Research on Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond Agricultural Heritage Protection Based on the Concept of Rural Environmental Museum—Case Study on Digang Village in Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province
Rui MA, Yifei GAO, Shuang DU, Yuxiang FAN
Research on Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond Agricultural Heritage Protection Based on the Concept of Rural Environmental Museum—Case Study on Digang Village in Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province
Since the initiation in 2002, the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) have attracted widespread attention from the international heritage community. Although the total number of GIAHS projects in China has ranked among the top in the world, most of these heritage sites still face challenges of insufficient value interpretation and presentation, as well as unsustainable protection and utilization. This research draws on the concept of rural environmental museum to establish a multi-scale protection framework for Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond GIAHS. Taking the mulberry-dyke & fish-pond agricultural heritage in Digang Village of Huzhou City in Zhejiang Province as an example, layered protection strategies were proposed considering its current status. At the macro-scale, delineate the heritage interpretation scope according to the refined regional cultural identity; at the meso-scale, build a graded facility system for heritage value display according to the determined display sequence; at the micro-scale, enhance the sense of place in daily landscapes and integrate daily community activities into heritage spaces. This path from heritage value interpretation to spatial planning can provide reference for related protection practice of other GIAHS projects.
● Theoretically established a generally applicable framework for the protection of Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond GIAHS
● Verified the practicality and effectiveness of this framework in protecting GIAHS in China
● Explored a methodology suitable for the connection between value interpretation and spatial planning of GIAHS in China, while expanding the application breadth and depth of the protection paradigm
Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) / Rural Environmental Museum / Digang Village / Mulberry-dyke & Fishpond System / Heritage Protection / Agricultural Landscape
[1] |
Min, Q. (2006). GIAHS: A new kind of world heritage. Resources Science, 28(4), 206– 208.
|
[2] |
Min, Q. (2020). Research priorities, problems and countermeasures of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems and their conservation. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 28(9), 1285– 1293.
|
[3] |
Santoro, A., Venturi, M., Bertani, R., & Agnoletti, M. (2020). A review of the role of forests and agroforestry systems in the FAO Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Programme. Forests, 11(8), 860.
|
[4] |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). GIAHS: Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems.
|
[5] |
Zhang, Y., Min, Q., Li, H., He, L., Zhang, C., & Yang, L. (2017). A conservation approach of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): Improving traditional agricultural patterns and promoting scale-production. Sustainability, 9(2), 295.
|
[6] |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). List of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS).
|
[7] |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). Agricultural heritage around the world.
|
[8] |
Shi, D. (2019). From eco museum to rural environmental museum: The concept and practice of rural revitalization in Japan. Chinese Museum, (1), 43– 49.
|
[9] |
Shi, D. (2022). Practice of the Asahi Eco Museum in Yamagata-ken (Japan) and its enlightenment to China. Chinese Museum, (1), 56– 61, 128.
|
[10] |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Guidelines for developing a GIAHS proposal document.
|
[11] |
Liu, J., & Shen, S. (2020). Research on system protection and tourism development of mulberry fish pond in Huzhou, a Global Important Agricultural Cultural Heritage. Modernizing Agriculture, (11), 57– 60.
|
[12] |
The People's Government of Nanxun District, Huzhou City, P. R. China. (2017). Zhejiang Huzhou Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond System proposal of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System.
|
[13] |
Jin, L. (2012). The theoretic roots of ecomuseums: The birth, development and practice of ecomuseums in China. Ecological Economy, (9), 180– 185.
|
[14] |
Lin, X. (2020). Holistic protection: Values, concepts, practices, and challenges—Some thoughts on the innovation of cultural heritage conservation. Fujian Tribune (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), (12), 36– 47.
|
[15] |
Wu, X., & Wu, Q. (2021). From community presentation to panoramic integration: The transformation of the perspective of China's eco-museum construction. Journal of North Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Science), (5), 16– 24.
|
[16] |
Borrelli, N., & Davis, P. (2012). How culture shapes nature: Reflections on ecomuseum practices. Nature and Culture, 7(1), 31– 47.
|
[17] |
Yin, K. (2017). Multiple-senses of place: An approach to ecomuseum. Folklore Studies, (5), 21– 28, 158.
|
[18] |
Davis, P., & Li, M. (2019). Places, cultural exhibition sites and ecomuseums. Chinese Museum, (1), 36– 42.
|
[19] |
Ohara, K. (2005). Ecomuseums in Japan today. Chinese Museum, (3), 58– 62.
|
[20] |
Wang, M., Chen, Z., & Zhou, H. (2021). A feasibility study on the construction of eco-museum in the villages of She people in Eastern Fujian Province—A case study of the village of Banyueli in Xiapu County. Fujian Wenbo, (9), 39– 44.
|
[21] |
Min, Q., He, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). Museum construction is an important content of agricultural cultural heritage protection: Summary of the Symposium on Agricultural Cultural Heritage Protection and Rural Museum Construction. Ancient and Modern Agriculture, (4), 114– 116.
|
[22] |
Meng, F., Su, D., Fang, L., & An, L. (2017). Construction of ecology museum and development of ethnic culture: A case study of Suojia Ecology Museum. Journal of Original Ecological National Culture, 9(4), 128– 140.
|
[23] |
Architectural History Institute of China Architecture Design & Research Group., & China Urban Development Planning & Design Consulting. (2022). Protection plan of Nanxun mulberry-dyke & fish-pond system of Huzhou City by cultural relics protection units (2022–2035) (Draft). People's Government of Nanxun District, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province.
|
[24] |
Zhejiang University. (2013). Protection and development plan of Nanxun mulberry-dyke & fish-pond system in Huzhou of Zhejiang Province. People's Government of Nanxun District, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province.
|
[25] |
Gu, X., Lou, L., Liu, M., & Min, Q. (2018). Review and prospect of studies on the dyke-pond system. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(4), 709– 720.
|
[26] |
Shen, W. (2019). A research into the mulberry-based fish pond system on protective inheritance and innovational development in modern times—Taking Yunhao Family Farm in Nanxun, Huzhou, Zhejiang as an example. Research on Heritages and Preservation, 4(1), 34– 38.
|
[27] |
Justice Bureau of Huzhou City. (2023). Announcement on public solicitation of opinions for Huzhou Mulberry-dyke & Fish-pond System protection regulations (Draft for review).
|
[28] |
Ren, Y., Li, C., & Zhang, S. (2023). The conservation of the mulberry fish pond as a cultural relic. Heritage, (1), 183– 194.
|
[29] |
Qin, H. (2017). Narrative interpretation of the cultural value of canal heritage—Taking Tongzhou Canal in Beijing as an example. Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 15(4), 22– 27.
|
[30] |
Li, X. (2019). Inheritance and practice of spatial pattern of traditional settlement landscape based on regional landscape in the south of Taihu Basin—Taking the landscape planning design of Nanxun-Qidu as an example [Master's thesis]. Beijing Forestry University.
|
[31] |
China Academy of Urban Planning and Design., & Cultural Relics and Archaeology Institute of Zhejiang Province. (2011). Heritage conservation plan for the Zhejiang section of the Grand Canal.
|
[32] |
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences., & Taihu Region Agricultural History Research Group of Chinese Agricultural Heritage Research Office of Nanjing Agricultural University. (1990). Draft of the Agricultural History of the Taihu Lake Region (pp. 181– 182, 422). China Agriculture Press.
|
[33] |
Wang, C., & Zhang, R. (2020). A study on the interpretation system of cultural heritage: A case study of the Great Wall of Ming Dynasty in Beijing. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (1), 139– 149.
|
[34] |
ICOMOS. (2017). Charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites.
|
[35] |
National Cultural Heritage Administration of China. (2013). Nomination document for the Grand Canal of China as a World Heritage Site.
|
[36] |
Yin, K. (2019). Ecomuseum: Thought, Theory and Practice (p. 64). Science Press.
|
[37] |
Peng, Z., Qin, H., Guo, Z., Zhou, K., Huang, H., Sun, M., Zhang, R., Li, Y., Liang, J., & Zhou, X. (2023). Interpretation and presentation: The contemporary construction and expression of multiple values of cultural heritage. Chinese Cultural Heritage, (3), 4– 28.
|
[38] |
Qin, H. (2018). The interpretation path of the architectural heritage's cultural value from the perspective of narration (Ⅱ). Huazhong Architecture, 36(4), 1– 3.
|
[39] |
Qin, H. (2018). The interpretation path of the architectural heritage's cultural value from the perspective of narration (Ⅰ). Huazhong Architecture, 36(3), 19– 22.
|
[40] |
Chen, B., Qiu, Z., Usio, N., & Nakamura, K. (2018). Tourism's impacts on rural livelihood in the sustainability of an aging community in Japan. Sustainability, 10(8), 2896.
|
[41] |
Davis, P., Gong, S., & Mai, X. (Trans. ). (2023). Ecomuseums: A Sense of Place. Science Press.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |