Advances in basic biology of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): a comprehensive overview

Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial legume forage, has been broadly cultivated owing to a variety of favorable characteristics, including comprehensive ecological adaptability, superior nutritive value and palatability, and nitrogen fixation capacity. The productivity traits of alfalfa, specifically its biomass yield and forage quality, are significantly influenced by a series of determinants, including internal developmental factors and external environmental cues. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying the fundamental biological problems of alfalfa remain elusive. Here, we conducted a comprehensive review focusing on the genomics of alfalfa, advancements in gene-editing technologies, and the identification of genes that control pivotal agronomic characteristics, including biomass formation, nutritional quality, flowering time, and resistance to various stresses. Moreover, a molecular design roadmap for the ‘ideal alfalfa’ has been proposed and the potential of pangenomes, self-incompatibility mechanisms, de novo domestication, and intelligent breeding strategies to enhance alfalfa's yield, quality, and resilience were further discussed. This review will provide comprehensive information on the basic biology of alfalfa and offer new insights for the cultivation of ideal alfalfa.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (32441004 to Y.Z.), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1003201), STI 2030-Major Projects (2023ZD0407102), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y2021032).

Author contributions

Y.Z. conceived and wrote the review. L.W. revised and edited the review.

Data availability

All data have been included in the article.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Chen H, Zeng Y, Yang Y. et al. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly and efficient transgene-free genome editing for the autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:2494

[2] Zhou C, Han L, Pislariu C. et al. From model to crop: functional analysis of a STAY-GREEN gene in the model legume Medicago truncatula and effective use of the gene for alfalfa improvement. Plant Physiol. 2011; 157:1483-96

[3] Singer SD, Hannoufa A, Acharya S. Molecular improvement of alfalfa for enhanced productivity and adaptability in a chang-ing environment. Plant Cell Environ. 2018; 41:1955-71

[4] Lorenzo CD, García-Gagliardi P, Antonietti MS. et al. Improve-ment of alfalfa forage quality and management through the down-regulation of MsFTa1. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:944-54

[5] Latif A, Sun Y, Noman A. Herbaceous alfalfa plant as a multi-purpose crop and predominant forage specie in Pakistan. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023; 7:1126151

[6] Mielmann A. The utilisation of lucerne (Medicago sativa): a review. British Food J. 2013; 115:590-600

[7] Shen C, du H, Chen Z. et al. The chromosome-level genome sequence of the autotetraploid alfalfa and resequencing of core germplasms provide genomic resources for alfalfa research. Mol Plant. 2020; 13:1250-61

[8] Long R, Zhang F, Zhang Z. et al. Genome assembly of alfalfa cultivar Zhongmu-4 and identification of SNPs associated with agronomic traits. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022; 20: 14-28

[9] Li A, Liu A, du X. et al. A chromosome-scale genome assembly of a diploid alfalfa, the progenitor of autotetraploid alfalfa. Hortic Res. 2020; 7:194

[10] Shi K, Dong H, du H. et al. The chromosome-level assembly of the wild diploid alfalfa genome provides insights into the full landscape of genomic variations between cultivated and wild alfalfa. Plant Biotechnol J. 2024; 22:1757-72

[11] Ye Q, Meng X, Chen H. et al. Construction of genic male sterility system by CRISPR/Cas9 editing from model legume to alfalfa. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:613-5

[12] Zhao HX, Zhao S, Cao Y. et al. Development of a single transcript CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for efficient genome editing in autote-traploid alfalfa. Crop J. 2024; 12:788-95

[13] Subedi U, Burton Hughes K, Chen G. et al. Eliciting targeted mutations in Medicago sativa using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: a potential tool for the improvement of disease resistance. Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2659:219-39

[14] Fang LF, Liu T, Li M. et al. MODMS: a multi-omics database for facilitating biological studies on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhad245

[15] Jiang X, Yang T, He F. et al. A genome-wide association study reveals novel loci and candidate genes associated with plant height variation in Medicago sativa. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:544

[16] Wolabu TW, Mahmood K, Jerez IT. et al. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of alfalfa FLOWERING LOCUS Ta1 (MsFTa1) leads to delayed flowering time with improved forage biomass yield and quality. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:1383-92

[17] Hrbackova M, Luptovčiak I, Hlaváčková K. et al. Overexpression of alfalfa SIMK promotes root hair growth, nodule clustering and shoot biomass production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:767-84

[18] Reiter RJ, Tan DX, Zhou Z. et al. Phytomelatonin: assisting plants to survive and thrive. Molecules. 2015; 20:7396-437

[19] Tan DX, Hardeland R, Back K. et al. On the significance of an alternate pathway of melatonin synthesis via 5-methoxytryptamine: comparisons across species. J Pineal Res. 2016; 61:27-40

[20] Cen HF, Wang T, Liu H. et al. Overexpression of MsASMT1 pro-motes plant growth and decreases flavonoids biosynthesis in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:489

[21] Aung B, Gruber MY, Amyot L. et al. MicroRNA156 as a promis-ing tool for alfalfa improvement. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 13: 779-90

[22] Gou J, Debnath S, Sun L. et al. From model to crop: functional characterization of SPL8 in M. truncatula led to genetic improve-ment of biomass yield and abiotic stress tolerance in alfalfa. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16:951-62

[23] Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB. et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature. 2008; 455:189-94

[24] Ma L, Zhang Y, Wen H. et al. Silencing of MsD14 resulted in enhanced forage biomass through increasing shoot branching in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plants (Basel). 2022; 11:939

[25] Getachew G, Laca EA, Putnam DH. et al. The impact of lignin downregulation on alfalfa yield, chemical composition, and in vitro gas production. J Sci Food Agric. 2018; 98:4205-15

[26] Tong ZY, Li H, Zhang R. et al. Co-downregulation of the hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl trans-ferase and coumarate 3-hydroxylase significantly increases cellulose content in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2015; 239:230-7

[27] Reddy MSS, Chen F, Shadle G. et al. Targeted down-regulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes for forage quality improvement in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 16573-8

[28] Wolabu TW, Mahmood K, Chen F. et al. Mutating alfalfa COUMARATE 3-HYDROXYLASE using multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 leads to reduced lignin deposition and improved forage quality. Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1363182

[29] Zhou Q, Mao P, Luo D. et al. Comparative transcriptome anal-yses reveal that the MsNST1 gene affects lignin synthesis in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Crop J. 2022; 10:1059-72

[30] Wang HF, Xu Y, Wang Y. et al. Manipulation of WUSCHEL orthologue expression improves the forage yield and quality in Medicago. Plant Biotechnol J. 2025

[31] Arun M, Subramanyam K, Theboral J. et al. Transfer and tar-geted overexpression of γ-tocopherol methyltransferase (γ-TMT) gene using seed-specific promoter improves tocopherol composition in Indian soybean cultivars. Appl Biochem Biotech-nol. 2014; 172:1763-76

[32] Jiang J, Jia H, Feng G. et al. Overexpression of Medicago sativa TMT elevates the α-tocopherol content in Arabidopsis seeds, alfalfa leaves, and delays dark-induced leaf senescence. Plant Sci. 2016; 249:93-104

[33] Zhang YY, Wang Z, Zhang F. et al. Overexpression of MsDREB1C modulates growth and improves forage quality in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plants (Basel). 2024; 13:1237

[34] Ma L, Liu X, Liu W. et al. Characterization of squamosa-promoter binding protein-Box family genes reveals the critical role of MsSPL20 in alfalfa flowering time regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 12:775690

[35] Galindo-Sotomonte L, Jozefkowicz C, Gómez C. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of a polyester synthase-like gene delays flowering time in alfalfa. Plant Cell Rep. 2023; 42: 953-6

[36] Jiang X, Zhang L, Li Y. et al. Functional characterization of the MsFKF1 gene reveals its dual role in regulating the flow-ering time and plant height in Medicago sativa L. Plants (Basel). 2024; 13:655

[37] Lorenzo CD, García-Gagliardi P, Gobbini ML. et al. MsTFL1A delays flowering and regulates shoot architecture and root development in Medicago sativa. Plant Reprod. 2024; 37:229-42

[38] Gao R, Gruber MY, Amyot L. et al. SPL13 regulates shoot branch-ing and flowering time in Medicago sativa. Plant Mol Biol. 2018; 96: 119-33

[39] He F, Zhang F, Jiang X. et al. A genome-wide association study coupled with a transcriptomic analysis reveals the genetic loci and candidate genes governing the flowering time in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:913947

[40] Jiang X, Yang T, Zhang F. et al. RAD-seq-based high-density linkage maps construction and quantitative trait loci mapping of flowering time trait in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:899681

[41] Lin S, Yang J, Liu Y. et al. MsSPL12 is a positive regulator in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) salt tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2024; 43:101

[42] He F, Wei C, Zhang Y. et al. Genome-wide association analysis coupled with transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes related to salt stress in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:826584

[43] Yu R, Zuo T, Diao P. et al. Melatonin enhances seed germi-nation and seedling growth of Medicago sativa under salinity via a putative melatonin receptor MsPMTR1. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:702875

[44] Roboti P, High S. The oligosaccharyltransferase subunits OST48, DAD1 and KCP2 function as ubiquitous and selective modulators of mammalian N-glycosylation. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125: 3474-84

[45] Zhang Y, Cui C, Lai ZC. The defender against apoptotic cell death 1 gene is required for tissue growth and efficient N-glycosylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2016; 420: 186-95

[46] Wang X, Tang H, Lu T. et al. Novel underlying regulatory mech-anism of the MsDAD2-mediated salt stress response in alfalfa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2024; 690:149252

[47] Kong W, Huang H, Du W. et al. Overexpression of MsNIP2 improves salinity tolerance in Medicago sativa. J Plant Physiol. 2024; 295:154207

[48] Li C, Song T, Zhan L. et al. Overexpression of MsRCI2A, MsRCI2B, and MsRCI2C in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) provides different extents of enhanced alkali and salt tolerance due to functional specialization of MsRCI2s. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:702195

[49] Zhang D, Zhang Z, Li C. et al. Overexpression of MsRCI2D and MsRCI2E enhances salt tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) by stabilizing antioxidant activity and regulating ion home-ostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:9810

[50] Ma L, Li X, Zhang J. et al. MsWRKY33 increases alfalfa (Med-icago sativa L.) salt stress tolerance through altering the ROS scavenger via activating MsERF5 transcription. Plant Cell Environ. 2023; 46:3887-901

[51] Arner, Prabhu KS, Thompson JT. et al. Myo-inositol oxygenase: molecular cloning and expression of a unique enzyme that oxidizes myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol. Biochem J. 2001; 360: 313-20

[52] Guo WL, Chen J, Liu L. et al. MsMIOX2,encoding a MsbZIP53-activated myo-inositol oxygenase, enhances saline-alkali stress tolerance by regulating cell wall pectin and hemicellulose biosynthesis in alfalfa. Plant J. 2024; 120: 998-1013

[53] Spitzer-Rimon B, Farhi M, Albo B. et al. The R2R3-MYB-like regulatory factor EOBI, acting downstream of EOBII, regulates scent production by activating ODO1 and structural scent-related genes in petunia. Plant Cell. 2012; 24:5089-105

[54] Song YG, Tang H, Zhang Z. et al. A novel MsEOBI-MsPAL1 mod-ule enhances salinity stress tolerance, floral scent emission and seed yield in alfalfa. Plant Cell Environ. 2024; 48:907-22

[55] Su LT, Lv A, Wen W. et al. MsMYB206-MsMYB450-MsHY5 com-plex regulates alfalfa tolerance to salt stress via regulating flavonoid biosynthesis during the day and night cycles. Plant J. 2025; 121:e17216

[56] Lei KJ, Lin YM, Ren J. et al. Modulation of the phosphate-deficient responses by MicroRNA156 and its targeted SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57:192-203

[57] Hanly A, Karagiannis J, Lu QSMM. et al. Characterization of the role of SPL9 in drought stress tolerance in Medicago sativa. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:6003

[58] Luo S, Liu J, Shi K. et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal that MsSPHK1-A sphingosine kinase gene negatively regulates drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024; 218:109302

[59] Shi K, Liu J, Liang H. et al. An alfalfa MYB-like transcriptional factor MsMYBH positively regulates alfalfa seedling drought resistance and undergoes MsWAV3-mediated degradation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024; 66:683-99

[60] Li R, Zeng X, Jiang X. et al. MsFtsH8 enhances the tolerance of PEG-simulated drought stress by boosting antioxidant capacity in Medicago sativa L. Plants (Basel). 2024; 13:3025

[61] Yin H, Wang Z, Li H. et al. MsTHI1 overexpression improves drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:992024

[62] Ma J, Qiu D, Gao H. et al. Over-expression of a γ-tocopherol methyltransferase gene in vitamin E pathway confers PEG-simulated drought tolerance in alfalfa. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20:226

[63] Lv A, Su L, Fan N. et al. The MsDHN1-MsPIP2;1-MsmMYB mod-ule orchestrates the trade-off between growth and survival of alfalfa in response to drought stress. Plant Biotechnol J. 2024; 22: 1132-45

[64] Luo D, Liu J, Wu Y. et al. NUCLEAR TRANSPORT FACTOR 2-LIKE improves drought tolerance by modulating leaf water loss in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant J. 2022; 112:429-50

[65] Zhang T, Yu LX, Zheng P. et al. Identification of loci associated with drought resistance traits in heterozygous autotetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) using genome-wide association stud-ies with genotyping by sequencing. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0138931

[66] Chen F, Ha X, Ma T. et al. Comparative analysis of the phys-iological and transcriptomic profiles reveals alfalfa drought resistance mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:954

[67] Zhou Z, Li J, Gao Y. et al. Research on drought stress in Medicago sativa L. from 1998 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1406256

[68] Matthews C, Arshad M, Hannoufa A. Alfalfa response to heat stress is modulated by microRNA156. Physiol Plant. 2019; 165: 830-42

[69] Arshad M, Hannoufa A. Alfalfa transcriptome profiling pro-vides insight into miR156-mediated molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance. Genome. 2022; 65:315-30

[70] Zhou J, Tang X, Li J. et al. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses provide insights into the responses to high temperature stress in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:776

[71] Liu L, Si L, Zhang L. et al. Metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis revealed the response mechanism of alfalfa to com-bined cold and saline-alkali stress. Plant J. 2024; 119:1900-19

[72] Zhang LS, Sun Y, Ji J. et al. Flavonol synthase gene MsFLS13 reg-ulates saline-alkali stress tolerance in alfalfa. Crop J. 2023; 11: 1218-29

[73] Davik J, Wilson RC, Njah RG. et al. Genetic mapping and iden-tification of a QTL determining tolerance to freezing stress in Fragaria vesca L. PLoS One. 2021; 16:e0248089

[74] Adhikari L, Makaju SO, Lindstrom OM. et al. Mapping freezing tolerance QTL in alfalfa: based on indoor phenotyping. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21:403

[75] Pu XJ, Fu Y, Xu C. et al. Transcriptomic analyses provide molecu-lar insight into the cold stress response of cold-tolerant alfalfa. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:741

[76] Yang B, Zhao Y, Guo ZF. Research progress and prospect of alfalfa resistance to pathogens and pests. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11:2008

[77] Wang Y, Tyler BM, Wang YC. Defense and counterdefense during plant-pathogenic oomycete infection. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2019; 73:667-96

[78] Lin S, Niu Y, Medina CA. et al. Two linked resistance genes function divergently in defence against Verticillium wilt in alfalfa. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:619-21

[79] Agrell J, Oleszek W, Stochmal A. et al. Herbivore-induced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). JChemEco.l 2003; 29: 303-20

[80] Lei YT, Liu Q, Hettenhausen C. et al. Salt-tolerant and -sensitive alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars have large variations in defense responses to the lepidopteran insect Spodoptera litura under normal and salt stress condition. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0181589

[81] Abdullah A, Ullah MI, Raza AM. et al. Host plant selection affects biological parameters in armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pakistan J Zool. 2019; 51:2117-23

[82] Yan JP, Qiu RM, Wang KX. et al. Enhancing alfalfa resistance to Spodoptera herbivory by sequestering microRNA396 expres-sion. Plant Cell Rep. 2023; 42:805-19

[83] Zhang S, Wang C. Transcriptome profiling of gene expression in fall dormant and nondormant alfalfa. Genom Data. 2014; 2: 282-4

[84] Wang CZ, Ma BL, Han J. et al. Photoperiod effect on phytochrome and abscisic acid in alfalfa varieties differing in fall dormancy. J Plant Nutrition. 2008; 31:1257-69

[85] Zhou P, Silverstein KAT, Ramaraj T. et al. Exploring structural variation and gene family architecture with de novo assemblies of 15 Medicago genomes. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18:261

[86] Wang WS, Mauleon R, Hu Z. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature. 2018; 557: 43-9

[87] Hurgobin B, Golicz AA, Bayer PE. et al. Homoeologous exchange is a major cause of gene presence/absence variation in the amphidiploid Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16:1265-74

[88] Liu YC, du H, Li P. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell. 2020; 182:162-176.e13

[89] Lye ZN, Purugganan MD. Copy number variation in domestica-tion. Trends Plant Sci. 2019; 24:352-65

[90] Qin P, Lu H, du H. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell. 2021; 184:3542-3558.e16

[91] Kaur H, Shannon LM, Samac DA. A stepwise guide for pangenome development in crop plants: an alfalfa (Medicago sativa)casestudy. BMC Genomics. 2024; 25:1022

[92] Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ. et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial "pan-genome". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102:13950-5

[93] Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Barker GC. et al. The pangenome of an agro-nomically important crop plant Brassica oleracea. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:13390

[94] Tao YF, Zhao XR, Mace E. et al. Exploring and exploiting pan-genomics for crop improvement. Mol Plant. 2019; 12:156-69

[95] Wang BB, Hou M, Shi J. et al. De novo genome assembly and analyses of 12 founder inbred lines provide insights into maize heterosis. Nat Genet. 2023; 55:312-23

[96] Gui ST, Wei W, Jiang C. et al. A pan-Zea genome map for enhancing maize improvement. Genome Biol. 2022; 23:178

[97] Yan HD, Sun M, Zhang Z. et al. Pangenomic analysis identifies structural variation associated with heat tolerance in pearl millet. Nat Genet. 2023; 55:507-18

[98] Tao YF, Luo H, Xu J. et al. Extensive variation within the pan-genome of cultivated and wild sorghum. Nat Plants. 2021; 7: 766-73

[99] Yang T, Liu R, Luo Y. et al. Improved pea reference genome and pan-genome highlight genomic features and evolutionary characteristics. Nat Genet. 2022; 54:1553-63

[100] Hübner S, Bercovich N, Todesco M. et al. Sunflower pan-genome analysis shows that hybridization altered gene content and disease resistance. Nat Plants. 2019; 5:54-62

[101] Liu ZJ, Wang N, Su Y. et al. Grapevine pangenome facili-tates trait genetics and genomic breeding. Nat Genet. 2024; 56: 2804-14

[102] Cochetel N, Minio A, Guarracino A. et al. A super-pangenome of the North American wild grape species. Genome Biol. 2023; 24:290

[103] Jiao, Xie X, Hao C. et al. Pan-genome bridges wheat structural variations with habitat and breeding. Nature. 2025; 637:384-93

[104] Tang D, Jia Y, Zhang J. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature. 2022; 606:535-41

[105] Song JM, Guan Z, Hu J. et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Bras-sica napus. Nat Plants. 2020; 6:34-45

[106] Li JY, Yuan D, Wang P. et al. Cotton pan-genome retrieves the lost sequences and genes during domestication and selection. Genome Biol. 2021; 22:119

[107] Silva NF, Goring DR. Mechanisms of self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001; 58:1988-2007

[108] Takayama S, Isogai A. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005; 56:467-89

[109] Fobis-Loisy I, Miege C, Gaude T. Molecular evolution of the s locus controlling mating in the brassicaceae. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004; 6:109-18

[110] Franklin-Tong N, Franklin FCH. Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8:598-605

[111] Hiscock SJ, McInnis SM. Pollen recognition and rejection during the sporophytic self-incompatibility response: Brassica and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 8:606-13

[112] Kachroo A, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. Self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: receptor-ligand signaling and cell-to-cell communication. Plant Cell. 2002; 14:S227-38

[113] Kao TH, Tsukamoto T. The molecular and genetic bases of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell. 2004; 16:S72-83

[114] McCubbin AG, Kao T. Molecular recognition and response in pollen and pistil interactions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000; 16: 333-64

[115] Takayama S, Isogai A. Molecular mechanism of self-recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility. JExp Bot. 2003; 54:149-56

[116] Aguiar B, Vieira J, Cunha AE. et al. No evidence for Fabaceae gametophytic self-incompatibility being determined by Rosaceae, Solanaceae, and Plantaginaceae S-RNase lineage genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15:129

[117] Li, Liu S, Wang Y. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of self-incompatibility in alfalfa. Plants (Basel). 2024; 13:875

[118] Zsögön A, Cermak T, Voytas D. et al. Genome editing as a tool to achieve the crop ideotype and de novo domestication of wild relatives: case study in tomato. Plant Sci. 2017; 256:120-30

[119] Osterberg, Xiang W, Olsen LI. et al. Accelerating the domestica-tion of new crops: feasibility and approaches. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22:373-84

[120] Li TD, Yang X, Yu Y. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:1160-3

[121] Zsögön A, Čermák T, Naves ER. et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36: 1211-6

[122] Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J. et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat Plants. 2018; 4:766-70

[123] Yu H, Lin T, Meng X. et al. A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell. 2021; 184:1156-1170.e14

[124] Xie Y, Zhang TH, Huang XZ. et al. Atwo-in-onebreedingstrat-egy boosts rapid utilization of wild species and elite cultivars. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:800-2

[125] Zhang JK, Yu H, De LJY. De novo domestication: retrace the his-tory of agriculture to design future crops. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2023; 81:102946

[126] Xie X, Liu YG. De novo domestication towards new crops. Natl Sci Rev. 2021;8:nwab033

[127] Zhu W, Li W, Zhang H. et al. Big data and artificial intelligence-aided crop breeding: progress and prospects. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024; 00:1-18

[128] Farooq MA, Gao S, Hassan MA. et al. Artificial intelligence in plant breeding. Trends Genet. 2024; 40:891-908

[129] Mushtaq MA, Ahmed HGMD, Zeng YW. Applications of artifi-cial intelligence in wheat breeding for sustainable food secu-rity. Sustain For. 2024; 16:5688

[130] Zhu WC, Han R, Shang X. et al. The CropGPT project: call for a global, coordinated effort in precision design breeding driven by AI using biological big data. Mol Plant. 2024; 17: 215-8