Multi-omics landscapes reveal the genetic basis of graft compatibility in tomato

Abstract

Grafting is a horticultural strategy for improving crop productivity and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the genetic basis of graft compatibility and its effects on plant growth and fruit metabolism remain poorly understood in tomato. In this study, we systematically evaluated the growth and development of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) of scions ‘72–69’ grafted onto 14 rootstocks (9 novel F₁ hybrids [GC1–GC9] and 5 commercial cultivars [GC10–GC14]). Based on mature-stage growth and yield performance, the 14 graft combinations were classified into high-compatibility (high-com, GC1–GC5) and low-compatibility (low-com, GC6–GC14) groups. Low-com combinations exhibited reduced vegetative growth and yield, earlier fruit maturation, and structural abnormalities in the scion stem tissues, whereas high-com combinations maintained stronger growth and productivity. Comparative genomic analysis of F₁ rootstocks with contrasting compatibility phenotypes identified 28 candidate genomic regions encompassing 203 genes. Among these, ethylene-overproduction protein 1 (SlETO1) and wall-associated kinase-like (SlWAKL10) contained heterozygous coding variants within conserved domains in the low-com rootstocks, whereas the corresponding loci were homozygous in the high-com rootstocks, suggesting their potential association with graft compatibility. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed distinct molecular and metabolic responses between the two graft-compatibility groups. Low-com fruits exhibited enhanced expression of stress- and ethylene-related genes and accumulated substantially higher levels of soluble sugars, including glucose, fructose, and sucrose, whereas high-com fruits showed greater accumulation of organic acids. Correlation analyses further indicated associations between SlWAKL10 and SlETO1 expression and soluble sugar accumulation. Collectively, our work establishes a genetic framework for rootstock-scion compatibility and reveals its systemic effects on fruit metabolism, providing critical insights for molecular breeding of graft-compatible tomato rootstocks.

Keywords

Graft compatibility / Tomato / Multi-omics / Fruit quality

References

[1] Al-Harbi A, Hejazi A, Al-Omran A. Responses of grafted tomato (Solanum lycopersiocon L.) to abiotic stresses in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2017, 24: 1274-1280

[2] Assunção M, Pinheiro J, Cruz S, Brazão J, Queiroz J, Eiras Dias JE, et al.. Gallic acid, sinapic acid and catechin as potential chemical markers of Vitis graft success. Sci Hortic, 2019, 246: 129-135

[3] Assunção M, Santos C, Brazão J, Eiras-Dias JE, Fevereiro P. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying graft success in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol, 2019, 19: 396

[4] Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30: 2114-2120

[5] Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34: i884-i890

[6] Copes DL. Development of internal graft incompatibility symptoms in Pinus radiata D. Don n z J Forest Sci, 1980, 10: 367-380

[7] Cui Q, Xie L, Dong C, Gao L, Shang Q. Stage-specific events in tomato graft formation and the regulatory effects of auxin and cytokinin. Plant Sci, 2021, 304 110803

[8] Feng J, Meyer CA, Wang Q, Liu JS, Shirley Liu X, Zhang Y. GFOLD: a generalized fold change for ranking differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28: 2782-2788

[9] Feng M, Augstein F, Kareem A, Melnyk CW. Plant grafting: molecular mechanisms and applications. Mol Plant, 2024, 17: 75-91

[10] Gong T, Brecht JK, Koch KE, Hutton SF, Zhao X. A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13 948656

[11] Gu SY, Lo WS, Wu SJ, Wang LC. Dimerization of the ETO1 family proteins plays a crucial role in regulating ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J, 2021, 105: 1293-1308

[12] Han R, Hang Nguyen TK, Kang H. The regulation and impact of mRNA m6A methylation during the expansion and ripening of tomato fruits under various abiotic stresses. Hortic Plant J, 2025

[13] Houtgast EJ, Sima VM, Bertels K, Al-Ars Z. Hardware acceleration of BWA-MEM genomic short read mapping for longer read lengths. Comput Biol Chem, 2018, 75: 54-64

[14] Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods, 2015, 12: 357-360

[15] Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Zrenner R, Schwarz D. Vegetable grafting: The implications of a growing agronomic imperative for vegetable fruit quality and nutritive value. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 741

[16] Lee J-M, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Echevarria PH, Morra L, et al.. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci Hortic, 2010, 127: 93-105

[17] Lee HY, Park HL, Park C, Chen YC, Yoon GM. Reciprocal antagonistic regulation of E3 ligases controls ACC synthase stability and responses to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2021, 118 e2011900118

[18] Lefouili M, Nam K. The evaluation of Bcftools mpileup and GATK HaplotypeCaller for variant calling in non-human species. Sci Rep, 2022, 12 11331

[19] Li L, Li K, Ali A, Guo Y. AtWAKL10, a cell wall associated receptor-like kinase, negatively regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22 4885

[20] Lin T, Zhu G, Zhang J, Xu X, Yu Q, Zheng Z, et al.. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet, 2014, 46: 1220-1226

[21] Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E, Dijk Dv. Pithiness and growth of radish tubers as affected by irradiance and plant density. Ann. Bot. 1997;79: 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0357

[22] Notaguchi M, Kurotani KI, Sato Y, Tabata R, Kawakatsu Y, Okayasu K, et al.. Cell-cell adhesion in plant grafting is facilitated by β-1,4-glucanases. Science, 2020, 369: 698-702

[23] Parisi M, Pentangelo A, D’Alessandro A, Festa G, Francese G, Navarro A, et al.. Grafting effects on bioactive compounds, chemical and agronomic traits of ‘Corbarino’ tomato grown under greenhouse healthy conditions. Hortic Plant J, 2022, 9: 273-284

[24] Peng Z, Song S, Fu D, Zhou J, Chang H, Wang B, et al.. Combined transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the mechanism of fruit quality formation in different watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars. Sci Hortic, 2025, 339 113797

[25] Proebsting EL. Further Observations on structural defects of the graft union. Bot Gaz, 1928, 86: 82-92

[26] Rahman M, Islam T, Jett L, Kotcon J. Biocontrol agent, biofumigation, and grafting with resistant rootstock suppress soil-borne disease and improve yield of tomato in West Virginia. Crop Prot, 2021, 145 105630

[27] Scholak T, Schucher N, Bahdanau D. PICARD: Parsing incrementally for constrained auto-regressive decoding from language models. arXiv:2109.05093. 2021:11. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.05093.

[28] Spanò R, Ferrara M, Gallitelli D, Mascia T. The role of grafting in the resistance of tomato to viruses. Plants-Basel, 2020, 9: 1042

[29] Suchoff DH, Louws FJ, Gunter CC. Yield and disease resistance for three bacterial wilt-resistant tomato rootstocks. HortTechnology, 2019, 29: 330-337

[30] Thomas H, Van den Broeck L, Spurney R, Sozzani R, Frank M. Gene regulatory networks for compatible versus incompatible grafts identify a role for SlWOX4 during junction formation. Plant Cell, 2022, 34: 535-556

[31] Wang J, Jiang L, Wu R. Plant grafting: how genetic exchange promotes vascular reconnection. New Phytol, 2017, 214: 56-65

[32] Wang L, Liao Y, Liu J, Zhao T, Jia L, Chen Z. Advances in understanding the graft healing mechanism: a review of factors and regulatory pathways. Hortic Res. 2024;11: uhae175. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae175

[33] Ye J, Wang X, Hu T, Zhang F, Wang B, Li C, et al.. An inDel in the promoter of Al-activated malate transporter9 selected during tomato domestication determines fruit malate contents and aluminum tolerance. Plant Cell, 2017, 29: 2249-2268

[34] Yuan M, Jin T, Wu J, Li L, Chen G, Chen J, et al.. IAA-miR164a-NAC100L1 module mediates symbiotic incompatibility of cucumber/pumpkin grafted seedlings through regulating callose deposition. Hortic Res, 2024, 11 uhad287

[35] Zhang ZH, Li MM, Cao BL, Chen ZJ, Xu K. Grafting improves tomato yield under low nitrogen conditions by enhancing nitrogen metabolism in plants. Protoplasma, 2021, 258: 1077-1089

[36] Zhang M, Tang H, Xu Q, Xiao Z, Zhou C, Qian Y, et al.. Integration of GWAS and transcriptome approaches for the identification of nitrogen-, phosphorus-, and potassium-responsive genes in tomato. Hortic Res, 2025, 12 uhaf112

[37] Zhong H, Liu Z, Zhang F, Zhou X, Sun X, Li Y, et al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of self- and hetero-grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in grapevine. Hortic Res. 2022;9: uhac103. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac103

[38] Zhou Z, Yuan Y, Wang K, Wang H, Huang J, Yu H, et al.. Rootstock-scion interactions affect fruit flavor in grafted tomato. Hortic Plant J, 2022, 8: 499-510

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32541115)

National Key Research and Development Plan(2022YFF1003002)

Young Scientist Fostering Funds for the National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Horticultural Crops(11909920008)

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662023PY011)

China Agricultural Research System(CARS-23-A13)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)