Characterizing hydraulic fractures in shale gas reservoirs using transient pressure tests

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling has been the technology that makes it possible to economically produce natural gas from unconventional shale gas or tight gas reservoirs. Hydraulic fracturing operations, in particular, multistage fracturing treatments along with horizontal wells in unconventional formations create complex fracture geometries or networks, which are difficult to characterize. The traditional analysis using a single vertical or horizontal fracture concept may be no longer applicable. Knowledge of these created fracture properties, such as their spatial distribution, extension and fracture areas, is essential information to evaluate stimulation results. However, there are currently few effective approaches available for quantifying hydraulic fractures in unconventional reservoirs.

This work presents an unconventional gas reservoir simulator and its application to quantify hydraulic fractures in shale gas reservoirs using transient pressure data. The numerical model incorporates most known physical processes for gas production from unconventional reservoirs, including two-phase flow of liquid and gas, Klinkenberg effect, non-Darcy flow, and nonlinear adsorption. In addition, the model is able to handle various types and scales of fractures or heterogeneity using continuum, discrete or hybrid modeling approaches under different well production conditions of varying rate or pressure. Our modeling studies indicate that the most sensitive parameter of hydraulic fractures to early transient gas flow through extremely low permeability rock is actually the fracture-matrix contacting area, generated by fracturing stimulation. Based on this observation, it is possible to use transient pressure testing data to estimate the area of fractures generated from fracturing operations. We will conduct a series of modeling studies and present a methodology using typical transient pressure responses, simulated by the numerical model, to estimate fracture areas created or to quantity hydraulic fractures with traditional well testing technology. The type curves of pressure transients from this study can be used to quantify hydraulic fractures in field application.

Keywords

Hydraulic fractures / Shale gas reservoirs / Transient pressure tests / Reservoir simulation / Formation characterization / Gas adsorption

Acknowledgments

This work was Supported in part by EMG Research Center and UNGI of Petroleum Engineering Department at Colorado School of Mines, and by foundation CMG.

References

[1] K. Pruess, GMINC e a Mesh Generator for Flow Simulations in Fractured Reservoirs (Report LBL-15227), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 1983.

[2] C.L. Cipolla, E.P. Lolon, J.C. Erdle, B. Rubin, Reservoir modeling in shale-gas reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 13 (04) (2010) 638-653.

[3] R. Al-Hussainy, H.J. Ramey Jr. P. B. Crawford, The flow of real gases through porous media, J. Petrol. Technol. 18 (5) (May 1966).

[4] Alana Leahy-Dios, et al., Modeling of transport phenomena and multicomponent sorption for shale gas and coalbed methane in an unstructured grid simulator,in: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference, 2011.

[5] H. Cinco-Ley, V.F. Samaniego, Transient pressure analysis on fractured wells, J. Petrol. Technol. 33 (9) (September 1981)1749-1766.

[6] Y.S. Wu, P. Fackahroenphol,A unified mathematical model for unconventional reservoir simulation, in:SPE 142884, Submitted for the SPE EUROPEC Conference, 23e26 May 2011 in Vienna, Austria, 2011.

[7] Y.S. Wu, C. Wang,Transient pressure testing analysis of gas wells in unconventional reservoirs (SPE-SAS-312), in: Presented at the 2012 SPE Annual Technical Symposium & Exhibition (ATS&E), Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 8-11 April 2012, 2012.

[8] O.G. Apaydin, E. Ozkan, R. Raghavan, Effect of discontinuous microfractures on ultratight matrix permeability of a dual-porosity medium, in: SPE 147391, Presented at the 2011 SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference Held in Calgary, Canada, May, 2012.

[9] R.D. Baree, V.L. Baree, D.P. Craig, Holistic fracture diagnostics: consistent interpretation of prefrac injection tests using multiple analysis methods, J. Petrol. Technol. 24 (3) (August 2009).

[10] Robert A. Wattenbarger, Ahmed H. El-Banbi, Bryan Maggard,Mauricio E. Villegas, J. Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas wells, in:SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-permeability Reservoirs Symposium, 5e8 April 1998, Denver, Colorado, 1998.

[11] D. Silin, T. Kneafsey, Shale gas: nanometer-scale observations and well modelling, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 51 (6) (2012) 464-475.

[12] Y.S. Wu, J. Li, D. Ding, C. Wang, Y. Di, A generalized framework model for the simulation of gas production in unconventional gas reservoirs, SPE J. 19 (5) (2014) 845-857.

[13] N.R. Warpinski, M.J. Mayerhofer, M.C. Vincent, C.L. Cipolla, E.P. Lolon, Stimulating unconventional reservoirs: maximizing network growth while optimizing fracture conductivity,in:Presented at the 2008 SPE Shale Gas Production Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, 16e18 November, 2008.

[14] M. Nobakht, C.R. Clarkson, A new analytical method for analyzing linear flow in tight/shale gas reservoirs: constant-rate boundary condition, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 15 (1) (February 2012).

[15] M.J. Mayerhofer, E.P. Lolon, N.R. Warpinski, C.L. Cipolla, D. Walser, C.M. Rightmire, What is stimulated reservoir volume? SPE Prod. Oper. 25 (1) (February 2010).

[16] J.L. Miskimins, Design and life-cycle considerations for unconventional reservoir wells, SPE Prod. Oper. 24 (2) (May 2009).