Effect of wettability of ceramic proppant surface in guar gum solution on the oil flow efficiency in fractures

Kanjicai Dong , Ming Wang , Chi Zhang

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 388 -396.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :388 -396. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.12.009
research-article
Effect of wettability of ceramic proppant surface in guar gum solution on the oil flow efficiency in fractures
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Guar gum and its derivatives have been the most commonly used polymers to increase the viscosity of fracture fluids. Ceramic proppants are vital products for enhancing oil and gas well productivity in low-permeability reservoirs. In the last several decades, abundant studies have been found in the investigation of proppant size, shape, compositions on the fracture conductivity. However, few types of research can be found to study the proppant wettability effect on the oil and gas flow efficiency. In our research, eight experiments were conducted using traditional guar gum fracturing fluid. Results of this work indicated that ceramic proppant promotes oil flow efficiency from sandstone core samples to proppant packs and thus should promote oil well productivity. The mechanism behind this phenomenon is believed to be the formation of oil flow channels across the fracture face due to the imbibition of oil in the core onto the oil-wet surface of the proppant, promoting oil flow from the core to the fracture. After guar gum was added the results inverted, this phenomenon for water-wet proppant is believed to be increased by the viscosity of fracture fluids which increased the viscosity of water, promoting oil flow from the core to the fracture. Nevertheless, the stimulation effect of oil-wet proppant on oil flow efficiency can be reduced by the presence of guar gum solution. Inside the proppant matrix filled with guar gum fracturing fluid, oil can be blocked inside the proppant matrix as a discontinuous phase while the aqueous phase can be easily mixed with the guar gum fluid and then be transferred out.

Keywords

Fracturing / Proppant / Surface wettability / Oil flow efficiency / Guar Gum

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kanjicai Dong, Ming Wang, Chi Zhang. Effect of wettability of ceramic proppant surface in guar gum solution on the oil flow efficiency in fractures. Petroleum, 2019, 5(4): 388-396 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.12.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

P. Saldungaray, T. Palisch, Understanding ceramic proppants: are they all created equal? Paper SPE 164042 Presented at the SPE Middle East Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition Held in Oman, 28-30 January 2013, 2013.

[2]

B.D. Poe, M.E. Economides, M.J. Economides, K.G. Nolte, Post-treatment evaluation and fractured well performance, in: M. E. Economides, K.G. Nolte (Reservoir Stimulation,Eds.), John Wiley and Sons, 2000.

[3]

M.C. Vincent, Proving it-A review of 80 published field studies demonstrating the importance of increased fracture conductivity, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, January 2002.

[4]

E.C. Donaldson, R.D. Thomas, P.B. Lorenz, Wettability determination and its effect on recovery efficiency, SPE J. (1969) 13-20 March.

[5]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 1: rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability, J. Petrol. Technol. 38 (October 1986) 1125-1144.

[6]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 2: wettability measurement, J. Petrol. Technol. 38 (November 1986) 1246-1262.

[7]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 3: the effects of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media, J. Petrol. Technol. 38 (December 1986) 1371-1378.

[8]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 4: effects of wettability on capillary pressure, J. Petrol. Technol. 39 (October 1987) 1283-1300.

[9]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 5: the effects of wettability on relative permeability, J. Petrol. Technol. 39 (November 1987) 1453-1468.

[10]

W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey—Part 6: the effects of wettability on waterflooding, J. Petrol. Technol. 39 (December 1987) 1605-1622.

[11]

T. Mora, O.A. Orogbemi, Z.T. Karpyn, A study of hydraulic fracture conductivity and its dependence on proppant wettability, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 28 (2010) 1527-1534.

[12]

B. Xu, A.D. Hill, D. Zhu, L. Wang, Experimental evaluation of guar-fracture-fluid filter-cake behavior, SPE Prod. Oper. (April 2011) 381-387.

[13]

R. Barati, S.J. Johnson, S. McCool, D.W. Green, G.P. Willhite, J.T. Liang, Fracturing fluid cleanup by controlled release of enzymes from polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 121 (3) (2011) 1292-1298.

[14]

L. Dai, B. Wang, X. An, L. Zhang, A. Khan, Y. Ni, Oil/water interfaces of guar gumbased biopolymer hydrogels and application to their separation, Carbohydrate Polym. 169 (2017) 9-15.

[15]

X. Ma, G. Lei, Z. Wang, Q.A. Da, P. Song, X. Zhang, C. Yao, Microbial remediation of guar-based fracturing fluid damage, SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, SPE, February 2018.

[16]

B. Ihejirika, A. Dosunmu, C. Eme, Performance evaluation of guar gum as a Carrier fluid for hydraulic fracturing, SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, SPE, August 2015.

[17]

L. Chen, E. Bonaccurso, Effects of surface wettability and liquid viscosity on the dynamic wetting of individual drops, Phys. Rev. 90 (2) (2014) 022401.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/