Vulnerability analysis of shield tunnels under surcharge loading

Zhongkai HUANG , Hongwei HUANG , Nianchen ZENG , Xianda SHEN

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 1110 -1127.

PDF (4882KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 1110 -1127. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-025-1193-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Vulnerability analysis of shield tunnels under surcharge loading

Author information +
History +
PDF (4882KB)

Abstract

Accidental surcharge, a type of uncertain manmade hazard, poses a huge threat to the safe operation of shield tunnels. In this regard, a vulnerability assessment framework is proposed in this paper to evaluate the damage state of a shield tunnel subjected to sudden extreme surcharges, accounting for the effect of soil uncertainty and tunnel burial depths. A two-dimensional numerical model of the shield tunnel in soft soil under surcharge loading is established and verified by the field monitoring data. Then, joint opening and horizontal convergence of the shield tunnel are chosen as damage indices, and the corresponding fragility curves and vulnerability curves are established based on the Monte Carlo calculation. The influences of surcharge loading and buried depths on the vulnerability are discussed. Finally, the proposed vulnerability assessment framework is applied in a real case in Shanghai to make a quick judgement on the dangerous sections of shield tunnels. The research results show that the vulnerability of shield tunnels increases with the surcharge loading. Deep shield tunnels have higher initial vulnerability but are not sensitive to surcharge loading. The study sheds light on the robust design, post-hazard decision-making, and rapid risk identification for shield tunnels subjected to surcharge loads.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

shield tunnel / vulnerability assessment / accidental surcharge / uncertainty / failure probability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhongkai HUANG, Hongwei HUANG, Nianchen ZENG, Xianda SHEN. Vulnerability analysis of shield tunnels under surcharge loading. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2025, 19(7): 1110-1127 DOI:10.1007/s11709-025-1193-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Huang Z, Zhang H, Fu H L, Ma S K, Liu Y. Deformation response induced by surcharge loading above shallow shield tunnels in soft soil. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(8): 2533–2545

[2]

Zhang D M, Liu Z S, Wang R L, Zhang D M. Influence of grouting on rehabilitation of an over-deformed operating shield tunnel lining in soft clay. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14(4): 1227–1247

[3]

Zhang D M, Zhang D M, Soga K, Huang H W, Wang F. Rehabilitation of overdeformed metro tunnel in Shanghai by multiple repair measures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(11): 04019101

[4]

Zhang J Z, Huang H W, Zhang D M, Zhou M L, Tang C, Liu D J. Effect of ground surface surcharge on deformational performance of tunnel in spatially variable soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 136: 104229

[5]

Zhang Y, Huang H, Zhang D, Ayyub B M. Deformation recoverability of longitudinal joints in segmental tunnel linings: An experimental study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 124: 104475

[6]

Wei G, Zhang S, Xiang P. Model test study on the influence of ground surcharges on the deformation of shield tunnels. Symmetry, 2021, 13(9): 1565

[7]

Huang H, Shao H, Zhang D, Wang F. Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: a case study. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2017, 13(3): 345–360

[8]

Liu Y, Meng F, Chen R, Cheng H, Wu H, Yin X. Mechanical responses of underlying tunnels subjected to surface surcharge in soft ground. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2023, 37(5): 04023044

[9]

Cui J, Che A, Li S, Cheng Y. A maximum-entropy-based multivariate seismic vulnerability analysis method for power facilities: A case study on a ±1100-kV dry type smoothing reactor. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 142: 106740

[10]

Lonetti P, Pascuzzo A. Vulnerability and failure analysis of hybrid cable-stayed suspension bridges subjected to damage mechanisms. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 45: 470–495

[11]

Lv C, Yan Q, Li L, Li S. Field test and probabilistic vulnerability assessment of a reinforced concrete bridge pier subjected to blast loads. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 143: 106802

[12]

Zhou L, Li X, Yan Q. Dynamic response and vulnerability analysis of pier under near-field underwater explosion. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 155: 107749

[13]

Argyroudis S, Tsinidis G, Gatti F, Pitilakis K. Effects of SSI and lining corrosion on the seismic vulnerability of shallow circular tunnels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 98: 244–256

[14]

Argyroudis S A, Pitilakis K D. Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 35: 1–12

[15]

Bai F, Guo Q, Root K, Naito C, Quiel S. Blast vulnerability assessment of road tunnels with reinforced concrete liners. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 2672(41): 156–164

[16]

Chaudhary R K, Mishra S, Chakraborty T, Matsagar V. Vulnerability analysis of tunnel linings under blast loading. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2019, 10(1): 73–94

[17]

Dong Z, Kuo C, Yin J, Wen S, Liu G, Gou Y. Examination of longitudinal seismic vulnerability of shield tunnels utilizing incremental dynamic analysis. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9: 779879

[18]

Nguyen D D, Park D, Shamsher S, Nguyen V Q, Lee T H. Seismic vulnerability assessment of rectangular cut-and-cover subway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 86: 247–261

[19]

Xu L R, Wang L, Su Z M. Assessment of engineering vulnerability of tunnel suffering from debris flow. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(7): 2153–2158

[20]

Ansari A, Rao K S, Jain A K. Seismic response and fragility evaluation of circular tunnels in the Himalayan region: Implications for post-seismic performance of transportation infrastructure projects in Jammu and Kashmir. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 137: 105118

[21]

Cheng X, Li Q, Hai R, He X. Study on seismic vulnerability analysis of the interaction system between saturated soft soil and subway station structures. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 7410

[22]

Huang Z K, Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G, Argyroudis S, Zhang D M. Seismic vulnerability of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits: The case of Shanghai metropolitan system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103341

[23]

Liu G, Geng P, Wang T, Meng Q, Huo F, Wang X, Wang J. Seismic vulnerability of shield tunnels in interbedded soil deposits: Case study of submarine tunnel in Shantou Bay. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 286: 115500

[24]

Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 4(4): 415–443

[25]

Menichini G, Nistri V, Boschi S, Del Monte E, Orlando M, Vignoli A. Calibration of vulnerability and fragility curves from moderate intensity Italian earthquake damage data. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 67: 102676

[26]

Singhal A, Kiremidjian A S. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1996, 122(12): 1459–1467

[27]

Shen Y, Hesham El Naggar M, Zhang D, Huang Z, Du X. Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Underground Space, 2025, 21: 149–163

[28]

Li Y, Wang R, Ma H, Zhang J M. Rising groundwater table due to restoration projects amplifies earthquake induced liquefaction risk in Beijing. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 1–11

[29]

Eidsvig U M K, Papathoma-Köhle M, Du J, Glade T, Vangelsten B V. Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment. Engineering Geology, 2014, 181: 15–26

[30]

Saeidi A, Deck O, Verdel T. Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(10): 2275–2286

[31]

Andreotti G, Lai C G. Use of fragility curves to assess the seismic vulnerability in the risk analysis of mountain tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 103008

[32]

Moayedifar A, Nejati H R, Goshtasbi K, Khosrotash M. Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Earthquakes and Structures, 2019, 16(6): 705–714

[33]

Argyroudis S, Kaynia A M. Analytical seismic fragility functions for highway and railway embankments and cuts. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(11): 1863–1879

[34]

Sarkar R, Pareek K. Influence of stratification and assessment of fragility curves for mountain tunnels. Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 174(3): 279–290

[35]

Huh J, Tran Q H, Haldar A, Park I, Ahn J H. Seismic vulnerability assessment of a shallow two-story underground RC box structure. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(7): 735

[36]

Huang H W, Zhang D M. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: Characterization and field application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 301–312

[37]

TheBritish Tunnelling SocietyTheInstitution of Civil Engineers. Tunnel Lining Design Guide. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 2004

[38]

GB50157-2013. Code for Design of Metro. Ministry of Housing and Urbanrural Development (MOHURD). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2013

[39]

DGJ08-11-99. Shanghai Foundation Design Code. Shanghai: Shanghai Construction Committee, 1999

[40]

Lee K M, Hou X Y, Ge X W, Tang Y. An analytical solution for a jointed shield-driven tunnel lining. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25(4): 365–390

[41]

Gong C, Ding W, Soga K, Mosalam K M. Failure mechanism of joint waterproofing in precast segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 334–352

[42]

Wang J, Liu H, Liu H. Measuring joint opening displacement between model shield-tunnel segments for reduced-scale model tests. Structures, 2018, 16: 112–118

[43]

Wu H N, Liu L, Liu Y, Chen R P, Wang H L, Ruan S Q, Fan M. Weakening behavior of waterproof performance in joints of shield tunnels under adjacent constructions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(6): 884–900

[44]

Zhao M, Ding W Q, Peng Y C, Shen B W, Guo X H, Yang L S. Experimental study on the reliability of shield tunnel segment joints to remain watertight under high water pressure. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2013, 50(3): 87–93

[45]

Zhou W, Liao S, Men Y. Long-term evolution of joint leakage and joint opening for shield tunnel in soft soils deep under seabed. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26(3): 1396–1406

[46]

WangR LZhangD M. Mechanism of transverse deformation and assessment index for shield tunnels in soft clay under surface surcharge. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 1092–1101 (in Chinese)

[47]

Cui G, Cui J, Fang Y, Chen Z, Wang H. Scaled model tests on segmental linings of shield tunnels under earth and water pressures. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2020, 20(6): 338–354

[48]

Zhang Y, Saadat Y, Huang H, Zhang D, Ayyub B M. Experimental study on deformational resilience of longitudinal joint in shield tunnel lining. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2024, 20(3): 368–379

[49]

Do N A, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I. 2D numerical investigation of segmental tunnel lining behavior. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 37: 115–127

[50]

Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra A H. Probabilistic analysis of pressurized tunnels against face stability using collocation-based stochastic response surface method. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(4): 385–397

[51]

Zhang D, Zhai W, Huang H, Chapman D. Robust retrofitting design for rehabilitation of segmental tunnel linings: Using the example of steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 231–242

[52]

Tan L, Cao Y, Wang F, Tang T, Wang X, Li Q. A three-Stage prediction method for track displacement during shield tunneling. Urban Rail Transit, 2023, 9(3): 205–220

[53]

ZhengGDengXLiuQ C. Analysis of responses of existing shield tunnel to pressure-relief in confined aquifer. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(1): 2453–2460 (in Chinese)

[54]

ShaoHHuangHWangR. Analysis on convergence deformation law of shield tunnel in shanghai metro. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(4): 1183–1191 (in Chinese)

[55]

WangR LXiaoT GZhuY. Water leakage treatment and deformation control of shield tunnel in Shanghai metro. Underground Engineering and Tunnels, 2011, 2: 102–108 (in Chinese)

[56]

Fu X, Guo D E R, Li G, Li H N, Zhu D J. Seismic vulnerability assessment of electrical substation system based on the hybrid fragility functions and Bayesian network. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2024, 53(14): 4287–4309

[57]

De Risi R, Goda K, Mori N, Yasuda T. Bayesian tsunami fragility modeling considering input data uncertainty. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2017, 31(5): 1253–1269

[58]

Chen Y, Liu W, Ai D, Zhu H, Du Y. Probabilistic reliability assessment method for max ground settlement prediction of subway tunnel under uncertain construction information. Computers and Geotechnics, 2025, 177: 106805

[59]

Zhang H, Wu Y, Yang S. Probabilistic analysis of tunnel convergence in spatially variable soil based on Gaussian process regression. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 131: 107840

[60]

Liu X, Bai Y, Yuan Y, Mang H A. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016, 12(10): 1364–1379

[61]

LiuZ SZhangD M. The mechanism and effects of AFRP reinforcement for a shield tunnel in soft soil. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2014, 51(5): 155–160 (in Chinese)

[62]

ShaoHHuangH WZhangD M. Case study on repair work for excessively deformed shield tunnel under accidental surface surcharge in soft clay. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 1036–1043 (in Chinese)

[63]

Zhai W, Chapman D, Zhang D, Huang H. Experimental study on the effectiveness of strengthening over-deformed segmental tunnel lining by steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 104: 103530

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4882KB)

296

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/