Nodal culture for efficient regeneration and CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in recalcitrant horticultural crops
Himanshu Pandey , Varucha Misra , Avinash Sharma , Basistha Chatterjee , Monoj Sutradhar , Rajeev Kumar , Punabati Heisnam , V. S. Devadas , Ashutosh Kumar Mall , Nimisha Tehri , Amit Vashishth
Horticulture Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 28
Nodal culture for efficient regeneration and CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in recalcitrant horticultural crops
Nodal culture is a powerful plant tissue culture technique addressing critical challenges such as desiccation, microbial contamination, and the limited viability of explants, particularly in recalcitrant horticultural crops like Garcinia mangostana, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Cucumis melo, Citrus limon, Kinnow mandarin, and Coffea arabica. This method utilizes sterilized immature nodal explants, with regeneration induced through the precise application of growth regulators, primarily auxins and cytokinins, to media such as Driver-Kuniyuki (DKW), Woody Plant Media (WPM), and Murashige and Skoog (MS) under controlled conditions. These regulators significantly enhance both shoot and root regeneration, thus reducing the generation time for difficult-to-regenerate species. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a pivotal role in regulating cell division and hormone signaling during regeneration. Additionally, transcription factors such as wound-induced dedifferentiation 1 (WIND1), WUSCHEL (WUS), Enhancer of Shoot Regeneration 1 (ESR1), Cup-shaped Cotyledon 1 and 2 (CUC1, CUC2), and Lateral Organ Boundaries Domain 16 (LBD16) are integral to callus induction and organogenesis. Genetic variation observed in regenerated populations reflects the complexity of these regulatory networks and underscores the need for further investigation. Notably, nodal culture provides a promising alternative to conventional tissue culture methods, particularly in facilitating CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic modifications in recalcitrant crops. This technique enhances the efficient regeneration of transgenic horticultural crops, overcoming significant barriers to transformation. Future research should focus on refining nodal culture protocols across a broader spectrum of horticultural species, improving gene editing efficiency, and integrating this approach with advanced breeding technologies for targeted trait development and sustainable crop improvement.
Nodal culture / Recalcitrant horticultural plant / Genetic transformation / Regeneration / Speed breeding / Abiotic/Biotic stress
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Akhatar J, Kaur H, Kumar H. Conventional plant breeding to modern biotechnological approaches in crop improvement. In: Kamaluddin, Kiran U, Abdin MZ, editors. Technologies in: plant biotechnology and breeding of field crops. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. p. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5767-2_1. |
| [5] |
Altaf MT, Liaqat W, Ali A, Jamil A, Bedir M, Nadeem MA, et al. Conventional and biotechnological approaches for the improvement of industrial crops. In: Kumar N, editor. Industrial Crop Plants. Singapore: Springer; 2024.p. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1003-4_1. |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Antwi-Wiredu A, Amiteye S, Diawuoh RG, Asumeng AK, Klu GY. In vitro propagation of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) using shoot-tip and nodal cutting explants. Int J Adv Struct Eng. 2018;4(6):38–50. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2018.32743. |
| [8] |
AV MM, Karishma NA. Development of micropropagation protocol for jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) KJ 182. J Trop Agric. 2024;62(1):10–13. |
| [9] |
Azam FMS, Rahmatullah M. Tissue culture of Artocarpus heterophyllus L., an underutilized fruit of Bangladesh. Acta Hortic. 2009;269–76. |
| [10] |
Babu GA, Mosa Christas K, Kowsalya E, Ramesh M, Sohn SI, Pandian S. Improved sterilization techniques for successful invitro micropropagation. In: Gupta S, Chaturvedi P, editors. Commercial Scale Tissue Culture for Horticulture and Plantation Crops. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022.p. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0055-6_1. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Chatterjee A, Purkaystha S, Bhattacharyya S, Sen P . Genetic engineering and genome editing for enhancing nutritional quality. In: Mathur P, Gupta A, editors. Recent trends and applications of leguminous microgreens as Functional Foods. Switzerland: Springer 2025;389–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75678-8. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Elhiti M, Stasolla C. ROS signalling in plant embryogenesis. In: Gupta KJ, Igamberdiev AU, editors. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species signaling and communication in crops. Switzerland: Springer; 2014. p. 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10079-1. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Fernandez A, Leon-Lobos P, Contreras S, Ovalle JF, Sershen, Walt KVD, et al. The potential impacts of climate change on ex situ conservation options for recalcitrant-seeded species. Front For Glob Change. 2023;6:1110431. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1110431. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Gebremariam E. Invitro propagation of Coffea arabica cv. MCH2 using nodal explants. J Nat Sci Res. 2017;7(1):17–21. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Gunson HE, Spencer-Phillips PTN. Latent bacterial infections: epiphytes and endophytes as contaminants of micropropagated crops. In: Lumsden PJ, Nicholas JR, Davies WJ, editors. Physiology, growth and development of crops in culture. Dordrecht: Springer; 1994. p. 379–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0790-7_43. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Hiti-Bandaralage JC, Hayward A, Mitter N. Micropropagation of avocado (Persea americana Mill.). Am J Plant Sci. 2017;11:2898–921. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.811197. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Isda MN, Hasibuan M, Fatonah S. The formation of shoots in mangosteen (Garcinia Mangostana L.) nodules from Bengkalis, Riau in Murashige Skoog and woody plant medium. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1351:12–28. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1351/1/012028. |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
Jia H, Zou X, Orbovic V, Wang N. Genome editing in citrus tree with CRISPR/Cas9. Plant genome editing with CRISPR systems: Methods and Protocols. 2019;235-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13132. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Mahmad N. Germination, regeneration and pigment detection in Nelumbo nucifera gaertn. (pink Asian lotus)[Doctoral dissertation]. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya; 2012. p. 1–404. |
| [66] |
Majumder A, Roychowdhury D, Ray S. Biotechnological approaches for ex situ conservation of medicinal crops. In: Jha S, Halder M, editors. Medicinal Plants: biodiversity, biotechnology and conservation. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 729–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9936-9_26. |
| [67] |
Mazri MA, Koufan M, Abdelwahd R, Belkoura I. In vitro responses of some Mediterranean fruit crops to auxin, cytokinin and gibberellin treatments. In: Aftab T, editor. Auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins signaling in crops. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 91–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05427-3_5.. |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
Ochatt SJ. Less frequently used growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In: Loyola-Vargas V, Ochoa-Alejo N, editors. Plant cell culture protocols. New York: Springer; 2024. p. 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3954-2_8. |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
Parvin S, Kausar M, Haque ME, Khalekuzzaman M, Sikdar B, Islam MA. In vitro propagation of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) from nodal segments, shoot tips and cotyledonary nodes. Rajshahi Univ J Life Earth Agricl Sci. 2013;41:71–7. https://doi.org/10.3329/rujleas.v41i0.21627. |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
Patel P, Sarswat SK, Modi A. Strategies to overcome explant recalcitrance under in vitro conditions. In: Rai AC, Kumar A, Modi A, Singh M, editors. Advances in plant tissue culture. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022. p. 283–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90795-8.00003-5. |
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
Pritchard HW, Tsan FY, Wen B, Jaganathan GK, Calvi G, Pence VC, et al. Regeneration in recalcitrant-seeded species and risks from climate change. In: Baskin CC, Baskin JM, editors. Plant regeneration from seeds: a global warming perspective. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022. p. 259–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-00735-8. |
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
Ravindran PN, Nirmal Babu K, Shiva KN. Botany and crop improvement of turmeric. In: Ravindran PN, Nirmal Babu K, Sivaraman K, editors. Turmeric: the genus Curcuma. London: CRC Press; 2007. p. 15–70. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006322. |
| [88] |
Ricroch A, Dervishi A, Choudry MW, Riaz R, Bakhsh A. A roadmap for plant genome editing, Springer, Singapore; 2024. p. 259–69. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/86933. |
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
Roy SK, Roy PK, Sinha P, Haque MS. Mass clonal propagation of Artocarpus Heterophyllus through in vitro culture. In: Kubota C, Chun C, editors. Transplant production in the 21st century. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000. p. 219–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9371-7_36. |
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
Sehgal H, Joshi M. The journey and new breakthroughs of plant growth regulators in tissue culture. In: Rai AC, Kumar A, Modi A, Singh M, editors. Advances in plant tissue culture. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022. p. 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90795-8.00002-3. |
| [94] |
Shields R, Robinson S, Anslow PA. Use of fungicides in plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep. 1984;3:33–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270226. |
| [95] |
Sholi N, Qasrawi H. In vitro regeneration of avocado (Persea americana) west indian rootstock cv. lula via tissue culture. مجلة جامعة فلسطين التقنية للأبحاث. 2022;10(1):11–21. |
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
Sivakumar P, Pavithra N, Ballolla T, Vineeta ME, Selvaraj KV, Logeswaran J. Effect of growth regulators in invitro propagation of Ixora spp.: an short review. J Curr Opin Crop Sci. 2020;1(1):31–4. https://doi.org/10.62773/jcocs.v1i1.15. |
| [100] |
Sujith SS. In vitro techniques for conservation of recalcitrant species [Master’s Seminar]. Thrissur: Centre for plant biotechnology and molecular biology, College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University; 2015. p. 1–35. |
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
Traore A, Maximova SN, Guiltinan MJ. Micropropagation of Theobroma cacao L. using somatic embryo-derived plants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 2003;39(3):332–7. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002409. |
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
Zhumanova N, Akimbayeva N, Myrzakhmetova N, Dzhiembaev B, Ku A, Diyarova B, et al. A comprehensive review of new generation plant growth regulators. ES Food & Agrofor. 2024;17:1190. https://doi.org/10.30919/esfaf1190. |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |