Application of artificial intelligence in predicting the dynamics of bottom hole pressure for under-balanced drilling: Extra tree compared with feed forward neural network model

Emmanuel E. Okoro , Tamunotonjo Obomanu , Samuel E. Sanni , David I. Olatunji , Paul Igbinedion

Petroleum ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 227 -236.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) :227 -236. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2021.03.001
research-article
Application of artificial intelligence in predicting the dynamics of bottom hole pressure for under-balanced drilling: Extra tree compared with feed forward neural network model
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study used six fields data alongside correlation heat map to evaluate the field parameters that affect the accuracy of bottom hole pressure (BHP) estimation. The six oil field data were acquired using measurement while drilling device to collect surface measurements of the downhole pressure data while drilling. For the two case studies, measured field data of the wellbore filled with gasified mud system was utilized, and the wellbores were drilled using rotary jointed drill strings. Extremely Randomized Tree and feed forward neural network algorithms were used to develop models that can predict with high accuracy, BHP from measured field data. For modeling purpose, an extensive data from six fields was used, and the proposed model was further validated with two data from two new fields. The gathered data encompasses a variety of well data, general information/data, depths, hole size, and depths. The developed model was compared with data obtained from two new fields based on its capability, stability and accuracy. The result and model’s performance from the error analysis revealed that the two proposed Extra Tree and Feed Forward models replicate the bottom hole pressure data with R2 greater than 0.9. The high values of R2 for the two models suggest the relative reliability of the modelling techniques. The magnitudes of mean squared error and mean absolute percentage error for the predicted BHPs from both models range from 0.33 to 0.34 and 2.02%-2.14%, for the Extra tree model and 0.40-0.41 and 3.90%-3.99% for Feed Forward model respectively; the least errors were recorded for the Extra Tree model. Also, the mean absolute error of the Extra Tree model for both fields (9.13-10.39 psi) are lower than that of the Feed Forward model (10.98-11 psi), thus showing the higher precision of the Extra Tree model relative to the Feed Forward model. Literature has shown that underbalanced operation does not guarantee the improvement of horizontal well’s extension ability, because it mainly depends on the relationship between the bottomhole pressure and its corresponding critical point. Thus, the application of this study proposed models for predicting bottomhole pressure trends.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence / Bottom hole pressure / Extra tree / Predictive model / Oil and gas / Feed forward algorithms

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Emmanuel E. Okoro, Tamunotonjo Obomanu, Samuel E. Sanni, David I. Olatunji, Paul Igbinedion. Application of artificial intelligence in predicting the dynamics of bottom hole pressure for under-balanced drilling: Extra tree compared with feed forward neural network model. Petroleum, 2022, 8(2): 227-236 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2021.03.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Covenant University Centre for Research Innovation and Discovery (CUCRID) Ota, Nigeria for its support in making the publication of this research possible.

References

[1]

S. Ghobadpouri, E. Hajidavalloo, A.R. Noghrehabadi, Modeling and simulation of gas-liquid-solid three phase flow in under-balanced drilling operation, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 156 (2017) 348-355.

[2]

E.E. Okoro, A.O. Alaba, S.E. Sanni, E.B. Ekeinde, A. Dosunmu, Development of an automated drilling fluid selection tool using integral geometric parameters for effective drilling operations, Heliyon 5 (5) (2019a), e01713.

[3]

S. Salehi, G. Hareland, R. Nygaard, Numerical simulations of wellbore stability in under-balanced-drilling wells, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 72 (2010) 229-235.

[4]

G. Li, H. Li, Y. Meng, N. Wei, C. Xu, L. Zhu, H. Tang, Reservoir characterization during underbalanced drilling of horizontal wells based on real-time data monitoring, J. Appl. Maths. (2014), 905079, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/905079.

[5]

E.M. Ozbayoglu, Optimization of liquid and gas flow rates for aerated drilling fluids considering hole cleaning for vertical and low inclination wells, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 49 (2010) 15-24.

[6]

M. Liu, B. Bai, X. Li, A unified formula for determination of wellhead pressure and bottom-hole pressure, Energy Procedia 37 (2013) 3291-3298.

[7]

E. Dietrich, Coiled tubing and underbalanced drilling, Underbalanced Drilling: Limits Extremes (2012) 415-440, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-933762-05-0.50016-4.

[8]

R. Ashena, J. Moghadasi, Bottom hole pressure estimation using evolved neural networks by real coded ant colony optimization and genetic algorithm, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 77 (2011) 375-385.

[9]

S. He, J. Zhou, Y. Chen, X. Li, M. Tang, Research on wellbore stress in underbalanced drilling horizontal wells considering anisotropic seepage and thermal effects, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 45 (2017) 338-357.

[10]

E.E. Okoro, O.E. Agwu, D. Olatunji, O.D. Orodu, Artificial bee colony ABC a potential for optimizing well placement e a review. SPE-198729-MS, Nigeria, in:Proceedings of Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition Held in Lagos, 2019, pp. 5-7. August.

[11]

M.N. Amar, N. Zeraibi, K. Redouane, Bottom hole pressure estimation using hybridization neural networks and grey wolves optimization, Petroleum 4 (2018) 419-429.

[12]

A.M. Ansari, N.D. Sylvester, C. Sarica, O. Shoham, J.P. Brill, A comprehensive mechanistic model for upward two-phase flow in wellbore, in: SPE Production & Facilities Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-20630-MS, 23-26 September, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1994, pp. 143-152.

[13]

R.N. Chokshi, Z. Schmidt, D.R. Doty, Experimental study and the development of a mechanistic model for two-phase flow through vertical tubing, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-35676-MS, West Region Meeting, 22-24 May, Anchorage, Alaska, 1996.

[14]

L.E. Gomez, O. Shoham, Z. Schmidt, R.N. Chokshi, T. Northug, Unified mechanistic model for steady-state two-phase flow: horizontal to vertical upward flow, SPE J. 5 (2000) 339-350.

[15]

M.A. Ahmadi, M. Galedarzadeh, S.R. Shadizadeh, Low parameter model to monitor bottom hole pressure in vertical multiphase flow in oil production wells, Petroleum 2 (2016) 258-266.

[16]

M. Yaghini, M.M. Khoshraftar, M. Fallahi, A hybrid algorithm for artificial neural network training, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26 (1) (2013) 293-301.

[17]

M. Ahmadi, Z. Chen, Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating permeability and porosity of oil reservoirs via petro-physical logs, Petroleum 5 (3) (2019a) 271-284.

[18]

J. Nossent, P. Elsen, W. Bauwens, Sobol sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model, Environ. Model. Software 26 (2011) 1515-1525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010.

[19]

G. Louppe, Understanding Random Forests: from Theory to Practice, 2014. PhD thesis, Universite de Liege, http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/170309.

[20]

M. Jaxa-Rozen, J. Kwakkel, Tree-based ensemble methods for sensitivity analysis of environmental models: a performance comparison with Sobol and Morris techniques, Environ. Model. Software 107 (2018) 245-266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.011.

[21]

F. Pianosi, T. Wagener, A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions, Environ. Model. Software 67 (2015) 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004.

[22]

B.K. Lavine, T.R. Blank, Feed-forward neural networks, Comprehen. Chemometr. (2009) 571-586, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00026-0.

[23]

A.E. Kiouche, M. Bessedik, F. Benbouzid-SiTayeb, M.R. Keddar, An efficient hybrid multi-objective memetic algorithm for the frequency assignment problem, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87 (2020) 103265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103265.

[24]

M. Ahmadi, Z. Chen, Machine learning models to predict bottom hole pressure in multi-phase flow in vertical production wells, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 97 (11) (2019b), https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23526.

[25]

G.H. Nygaard, E.H. Vefring, K.K. Fjelde, G. Naevdal, R.J. Lorentzen, S. Mylvaganam, Bottomhole pressure control during drilling operations in gas-dominant wells, SPE J. 12 (1) (2007) 49-61, https://doi.org/10.2118/91578-pa.

[26]

R. Irani, R. Nasimi, Application of artificial bee colony-based neural network in bottom hole pressure prediction in underbalanced drilling, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 78 (2011) 6-12.

[27]

C. Perez-Tellez, Improved Bottomhole Pressure Control for Underbalanced Drilling Operations, Louisiana State University, 2003. LSU Doctoral Dissertations 1636, Agricultural and Mechanical College, https://digitalcommons.lsu. edu/gradschool_dissertations/1636.

[28]

S. Luo, Y. Li, Y. Meng, L. Zhang,A New Drilling Fluid for Formation Damage Control Used in Underbalanced Drilling, 2000. Paper 59261 presented at the IADC/SPE drilling Conference held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 23-25 February.

[29]

S. Jansen, P. Brett, J. Kohnert, Safety critical learnings in underbalanced well operations, in: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference Held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27 February-1 March, 2001.

[30]

D. Hannegan, R. Divine,Underbalanced Drilling-Perceptions and Realities of Today’s Technology in Offshore Applications, 2002. Paper 74448 presented at the IADC/SPE drilling Conference held in Dallas, Texas, February 26-28.

[31]

R. Maree, P. Geurts, J. Piater, L. Wehenkel,A generic approach for image classification based on decision tree ensembles and local sub-windows, in:Proceedings of the 6th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, 2004, pp. 860-865. Jeju, Korea.

[32]

O. Sagi, L. Rokach, Explainable decision forest: transforming a decision forest into an interpretable tree, Unform. Fusion 61 (2020) 124-138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.013.

[33]

P. Geurts, D. Ernst, L. Wehenkel, Extremely randomized trees, Mach. Learn. 63 (2006) 3-42.

[34]

V. John, Z. Liu, C. Guo, S. Mita, K. Kidono, Real-time Lane Estimation Using Deep Features and Extra Trees Regression, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 721-733, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29451-3_57.

[35]

M. Seyyedattar, M.M. Ghiasi, S. Zendehboudi, Butt, Determination of bubble point pressure and oil formation volume factor: extra trees compared with LSSVM-CSA hybrid and ANFIS models, Fuel 269 (2020) 116834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116834.

[36]

M.P. Singh, V.K. Saraswat, Multilayer feed forward neural networks for nonlinear continuous bidirectional associative memory, Appl. Soft Comput. 61 (2017) 700-713, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.026.

[37]

B.K. Lavine, T.R. Blank, Feed-forward neural networks, comprehensive chemometrics, chemical and biochemical data analysis, Chem. Mol. Sci. Chem. Eng. (2009) 571-586, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00026-0.

[38]

P. Ciosek, Z. Brzozka, W. Wroblewski, E. Martinelli, C. Di Natale, A. D’Amico, Direct and two-stage data analysis procedures based on PCA, PLS-DA and ANN for ISE-based electronic tongue-effect of supervised feature extraction, Talanta 67 (3) (2005) 590-596.

[39]

L. Moreno-Baron, R. Cartas, A. Merkoci, A. Arben, S. Alegret, J. Guiterrez, L. Leija, P. Hernandez, R. Munoz, M. del Valle, Data compression for a voltammetric electronic tongue modeled with artificial neural networks, Anal. Lett. 38 (13) (2005) 2189-2206.

[40]

H. Yarveicy, M.M. Ghiasi, Modeling of gas hydrate phase equilibria: Extremely randomized trees and LSSVM approaches, J. Mol. Liqs. 243 (2017) 533-541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.08.053.

[41]

E.E. Okoro, A.G. Okolie, S.E. Sanni, E.S. Joel, O. Agboola, M. Omeje, Assessment of naturally occurring radiation in lithofacies of oil field in Niger Delta region and its possible health implications, J. Environ. Manag. 264 (2020) 110498.

[42]

R.E. Walpole, R.H. Myers, S.L. Myers, K. Ye,Probability and Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, ninth ed.ed., Pearson Education, Inc., Boston, USA, 2011.

[43]

P. Zhang, Y.-F. Jin, Z.-Y. Yin, Y. Yang, Random forest based artificial intelligent model for predicting failure envelopes of caisson foundations in sand, Appl. Ocean Res. 101 (2020) 102223.

[44]

A.K. Abbas, R.E. Flori, M. Alsaba, Estimating rock mechanical properties of the Zubair shale formation using a sonic wireline log and core analysis, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 53 (2018) 359-369.

[45]

Z. Jin, Z.-Y. Yin, P. Kotronis, Z. Li, Advanced numerical modelling of caisson foundations in sand to investigate the failure envelope in the H-M-V space, Ocean Eng. 190 (2019) 106394.

[46]

I. Kandel, M. Castelli, The Effect of Batch Size on the Generalizability of the Convolutional Neural Networks on a Histopathology Dataset, ICT Express, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.04.010.

[47]

P. Spesivtsev, K. Sinkov, I. Sofronov, A. Zimina, A. Umnov, R. Yarullin, D. Vetrov, Predictive model for bottomhole pressure based on machine learning, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 166 (2018) 825-841, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.046.

[48]

I. Jahanandish, B. Salimifard, H. Jalalifar, Predicting bottomhole pressure in vertical multiphase flowing wells using artificial neural networks, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 75 (2011) 336-342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.11.019.

[49]

A.M. Ansari, N.D. Sylvester, C. Sarica, A comprehensive mechanistic model for upward two-phase flow in wellbore, SPE Prod. Eng. 9 (2) (1994) 143-152. SPE-84609-PA.

[50]

H. Mukherjee, J.P. Brill, Pressure drop correlations for inclined two-phase flow, J. Energy Resour. Technol. 107 (4) (1985) 549-555.

[51]

L.-Q. Ping, Z.-M. Wang, J.-G. Wei, Pressure drop models for gas-liquid twophase flow and its application in Underbalanced drilling, J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 18 (3) (2006) 405-411, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(06)60086-3.

[52]

D. Sui, R. Nybo, S. Hovland, T.A. Johansen,A moving horizon observer for estimation of bottomhole pressure during drilling, in:IFAC Workshop on Automatic Control in Offshore Oil and Gas Production, May 31-June 1, 2012. Trondheim, Norway.

[53]

I. Sule, F. Khan, S. Butt, M. Yang, Kick control reliability analysis of managed pressure drilling operation, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 52 (2018) 7-20.

[54]

T. Pedersen, U.J.F. Aarsnes, J.-M. Godhavn, Flow and pressure control of underbalanced drilling operations using NMPC, J. Process Contr. 68 (2018) 73-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.05.001.

[55]

K.A. Fattah, S.M. El-Katatney, A.A. Dahab, Potential implementation of underbalanced drilling technique in Egyptian oil fields, J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 23 (2011) 49-66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2010.02.001.

[56]

X. Li, H. Ma, H. Zhao, D. Gao, B. Lu, S. Ding, D. Gong, Z. Ma, Study on the model for predicting maximum allowable measured depth of a horizontal well drilled with underbalanced operation, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 191 (2020) 107104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107104.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/