A review of the effect of a/W ratio on fracture toughness (I) —Experimental investigation in EPFM
Li Qing-fen , Jin Guo , Wang Yan-bo
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2005, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -7.
A review of the effect of a/W ratio on fracture toughness (I) —Experimental investigation in EPFM
Many experimental investigations have previously been performed and recently done on different shipbuilding structural steels where the specimens size and crack depth/specimen width (a/W) were varied. A series of interesting results have been gained. It is worthwhile to have a review on the effect of a/W ratio on fracture toughness, and further theoretical analysis is necessary. In this paper, experimental work in elasticplastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) was discussed. Tests had been carried out on 10 kinds of strength steels. Results showed that J i and δ1 values increased with decreasing a/W when a/W<0.3 for three-point bend specimens and that shallow crack specimens which have less constrained flow field give markedly higher values of toughness than deeply notched specimens. However, for a/W>0.3, the toughness was found to be independent of a/W. Slip line field analysis shows that for shallow cracks, the hydrostatic stress is lower than that from standard deeply cracked bend specimen which develops a high level of crack tip constraint, provides a lower bound estimate of toughness, and will ensure an unduly conservative approach when applied to structure defects especially if initiation values of COD/J-integral are used.
fracture toughness / COD / J-integral / a/W ratio / shallow crack
| [1] |
B. S. 5762, Crack Opening Displacement (COD) Testing [S]. 5762. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
LI Q F, SHI D. The effect of a/W ratio and crack shape on J i and δ1 values in a ship plate steel [A]. Proceedings of the IOPE-91[C]. Edinburgh, 1991: 137–141. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
LI Q F, QIU B H, CUI X F. Effect of plastic constraint on ductile fracture in structural steels [A]. Proc of IWMST02 [C]. Tokyo, 2002: 83–85. |
| [12] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |