A comprehensive review on proppant technologies

Abstract

The main function of traditional proppants is to provide and maintain conductive fractures during well production where proppants should meet closure stress requirement and show resistance to diagenesis under downhole conditions. Many different proppants have been developed in the oil & gas industry, with various types, sizes, shapes, and applications. While most proppants are simply made of silica or ceramics, advanced proppants like ultra-lightweight proppant is also desirable since it reduces proppant settling and requires low viscosity fluids to transport. Additionally, multifunctional proppants may be used as a crude way to detect hydraulic fracture geometry or as matrices to slowly release downhole chemical additives, besides their basic function of maintaining conductive hydraulic fractures. Different from the conventional approach where proppant is pumped downhole in frac fluids, a revolutionary way to generate in-situ spherical proppants has been reported recently. This paper presents a comprehensive review of over 100 papers published in the past several decades on the subject. The objectives of this review study are to provide an overview of current proppant technologies, including different types, compositions, and shapes of proppants, new technologies to pump and organize proppants downhole such as channel fracturing, and also in-situ proppant generation. Finally, the paper sheds light on the current challenges and emphasizes needs for new proppant development for unconventional resources.

Keywords

Proppant / Lightweight / Multifunctional proppant / Channel fracturing / In-situ proppant generation

Acknowledgments

The Authors thank Aramco Services Company and Saudi Aramco for permission to publish this paper.

References

[1] G.A. Al-Muntasheri, A critical review of hydraulic fracturing fluids over the last decade, SPE Prod. Oper. 29 (4) (2014) 243-260.

[2] T. Palisch, B. Wilson, B. Duenckel, New Technology Yields Ultra Highstrength Proppant, 2014. SPE 168631.

[3] J.D. Weaver, M. Parker, D.W. van Batenburg, P.D. Nguyen, Sustaining Fracture Conductivity, 2005. SPE 94666.

[4] M.A. Parker, K. Ramurthy, P.W. Sanchez, New Proppant for Hydraulic Fracturing Improves Well Performance and Decreases Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing Operations, 2012. SPE 161344.

[5] M. O'Driscoll,Proppant prospects for bauxite, in:Presented at 19th Bauxite & Alumina Conference, 13e15 March, Miami, Florida, USA, 2013.

[6] M.C. Vincent, Examining Our Assumptions-have Oversimplifications Jeopardized Our Ability to Design Optimal Fracture Treatment?, 2009. SPE 119143.

[7] J.M. McGowen,S. Vitthal, Fracturing-fluid Leakoff under Dynamic Conditions Part I: Development of a Realistic Laboratory Testing Procedure, 1996. SPE 36492.

[8] J.M. McGowen, R.D. Barree, M.W. Conway, Incorporating Crossflow and Spurt-loss Effects in Filtration Modeling within a Fully 3D Fracturegrowth Simulator, 1999. SPE 56597.

[9] T. Palisch, R. Duenckel, L. Bazan, H.J. Heidt, G. Turk, Determining Realistic Fracture Conductivity and Understanding its Impact on Well Performancee Theory and Field Examples, 2007. SPE 106301.

[10] S.K. Schubarth, J.P. Spivey, P.T. Huckabee, Using Reservoir Modeling to Evaluate Stimulation Effectiveness in Multilayered “Tight” Gas Reservoirs: A Case History in the Pinedale Anticline Area, 2006. SPE 100574.

[11] A. Kumar, K. Chellappah, M. Aston, R. Bulgachev, Quality Control of Particle Size Distributions, 2013. SPE 165150.

[12] F. Growcock, R. Mahrous, R. Flesher, Shear Degradability of Granular Lost Circulation Materials, 2012. AAD--12-FTCE-27.

[13] D. Schmidt, P.E. Rankin, B. Williams, T. Palisch, J. Kullman, Performance of Mixed Proppant Sizes, 2014. SPE 168629.

[14] K. Hu, J. Sun, J. Wong, B.E. Hall, Proppants Selection Based on Field Case Studies of Well Production Performance in the Bakken Shale Play, 2014. SPE 169566.

[15] P.C. Harris, H. Walters, Real-time Control of Low-polymer Fracturing Fluids, 2000. SPE 63238.

[16] N. Goel, S. Shah, A Rheological Criterion for Fracturing Fluids to Transport Proppant during a Stimulation Treatment, 2001. SPE 71663.

[17] T.Y. Hu, H. Chung, J.E. Maxey, What is More Important for Proppant Transport, Viscosity or Elasticity?, 2015. SPE 173339.

[18] M. Samuel, R.J. Card, E.B. Nelson, J.E. Brown, P.S. Vinod, H.L. Temple, Q. Qu, D.K. Fu, Polymer-free fluid for fracturing applications, SPE Drill. Completion 14 (4) (1999) 240-246.

[19] M. Samuel, D. Polson, W. Kordziel, T. Waite, G. Waters, P.S. Vinod, D. Fu, R. Downey, Viscoelastic Surfactant Fracturing Fluids: Application in Low Permeability Reservior, 2000. SPE 60322.

[20] H.G. Waters, B. Slabaugh, R.G. Morgan, P.C. Harris, S.J. Health, R.J. Powell, D.M. Barrick, J.W. Johnson,Testing Device and Method for Viscosified Fluid Containing Particulate Material, US Patent No. 6,782,735 (2004).

[21] P.C. Harris, R.G. Morgan, S.J. Heath, Measurement of Proppant Transport of Frac Fluids, 2005. SPE 95287.

[22] P.C. Harris, H.G. Walters, J. Bryant, Prediction of proppant transport from rheological data, SPE Prod. Oper. 24 (4) (2009) 550-555.

[23] M.G. Mack, C.E. Coker, Proppant Selection for Shale Reservoirs: Optimizing Conductivity, Proppant Transport and Cost, 2013. SPE 167221.

[24] M. Mack, J. Sun, C. Khadilkar, Quantifying Proppant Transport in Thin Fluids e Theory and Experiments, 2014. SPE 168637.

[25] J. Dufek, G.W. Bergantz, Suspended load and bed-load transport of particle-laden gravity currents: the role of particle-bed interaction, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 21 (2) (2007) 119-145.

[26] J.R. Hellmann, B.E. Scheetz, W.G. Luscher, D.G. Hartwich, R.P. Koseski, Proppants for shale gas and oil recovery, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 93 (1) (2014) 28-35.

[27] C.T. Montgomery, M.B. Smith, Hydraulic fracturing. History of an enduring technology, J. Pet. Technol (December 2010)26-41.

[28] C.J. Stephenson, A.R. Rickards, H.D. Brannon, Is Ottawa Still Evolving? API Specifications and Conductivity in 2003, 2003. SPE 84304.

[29] A.R. Sinclair, J.W. Graham,C.P. Sinclair, Improved Well Stimulation with Resin-coated Proppants, 1993. SPE 11579.

[30] P.D. Nguyen, R.G. Dusterhoft, B.T. Dewprashad,J.D. Weaver, New Guidelines for Applying Curable Resin-coated Proppants, 1998. SPE 39582.

[31] J.R. Murphey, K.D. Totty,Continuously Forming and Transporting Consolidatable Resin Coated Particulate Materials in Aqueous Gels, US Patent No. 4,829,100 (1989).

[32] D.R. Underdown, J.C. Day,D.D. Sparlin, A Plastic Pre-coated Gravel for Controlling Formation Sand, 1980. SPE 8801.

[33] M. Zoveidavianpoor, A. Gharibi, Application of polymers for coating of proppant in hydraulic fraturing of subterraneous formations: a comprehensive review, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24 (2015) 197-209.

[34] S. Davis, T. W. A. Devereux,US Patent Application No. 20070204992 A1 (2007).

[35] B. Dewprashad, H.H. Abass, D.L. Meadows, J.D. Weaver,B.J. Bennett, A Method to Select Resin-coated Proppants, 1993. SPE 26523.

[36] A.R. Rickards, H.D. Brannon, W.D. Wood, C.J. Stephenson, High Strength, Ultra-lightweight Proppant Lends New Dimensions to Hydraulic Fracturing Applications, 2003. SPE 84308.

[37] J. Bicerano,Method for the Fracture Stimulation of a Subterranean Formation Having a Wellbore by Using Impact-Modified Thermoset Polymer Nanocomposite Particulates as Proppants, US Patent No. 8,461,087 B 2 (2013).

[38] J. Bicerano,Method for the Fracture Stimulation of a Subterranean Formation Having a Wellbore by Using Impact-Modified Thermoset Polymer Nanocomposite Particulates as Proppants, US Patent No. 8,492,316 B 2 (2013).

[39] R. Rediger, J. Petrella, M.J. Aron, B.W. Fennell,Increasing Buoyancy of Well Treating Materials. US Patent 8,058,213 B 2 (2011).

[40] M.G. Mack, C.E. Coker, Development and Field Testing of Advanced Ceramic Proppants, 2013. SPE 166323.

[41] J.B. Parse, B.D. Jette,Single Component Neutrally Buoyant Proppant, US Patent No. 20120145390 A1 (2012).

[42] J. B. Parse, B.D. Jette,Multiple Component Neutrally Buoyant Proppant, US Patent No. 20120149610 A1 (2012).

[43] N. Bestaoui-Spurr, Materials Science Improves Silica Sand Strength, 2014. SPE 168158.

[44] H.D. Brannon, A.R. Rickards, C.J. Stephenson, R.L. Maharidge,Method of Stimulating Oil and Gas Wells Using Deformable Proppants, US Patent No. 7,322,411 B 2 (2008).

[45] L.L. Gadeken, H.D. Smith Jr., TracerScan: A Spectroscopy Technique for Determining the Distribution of Multiple Radioactive Tracers in Downhole Operations, The Log Analyst, January-February 1987, pp. 27-39.

[46] J.L. Taylor III, T.R. Bandy, Tracer technology finds expanding applications, Petrol. Eng. Int. 61 (6) (1989) 31-34, 36.

[47] R.R. McDaniel, S.M. McCarthy, M. Smith,Methods and Compositions for Determination of Fracture Geometry in Subterranean Formations, US Patent No. 7,726,397 B 2 (2010).

[48] R. Duenckel, H.D. Smith, W.A. Warren, A.D. Grae, Field Application of a New Proppant Detection Technology, 2011. SPE 146744.

[49] A.D. Grae, R.J. Duenckel, J.R. Nelson, H.D.J. Smith, X. Han, T.T. Palisch, Field Study Compares Fracture Diagnostic Technologies, 2012. SPE 152169.

[50] F. Torres, W. Reinoso, G. Tierra, M. Chapman, X. Han, P. Campo, Field Application of New Proppant-dection Technology-a Case History in the Putumayo Basin of Colombia, 2012. SPE 152251.

[51] R.J. Duenckel, T.T. Palisch, X. Han, P. Saldungaray, Environmental Stewardship: Global Applications of a Non-radioactive Method to Identify Proppant Placement and Propped Fracture Height, 2013. SPE 166251.

[52] K. Bartko, A. Salim, P. Saldungaray, D. Kalinin, X. Han, P. Saldungaray, Hydraulic Fracture Geometry Evaluation Using Proppant Detection: Experiences in Saudi Arabia, 2013. SPE 168094.

[53] X. Han, R. Duenckel, H.J. Smith, H.D. Smith, An Environmentally Friendly Method to Evaluate Gravel and Frac Packed Intervals Using a New Nonradioactive Tracer Technology, 2014. OTC 25166.

[54] J. Weirich, J. Li, T. Abdelfattah, C. Pedroso, Frac-packing: Best Practices and Lessons Learned from over 600 Operations, 2012. SPE 147419.

[55] S. Ramachandran, G. Al-Muntasheri, J. Leal, Q. Wang, Corrosion and Scale Formation in High Temperature Sour Gas Wells: Chemistry and Field Practice, 2015. SPE 173713.

[56] P.J.C. Webb, T.A. Nistad, B. Knapstad, P.D. Ravenscroft,I.R. Collins, Economic and Technical Advantages of Revolutionary New Chemial Delivery System for Fractured and Gravel Packed Wells, 1997. SPE 38548.

[57] P.J.C. Webb, T.A. Nistad, B. Knapstad, P.D. Ravenscroft, I.R. Collins, Revolutionary New Chemical Delivery System for Fractured, Gravel Packed and Prepacked Screen Wells, 1997. SPE 38164.

[58] D.V.S. Gupta, J.W. Kirk,Method of Inhibiting or Controlling Formation of Inorganic Scales, US Patent No. 7,491,682 B 2 (2009).

[59] S. Szymczak, J.M. Brown, S. Noe, G. Gallup, Long-term Scale Inhibition Using a Solid Scale Inhibitor in a Fracture Fluid, 2006. SPE 102720.

[60] D.V.S. Gupta, J.M. Brown, S. Szymczak,A 5-Year Survey of Applications and Results of Placing Solid Chemical Inhibitors in the Formation via Hydraulic Fracturing, 2010. SPE 134414.

[61] L.J. Kalfayan, C.A. McAfee, L.M. Cenegy, Field Wide Implementation of Proppant-based Scale Control Technology in the Bakken Field, 2013. SPE 165201.

[62] D.V.S. Gupta, J.M. Brown, S. Szymczak, Multi-year Scale Inhibition from a Solid Inhibitor Applied during Stimulation, 2008. SPE 115655.

[63] J.M. Brown, D. Shen, D.V.S. Gupta, G. Taylor, R.W. Self, Laboratory and Field Studies of Long-term Release Rates for a Solid Scale Inhibitor, 2011. SPE 140177.

[64] R.J. Duenckel, J.G. Leasure, T. Palisch, Improvements in Downhole Chemical Delivery: Development of Multifunctional Proppants, 2014. SPE 168605.

[65] J.G. Leasure, R.J. Duenckel, Effective Scale Prevention Using Chemically Infused ProppanteA Uinta Basin Case History, 2015. SPE 173792.

[66] D.V.S. Gupta, J. Walter,Well Treatment Compositions for Slow Release of Treatment Agents and Methods of Using the Same, US Patent No. 7,493,955 B 2 (2009).

[67] D.V.S. Gupta, S. Szymczak, J.M. Brown, Solid Production Chemicals Added with the Frac for Scale, Paraffin and Asphaltene Inhibition, 2009. SPE 119393.

[68] T. Smith, S. Szymczak, D.V.S. Gupta, J.M. Brown, Solid Paraffin Inhibitor Pumped in a Hydraulic Fracture Provides Long-term Paraffin Inhibition in Permian Basin Wells, 2009. SPE 124868.

[69] V. Wornstaff, S. Hagen, T. Ignacz, M. Chorney, B. Pedersen, Solid Paraffin Inhibitors Pumped in Hydraulic Fractures Increase Oil Recovery in Viking Wells, 2014. SPE 168147.

[70] S. Szymczak, D.V.S. Gupta, W. Steiner, S. Bolton, J. Romano, Well Stimulation Using a Solid, Proppant-sized, Paraffin Inhibitor to Reduce Costs and Increase Production for a South Texas, Eagle Ford Shale Oil, 2014. SPE 168169.

[71] D.V.S. Gupta, D. Shen, S.J. Szymczak, A Chemical Inhibitor-infused, High-Strength Proppant Additive for Reservior Flow Assurance against Scale Deposition in Wells with High Intervention Costs, 2013. SPE 165078.

[72] R. J. Duenckel,Proppants for Gel Clean-Up, US Patent No. 7,721,804 B 2 (2010).

[73] T. Palisch, M. Chapman, J. Leasure, Novel Proppant Surface Treatment Yields Enhanced Multiphase Flow Performance and Improved Hydraulic Fracture Clean-up, 2015. SPE 175537.

[74] R.R. McDaniel,Dural Functional Proppants, US Patent Application No. 20140309149 A1 (2014).

[75] W.C. Krumbein, L.L. Sloss, Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, second ed., W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1963, p. 660.

[76] ISO 13503-2: 2006 /Amd.1:2009(E), Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Completion Fluids and MaterialsePart 2: Measurement of Properties of Proppants Used in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel-packing Operations, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

[77] G. McDaniel, J. Abbott, F. Mueller, A. Mokhtar, S. Pavlova, O. Nevvonen, T. Parias, J.A. Alary, Changing the Shape of Fracturing: New Proppant Improves Fracture Conductivity, 2010. SPE 135360.

[78] J.A. Alary, T. Parias,Method of Manufacturing and Using Rod-Shaped Proppants and Anti-Flowback Additives, US Patent No. 8,562,900 B 2 (2013).

[79] J. Edelman, K. Maghrabia, M. Semary, A. Mathur, A.S. Zaki, J.M. Bernechea, Rod-shaped Proppant Provides Superior Proppant Flowback Control in the Egyptian Eastern Desert, 2013. SPE 164014.

[80] M.S.A. Abdelhamid, M. Marouf, Y. Kamal, A. Shaaban, A. Mathur, M. Yosry, C. Kraemer, Field Development Study: Channel Fracturing Technique Combined with Rod-shaped Proppant Improved Production, Eliminates Proppant Flowback Issues and Screen-outs in the Western Desert, Egypt, 2013. SPE 164753.

[81] Y. Liu, E. Fonseca, C. Hackbarth, R. Hulseman, K.N. Tackett II, A New Generation High-drag Proppant: Prototype Development, Laboratory Testing, and Hydraulic Fracturing Modeling, 2015. SPE 173338.

[82] T. Hughes, E. Barmatov, J. Geddes, M. Fuller, B. Drochon, S. Makarychev- Mikhailov,Delivery of Particulate Material Below Ground, US Patent Application No. 20120048554 (2012).

[83] R.P. Mahoney, D.S. Soane, M.K. Herring, P.M. Snider, Self-suspending Proppant, 2013. SPE 163818.

[84] R.P. Mahoney, D.S. Soane, M.K. Herring, K.P. Kincaid, R.C. Portilla, P. Wuthridge,Self-Suspending Proppants for Hydraulic Fracturing, US Patent Application No. 20140228258 A1 (2014).

[85] F.F. Chang, P.D. Berger, C.H. Lee, In-situ Formation of Proppant and Highly Permeability Blocks for Hydraulic Fracturing, 2015. SPE 173328.

[86] M.R. Gillard, O.O. Medvedev, P.R. Hosein, A. Medvedev, F. Penacorada, E. d' Huteau, A New Approach to Generating Fracture Conductivity, 2010. SPE 135034.

[87] A. Medvedev, K. Yudina, M.K. Panga, C.C. Kraemer, A. Pena, On the Mechanisms of Channel Fracturing, 2013. SPE 163836.

[88] E. d'Huteau, M. Gillard, M. Miller, A. Pena, J. Johnson, M. Turner, O. Medvedev, T. Rhein, D. Willberg, Open-channel Fracturing e A Fast Track to Production, Oilfield Review, Autumn 2011, pp. 4-17.

[89] U.A. Inyang, P.D. Nguyen, J. Cortez, Development and Field Applications of Highly Conductive Proppant-free Channel Fracturing Method, 2014. SPE 168996.

[90] J. Zhou, H. Sun, Q. Qu, M. Guerin, L. Li, Benefits of Novel Preformed Gel Fluid System in Proppant Placement for Unconventional Reservoirs, 2014. SPE 167774.

[91] J. Zhou, P. Carman, H. Sun, R. Wheeler, H. Brannon, D.V.S. Gupta, Nearly Perfect Proppant Transport by Particle Fracturing Fluids Yields Exciting Opportunities in Well Completion Applications, 2015. SPE 174267.

[92] H. Sun, J. Zhou, H. Brannon, S. Gupta, M. Ault, P. Carman, R. Wheeler, Case Study of Soft Particle Fluid to Improve Proppant Transport and Placement, 2015. SPE 174801.

[93] K.K. Chong, W.V. Grieser, A. Passman, H.C. Tamayo, N. Modeland, B.E. Burke, A Completions Guide Book to Shale-play Development: A Review of Successful Approaches toward Shale-play Stimulation in the Last Two Decades, 2010. SPE 133874.

[94] G.E. King, Thirty Years of Gas Shale Fracturing: what Have We Learned?, 2010. SPE 133456.

[95] S.A. Holditch, C. Torres-Verdin, Unconventional Gas, National Petroleum Council Global Oil & Gas Study, 2007. Topic Paper #29.

[96] R. Rickman, M.J. Mullen, J.E. Petre, W.V. Grieser, D. Kundert, A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale, 2008. SP--115258.

[97] H.D. Brannon, T.R. Starks, Maximizing Return-on-fracturing-investment by Using Ultra Lightweight Proppant to Optimize Effective Fracture Area: Can Less Be More?, 2009. SPE 119385.

[98] X. Weng, C. Kresse, C. Cohen, R.Wu, H. Gu, Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Network Propagation in a Naturally Fractured Formation, 2011. SPE 140253.

[99] M. Mirzae, C. Cipolla, A Workflow for Modeling and Simulation of Hydraulic Fractures in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs, 2012. SPE 153022.

[100] C.E. Cohen, C. Abad, X. Weng, K. England, A. Phatak, O. Kresse, O. Nevvonen, V. Lafitte, P. Abivin, Optimum Fluid and Proppant Selection for Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Parametric Study Based on Fracturing-to-production Simulations, 2013. SPE 163876.

[101] R.D. Barree, S.A. Cox, V.L. Barree, M.W. Conway, Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Selection, 2003. SPE 84306.

[102] M. Yang, X. Liu, D. Jiao, M.J. Economides, Hydraulic Fracture Design FlawseProppant Selection, 2013. SPE 165328.

[103] M. Yang, M.J. Economides, C. Wei, C. Gao, Hydraulic Fracture Design FlawseProppant Selection, 2013. SPE 166299.