Experimental investigation on the lateral bearing behavior of lattice-shaped diaphragm wall with double-layer configuration

Abstract

This paper delves into the lateral load-bearing behavior of lattice-shaped diaphragm wall (LSDW), a novel type of diaphragm wall foundation with many engineering advantages. By employing a double-layer wall structure for the first time in laboratory settings, the research presents an innovative testing methodology, complete with novel computational formulas, to accurately measure the responses of LSDW’s inner and outer walls under varying loads. It is found that the Q–s curves of LSDWs exhibit a continuous, progressive deformation and failure characteristic without any abrupt drops, and the standard for judging the horizontal bearing capacity of LSDW foundations should be based on the allowable displacement of the superstructure. The bearing capacity for the double-chamber LSDWs was found to be approximately 1.68 times that of the single-chamber structure, pointing to a complex interplay between chamber number and structural capacity that extends beyond a linear relationship and incorporates the group wall effect. The study also reveals that LSDWs act as rigid bodies with minimal angular displacement and a consistent tilting deformation, peaking in bending moment at about 0.87 of wall depth from the mud surface, across different chamber configurations. Furthermore, it can be found that using the p–y curve method for analyzing the horizontal behavior of LSDW foundations is feasible, and the hyperbolic p–y curve method offers higher accuracy in calculations. These insights offer valuable guidance for both field and laboratory testing of LSDWs and aid in the design and calculation of foundations under horizontal loads.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

lattice-shaped diaphragm wall / lateral bearing behavior / p– y curve / model test / double-layer wall structure

References

[1] Wu J, Pu L, Shang H, Zhang Y, Wang L, Hu H. Experimental study on the vertical bearing behavior of nodular diaphragm wall in sandy soil based on PIV technique. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2023, 35(2): 195–208

[2] Wu J, Cheng Q, Wen H, Wang L, Li Y, Zhang J. A load transfer approach to rectangular closed diaphragm wall. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 169(6): 509–526

[3] Wu J, Wang L, Cheng Q. Soil arching effect of lattice-shaped diaphragm wall as bridge foundation. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 446–454

[4] Wu J, Naggar M H E, Cheng Q, Wen H, Li Y, Zhang J. Iterative load transfer procedure for settlement evaluation of lattice-shaped diaphragm walls in multilayered soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 120: 103409

[5] Chen X, Gong W, Meng F, Li T. Experimental study on vertical bearing characteristics of well-type underground continuous wall foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 11: 1665–1669

[6] Meng F, Chen X, Cheng X, Gong W, Li T. Experimental study on bridge foundation of underground continuous wall in loess area. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2011, 19(4): 515

[7] SongZChengQMengFGongW. Field experiment study on single piece underground continuous wall under horizontal load in loess foundation. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 8: 2183–2188 (in Chinese)

[8] DaiGZhouXLiuYLiuLGongW. Model test study on horizontal bearing capacity of well-type continuous wall. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(Sup 2): 185–189 (in Chinese)

[9] Wu J, Cheng Q, Wen H, Cao J. Comparison on the vertical behavior of lattice shaped diaphragm wall and pile group under similar material quantity in soft soil. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 19(7): 2051–2060

[10] Li Y, Cheng Q G, Zhang J L, Lyu B, Wang Y F, Wu J J. Seismic behavior of rectangular closed diaphragm walls in gently sloping liquefiable deposit: Dynamic centrifuge testing. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(12): 04019105

[11] Zhang J, Cheng Q, Li Y, Zhang E, Wang Y, Wu J, Xie S. Mechanism of liquefaction mitigation by rectangular closed diaphragm walls in sloping liquefiable deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 142: 106582

[12] Zhu L, Xu Z, Bai Z, Chen J, Wang J. Analysis of stress and deformation characteristics of soil behind circular caisson under large top force. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(11): 1510–1516

[13] CheCZhuFYinY. Experimental study on the influence of rooted caisson foundation under horizontal load on surrounding soil. Highway, 2010, (1): 62–67 (in Chinese)

[14] Wang L, Zhao Q, Wu J. Numerical study on the group wall effect of nodular diaphragm wall foundation in high-rise buildings. Open Geosciences, 2023, 15: 20220562

[15] Kitazume M, Orano K, Miyajima S. Centrifuge model tests on failure envelope of column type deep mixing method improved ground. Soil and Foundation, 2000, 40(4): 43–55

[16] Yang K, Liang R. Methods for deriving p–y curves from instrumented lateral load tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2007, 30(1): 31–38

[17] Hong Y, Yao M, Wang L. A multi-axial bounding surface p–y model with application in analyzing pile responses under multi-directional lateral cycling. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 157: 105301

[18] Malakshah R R, Moradi M, Mehrabadi A R, Ghalandarzadeh A. Scour effects on monopile lateral behavior under cyclic and monotonic loading. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 269: 113396

[19] Consoli N C, Diambra A, Cordeiro R E, Born R B, Cheng X. Field and numerical analysis of cyclic displacement controlled lateral load tests on driven piles in a residual soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2023, 41(2): 685–705

[20] Amar Bouzid D. Numerical investigation of large-diameter monopiles in sands: Critical review and evaluation of both API and newly proposed p–y curves. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 18(11): 04018141

[21] FlemingKWeltmanARandolphMElsonK. Piling Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press, 2008

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press