attest on behalf of my co-authors that the work mentioned was original research that was neither under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part, nor had it been previously published. All writers listed have given their consent to the included manuscript.

References

[1]

S. Li, K. Yang, Z. Li, K. Zhang, N. Jia, Properties of CO2 foam stabilized by hydrophilic nanoparticles and nonionic surfactants, Energy Fuels 33 (6) (Jun. 2019) 5043-5054, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00773.

[2]

Y. Tian, et al., Feasibility study of gas injection in low permeability reservoirs of Changqing oilfield, Fuel 274 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117831.

[3]

L.L. Schramm, F. Wassmuth, Foams: Basic Principles, 1994.

[4]

G.J. Hirasaki, J.B. Lawson, Mechanisms of foam flow in porous media: apparent viscosity in smooth capillaries, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 25 (2) (1985), https://doi.org/10.2118/12129-PA.

[5]

J.G. Roof, Snap-off of oil droplets in water-wet pores, Soc Pet. Eng. J. 10 (1) (1970), https://doi.org/10.2118/2504-pa.

[6]

W.R. Rossen, A critical review of Roof snap-off as a mechanism of steady-state foam generation in homogeneous porous media, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 225 (1-3) (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00309-1.

[7]

A. Bhakta, E. Ruckenstein, Drainage and coalescence in standing foams, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 191 (1) (1997), https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1997.4953.

[8]

D.A. Reinelt, A.M. Kraynik, Viscous effects in the rheology of foams and concentrated emulsions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 132 (2) (1989), https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(89)90263-4.

[9]

R.K. Prud'homme, S.A. Khan, Foams: Theory, Measurements, and Applications, 2017.

[10]

N.D. Denkov, Mechanisms of foam destruction by oil-based antifoams, Langmuir 20 (22) (2004), https://doi.org/10.1021/la049676o.

[11]

X. Xu, A. Saeedi, K. Liu, Laboratory studies on CO2 foam flooding enhanced by a novel amphiphilic ter-polymer, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 138 (2016) 153-159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.025.

[12]

F. Guo, S. Aryana, An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery, Fuel 186 (Dec. 2016) 430-442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.058.

[13]

A. Rahman, A. Shirif, E. Torabi, F. Rahimbakhsh, A critical review on nanoparticle-assisted enhanced oil recovery: introducing scaling approach, Int. J. Nano Dimens. 13 (1) (2022) 1-30.

[14]

J. Zhao, F. Torabi, J. Yang, The synergistic role of silica nanoparticle and anionic surfactant on the static and dynamic CO2 foam stability for enhanced heavy oil recovery: an experimental study, Fuel 287 (Mar. 2021) 119443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119443.

[15]

C. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Sun, P. Wang, S. Wang, W. Liu, CO2 foam properties and the stabilizing mechanism of sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate and hydrophobic nanoparticle mixtures, Soft Matter 12 (3) (2016), https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm01408e.

[16]

Z.A. Al Yousef, M.A. Almobarky, D.S. Schechter, Surfactant and a mixture of surfactant and nanoparticles to stabilize CO2/brine foam, control gas mobility, and enhance oil recovery, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10 (2) (Feb. 2020) 439-445, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0695-9.

[17]

F. Carn, A. Colin, O. Pitois, M. Vignes-Adler, R. Backov, Foam drainage in the presence of nanoparticle-surfactant mixtures, Langmuir 25 (14) (2009), https://doi.org/10.1021/la900414q.

[18]

H. Farhadi, S. Riahi, S. Ayatollahi, H. Ahmadi, Experimental study of nanoparticle-surfactant-stabilized CO2 foam: stability and mobility control, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 111 (2016) 449-460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.05.024.

[19]

A. Maestro, E. Rio, W. Drenckhan, D. Langevin, A. Salonen, Foams stabilised by mixtures of nanoparticles and oppositely charged surfactants: relationship between bubble shrinkage and foam coarsening, Soft Matter 10 (36) (Sep. 2014) 6975-6983, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sm00047a.

[20]

J.S. Kim, Y. Dong, W.R. Rossen, Steady-state flow behavior of CO2 foam, SPE J. 10 (4) (2005), https://doi.org/10.2118/89351-PA.

[21]

A. Rahman, F.A. Happy, S. Ahmed, M.E. Hossain, Development of scaling criteria for enhanced oil recovery: a review, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 158 (2017) 66-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.040.

[22]

A. Rahman, S. Ahmed, M.E. Hossain, F.A. Happy, Development of scaling criteria for steam flooding EOR process, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10 (8) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-00909-1.

[23]

F.A. Happy, A. Rahman, S. Imtiaz, M.E. Hossain, A critical review of engineering approach in the context of memory concept for fluid flow through porous media, J. Porous Media 23 (6) (2020) 593-611, https://doi.org/10.1615/JPorMedia.2020020571.

[24]

A. Rahman, Development of Scaling Criteria and Numerical Simulation Study of Steam Flooding Process, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2018.

[25]

H. Wang, F. Zeng, F. Torabi, H. Xiao, Experimental and numerical studies of non-equilibrium solvent exsolution behavior and foamy oil stability under quiescent and convective conditions in a visualized porous media, Fuel 291 (May 2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120146.

[26]

A. Dehghan Monfared, M.H. Ghazanfari, M. Jamialahmadi, A. Helalizadeh, Potential application of silica nanoparticles for wettability alteration of oilwet calcite: a mechanistic study, Energy Fuels 30 (5) (May 2016)3947-3961, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00477.

[27]

V. Mirchi, S. Saraji, M. Akbarabadi, L. Goual, M. Piri, A systematic study on the impact of surfactant chain length on dynamic interfacial properties in porous media: implications for enhanced oil recovery, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56 (46) (2017), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02623.

[28]

M.S. Kamal, A.A. Adewunmi, A.S. Sultan, M.F. Al-Hamad, U. Mehmood, Recent advances in nanoparticles enhanced oil recovery: rheology, interfacial tension, oil recovery, and wettability alteration, J. Nanomater. 2017 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2473175.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/