A review of chemical-assisted minimum miscibility pressure reduction in CO₂ injection for enhanced oil recovery

Abstract

Miscible CO₂ injection appears to be an important enhanced oil recovery technique for improving sweep efficiency and eliminating CO₂-oil interfacial tension resulting in up to 10% higher oil recovery compared to immiscible flooding, in addition to the environmental benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through carbon capturing utilising and storage (CCUS). Moreover, this technique could be similarly applicable to natural gas and nitrogen projects to increase oil recovery and to reduce the associated gas flaring. However, miscible displacement may not be achievable for all reservoirs, in particular, reservoirs with high temperature where high injection pressure would be needed to reach miscibility which likely exceeds the formation fracture pressure. Therefore, to further achieve reservoirs’ potential, there is a pressing need to explore a viable means to decrease the miscibility pressure, and thus expand the application envelop of miscible gas injection in reservoirs with high temperatures.

In this work, we aim to provide insights into minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) reduction by adding chemicals into CO₂ phase during injection. We achieved this objective by performing a comprehensive review on chemical-assisted MMP reduction using different chemical additives (e.g., alcohols, fatty acids, surfactants) and different experimental methodologies.

Previous experimental studies have shown that a fraction of chemical additives can yield up to 22% of MMP reduction in CO₂-oil system. Based on results analysis, surfactant based chemicals were found to be more efficient compared to alcohol based chemicals in reducing the interfacial tension in the CO₂-oil system. Based on the current experimental results, adding chemicals to improve the miscibility and reduce the MMP in the CO₂-oil system appears to be a promising technique to increase oil recovery while reducing operating cost. Selection of the effective chemical additives may help to expand the application of miscible gas injection to shallow and high temperature reservoirs. Furthermore, our review provides an overall framework to screen potential chemical additives and an injection strategy to be used for miscible displacement in CO₂ and/or gas systems.

Keywords

Enhanced oil recovery / Natural gas injection / CO₂ injection / Minimum miscibility pressure / Chemical-assisted

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this work.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company (PetroChina).

References

[1] A.O. Gbadamosi, et al., An overview of chemical enhanced oil recovery: recent advances and prospects, Int. Nano Lett. (2019) 171-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-019-0272-8.

[2] M.S. Kamal, et al., Recent advances in nanoparticles enhanced oil recovery: rheology, interfacial tension, oil recovery, and wettability alteration, J. Nanomater. 2017 (2017) 1-15.

[3] V. Alvarado, E. Manrique, Enhanced oil recovery: an update review, Energies 3 (9) (2010) 1529-1575.

[4] F.I. Stalkup Jr., Status of miscible displacement, J. Petrol. Technol. 35 (4) (1983) 815-826.

[5] A.N. El-hoshoudy, S. Desouky, CO₂ miscible flooding for enhanced oil recovery, in: Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration, 2018.

[6] M. Perera, et al., A review of CO2-enhanced oil recovery with a simulated sensitivity analysis, Energies 9 (7) (2016).

[7] M. Agista, K. Guo, Z. Yu, A state-of-the-art review of nanoparticles application in petroleum with a focus on enhanced oil recovery, Appl. Sci. 8 (6) (2018).

[8] K. Jha, A laboratory study of heavy oil recovery with carbon dioxide, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 25 (2) (1986).

[9] S. Hara, P. Christman, Investigation of a cyclic countercurrent light-oil/CO₂ immiscible process, SPE Adv. Technol. 1 (1) (1993) 159-165.

[10] J.F.M. Orr, J.J. Taber, Displacement of oil by carbon dioxide, Final report, New Mexico Inst. of Mining and Technology, Socorro (USA), 1981, DO-/ET/12082-9. doi:10.2172/6525959..

[11] I.E. Agency, World Energy Outlook, vol. 2018, 2018.

[12] L. Jin, et al., Impact of CO₂ impurity on MMP and oil recovery performance of the Bell Creek oil field, Energy Procedia 114 (2017) 6997-7008.

[13] R. Al-Mjeni, et al., Has the time come for EOR? Oilfield Rev. 22 (2010) 16-35.

[14] M. Godec, et al., CO₂ storage in depleted oil fields: the worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery, Energy Procedia 4 (2011) 2162-2169.

[15] B. Jia, J.-S. Tsau, R. Barati, A review of the current progress of CO₂ injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs, Fuel 236 (2019) 404-427.

[16] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Effects of reservoir temperature and percent levels of methane and ethane on CO2/oil MMP values as determined using vanishing interfacial tension/capillary rise, Energy Procedia 114 (2017) 5287-5298.

[17] M. Fathinasab, et al., Minimum miscibility pressure and interfacial tension measurements for N2 and CO₂ gases in contact with W/O emulsions for different temperatures and pressures, Fuel 225 (2018) 623-631.

[18] M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, Y. Gu, Mutual interactions between crude oil and CO₂ under different pressures, Fluid Phase Equil. 265 (1-2) (2008) 94-103.

[19] S. Thomas, Enhanced oil recovery -an overview, Oil & Gas Science and Technology -Revue de l’IFP 63 (1) (2007) 9-19.

[20] G.F. Teletzke, P.D. Patel, A. Chen,Methodology for miscible gas injection EOR screening, in:SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2005, p. 11.

[21] X. Wang, Y. Gu, Oil recovery and permeability reduction of a tight sandstone reservoir in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (4) (2011) 2388-2399.

[22] M. Cao, Y. Gu, Physicochemical characterization of produced oils and gases in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Energy Fuels 27 (1) (2013) 440-453.

[23] M.M. Kulkarni, D.N. Rao, Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) process performance, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 48 (1) (2005) 1-20.

[24] M. Cao, Y. Gu, Oil recovery mechanisms and asphaltene precipitation phenomenon in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Fuel 109 (2013) 157-166.

[25] L.W. Holm, V.A. Josendal, Mechanisms of Oil Displacement by Carbon Dioxide, Society of Petroleum Engineers., 1974.

[26] Y.M. Al-Wahaibi, First-contact-miscible and multicontact-miscible gas injection within a channeling heterogeneity system, Energy Fuels 24 (3) (2010) 1813-1821.

[27] L.W. Holm, V.A. Josendal, Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbon dioxide, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. SPE-4736 (1974) 1427-1438. CONF-7404143, https://doi. org/10.2118/4736-PA.

[28] N.M. Al Hinai, et al., Effects of oligomers dissolved in CO₂ or associated gas on IFT and miscibility pressure with a gas-light crude oil system, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2019) 181.

[29] Y. Gu, P. Hou, W. Luo, Effects of four important factors on the measured minimum miscibility pressure and first-contact miscibility pressure, J. Chem. Eng. Data 58 (5) (2013) 1361-1370.

[30] Z. Yang, et al., Interfacial tension of CO₂ and crude oils under high pressure and temperature, Colloid. Surface. Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 482 (2015) 611-616.

[31] Z. Yang, et al., Reducing the minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂ and crude oil using alcohols, Colloid. Surface. Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 568 (2019) 105-112.

[32] F.M. Orr, K. Jessen, An analysis of the vanishing interfacial tension technique for determination of minimum miscibility pressure, Fluid Phase Equil. 255 (2) (2007) 99-109.

[33] A. Golkari, M. Riazi, Experimental investigation of miscibility conditions of dead and live asphaltenic crude oileCO₂ systems, J. Petrol. Explor. Prod. Technol. 7 (2) (2016) 597-609.

[34] R. Rommerskirchen, et al., Reducing the miscibility pressure in gas injection oil recovery processes,in:Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2016, p. 14.

[35] S. Li, P. Luo, Experimental and simulation determination of minimum miscibility pressure for a Bakken tight oil and different injection gases, Petroleum 3 (1) (2017) 79-86.

[36] Y. Yang, et al., Improving oil recovery in the CO₂ flooding process by utilizing nonpolar chemical modifiers, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 24 (5) (2016) 646-650.

[37] P. Guo, et al., Use of oil-soluble surfactant to reduce minimum miscibility pressure, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 35 (4) (2017) 345-350.

[38] J. Liu, et al., Experimental study on reducing CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure with hydrocarbon agents, Energies 12 (10) (2019).

[39] H. Luo, et al., Effects of the non-ionic surfactant (CiPOj) on the interfacial tension behavior between CO₂ and crude oil, Energy Fuels 32 (6) (2018) 6708-6712.

[40] W.F. Yellig, R.S. Metcalfe, Determination and prediction of CO₂ minimum miscibility pressures (includes associated paper 8876 ), J. Petrol. Technol. 32 (1) (1980) 160-168.

[41] J. Bon, H.K. Sarma, A.M. Theophilos, An investigation of minimum miscibility pressure for CO₂ -rich injection gases with pentanes-plus fraction, in: SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2005, p. 10.

[42] K. Zhang, et al., A review of experimental methods for determining the Oil-Gas minimum miscibility pressures, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2019) 183.

[43] D.L. Flock, A. Nouar, Parametric analysis on the determination of the minimum miscibility pressure in slim tube displacements, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 23 (5) (1984) 80-88.

[44] L.W. Holm, V.A. Josendal, Effect of oil composition on miscible-type displacement by carbon dioxide, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 22 (1) (1982) 87-98.

[45] K. Zhang, Y. Gu, Two different technical criteria for determining the minimum miscibility pressures (MMPs) from the slim-tube and coreflood tests, Fuel 161 (2015) 146-156.

[46] A.M. Elsharkawy, F.H. Poettmann, R.L. Christiansen, Measuring minimum miscibility pressure: slim-tube or rising-bubble method?, in: SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1992, p. 10.

[47] D.J. Graue, E.T. Zana, Study of a possible CO₂ flood in rangely field, J. Petrol. Technol. 33 (7) (1981) 1312-1318.

[48] W. Ahmad, et al., Experimental determination of minimum miscibility pressure, Proc. Eng. 148 (2016) 1191-1198.

[49] H. Zhang, D. Hou, K. Li, An improved CO2-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure correlation, J. Chem. 2015 (2015) 1-10.

[50] A.M. Elsharkawy, F.H. Poettmann, R.L. Christiansen, Measuring CO₂ minimum miscibility Pressures: slim-tube or rising-bubble method? Energy Fuels 10 (2) (1996) 443-449.

[51] O. Glaso, Miscible displacement: recovery tests with nitrogen, SPE Reservoir Eng. 5 (1) (1990) 61-68.

[52] J.M. Ekundayo, S.G. Ghedan, Minimum miscibility pressure measurement with slim tube Apparatus -how unique is the value?, in: SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2013, p. 10.

[53] M. Mihcakan, Minimum miscibility pressure, rising bubble apparatus, and phase behavior, in: SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1994, p. 9.

[54] D.N. Rao, J.I. Lee, Application of the new vanishing interfacial tension technique to evaluate miscibility conditions for the Terra Nova Offshore Project, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 35 (3) (2002) 247-262.

[55] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Rapid and simple capillary-rise/vanishing interfacial tension method to determine crude oil minimum miscibility pressure: pure and mixed CO2, methane, and ethane, Energy Fuels 30 (8) (2016) 6365-6372.

[56] D.N. Rao, A new technique of vanishing interfacial tension for miscibility determination, Fluid Phase Equil. 139 (1) (1997) 311-324.

[57] K. Zhang, Y. Gu, Two new quantitative technical criteria for determining the minimum miscibility pressures (MMPs) from the vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) technique, Fuel 184 (2016) 136-144.

[58] P. Cheng, et al., Automation of axisymmetric drop shape-analysis for measurement of interfacial-tensions and contact angels, Colloid. Surface. 43 (1990) 151-167.

[59] D.S. Sequeira, S.C. Ayirala, D.N. Rao, Reservoir condition measurements of compositional effects on gas-oil interfacial tension and miscibility, in: SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 2008, p. 24.

[60] M. Bayat, et al., Investigation of gas injection flooding performance as enhanced oil recovery method, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29 (2016) 37-45.

[61] K. Jessen, F.M. Orr, On interfacial-tension measurements to estimate minimum miscibility pressures, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 11 (5) (2008) 933-939.

[62] M. Ghorbani, et al., Modified vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) test for CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) measurement, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 20 (2014) 92-98.

[63] D. Zhou, F.M. Orr Jr., An analysis of rising bubble experiments to determine minimum miscibility pressures, SPE J. 3 (1) (1998) 19-25.

[64] R.L. Christiansen, H.K. Haines, Rapid measurement of minimum miscibility pressure with the rising-bubble apparatus, SPE Reservoir Eng. 2 (4) (1987) 523-527.

[65] K. Zhang, Y. Gu, New qualitative and quantitative technical criteria for determining the minimum miscibility pressures (MMPs) with the risingbubble apparatus (RBA), Fuel 175 (2016) 172-181.

[66] K. Zhang, N. Jia, F. Zeng, Application of predicted bubble-rising velocities for estimating the minimum miscibility pressures of the light crude oileCO₂ systems with the rising bubble apparatus, Fuel 220 (2018) 412-419.

[67] R. Czarnota, et al., Minimum miscibility pressure measurement for CO₂ and oil using rapid pressure increase method, J. CO₂ Util. 21 (2017) 156-161.

[68] D. Zhou, F.M. Orr Jr., An analysis of rising bubble experiments to determine minimum miscibility pressures,in:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas, 1995, pp. 883-892.

[69] Q. Li, et al., Solubility of solid solutes in supercritical carbon dioxide with and without cosolvents, Fluid Phase Equil. 207 (1) (2003) 183-192.

[70] N.F. Djabbarah, Miscible Oil Recovery Process Using Carbon Dioxide and Alcohol, 1988.

[71] S. Rudyk, S. Hussain, P. Spirov, Supercritical extraction of crude oil by methanol-and ethanol-modified carbon dioxide, J. Supercrit. Fluids 78 (2013) 63-69.

[72] B. Moradi, et al., Effects of alcohols on interfacial tension between carbon dioxide and crude oil at elevated pressures and temperature, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 121 (2014) 103-109.

[73] R. Varadaraj, et al., Effect of hydrocarbon chain branching on interfacial properties of monodisperse ethoxylated alcohol surfactants, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 147 (2) (1991) 387-395.

[74] M.J. Rosen, J.T. Kunjappu, Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

[75] C.L. Voon, M. A, Reduction of MMP using oleophilic chemicals, Int. J. Civ. Mech. Eng. 8 (2014) 350-353.

[76] M.D.L. de Castro, M. Valcárcel, M.T. Tena, Physico d chemical properties of supercritical fluids, in: M. D.L. de Castro, M. Valcárcel, M.T. Tena (Analytical Supercritical Fluid Extraction,Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994, pp. 32-78.

[77] M.A. Qayyimah, M. Awang, S. Yusup, Fatty acid methyl ester from rubber seed oil as additives in reducing the minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂ and crude oil, J. Appl. Sci. 16 (11) (2016) 542-548.

[78] J. Zhang, Amphiphilic molecules, in: E. Drioli, L. Giorno (Encyclopedia of Membranes,Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 1-4.

[79] C. Negin, S. Ali, Q. Xie, Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery, Petroleum 3 (2) (2017) 197-211.

[80] J.J. Sheng, Chapter 7 -surfactant flooding,in: J. J. Sheng (Ed.), Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery, Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, 2011, pp. 239-335.

[81] K. Jarrahian, et al., Wettability alteration of carbonate rocks by surfactants: a mechanistic study, Colloid. Surface. Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 410 (2012) 1-10.

[82] M. Salehi, S.J. Johnson, J.-T. Liang, Enhanced wettability alteration by surfactants with multiple hydrophilic moieties, J. Surfactants Deterg. 13 (3) (2010) 243-246.

[83] P. Esmaeilzadeh, A. Bahramian, Z. Fakhroueian, Adsorption of anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants on carbonate rock in presence of ZrO2 nanoparticles, Phys. Procedia 22 (2011) 63-67.

[84] C. James, J. Eastoe, Ion specific effects with CO2-philic surfactants, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 18 (1) (2013) 40-46.

[85] A. Mohamed, et al., Universal surfactant for water, oils, and CO2, Langmuir 26 (17) (2010) 13861-13866.

[86] M. Sagisaka, et al., Effective and efficient surfactant for CO₂ having only short fluorocarbon chains, Langmuir 28 (30) (2012) 10988-10996.

[87] S. Gold, et al., Branched trichain sulfosuccinates as novel water in CO₂ dispersants, Colloid Polym. Sci. 284 (2006) 1333-1337.

[88] R.B. Alston, G.P. Kokolis, C.F. James, CO₂ minimum miscibility pressure: a correlation for impure CO₂ streams and live oil systems, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 25 (2) (1985) 268-274.

[89] P.Y.H. Zhang, S. Sayegh, X.L. Zhou, Effect of CO₂ Impurities on Gas-Injection EOR Processes, Society of Petroleum Engineers., 2004.

[90] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Experimental determinations of minimum miscibility pressures using hydrocarbon gases and CO₂ for crude oils from the bakken and cut bank oil reservoirs, Energy Fuels 34 (5) (2020) 6148-6157.