TRANSDISCIPLINARY INSIGHT

Evaluation of liquefaction-induced lateral displacement using Bayesian belief networks

  • Mahmood AHMAD 1,2 ,
  • Xiao-Wei TANG 1 ,
  • Jiang-Nan QIU , 3 ,
  • Feezan AHMAD 4
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • 2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (Bannu Campus), Bannu 28100, Pakistan
  • 3. Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • 4. Department of Civil Engineering, Abasyn University, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan

Received date: 19 Nov 2019

Accepted date: 30 Jan 2020

Published date: 15 Feb 2021

Copyright

2021 Higher Education Press

Abstract

Liquefaction-induced lateral displacement is responsible for considerable damage to engineered structures during major earthquakes. Therefore, an accurate estimation of lateral displacement in liquefaction-prone regions is an essential task for geotechnical experts for sustainable development. This paper presents a novel probabilistic framework for evaluating liquefaction-induced lateral displacement using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) approach based on an interpretive structural modeling technique. The BBN models are trained and tested using a wide-range case-history records database. The two BBN models are proposed to predict lateral displacements for free-face and sloping ground conditions. The predictive performance results of the proposed BBN models are compared with those of frequently used multiple linear regression and genetic programming models. The results reveal that the BBN models are able to learn complex relationships between lateral displacement and its influencing factors as cause–effect relationships, with reasonable precision. This study also presents a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impacts of input factors on the lateral displacement.

Cite this article

Mahmood AHMAD , Xiao-Wei TANG , Jiang-Nan QIU , Feezan AHMAD . Evaluation of liquefaction-induced lateral displacement using Bayesian belief networks[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021 , 15(1) : 80 -98 . DOI: 10.1007/s11709-021-0682-3

Acknowledgments

This study was part of research work sponsored by the National Key Research & Development Plan of China (Nos. 2018YFC1505300-5.3 and 2016YFE0200100) and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51639002).
1
Rezania M, Faramarzi A, Javadi A A. An evolutionary based approach for assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and lateral displacement. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 24(1): 142–153

DOI

2
Al Bawwab W M K. Probabilistic assessment of liquefaction-induced lateral ground deformations. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 2005

3
Newmark N M. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(2): 139–160

DOI

4
Olson S M, Johnson C I. Analyzing liquefaction-induced lateral spreads using strength ratios. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(8): 1035–1049

DOI

5
Yegian M, Marciano E, Ghahraman V G. Earthquake-induced permanent deformations: Probabilistic approach. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 117(1): 35–50

DOI

6
Baziar M H. Engineering evaluation of permanent ground deformations due to seismically induced liquefaction. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1991

7
Towhata I, Sasaki Y, Tokida K I, Matsumoto H, Tamar Y, Yamada K. Prediction of permanent displacement of liquefied ground by means of minimum energy principle. Soil and Foundation, 1992, 32(3): 97–116

DOI

8
Byrne P M, Beaty M. Liquefaction induced displacements, Seismic behaviour of ground and geotechnical structures. In: Proceeding of Discussion Special Technical Session on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering during International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1997, 185–195

9
Hamada M, Sato H, Kawakami T. A Consideration of the Mechanism for Liquefaction-Related Large Ground Displacement. Technical Report NCEER-94–0026. 1994

10
Soroush A, Koohi S. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading—An overview and numerical analysis. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 2(4): 232–245

11
Finn W, Ledbetter R H, Wu G. Liquefaction in silty soils: Design and analysis. In: Ground failures under seismic conditions. Noe York: American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical, 1994

12
Baziar M, Ghorbani A. Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 25(1): 1–9

DOI

13
Wang J, Rahman M A. Neural network model for liquefaction-induced horizontal ground displacement. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999, 18(8): 555–568

DOI

14
Javadi A A, Rezania M, Nezhad M M. Evaluation of liquefaction induced lateral displacements using genetic programming. Computers and Geotechnics, 2006, 33(4–5): 222–233

DOI

15
Javdanian H. Field data-based modeling of lateral ground surface deformations due to earthquake-induced liquefaction. European Physical Journal Plus, 2019, 134(6): 297

DOI

16
Jafarian Y, Nasri E. Evaluation of uncertainties in the available empirical models and probabilistic prediction of liquefaction induced lateral spreading. Amirkabir Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 48(3): 275–290

17
Youd T L, Hansen C M, Bartlett S F. Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(12): 1007–1017

DOI

18
Youd T L, Perkins D M. Mapping of liquefaction severity index. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 113(11): 1374–1392

DOI

19
Rauch A F. EPOLLS: An empirical method for prediciting surface displacements due to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in earthquakes. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech, 1997

20
Bardet J, Mace N, Tobita T. Liquefaction-induced Ground Deformation and Failure. A Report to PEER/PG&E. Task 4A-Phase 1. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1999

21
Hamada M, Yasuda S, Isoyama R, Emoto K. Study on Liquefaction Induced Permanent Ground Displacements. Report of Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction. 1986

22
Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456

DOI

23
Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359

DOI

24
Bardet J P, Liu F. Motions of gently sloping ground during earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research. Earth Surface, 2009, 114(F2): 1–13

DOI

25
Bartlett S F, Youd T L. Empirical Prediction of Lateral Spread Displacement. Technical Report NCEER, 1, 92-0019. 1992

26
Bartlett S F, Youd T L. Empirical prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spread. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(4): 316–329

DOI

27
Chu D B, Stewart J P, Youd T L, Chu B. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in near-fault regions during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(12): 1549–1565

DOI

28
Cetin K O, Youd T L, Seed R B, Bray J D, Stewart J P, Durgunoglu H T, Lettis W, Yilmaz M T. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading at Izmit Bay during the Kocaeli (Izmit)-Turkey earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1300–1313

DOI

29
Youd T L, DeDen D W, Bray J D, Sancio R, Cetin K O, Gerber T M. Zero-displacement lateral spreads, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(1): 46–61

DOI

30
Kanibir A. Investigation of the Lateral Spreading at Sapanca and Suggestion of Empirical Relationships for Predicting Lateral Spreading. Turkey: Department of Geological Engineering, Hacettepe University, 2003

31
Baziar M, Saeedi Azizkandi A. Evaluation of lateral spreading utilizing artificial neural network and genetic programming. International Journal of Civil Engineering Transaction B. Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 11(2): 100–111

32
Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Representation & Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988

33
Warfield J N. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1974, SMC-4(1): 81–87

DOI

34
Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, NoorulHaq A, Geng Y. An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 47: 283–297

DOI

35
Sushil S. Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2012, 13(2): 87–106

DOI

36
Sadigh K, Chang C Y, Egan J, Makdisi F, Youngs R. Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismological Research Letters, 1997, 68(1): 180–189

DOI

37
Tang X W, Bai X, Hu J L, Qiu J N. Assessment of liquefaction-induced hazards using Bayesian networks based on standard penetration test data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 18(5): 1451–1468

DOI

38
Hu J L, Tang X W, Qiu J N. A Bayesian network approach for predicting seismic liquefaction based on interpretive structural modeling. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2015, 9(3): 200–217

DOI

39
Zhang L. Predicting seismic liquefaction potential of sands by optimum seeking method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 17(4): 219–226

DOI

40
Ahmad M, Tang X W, Qiu J N, Ahmad F. Interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis for identifying and benchmarking significant factors of seismic soil liquefaction. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 9(2): 233

DOI

41
Pfohl H C, Gallus P, Thomas D. Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2011, 41(9): 839–859

DOI

42
Saxena J, Sushil , Vrat P. Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—A micmac analysis for energy conservation. Systems Research, 1990, 7(4): 245–253

DOI

43
Kuhn M, Johnson K. Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer, 2013

44
Landis J R, Koch G G. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 1977, 33(2): 363–374

DOI

45
Sakiyama Y, Yuki H, Moriya T, Hattori K, Suzuki M, Shimada K, Honma T. Predicting human liver microsomal stability with machine learning techniques. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 2008, 26(6): 907–915

DOI

46
Congalton R G, Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton: CRC press, 2008

47
Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

DOI

48
Cheng J, Greiner R, Kelly J, Bell D, Liu W. Learning Bayesian networks from data: An information-theory based approach. Artificial Intelligence, 2002, 137(1–2): 43–90

DOI

Outlines

/