A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Melissa L. Starkie , Elizabeth V. Fowler , Alexander M. Piper , Xiaocheng Zhu , Pauline Wyatt , David Gopurenko , Matt N. Krosch , Francesca Strutt , Karen F. Armstrong , Hamish Patrick , Mark K. Schutze , Mark J. Blacket
Insect Science ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4) : 1285 -1295.
A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses.
ARMS-PCR / colony / molecular diagnostics / pangolin / tetra-primer
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Biosecurity New Zealand. (2023) Official New Zealand Pest Register. New Zealand Government. Available at: https://pierpestregister.mpi.govt.nz/pests-of-concern |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
FAO/APPPC (2004) Guidelines for the Development of Heat Disinfestation Treatments of Fruit Fly Host Commodities Regional Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM) No. 1. Asia and Pacific Plant Protection Commission,Bangkok. |
| [23] |
FAO/IPPC (2007) ISPM 28: Phytosanitary Treatments for Regulated Pests. International Plant Protection Agency,Rome. |
| [24] |
FAO/IPPC (2016) ISPM 37: Determination of Host Status of Fruit to Fruit Flies (Tephritidae). International Plant Protection Convention,Rome. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
NAPPO (2011) RSPM 34: Development of Phytosanitary Treatment Protocols for Regulated Arthropod Pests of Fresh Fruits or Vegetables. North American Plant Protection Organization,Ottawa, Canada. |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Plant Health Australia (2018a) The Australian Handbook for the Identification of Fruit Flies. Plant Health Australia,Canberra, ACT. |
| [49] |
Plant Health Australia. (2018b) Fruit Fly ID Australia. Available at: http://fruitflyidentification.org.au |
| [50] |
Plant Health Australia. (2018c) Fruit fly ID Key 2018—LUCID Web Player. Available at: https://fruitflyidentification.org.au/identify |
| [51] |
Plant Health Australia. (2020) DNA Barcoding. Available at: https://fruitflyidentification.org.au/diagnostic-methods/molecular-identification/dna-barcoding/ |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
2023 The Authors. Insect Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |