Practical solution for stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index of multiple vertical wells depleting closed reservoirs

Salam Al-Rbeawi , Fadhil S. Kadhim

Petroleum ›› 2020, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 53 -69.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2020, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :53 -69. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.10.002
research-article
Practical solution for stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index of multiple vertical wells depleting closed reservoirs
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The objective of this paper is introducing practical solutions for stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index and pressure behaviors and flow regimes of multiple vertical wells depleting closed rectangular reservoirs. It introduces full understanding of reservoir performance during transient and pseudo-steady state flow using pressure and pressure derivative patterns and productivity index and productivity index derivative schemes. The practical solutions proposed in this study are relied on a new approach for accurate estimation of starting time of pseudo-steady state flow and stabilized productivity index by applying productivity index derivative that converges mathematically to zero at the beginning of this flow. It is also an attempt for pointing out the optimal reservoir configuration that can give maximum stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index for different wellbore types and distributions in the drainage area.

Several analytical models are used in this study for describing pressure drop and productivity index behavior of multiple vertical wells considering different reservoir configurations and different wellbore types and locations. These wells were assumed either fully or partially penetrate the formations. These pressure models are justified to generate two pressure derivatives, one represents the derivative of time dependent pressure drop and the second represents the derivative of time-invariant pressure drop. The two derivatives are used for determining the starting time of pseudo-steady state flow and stabilized productivity index when both converge and mathematically become identical. These models are used also to generate several plots for time-invariant or stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index for different reservoir geometries considering different wellbore conditions. The maximum stabilized productivity index is illustrated in these plots and several analytical models for the expected flow regimes are developed using pressure and pressure derivative behaviors of different reservoirs and wellbore conditions.

The outcomes of this study are summarized in: 1) Developing new analytical solutions for pressure distribution in porous media drained by multiple vertical wells. 2) Developing new practical solution for estimating stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index. 3) Understanding pressure, pressure derivative, and productivity index behavior of finite acting reservoir depleted by multiple vertical wells during transient and pseudo-steady state production. 4) Investigating the impacts of different reservoir configurations and wellbore sizes and locations as well as partial penetration on stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index.

The novel points in this study are: 1) The optimum reservoir configuration that gives the maximum stabilized productivity index is the rectangular shape reservoir with reservoir length to width ratio of (2−4). 2) Starting time of pseudo-steady state and stabilized productivity index are impacted by wellbore numbers, sizes, and locations. 3) Starting time of pseudo-steady state flow is not affected by partial penetration ratio, however, stabilized productivity index is affected by this ratio. 4) Five spots pattern gives the maximum productivity index compared with other wellbore distribution patterns. 5) Productivity index of diagonally distributed wellbores is greater than the index of wellbores distributed along reservoir length.

Keywords

Pressure behavior and flow regimes / Reservoir characterization / Reservoir performance / Vertical wells / Modeling and simulation / Productivity index

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Salam Al-Rbeawi, Fadhil S. Kadhim. Practical solution for stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index of multiple vertical wells depleting closed reservoirs. Petroleum, 2020, 6(1): 53-69 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.10.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

D.K. Babu, A.S. Odeh, Productivity of a horizontal well Appendices a and B, Paper Presented at 63th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held on Houston, TX, USA, October 2-5, 1988, https://doi.org/10.2118/18334-MS.

[2]

E. Ozkan, Performance of Horizontal Wells, PhD dissertation The university of Tulsa, Tulsa, Ok, USA, 1988.

[3]

M.J. Economides, C.W. Brand, T.P. Frick, A well configuration in anisotropic reservoirs, SPE Form. Eval. 11 (04) (1996) 257-262, https://doi.org/10.2118/27980-PA.

[4]

Y. Tang, T. Yildiz, E. Ozkan, M.G. Kelkar, Effects of formation damage and highvelocity flow on the productivity of perforated horizontal wells, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 8 (04) (2005) 315-324, https://doi.org/10.2118/77534-PA.

[5]

J. Hagoort, Stabilized well productivity in double-porosity reservoirs, SPE reservoir evaluation & engineering Journal 11 (05) (2008) 940-947, https://doi.org/10.2118/110984-PA.

[6]

J. Hagoort, Semisteady-state productivity of a well in a rectangular reservoir producing at constant rate or constant pressure, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 14 (06) (2011) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.2118/149807-PA.

[7]

T.E. Johansen, D.G. Hender, L.A. James, Productivity index for arbitrary well trajectories in laterally isotropic, spatially anisotropic porous media, SPE J. 22 (02) (2017) 699-711, https://doi.org/10.2118/184408-PA.

[8]

I.R. Diyashev, M.J. Economides, The dimensionless productivity index as a general approach to well evaluation, SPE Production & Operation Journal 21 (03) (2006) 394-401, https://doi.org/10.2118/94644-PA.

[9]

F. Daviau, G. Mouronval, G. Bourdarot, P. Curutchet, Pressure analysis for horizontal wells, SPE Form. Eval. 3 (04) (1988) 720-724, https://doi.org/10.2118/14251-PA.

[10]

S.J.H. Al Rbeawi, D. Tiab, Transient pressure analysis of horizontal wells in a multiboundary system, Paper Presented at the SPE Production & Operation Symposium Held on OKC, OK, USA, October, 27- 29, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2118/142316-MS.

[11]

E. Aulisa, A. Ibragimov, J. Walton, A new method for evaluating the productivity index of nonlinear flows, SPE J. 14 (04) (2009) 693-706, https://doi.org/10.2118/108984-PA.

[12]

R.G. Nisle, The effect of partial penetration on pressure build-up in oil wells, Trans AIME, 971-G-SPE General 213 (1958) 85-90.

[13]

F. Brons, V.E. Marting, The effect of restricted fluid entry on well productivity, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 13 (02) (1961) 172-174, https://doi.org/10.2118/1322-G-PA.

[14]

S.A. Hovanessian, Pressure studies in bounded reservoirs, SPE J. 1 (04) (1961) 223-228, https://doi.org/10.2118/50-PA.

[15]

R.C. Earlougher, H.J. Ramey, F.G. Miller, T.D. Mueller, Pressure distributions in rectangular reservoirs, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 20 (02) (1968) 199-208, https://doi.org/10.2118/1956-PA.

[16]

M.S. Seth, Unsteady-state pressure distribution in a finite reservoir with partial well-bore opening, Canadian JPT 7 (04) (1968) 153-163, https://doi.org/10.2118/68-04-02.

[17]

A.S. Odeh, Steady-state flow capacity of wells with limited entry to flow, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 8 (01) (1968) 43-51, https://doi.org/10.2118/1797-PA.

[18]

M.W. Clegg, M. Mills, A study of the behavior of partially penetrating wells, SPE J. 9 (02) (1969) 189-203, https://doi.org/10.2118/2054-PA.

[19]

A.C. Gringarten, H.J. Ramey, The use of source and Green's function in solving unsteady-flow problems in reservoirs, SPE J. 13 (05) (1975) 285-296, https://doi.org/10.2118/3818-PA.

[20]

H. Cinco-Ley, H.J. Ramey, F.G. Miller, Pseudo-skin factors for partially-penetrating directionally-drilled wells, Paper Presented at the SPE 50th Annual Fall Meeting Held in Dallas, TX, USA, Sep. 28-Oct. 01, 1975, https://doi.org/10.2118/5589-MS.

[21]

H.L. Bilhartz, H.J. Ramey, The combined effects of storage, skin, and partial penetration on well test analysis, Paper Presented at the SPE 52nd Annual Fall Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Denver, CO, USA, Oct. 3-12, 1977, https://doi.org/10.2118/6753-MS.

[22]

I.M. Buhidma, R. Raghavan, Transient pressure behavior of partially penetrating wells subject to bottom water drive, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 32 (07) (1980) 1251-1261, https://doi.org/10.2118/8143-PA.

[23]

I. Javandel, P.A. Witherspoon, Pressure transient testing with A partially penetrating well in A two-layer reservoir, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1982), https://doi.org/10.2118/11139-MS.

[24]

M.E. Brown, M.-L. Mao, Pressure buildup analysis of prudhoe bay wells, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 34 (02) (1982) 387-396, https://doi.org/10.2118/9455-PA.

[25]

R.M. McKinley, T.D. Streltsova, Early-time pressure buildup analysis for prudhoe bay wells, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 36 (02) (1984) 311-319, https://doi.org/10.2118/10266-PA.

[26]

F.J. Kuchuk, P.A. Kirwan, New skin and wellbore storage type curves for partially penetrated wells, SPE Form. Eval. 2 (04) (1987) 546-554, https://doi.org/10.2118/11676-PA.

[27]

L.G. Jones, J.W. Watts, Estimating skin effect in a partially completed damaged well, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 23 (02) (1971) 249-252, https://doi.org/10.2118/2616-PA.

[28]

A.C. Reynolds, J.C. Chen, R. Raghavan, Pseudoskin factor caused by partial penetration, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 36 (12) (1984) 2197-2210, https://doi.org/10.2118/12178-PA.

[29]

T. Yildiz, Z. Bassiouni, Transient pressure analysis in partially-penetrating wells, Paper Presented at the International Technical Meeting Jointly Hosted by Petroleum Society of CIM and SPE in Calgary, Canada, June 10-13, 1990, https://doi.org/10.2118/90-02.

[30]

J. Vrbik, A simple approximation to the pseudo skin factor resulting from restricted entry, Canadian JPT 25 (05) (1991) 57-61, https://doi.org/10.2118/21469-PA.

[31]

L.K. Thomas, C.E. Evans, R.G. Pierson, S.L. Scott, Well performance model, JPT (J. Pharm. Technol.) 44 (02) (1992) 220-229, https://doi.org/10.2118/20723-PA.

[32]

T. Yildiz, Productivity of selectively perforated horizontal wells, SPE Prod. Oper. 21 (01) (2006) 75-80, https://doi.org/10.2118/90580-PA.

[33]

R. Camacho-Velazquez, A. Galindo-Nava, Optimum position for wells producing at constant wellbore pressure, SPE J. 1 (02) (1996) 155-168, https://doi.org/10.2118/28715-PA.

[34]

R. Camacho-Velazquez, A. Galindo-Nava, M. Prats, Buildup solution in a system with multiple wells producing at constant wellbore pressures, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 5 (04) (2002) 278-283, https://doi.org/10.2118/79104-PA.

[35]

S. Umnuayponwiwat, E. Ozkan, R. Raghavan, Pressure transient behavior and inflow performance of multiple wells in closed systems, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Dallas, TX, USA, Oct. 1-4, 2000, https://doi.org/10.2118/62988-MS.

[36]

P.P. Valco, T.A. Blasingame, Development and application of the multiwell productivity index (MPI), SPE J. 5 (01) (2000) 21-31, https://doi.org/10.2118/51793-PA.

[37]

R. Camacho-V, M. Vasquez-C, J. Roldan-C, F. Samaniego-V, L. Macias-C, New results on transient well tests analysis considering non-laminar flow in the reservoir, SPE Form. Eval. 11 (04) (1996) 237-243, https://doi.org/10.2118/26180-PA.

[38]

J. Lu, D. Tiab, Productivity equations for multiple wells system in anisotropic reservoirs, Paper Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference/SPE Gas Technology Symposium Held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 17-19, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2118/2008-099.

[39]

X. Wang, M. Economides, Advanced Natural Gas Engineering, Gulf publishing company, Houston, Texas, USA, 2009.

[40]

M.S. Newman, X. Yin, Lattice Boltzmann simulation of non-Darcy flow in stochastically generated 2D porous media geometries, SPE J. 18 (01) (2013) 12-26, https://doi.org/10.2118/146689-PA.

[41]

P. Forchheimer, Wasserbewguang durch boden, ZVDI 45 (1901) 1781. S. Al-Rbeawi and F.S. Kadhim Petroleum 6 (2020) 53-69 69

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/