Sweet-spot mapping through formation evaluation and property modelling using data from the Goldwyer Formation of the Barbwire Terrace, Canning Basin

Munther Alshakhs , Reza Rezaee

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 13 -29.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :13 -29. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.06.003
research-article
Sweet-spot mapping through formation evaluation and property modelling using data from the Goldwyer Formation of the Barbwire Terrace, Canning Basin
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The Goldwyer Formation of the Canning Basin has been regarded as a highly prospective shale play. This study assesses the potential prospectivity of this source rock as an unconventional hydrocarbon resource. Considering the sparsity of wells penetrating the Middle Ordovician Goldwyer across the vast under-explored area of the Canning Basin, a basin-wide study of the source rock is not warranted. Goldwyer assessment of the Barbwire Terrace, a subdivision of the Canning Basin, is carried out instead.

This assessment includes the estimation of key shale play properties, such as, total organic carbon, total porosity, water saturation, and brittleness index. Each property was estimated from available well data by testing multiple estimation methods. TOC values were derived from multiple regressions of different well data. A simplified Archie's equation was used to estimate water saturation. Density porosity method was primarily used for total porosity estimations. Sonic data along with density were utilized to estimate brittleness index.

Each property was then modelled across the Goldwyer Formation within the terrace. This provided geostatistical estimates on the propagation of such properties. In order to generate sweet spot maps for the Barbwire Terrace, averaged maps of different properties were combined in a weighted manner. This approach attempts to simplify the complexity of unconventional resource assessment, which therefore has provided a single product evaluating the prospectivity of the Goldwyer as a hydrocarbon resource.

Results have shown that TOC and porosity are mostly the deciding factors for the prospectivity of this source rock, given that their values can be too small where the Goldwyer is deemed non-prospective. Nonetheless, sweet-spot maps show that most prospective zone is the Upper Goldwyer (Goldwyer I), followed by the upper parts of the Lower Goldwyer (Goldwyer III). More specifically, southern flanks of north-western and middle regions of the Barbwire Terrace tend to be more prospective. A stricter approach where cut-off values were applied for each property showed that sweet-spot maps are only prospective in the southern flanks of the middle Barbwire Terrace of Goldwyer I.

Keywords

Sweet-spot maps / Formation evaluation / Petrophysical modelling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Munther Alshakhs, Reza Rezaee. Sweet-spot mapping through formation evaluation and property modelling using data from the Goldwyer Formation of the Barbwire Terrace, Canning Basin. Petroleum, 2019, 5(1): 13-29 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.06.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Schlumberger for their generous donation of Petrel licenses and Saudi Aramco for sponsoring the Author's studies at Curtin University.

References

[1]

S.J. Cadman, L. Pain, V. Vuckovic, Le Poidevin, S. R, Canning Basin, W.A. Australian petroleum accumulation, department of primary industries and energy bureau of resource sciences, Petroleum Resource Branch (1993). Report 9.

[2]

World Shale Gas Resources:an Initial Assessment of 14 Regions outside the United States, 2011 (Retrieved from U.S. Energy Information Administration).

[3]

R.R. Towner, D.L. Gibson, Geology of the onshore Canning Basin, western Australia. Bureau of mineral resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Bulletin 215 (1983).

[4]

P.W. Haines, Depositional facies and regional correlations of the ordovician goldwyer and nita formations Canning Basin, western Australia with implications for petroleum exploration, Geological Survey of Western Australia (2004). Record 2004/7.

[5]

N.E. Triche, M. Bahar, Shale gas Volumetrics of unconventional resource plays in the canning basin, western Australia,in: SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2118/167078-ms.

[6]

S.A. Brown, J.M. Boserio, K.S. Jackson, K.W. Spence, The geological evolution of the Canning Basin: implications for petroleum exploration,in:Paper Presented at the Proceedings of Geological Society of Australia/Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium, Perth, 1984.

[7]

Wapims.Western Australia's petroleum & geothermal information management System. Department of mines and petroleum.

[8]

J.W. Schmoker, Use of formation-Density logs to determine organic-carbon content in devonian shales of the western appalachian Basin and an additional example based on the bakken Formation of the williston basin, Petroleum Geology of the Black Shale of Eastern North America (1989).

[9]

M.R. Kamali, A.A. Mirshady, Total organic carbon content determined from well logs using DLogR and Neuro Fuzzy techniques, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 45 (3-4) (2004) 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.08.005.

[10]

S.Z. Sun, Y. Sun, C. Sun, Z. Liu, N. Dong, Methods of calculating total organic carbon from well logs and its application on Rock's properties analysis. GeoConvention 2013: integration, Geoscience Engineering Partnership (2013).

[11]

T.C. Hester, J.W. Schmoker, Determination of Organic Content from Formation-density Logs, Devonian-mississippian Woodford Shale, Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma, 1987 (87-20). Retrieved from http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr8720.

[12]

Q.R. Passey, S. Creaney, J.B. Kulla, F.J. Moretti, J.D. Stroud, A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs, AAPG (Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.) Bull. 74 (12) (1990) 1777.

[13]

B. Cluff, M. Miller, Logs Evaluation of Gas Shales: a 35-year Perspective, Presentation, DWLS Luncheon, Denver, CO, 2010.

[14]

G.E. Archie, The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics, 1942, https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G.

[15]

M. Labani, R. Rezaee, Petrophysical Evaluation of Gas Shale Reservoirs Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015, pp. 117-137.

[16]

C.H. Sondergeld, K.E. Newsham, J.T. Comisky, M.C. Rice, C.S. Rai, Petrophysical considerations in evaluating and producing shale gas resources, in: SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2118/131768-MS.

[17]

J.C. Glorioso, A.J. Rattia, unconventional reservoirs: basic petrophysical concepts for shale gas,in:SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2118/153004-MS.

[18]

G. Yu, R. Aguilera, Use of pickett plots for evaluation of shale gas formations, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2118/146948-MS.

[19]

H. Zhao, N.B. Givens, B. Curtis, Thermal maturity of the Barnett Shale determined from well-log analysis, AAPG (Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.) Bull. 91 (4) (2007) 535-549, https://doi.org/10.1306/10270606060.

[20]

D.L. Luffel, F.K. Guidry, New core analysis methods for measuring reservoir rock properties of Devonian Shale, J. Petrol. Technol. 44 (11) (1992) 1184-1190, https://doi.org/10.2118/20571-pa.

[21]

D.J. Jacobi, J.J. Breig, B. LeCompte, M. Kopal, G. Hursan, F.E. Mendez, J. Longo, Effective geochemical and geomechanical characterization of shale gas reservoirs from the wellbore environment: caney and the woodford shale,in:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2009, https://doi.org/10.2118/124231-MS.

[22]

R.M. Sneider, J.S. Sneider, G.W. Bolger, J.W. Neasham, Comparison of seal capacity determinations: conventional core vs, Cuttings. AAPG Memoir 67 (1997).

[23]

R.K. Olson, M.W. Grigg, Mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) a useful tool for improved understanding of porosity and matrix permeability distributions in shale reservoirs, in: AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas, 2008.

[24]

J.A. Franquet, M.W. Bratovich, R.D. Glass, State-of-the-Art openhole shale gas logging, in: SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2118/160862-MS.

[25]

F.P. Wang, J.F.W. Gale, Screening criteria for shale-gas systems, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 59 (2009) 779-793.

[26]

D.M. Jarvie, R.J. Hill, T.E. Ruble, R.M. Pollastro, Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment, AAPG (Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.) Bull. 91 (4) (2007) 475-499, https://doi.org/10.1306/12190606068.

[27]

W.V. Grieser, J.M. Bray, Identification of production potential in unconventional reservoirs, Production and Operations Symposium (2007) doi:SPE10.2118/106623-ms.

[28]

R. Rickman, M. Mullen, E. Petre, B. Grieser, D. Kundert, A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale,in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2008. SPE 115258.

[29]

G.A. Waters, R.E. Lewis, D. Bentley, The effect of mechanical properties anisotropy in the generation of hydraulic fractures in organic shales, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2118/146776-MS.

[30]

J.P. Castagna, M.L. Batzle, R.L. Eastwood, Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks, Geophysics 50 (4) (1985) 571-581, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441933.

[31]

A. Royle, S. Bezdan, Shear-wave velocity estimation techniques: a comparison, in: CSEG Convention, 2001.

[32]

J. Gonzalez, R. Lewis, J. Hemingway, J. Grau, E. Rylander, R. Schmitt, Determination of formation organic carbon content using a new neutron-induced gamma ray spectroscopy service that directly measures carbon, in: SPWLA 54th Annual Logging Sympsium, 2013.

[33]

T. Smithson, How Porosity Is Measured. Oilfield Review, Schlumberger, 2012, pp. 63-64.

[34]

J.G. Speight,The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, 5 ed., CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, United States, 2014.

[35]

B.P. Tissot, D.H. Welte, Petroleum Formation and Occurrence: a New Approach to Oil and Gas Exploration, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.

[36]

J.A. Ward,Kerogen density in the marcellus shale, in:SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, 2010. SPE 131767.

[37]

D.M. Jarvie, B. Claxton, B. Henk, J. Breyer, Oil and shale gas from the Barnett shale, ft. Worth basin, Texas, AAPG National Convention (2001). Denver, CO June 3-6, 2001.

[38]

Glover P.Petrophysics MSc Course Notes. University of Leeds, UK.

[39]

R.C. Selley, Elements of Petroleum Geology, 2 ed., Academic Press, 1998.

[40]

I. Clark, Statistics or geostatistics? Sampling error or nugget effect? J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall 110 (2010) 307-312.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/